Video & Transcript Research : 'students'
Page 56 of 451
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
Senate Legislative Session Day 33 (2-24-26)
Kentucky Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- When the bell rang, I asked an admin to escort student A to class while I escorted student B.
- expelled student. expelled student.
- those students who need good teachers. those students who need good teachers.
- students would be expelled for a year? students would be expelled for a year?
- IEPs and students who have students with IEPs and students who have done<00:27:23.679>
this <00
Summary:
The Senate convened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, roll call, and a declared quorum. The chamber excused an absent senator, approved the prior journal, received House communication that the House had passed HB 168, 185, 249, and 455 and requested concurrence, and heard committee reports advancing SB 37 and SB 214 from Agriculture, SB 157 and SB 189 with a committee substitute from Banking and Insurance, and SJR 54 with a committee substitute from Families and Children. The Senate also introduced SB 226 on pre-need burial contracts and SR 113 honoring Robert Connley Young.
The main floor debate centered on SB 101, an act relating to children, which would require a mandatory 12-month expulsion for students in grades 6-12 who assault a school employee, with exceptions for certain students with disabilities under an IEP and for incidents involving provocation by a school employee. The bill also creates a mandatory reporting requirement for assaults and penalties for intentionally failing to report them. The sponsor argued the measure responds to widespread, underreported assaults on teachers, citing 25,000 reported incidents since 2021 and sharing testimony from a teacher whose career ended after repeated assaults. Supporters said the bill would improve school safety, accountability, and classroom control, while opponents argued it is too harsh for children, could permanently remove students from school, and should leave more discretion to principals and districts.
After debate, the Senate adopted Senate Committee Substitute 1 for SB 101 and then proceeded to final passage. Several senators spoke for and against the bill during roll-call explanation, with supporters emphasizing teacher safety, parental responsibility, and consequences for repeat offenders, and opponents warning about lost educational opportunities and the need for second chances. The transcript cuts off during the roll call, but the chamber had already adopted the committee substitute and moved to vote on SB 101 as amended.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- , how to deal with motivating students, how to deal with handling<00:25:01.760>
student <00:25: - Student, that's fine, but it might be very appropriate for another student.
- were losing students previously.
- enrollment and student needs.
- on student enrollment and student needs. on student enrollment and student needs.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- technically when you have the students technically when you have the students that<02:08:18.639>
- <02:12:35.840>
And number of students in the state. And number of students in the state. - preparation pilot program for students preparation pilot program for students with<03:36:16.800>
- The students are there.
- helped the students in New Hampshire. helped the students in New Hampshire.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Floor Session procedural debate on a safe schools revenue program bill 3/26/26
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Charter school students, students that go to charter school, they're left out of safe school aid.
- It's the students.
- Our students that happen to be students in charter schools, they should have a safe place to study.
- >
to <00:05:08.160>be <00:05:08.320>students students that that happen to be students - students that that happen to be students in<00:05:08.720>
charter <00:05:09.120>schools,
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- We need to protect student identity.
- We we have a number of initiatives related to college career advising, student success, getting students
- What we have to do is we have to have better student services to make sure the students we have get the
- I believe that... student services at the schools for every student that we have becomes critical.
- . students everything that they lost.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- I'll have to get back with those students. And do we have students taking those blocks?
- Do we have students taking those blocks, and are they successful?
- I think that what we do need to work on is communication out to students and students at community colleges
- I assume that those students are in community colleges.
- That way the student doesn't... Can ask them, but they have to do it for free.
Summary:
The Senate Committee on Education K-16 heard two bills. SB 2847, by Senator Hagenbuch, would give Texas public four-year universities the same option community colleges already have to seek approval from the Higher Education Coordinating Board for core curricula of fewer than 42 semester credit hours. Hagenbuch said the bill is intended to add flexibility, support career-focused programs, and help students finish degrees faster. There was no public testimony, and the bill was left pending.
The committee then heard SB 3039, by Senator West, which addresses transferability and credit loss for students moving from community colleges to four-year institutions. West said the bill responds to ongoing problems with rejected transfer credits and seeks better data, study, and recommendations from the Coordinating Board. Deputy Commissioner Sarah Keaton testified that transfer remains a major policy issue, that reporting requirements from SB 25 have improved data collection, and that the main reasons credits do not transfer are grades and degree applicability. She also described the Texas Direct degree program and field-of-study curricula designed to transfer as blocks.
Members discussed the cost of lost credits, the need for better communication to students, and concerns that some institutions still reject credits or require duplicate coursework. No public witnesses signed up on SB 3039, and it was left pending subject to the call of the chair. A quorum was later established, the agenda was completed, and the committee recessed subject to the call of the chair.
LA
Transcript Highlights:
- The money goes where the students go.
- Students, not the school.
- Listen, student life has become... ...and letting the free market and the students choose.
- It's about supporting students, our most vulnerable students.
- It's about supporting students, our most vulnerable students.
LA
Transcript Highlights:
- The money goes where the students go.
- Students, not the school.
- Listen, student life has become... ...and letting the free market and the students choose.
- Student life is becoming very important.
- It's about supporting students, our most vulnerable students.
Summary:
The Senate Education Committee met to hear several education-related measures. It reported favorably, without objection, on House Bill 1215, which would transfer certain removed historical statues and monuments to the Office of State Parks, prohibit re-erection in the parish where they were removed, and require interpretive signage. The committee also advanced House Bill 682, which creates a school guardian program for honorably discharged veterans employed or contracted by local school systems or charter schools; testimony emphasized that guardians would be unarmed, trained, and used for mentoring and school safety. House Bill 1079, giving enrollment preferences in charter schools to children in early childhood programs, military families, foster children, and children in custody disputes, was also reported favorably, as was House Concurrent Resolution 81, directing the Department of Education to study options for districts facing declining enrollment.
The committee then took up House Bill 1084, which would allow public postsecondary institutions to raise tuition and mandatory fees by up to 15 percent annually, with higher increases requiring Board of Supervisors approval. The bill drew extended debate over affordability, TOPS, student retention, and whether universities should have more autonomy to set prices. Members raised concerns about fee burdens on families and whether the state should first study the issue; supporters argued the bill would increase transparency and let institutions respond to funding needs and market conditions. Senator Mazzell offered an amendment lowering the cap from 15 percent to 10 percent, and the committee adopted the amendment before reporting the bill favorably as amended.
Finally, the committee heard House Bill 342, which would shift the burden of proof in special education due process hearings from parents to local education agencies. The author and parents testified that the current system places an unfair burden on families of children with disabilities, who often lack access to records and legal resources, and that schools already control the documentation and should have to show compliance with IEP obligations. Jefferson Parish school officials opposed the bill, arguing it would increase legal costs, require more staff and attorney time, and potentially lead to more hearings; they also questioned the fiscal note. The Legislative Fiscal Office said the fiscal impact was indeterminable, and the committee continued hearing testimony from parents and school representatives as the transcript ended.
AL
Alabama 2026 1st Special Session
Alabama House Education Policy Committee Jan 28th, 2026
Education Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- students in her special education class. students in her special education class.
- Uh she also has worked with students Uh she also has worked with students that<00:30:41.120>
- the students are benefiting from that. the students are benefiting from that.
- So, this allows homeschool students to participate if there is room, and the homeschool student would
- , a regular student even the the student, a regular student would<00:54:23.280>
have <00:54:23.440
FL
Florida 2025 Regular Session
December 9, 2025 - 09:30 AM
Transcript Highlights:
- STUDENTS ENROLLED IN THIS PROGRAM VARY FROM TRADITIONAL UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS TO WORKING PROFESSIONALS
- THE STUDENTS FOR THE NEXT SET OF JOBS THAT WE WANT OUR STUDENTS TO FACE AS THEY MOVE FURTHER.
- STUDENTS BE?
- BECAUSE NOT ALL STUDENTS OF COURSE BUT SOME STUDENTS ARE NOT PRODUCING CRITICAL THINKING NOW.
- STUDENTS WILL USE THAT.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Committee on Economic Development, Growth, and Household Impact Aug 15th, 2025
Economic Development, Growth, and Household Impact
Transcript Highlights:
- Students work to get by, to be able to survive in Los Angeles.
- Most students now are working over. They're working over.
- So like we said, we had an over-representation of UCLA students. majority of LSRP students go to UCLA
- Students aren't just balanced.
- So really allowing students to work less.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- Many, many students.
- <00:05:17.639>
I <00:05:17.720>think students many many students and I think students - I just want to say that it's very, very successful because those students, they're wonderful students
- student, whatever it is, okay.
- We want students to have access.
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Education Policy and Administration (02/18/2026)
Education Policy and Administration
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:44:43.839>
What have a student, I have a student. - What have a student, I have a student.
- . students. students.
- That number of students is about five students per grade, so that's like one student per class.
- students would be severe. students would be severe.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- . students. students.
- Doesn't impact our students. that money. Doesn't impact our students.
- student? student?
- I will still go back to we fully support student books and student publishing.
- books and student support student books and student publishing.<01:18:25.960>
We <01:18:26.120
Keywords:
student-athletes, name image likeness, NIL, compensation, transparency, University of Hawaii, Title IX, funding, protections, athlete agents, student athletes, endorsement contracts, professional representation, registration requirements, sports law, 912, senate, all
Summary:
The joint committees heard testimony on Senate Bill 3263, which would create a state-supported endowment for University of Hawaii athletics NIL (name, image, and likeness) funding. University of Hawaii Athletics Director Matt Eliott supported the bill, saying NIL requires both immediate funding and a longer-term sustainable solution. He asked for several changes: lowering the initial endowment target from $10 million to $2 million so the fund could start sooner, allowing NIL reporting by team rather than by individual student-athlete, and clarifying that athletes may choose whether to use an agent, while still allowing certified agents or a parent/guardian if desired.
Committee members raised concerns about using taxpayer dollars for athlete compensation, the burden on a small-state budget, and whether the university could realistically raise the required matching funds. Several senators questioned whether the university had a concrete fundraising plan and whether the endowment would meaningfully help UH compete with larger programs. Eliott said UH is already fundraising privately for current NIL obligations, had raised more than $1.6 million toward a $3 million annual goal, and would continue fundraising for both short-term needs and the endowment match. He also said the university is not trying to compete with Power Five schools on the same scale, but to be successful at its own conference level.
Members also discussed transparency and privacy, with some senators arguing that if state money is used, the public should know how it is spent, while Eliott said individual student-athlete NIL information should remain private and team-level reporting would be preferable. He confirmed international student-athletes are eligible for NIL and said about 60 to 70 UH athletes are currently participating, with more than 100 expected next year. The discussion also touched on UH’s Mountain West media rights and local TV rights, with Eliott explaining that the conference distribution is expected to remain around $3.5 million and that local TV rights would be negotiated separately. No vote or final action was taken during the portion of the hearing provided.
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
House Chamber - Thu Mar 19, 2026, 12:00PM HST - Day 30
Hawaii House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- > Link,<00:21:24.160>
Atlas We have students Nikki Link, Atlas We have students Nikki Link - These students have represent many facets of our community, including student leadership, and I would
- students from Ka'ala Elementary School. students from Ka'ala Elementary School.
- >
many These students have represent many These students have represent many facets<00:22:46.240 - , build relationships with students, build relationships with students, family,<00:33:17.880>
Bills:
HR204, SB2925, SB2798, SB2320, SB2800, SB1230, SB2706, SB3233, SB2405, SB3320, SB2543, SB3097, SB3096, SB3140, SB2593, SB2567, SB2466, SB2140, SB2088, SB3090, SB608, SB2795, SB3294, SB3263, SB3001, SB2907, SB3251, SB2074, SB2360, SB2354, SB2908, SB2353, SB3045, SB2047, SB3254, SB3246, SB3133, SB2425, SB2671, SB3229, SB2969, SB1166, SB896, SB2391, SB2125, SB3118, SB3325, SB2613, SB2614, SB494, SB2376, SB3326, SB2001, SB2599, SB3048, SB3169, SB2002, SB3247, SB3253, SB2155, SB2192, SB3187, SB2190, SB2398, SB2424, SB3028, SB2338, SB3219, SB2981, HCR14
Keywords:
H.R. 204, House Resolution, Hawaii LifeSmarts, LifeSmarts State Competition, student competition, academic recognition, congratulatory resolution, Iolani School, Kalani High School, Waipahu High School, personal finance, consumer rights, health and safety, technology education, environmental education, National Consumers League, Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs, Hawaii Credit Union League, youth achievement, high school teams
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- How many students are served in a school?
- And the school finance system is essentially designed, predominantly, to fund, based upon students. student
- The special education student population is 14%.
- Yeah, generally MNO follows the student, INS doesn't, but MNO follows the student.
- Survives when there are no students are the students that are left behind that that smaller number are
AL
Alabama 2025 Regular Session
Alabama House Ways and Means Education Committee Apr 9th, 2025
Ways and Means Education
Transcript Highlights:
- So the students who attended intersession… So the students who attended intersession three times during
- the students who attend intersession less.
- In those early grades in particular, the average student scored lower than the other students but made
- higher gains than the students who weren't attending.
- Um, but we every take those to students.
Keywords:
HB447, school buses, student transportation, public schools, local boards of education, dual enrollment, career technical education, CTE, community college, trade school, technical college, offsite educational venues, student access, transportation policy, school bus law, Alabama education law, Montgomery County, probate court, judge of probate, will registration
FL
Florida 2025 Regular Session
Appropriations Committee on Higher Education Feb 19th, 2025
MA
Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Committee on Economic Development and Emerging Technologies Jun 21st, 2026 at 12:30 pm
Joint Committee on Economic Development and Emerging Technologies
Transcript Highlights:
- , postdocs, graduate students, and trainees.
- first-gen, low-income students and students with disabilities.
- students of color.
- This fall, our course registration has fallen precipitously from 50 students each class to about 15 students
- We've trained more than 150 graduate students and postdocs.
Summary:
The committee on Economic Development held a hearing on the DRIVE Act, a proposal to invest $400 million in Massachusetts research and innovation without new taxes. Governor Healey and administration officials said the bill would direct $200 million to public higher education research and regional partnerships and $200 million to a research funding pool for hospitals, universities, and other institutions, with the goal of retaining talent, leveraging private and philanthropic dollars, and offsetting major federal R&D cuts. They argued that research is a core economic engine for the state, supporting jobs across labs, construction, services, and surrounding businesses, and said the bill would help protect the Commonwealth’s tax base and competitiveness during a period of federal uncertainty and cuts to SNAP, Medicaid, and other programs.
Committee members raised concerns about whether Fair Share surtax dollars should instead be used for K-12 and other community needs, whether the proposal is enough given the scale of lost federal grants, and how the money would be allocated. The governor responded that the funds are one-time surplus dollars, that most surtax revenue already supports education, and that the bill is meant as a bridge to stabilize public higher education and research. She also said the legislation includes a review board and could support a revolving or matched-fund approach in some cases. Several members pressed for more detail on selection criteria, future funding, and whether private companies and large endowments should contribute more.
University of Massachusetts leaders and researchers testified that federal grant cancellations and delays are already causing layoffs, furloughs, rescinded admissions, and lost research capacity. UMass officials said the bill would help preserve faculty, postdocs, graduate students, and research programs in medicine, climate science, marine science, Braille instruction, and AI decision-making. They emphasized that the funding should be merit-based and that the state needs to act quickly to prevent talent from leaving Massachusetts. Business, labor, and industry groups, including MassBio, the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation, AIM, the AFL-CIO, and Building Trades, supported the bill, saying it would protect jobs, sustain the innovation ecosystem, and reinforce Massachusetts’ national leadership in research and life sciences. No vote was taken in the hearing.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:01:49.759>
in Indian and Alaskan native students in Indian and Alaskan native students - by recruiting and supporting students by recruiting and supporting students who<00:14:43.160>
- scholarships annually to students scholarships annually to students enrolled<00:18:31.919>
in - We've put a major commitment towards our student wellness and our student services to ensure that our
- student is they are actually a student student is they are actually a student and<00:59:03.760><