Transcript Highlights:

• A construction worker... For workers, this has real consequences.
• Public works laws that protect construction workers.
• Development policies and high-quality construction standards.
• The building and construction. Yes, thank you, Senator.
• The work in construction is very difficult, and particularly in communities of color.

Summary: The committee heard and advanced several labor, workforce, and public works bills. SB 1166 would place AC Transit employees under PERB jurisdiction for unfair labor practice disputes; supporters said it would reduce costly court litigation and align AC Transit with other transit agencies, while AC Transit was neutral. The bill passed 4-1 to Judiciary. SB 1054 would add wage-data elements to state reporting systems to improve Medi-Cal/Calfresh verification and workforce-program accountability; supporters emphasized reducing administrative burdens and improving data for education and training outcomes. It passed 4-0 to Appropriations. SB 1149 would expand bereavement leave to cover a “designated person” and align it with other California family-leave laws; supporters cited chosen-family and LGBTQ+ concerns, and the bill passed 5-0 to Appropriations. The committee also considered SB 909, which would raise and index public works contractor registration fees and prevailing-wage penalties and direct more penalty revenue to enforcement. Supporters argued stronger penalties and funding are needed to deter wage theft and backlogs, while contractor groups warned of higher costs, uncertainty, and no fix to staffing delays; it passed 4-1 to Judiciary. SB 1132 would require a standardized know-your-rights curriculum in the workforce development system, with supporters saying workers need labor and immigration rights information at job-entry points; it passed 4-1 to Appropriations. SB 1241 would strengthen enforcement of skilled-and-trained workforce requirements on public works projects by defining substantial compliance plans and limiting repeated noncompliance; labor supporters said it closes loopholes, while contractor groups argued the market lacks enough workers and the bill is too rigid. It passed 4-1 to Appropriations. The committee later took up SB 1038, which would require CalPERS to notify unions when employer audits are initiated so they can help members respond to potential pension or pay corrections. Supporters said members need representation when audit findings can create repayment obligations, and there was no opposition. The bill passed 4-0 to Appropriations. After a brief recess, the committee returned and formally closed the roll on SB 1038, then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• When the state spends public dollars on construction, workers should be paid fairly.
• But it also reinvests those funds into the agencies that need to be doing the work.
• The bill also directs 50% of penalty revenue into the enforcement fund.
• Science deserves great construction. We'd like to ask for your support. Thank you.
• , or public safety concerns associated with pharmaceutical facility construction.

Committee: House Labor and Employment

Transcript Highlights:

• Madam Chair and Members, Judy Yee on behalf of the State Building and Construction Trades Council, we
• It's a long-overdue overhaul for the construction industry to come into compliance with AB 5.
• Judy Yee, State Building and Construction Trades Council, in support.
• They're very supportive of the construct and the work and the leadership the Senator's done.
• They're very supportive of the construct and the work and the leadership the Senator's done.

Committee: House Labor and Employment

Summary: The Labor and Employment Committee heard several worker-protection bills. SB 513 by Senator Durazo would require employees to have access to their training and certification records, with supporters from labor unions and refinery workers describing how employers had withheld records during layoffs; the bill passed 5-0 and was re-referred to Appropriations. SB 809, also by Senator Durazo, addresses misclassification of construction truck owner-drivers by offering employers amnesty if they reclassify workers as employees and use a two-check payment system; it passed 5-0 and was sent to Judiciary. SB 578 by Senator Smallwood-Cuevas would codify the California Workplace Outreach Program to continue multilingual workplace-rights education through community organizations; supporters emphasized its role in helping low-wage and immigrant workers report violations, and it passed 5-0 to Appropriations. The committee also approved the consent calendar, which included SB 75, SB 400, SB 597, and SB 617, all by unanimous vote. Later, SB 261 by Senator Wahab would strengthen wage theft enforcement by creating a public list of employers with outstanding wage judgments and adding penalties for nonpayment after six months. Supporters, including Santa Clara County officials and labor advocates, said the bill would help workers collect unpaid wages and level the playing field for compliant employers; it passed 6-0 and was sent to Judiciary. SB 369 by Senator Padilla would require skilled and trained workers for all Salton Sea restoration projects, citing toxic conditions and the need for a local workforce pipeline; it passed 6-0 to Appropriations. SB 20 by Senator Menjivar would expand training and certification requirements related to silica exposure in stone fabrication work, following testimony about rising silicosis cases and deaths among mostly Latino workers; industry groups supported the bill with amendments, and it passed 6-0 to Appropriations. Across the hearing, there was no opposition testimony on the bills that were heard. Members repeatedly praised the measures as common-sense worker protections and several asked to be added as co-authors. The committee concluded by adjourning after the final vote on SB 20.

Transcript Highlights:

• Because new construction is exempted from the rollback. Right.
• Okay, the provision that new construction, or the increase in personal property, is treated as new construction
• It's not like it's a different construction method.
• He said Missouri is one of eight states, he believes, that does not offer any sort of state-funded fund
• to help construct facilities.

Committee: House Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

Summary: The committee met in executive session and first took up House Bill 2709, including a substitute that combined language from HB 2709 and HB 2671. Members debated an amendment that would have separated the Hancock-by-subclass portion from a personal property tax provision; supporters said it would make the bill cleaner and preserve a separate property tax issue already addressed elsewhere, while opponents argued it would create inconsistency. The amendment failed, the substitute was adopted, and the House Committee Substitute for HB 2709 and HB 2671 was voted do pass by a roll call of 14 yes and 5 no. The committee then passed HB 1759 do pass by a vote of 12 yes and 7 no, with one member noting that additional tweaks were expected on the floor. Next, the committee considered HB 2925, where Representative Fowler offered Amendment 04H to remove the requirement that property tax elections be held in November and replace it with an affirmative-consent standard requiring both a majority of votes cast and at least 25% of registered voters voting yes. Supporters said the change would avoid forcing local tax elections into a narrow election window and would require broader voter buy-in for long-term tax obligations; opponents argued it would be a major change that should receive more public review and could distort local election participation. The amendment failed 5 yes to 14 no, and HB 2925 was then voted do pass 11 yes to 8 no. In public testimony, Representative Van Schoiack presented HB 2415, which would require assessors to use a cost approach rather than a market approach for valuing buildings, while still valuing land through the market approach. He said the bill was intended to address over-assessment in larger counties and under-assessment in rural counties, and to make valuations more objective. Testimony was mixed: a public advocate supported the idea as a way to address rising taxes and tax sales, while county assessors and other witnesses said assessors already use multiple approaches, that cost approach works best for new or rural properties but can be subjective for older buildings, and that forcing one method statewide could create inaccuracies and large valuation swings. No action was taken on HB 2415 during the hearing. The committee also heard HJR 148 and HJR 111, presented by Representatives Coleman and Taylor, to bring Kansas City Public Schools under Hancock limits like other districts. Sponsors said KCPS is the only district still operating under a special court-imposed arrangement from desegregation-era orders and that the proposal would keep the district at its current levy while requiring voter approval for future increases. KCPS Superintendent Jennifer Collier opposed the measure as written, saying the district does want to come under Hancock but needs to do so on its own timeline and with a planned April 2027 levy proposal that would maintain the current rate; she said the district is now fiscally stronger and has community support, including passage of an 85% bond issue. Committee members questioned the legal basis, the effect on KCPS and charter schools, and whether the proposal would interfere with the district’s planned ballot strategy.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:04:19.280><c> could</c> that a million dollars of funding could that a million dollars of funding
• </c> among construction among construction workers.<00:04:26.639><c> Connect</c><00:04:26.960><c> workers
• </c><00:05:20.320><c> industry</c> legislation in the construction industry legislation in the construction
• </c><00:11:56.160><c> company,</c> our while we're a construction company, our while we're a construction
• And now you go on construction industry.

Committee: Senate Labor

Transcript Highlights:

• There's no funds to support the construction of that project.
• funding, turnpike construction funding for those projects.
• funding,<03:40:39.279><c> turnpike</c><03:40:39.920><c> construction</c><03:40:40.399><c> funding</c
• > funding, turnpike construction funding funding, turnpike construction funding for<03:40:40.960><c>
• ><c> even</c><04:21:58.960><c> though</c> construction funds are cut even though construction funds are

Committee: House Public Works and Highways

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> on whether there's uh construction on whether there's uh construction activity<00:09:03.720><c>
• </c> permits that don't involve construction permits that don't involve construction uh<00:10:39.519>
• <c> construction</c><00:10:40.079><c> activities</c><00:10:40.560><c> experience</c> uh construction
• Section 3 would allow MPCA to issue separate permits for operation and construction.
• </c> dollars a little bit of federal funding dollars a little bit of federal funding and<00:46:18.680

Committee: House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:

• Programs that fund affordable construction are relatively plentiful, but programs that support infill
• Sometimes those funds are split between cities and counties.
• more affordable housing construction.
• by a certain time or lose your funding.
• Construction is hard, dangerous work.

Summary: The committee heard several housing-related bills, beginning with SB 1003, which would create pro-housing enhanced infrastructure financing districts to help local governments fund infrastructure needed for housing developments. The author and supporters argued that infrastructure costs often prevent projects from penciling out, while the chair expressed support and said the bill would be taken up later when quorum was available. SB 1014 followed, proposing new disclosure requirements for local jurisdictions to provide good-faith estimates of on-site and off-site improvements within 30 days of application, with supporters saying it would reduce late surprises and opposition from several cities citing implementation concerns with the 30-day timelines. The committee then took up SB 802, a Sacramento-region bill requiring a joint powers authority to coordinate housing and homelessness services. Senator Ashby and former Mayor Darrell Steinberg argued that Sacramento’s fragmented system has failed for years and that a JPA would improve accountability, coordination, and use of state funds. The bill drew broad support from local officials, service providers, business groups, and advocates, while some county and city representatives registered opposition or neutral concerns about state-mandated local governance. Several committee members said they were persuaded by the need for regional coordination, though some raised concerns about local control; the chair noted the bill would be moved when quorum allowed. The committee also heard SB 1092 and SB 1093, both focused on mobile home park residents after disasters or park sales. SB 1092 would give residents a right of first opportunity to match a sale offer for a park, with supporters saying it protects vulnerable seniors and preserves affordable housing, while park owners and their representatives argued it would devalue property and raise constitutional and financing concerns. SB 1093 would require more transparent communication, access to property, and consideration of rebuilding or closure after a disaster; supporters cited the long uncertainty faced by Palisades residents, while opponents warned about liability, safety, and burdensome review requirements. Members split along similar lines, with some emphasizing property rights and market impacts and others stressing the need to protect residents and preserve scarce affordable housing.

Transcript Highlights:

• of construction and the cost of construction.
• I'm not a construction guy, but it's not tilt wall construction, but it's precast wall slide-in-to-place
• construction.
• It's precast wall slide-in-to-place construction.
• That then affects if they allow construction to go on, unpermitted construction, they allow somebody

Summary: The Economic Development Budget Subcommittee received a lengthy presentation from Kevin Guthrie, Executive Director of the Florida Division of Emergency Management, on disaster costs, recovery operations, sheltering, and major capital projects. He reviewed the 2024 hurricane season impacts from Debby, Helene, and Milton, explaining how FEMA public assistance and state reimbursement work, how cost shares can shift from 75/25 to 90/10 after a federal threshold is reached, and how Florida uses prior storm data and inflation to estimate recovery costs. He also described the state’s faster reimbursement timelines, crediting legislative investments in technology and digital field documentation, and said the division is working to reduce disaster closeout timelines from decades to about seven years. Members asked about debris removal, FEMA de-obligations, local preparedness, and whether regional shelters or co-located emergency operations centers could be used more efficiently. Guthrie said debris assistance is complicated and should generally remain tied to local contracts and planning, though the state will help fiscally constrained communities when needed. He explained de-obligations as FEMA clawing back previously approved funds after later review, and said Florida’s FROC program is helping local governments reduce those risks through standardized documentation, procurement review, and training. He also urged more mandatory emergency-management training for local and state officials and cautioned against weakening the FEMA 50% rule for rebuilding damaged structures. Guthrie provided updates on the new central Florida warehouse in Auburndale and the new State Emergency Operations Center in Tallahassee. He said the warehouse will improve logistics, include cold and ultra-cold storage, and be run by a private vendor with virtual inventory tracking, while the new EOC is designed for Category 5 conditions and expanded partner capacity. He acknowledged budget pressures that reduced the size of the EOC project and said an additional IT request was needed because those costs were not originally included. The meeting ended with praise for FDEM’s work and no votes or formal actions beyond adjournment.

Transcript Highlights:

• Is this federal funds, and do they audit, or are they state funds and we audit?
• Is this federal funds, and do they audit or the state funds and we audit?
• We have federal funds. We have state funds. How often are they audited?
• There are four agencies that are requesting funding from the performance fund, totaling $6.8 million
• There are four agencies that are requesting funding from the performance fund, totaling 6.8 million in

Committee: All JOINT BUDGET COMMITTEE

Summary: The committee considered and approved several temporary appropriation requests in Section B, including spending authority for the Court of Appeals to pay appointed counsel in criminal appeals, Commerce/Aeronautics airport and aviation grants, and Insurance Department items for workers’ compensation benefits and premium tax refunds. It also approved ARPA-related requests in Section C to return unused federal funds from DHS aging, mental health, substance abuse, and Older Americans Act grants. In Section D, the committee reviewed and approved Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act requests, including Agriculture grants for wildfire preparedness and forestry capacity, a large Commerce broadband BEAD request, environmental recycling-related reallocations, and Oil and Gas Commission grants for facility repairs and sample preservation. Members questioned the broadband program’s audit process and performance safeguards; the State Broadband Director said the funds are federal, subject to audits, and payments are released only after engineering certification of completed work. The committee also approved DHS reallocations in Section E, including major transfers within Medical Services from hospital medical appropriations to private and public nursing home lines, as well as transfers for children and family services, developmental disabilities, and youth services. The committee then reviewed cash fund requests, miscellaneous federal grants, pay plan and performance fund transfers, methods of finance, and a large set of contracts. A Northwest Arkansas Community College official explained storm-damage repairs and insurance settlement issues, and DHS explained its hospital medical transfer was moving excess appropriation rather than cash. Members also questioned several UAPB tobacco prevention subgrants, especially arts-based outreach, and asked for more data on effectiveness; the committee later voted to expunge and re-refer the J-2 item for further review at a later ALC meeting. Additional discussion covered a DEQ grant to Free Geek of Arkansas for e-waste recycling, a UAPB tobacco program, and various contracts for universities, DHS services, corrections, and public safety. The meeting ended with reports filed for information and a brief member comment thanking others for concern after a tornado in Stone County; no one was injured.

Transcript Highlights:

• retro funding And why are we not spending it faster?
• The Highway Trust Fund is funded by your federal motor fuel tax, 24 cents on a gallon of diesel and about
• We know what they're hauling, and the place we ought to fund that from is should be that revolving fund
• A construction project has gone flawlessly.
• And the funding requests this year.

Committee: House Appropriations and Budget

Transcript Highlights:

• Now I know that you guys have funding funding funding CIP<00:13:00.320><c> funding</c> CIP funding CIP
• do construction management have the proper amount of funds to train their people properly.
• should be providing funds for them the general funds.
• </c> funds for them the general funds. funds for them the general funds.
• </c> construction industry is strong support. construction industry is strong support.

Bills: SB2613 , SB2543 , SB2398 , SB2046 , SB2800 , SB2818 , SB2973 , SB2367 , SB2907 , SB3067 , SB3053 , SB2944 , SB2074 , SB2596

Committee: House Water & Land

Summary: The committee heard testimony on SB 2613, SD1, HD1, relating to public school land transfer. The Attorney General’s office and the Department of Education supported the bill’s technical cleanup of Act 307, but strongly opposed a new provision that would convey school parcels containing public and school library facilities to the Hawaii State Public Library System. They argued the added transfer language conflicted with Act 307’s purpose of consolidating school land for more efficient school operations, and said existing law already allows co-located library use through rights of entry, licenses, or other agreements. The library system supported the bill and said it was trying to resolve longstanding operational conflicts on shared school-campus libraries, especially where public access, construction, and campus safety issues arise. Members questioned whether the Board of Education should simply mediate the dispute, whether the bill was the right solution, and whether a formal memorandum of agreement might be a better approach than a land transfer. The library system described years of difficulty coordinating with DOE on projects and said it needed a clearer process to complete work and spend CIP funds. Discussion also touched on a Kauai parcel in the bill, identified as a tennis court, and whether resurfacing could be completed before any transfer. The Attorney General indicated that if the goal is to preserve library uses while keeping title with the state, DLNR or another documented arrangement may be more appropriate than transferring fee title to the library system. The committee then heard SB 2543 SD2 HD1, relating to state construction projects. DAGS supported the measure, and the Hawaii Ironworkers Stabilization Fund and Hawaii Building Construction Trade Council strongly supported it, saying the bill would help spot-check high-cost projects and reduce waste from overruns and delays. One testifier opposed the bill, arguing the proposed construction manager role was too limited and that DAGS needed more training, decentralized authority, and better internal decision-making rather than a new layer of oversight. Supporters said the bill was intended as a pilot program to address repeated cost overruns and improve accountability on state construction projects.

Transcript Highlights:

• This bill removes the construction prerequisite, the CCN prerequisite prior to getting construction.
• To begin construction when, well, let me back up.
• the construction has to be removed.
• So who bears the loss of the cost of construction?
• If you supplant state funds or private equity funds with state funding, we work very closely with energy

Bills: HB303 , SB96 , HM6

Committee: House House Commerce & Economic Development Committee

Transcript Highlights:

• Scott C.: It is a priority that the settlement be funded.
• Scott C.: It is a priority that the settlement be funded.
• Um, and we put we have the funds.
• and highway funds for broader multimodal purposes.
• > for</c> highway fund and highway funds for highway fund and highway funds for broader<00:31:52.720>

Committee: Senate Energy and Intergovernmental Affairs

Summary: The joint committees heard House Bill 344 HD1, which would require new buildings to include electric vehicle charger-ready parking stalls. Testimony was overwhelmingly in support from the State Energy Office, Department of Accounting and General Services, the Disabilities and Communication Access Board, and others. Members asked about cost and infrastructure impacts; the State Energy Office said the added cost would likely be modest if planned from the start, but that electrical capacity remains a key challenge for expanding EV charging. The chairs proposed two amendments: extending the bill to cover on-grade parking lots and adding language for Level 1 or Level 3 charging when appropriate. After discussion, both committees voted to pass HB 344 HD1 with amendments. In the Energy and Intergovernmental Affairs committee, the chair voted aye, one member voted with reservation, and excused members were noted; the Government Operations committee also passed the measure, with one aye vote and one vote with reservations. The committees also heard House Bill 10001 HD1 SD1, relating to the Maui wildfire settlement trust fund. The Governor’s Office, Attorney General’s Office, Maui County, and the Tax Foundation testified in support. Members questioned Hawaii Electric Industries’ ability to fund its share of the settlement and whether the state should pay first or in tranches. The chair proposed amendments requiring all defendant parties to submit payment plans and proof of ability to pay, and requiring non-state defendants to fund their shares into escrow before the state releases its share. The committee adopted the amendments and passed the bill unanimously by the members present. Later, the committee deferred action on House Bill 229 HD1 until March 20 for clarification on amendments, then passed House Bill 860 HD1 with amendments addressing liability for limited resurfacing of disputed roads, and passed House Bill 1161 HD2 with amendments concerning highway fund use, formula calculations, and EV-related county fees.

Transcript Highlights:

• ARPA FUNDS OR FUNDS BUDGETED TO OUR PROGRAM FROM THE STATE.
• LATER YOU HAVE TOTAL GRANTS, GRANT FUNDS REIMBURSE 240, A LITTLE OVER $240 MILLION.
• OUR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TEAM OVERSEAS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET OF FOUR PROJECTS
• WE ARE CURRENTLY OVERSEEING $1 BILLION IN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS AROUND THE STATE.
• WE EXPECT THE DESIGN OF THAT TO BE COMPLETE SOON AND IT WILL START CONSTRUCTION.

Transcript Highlights:

• Our board awarded those funds or allocated those funds to the activities that you see there.
• be required to expend some bank funds before they spend or draw down on our funds.
• One of them is funded from our general fund or Housing Opportunity Fund.
• new construction?
• Home funds and housing trust funds, other grants that are available.

Committee: House Mortgage Finance Authority Act Oversight Committee

Transcript Highlights:

• fund.
• You all might also consider the rural housing trust fund. Again, it only got one-time funding.
• Again, it only got housing trust fund. Again, it only got onetime<00:30:19.039><c> funding.
• ><c> funding.
• </c> lower the cost of construction in 2024. lower the cost of construction in 2024.

Summary: The Housing Task Force 2.0 reconvened with several new members and heard a presentation from Kentucky Housing Corporation Executive Director Winston Miller and Deputy Executive Director Wendy Smith. They framed the task force’s work as a practical effort to address Kentucky’s housing shortage, update members on the current housing landscape, summarize existing state and federal resources, and suggest areas for the task force to focus on over the coming year. KHC said its 2024 housing supply gap analysis found Kentucky is short about 206,000 housing units, split roughly evenly between rental and homeownership, and projected the gap could grow to 287,000 units by 2029 if current trends continue. They emphasized that every county in Kentucky needs more housing, that the 2008 housing crisis and loss of construction capacity remain major causes of the shortage, and that current pressures include high interest rates, rising insurance and tax costs, construction cost inflation, and housing prices and rents growing faster than incomes. KHC also said homelessness has risen in Kentucky, with point-in-time counts showing double-digit increases in recent years. The presenters reviewed existing resources, including federal programs, the Kentucky Affordable Housing Trust Fund, the rural housing trust fund, KHC mortgage and down payment assistance programs, and the state mortgage interest deduction. They said these resources are important but insufficient to close the gap, and noted that a proposed federal FY2026 budget would cut HUD programs by 44%, potentially removing about $286 million from Kentucky housing resources, though no action has been taken yet. They urged the task force to consider stronger, more flexible tools such as a revolving loan fund, a state affordable housing tax credit, and economic development and employer-assisted housing incentives, and pointed to Indiana’s housing infrastructure and regional development funds as examples. No votes or formal actions were taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• WSDOT is authorized to use funds from the Washington Wildlife Crossings Account for the design, construction
• WSDOT may use complete streets project funds to participate in local or tribal system projects and construct
• Use of state funds does not supplant committed program funding to the project.
• This requirement only... funds to participate in local or tribal system projects and construct when necessary
• Use of state funds do not supplant committed program funding to the project.

Committee: House Transportation

Transcript Highlights:

• Residents will have the right to return home as the phased construction project advances.
• Suffolk, as you know, is a national construction company based in the Roxbury neighborhood of Boston,
• Construction is one of the highest-risk industries, facing significant safety exposures.
• I am the Northeast Regional Safety Director of Suffolk Construction.
• Construction is dangerous.

Committee: Joint Joint Committee on State Administration and Regulatory Oversight

Summary: The joint committee held a public hearing on several bills covering state administration, land/public housing redevelopment, construction safety, memorialization, records management, rural grant equity, and animal research. Testimony in support of H. 3329 described an inequity in the Governor’s Council reimbursement statute, which currently cuts off travel, meals, and lodging reimbursement after four terms; the witnesses argued this disproportionately burdens members from western Massachusetts and creates geographic and economic barriers to service. The Boston Housing Authority supported legislation for the Brighton/Faneuil Gardens area, saying it would allow a mixed-use redevelopment that replaces all existing public housing units one-for-one, adds new affordable housing, creates replacement rehearsal space for displaced musicians, and preserves prevailing wage standards. A major portion of the hearing focused on S. 2112, a construction safety bill. Suffolk Construction, Boston building trade representatives, and local inspectors testified that the measure would strengthen training, site safety standards, oversight of high-risk work, and enforcement, while helping protect workers and the public and improving retention and recruitment of inspectors. Witnesses said the bill would align Massachusetts more closely with higher safety standards in other states and build on lessons from past construction-related incidents. The committee also heard support for S. 2162, which would create a COVID-19 memorial; the witness emphasized the scale of pandemic deaths in Massachusetts and the educational value of public memorials. Other testimony addressed H. 3321, which would modernize records preservation for registers of deeds by reducing reliance on costly microfilm in an increasingly electronic system; the witness said current law is outdated and expensive. H. 3311, aimed at advancing equity for rural communities receiving state grants, drew support from town officials in Leyden and Ashfield, who said small towns lack staff for grant writing and should be evaluated more on need and regional impact, especially for climate and public safety projects. Finally, S. 2117, concerning animal research, was supported by an animal welfare advocate who urged prohibiting state funds for animal experiments and shifting to non-animal research methods. After the hearing concluded, the chairs noted that additional hearings and polling votes would follow, and the committee then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• workers on pension-funded projects.
• workers on pension-funded projects.
• workers on pension-funded projects.
• visible during the construction phase.
• AB 1198 is the Fair Pay for Construction Workers Act.

Committee: Senate Labor, Public Employment and Retirement