Transcript Highlights:

• Speaker Pro Tem, the Committee of the Whole recommends that SB 1037 do pass as amended, SB 1233 do pass
• , SB 1290 do pass as amended, SB 1445 do pass as amended, and SB 1814 be retained.
• Pass out of committee, 17-1. Is there any further discussion? Pass out of committee, 17-1.
• Speaker, put from the Committee of the Whole recommends that SB 1050 do pass, 1055 do pass, 1274 do pass
• as amended, 1502 do pass, and SB 1573 do pass.

Summary: The House convened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, guest introductions, and a proclamation honoring the East Valley Hispanic Chamber of Commerce. Members also welcomed the Doctor of the Day and several guest groups, including Alzheimer’s Association advocates. The chamber then moved into Committee of the Whole to consider several Senate bills. In Committee of the Whole, the House advanced SB 1037, SB 1233, SB 1290, and SB 1445, adopting committee amendments where offered and giving each a do pass recommendation; SB 1814 was retained. Members discussed SB 1055, which would require reporting certain unlawfully present individuals arrested for crimes to federal immigration authorities, with Democrats raising concerns about profiling and civil liberties and Republicans arguing it simply enforces federal law; it also received a do pass recommendation. SB 1274, relating to transportation and infrastructure, was amended and recommended do pass, SB 1502 also advanced, and SB 1573, concerning foreign or religious sectarian law in state courts, prompted debate over whether it was necessary or duplicative but was likewise recommended do pass. The Committee of the Whole report was adopted, and the measures were assigned accordingly. The House then took up third-reading votes. SB 1168 and SB 1172 passed overwhelmingly, SB 1290 passed after debate about HOA meeting openness, SB 1221 passed on a 32-24 vote after supporters said it would improve tax transparency, and SB 1400 passed 47-9 despite concerns about peer support and counseling protections. SB 1214, a medical practice bill involving stem cell regenerative therapies, failed 25-31 after some members said they were not comfortable with the measure; afterward, a motion to reconsider its failure was adopted, placing it back on the third-reading calendar. The House also granted the Senate permission to adjourn until April 27, and then adjourned until 10 a.m. on Wednesday, April 22, 2026.

Transcript Highlights:

• I would suggest that not passing this bill, particularly if Mr.
• Notably, it passed all 58 counties.
• We can't underfund it and say it's failing.
• He was a transient passing through the neighborhood.
• Do pass as amended to appropriations. Current vote is 1 to 1.

Summary: The committee met without a quorum and operated as a subcommittee while hearing several bills on public safety, parole, criminal justice oversight, Proposition 36 implementation, behavioral health, gang database reform, cargo theft, and nonconsensual intimate images. The chair explained hearing procedures and noted that SB 906 was pulled from the agenda. Several measures were heard but not voted on because quorum was lacking. SB 1446, a committee bill, would expand discretion in en banc parole review, make en banc votes public record, and allow CDCR referrals for sexually violent predator evaluation of certain incarcerated people serving determinate or indeterminate terms. Support came from the California District Attorneys Association; opposition came from the Ella Baker Center, Uncommon Law, public defenders, and others who argued it would add confusion, litigation risk, and unnecessary duplication. The author said the bill was intended to clarify review standards and improve transparency. SB 1278 would exclude certain sex offenses and habitual/one-strike offenders from elderly parole eligibility. The San Diego District Attorney’s Office and California District Attorneys Association supported it, citing cases such as Gregory Vogelsang and David Funston; opponents from Uncommon Law, the Ella Baker Center, and others argued elderly parole is already highly restrictive, evidence-based, and cost-effective. Vice Chair Seyarto strongly supported SB 1278, emphasizing victim justice and public safety. SB 1354 would bar out-of-state military personnel not operating under Title 10 from entering California to perform military or law enforcement functions without the governor’s permission; a committee amendment removed a criminal penalty and left enforcement to the Attorney General. SB 926 would provide funding for Proposition 36 implementation, with committee amendments deleting a specific appropriation and shifting funding decisions to the budget process; supporters said counties need resources for treatment, probation, and administration, while opponents criticized the bill as fiscally reckless and duplicative. SB 874 would require background checks and clearer statewide standards for Medi-Cal behavioral health treatment services, especially ABA services for children; supporters said it would improve patient safety and program integrity. SB 1210 would extend CalGang-style oversight, notice, appeal, and DOJ regulation to all gang databases, not just shared ones; supporters described harms from inaccurate, unregulated local databases, while police chiefs opposed applying the CalGang framework to all local investigative files. The committee also heard SB 1019, which would create a DOJ cargo theft task force and add reporting requirements; supporters from BNSF, trucking, shipping, ports, and law enforcement said organized cargo theft is harming supply chains and worker safety, and no opposition was presented. Finally, SB 1217 would create a DOJ clearinghouse to help victims remove nonconsensual intimate images, including AI-generated deepfakes, from covered platforms; amendments narrowed the bill’s scope and clarified law enforcement’s role. The author and survivor witnesses described ongoing trauma from repeated reposting of exploitative images and argued the bill would provide a centralized removal process. The transcript ends during testimony on SB 1217, with no final votes taken on the measures heard.

Transcript Highlights:

• Notably, it passed in all 58 counties. Notably, it passed in all 58 counties.
• We can't underfund it and say it's failing.
• That bill fails. What's the tally? Okay, that bill fails on a vote of three to two. Was it Fresno?
• Motion is due pass as amended to appropriations. Motion is due pass as amended to appropriations.
• Motion is due pass as amended to appropriations. Motion is due pass as amended to appropriations.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• My understanding is that this did not pass through the Senate, so it was null and void.
• Hodges would have failed four to three instead of passing five to four.
• I move we send H.J.R. 10 to the floor with a do pass recommendation.
• Motion fails. Yes. I was on the wrong side. I got the two motions confused.
• So the motion fails, six to eight.

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The committee first approved the minutes from February 17 and 18 and agreed to hold RS 33446 at the sponsor’s request. It then considered RS 33-144, a memorial urging the U.S. Supreme Court to revisit Obergefell v. Hodges. The sponsor argued the issue belongs to the states, cited Idaho’s constitutional definition of marriage, and said the memorial was needed because the federal ruling had effectively nullified Idaho’s amendment. Members questioned the need for the memorial given Idaho’s existing constitutional language and discussed federalism, equal protection, and the historical wording in the RS. A substitute motion removed language referring to “Anglo-American legal tradition,” and that amended RS 33-144 was introduced, with Representatives Haas and Church recorded as voting no. The committee next heard RS 33-421, a proposal to codify rules for large electric loads and require new large users, such as data centers, to bear more of the infrastructure and study costs rather than shifting them to existing ratepayers. The sponsor said the measure was intended to protect Idaho consumers and ensure growth pays for growth. Members asked about effects on existing large-load customers, utilities’ involvement, and whether the bill was moving ahead of the Public Utilities Commission. The RS was introduced after discussion. The main item of the day was H.J.R. 10, a proposed constitutional amendment on Idaho endowment lands that would prioritize revenue-generating uses while also addressing public access and traditional uses such as timber, grazing, mining, and recreation. The sponsor said the amendment would protect long-term revenue and public access without changing the trust beneficiaries, while opponents from logging, mining, county government, and the Department of Lands warned it could create legal ambiguity, invite litigation, and conflict with the state’s fiduciary duties under the Idaho Admissions Act. Supporters from recreation and outfitting groups said it would provide stability and better recognize recreation as an economic use. After extended testimony, a motion to hold the resolution in committee failed 6-8, and the motion to send H.J.R. 10 to the floor with a do-pass recommendation then failed on a 7-7 tie, ending the meeting without advancing the resolution.

Transcript Highlights:

• Please do pass this important financial tool. Thank you.</p> <p>Thank you.
• era that has passed.
• The amendment failed. amendment is adopted. My apologies, I misread. The amendment fails.
• Nay, the amendment passes is adopted.
• The proposed amendment fails.

Summary: The Senate Housing Committee heard several housing-related bills and gubernatorial appointments. SB 6201 would create property tax and REET exemptions for property used as affordable housing by social housing agencies, with testimony from the sponsor and supporters from Seattle Social Housing and House Our Neighbors emphasizing lower development costs and deeper affordability. Senator Gildon questioned how the 50% occupancy requirement would work at purchase, and staff explained the covenant and compliance requirements. The committee also heard SB 6205, which would add conflict-of-interest restrictions and reporting requirements for the Community Reinvestment Account, Affordable Housing Program, and Covenant Homeownership Program; Senator Braun said the bill responds to reports of misuse and is intended to improve transparency and trust. The committee heard gubernatorial appointments Pedro Espinoza and Diana H. Perez to the Housing Finance Commission, both of whom described their construction, local government, and housing experience and were supported by committee members. In executive session, the committee adopted a substitute and passed SB 6001 on scissors stairs, SB 6026 on allowing residential uses in commercial and mixed-use zones, and SB 6054 on fire-hardened building materials. SB 6026 drew the most debate, with amendments added and others rejected; supporters said it would expand housing supply, while opponents and local governments raised concerns about historic districts, main street areas, and limits on local planning authority. SB 6054 was amended to remove the 10% cap on fire-hardened materials, with members saying it would help homeowners protect against wildfire risk. The committee then moved to public hearings on SB 6069, which would require cities and counties to allow emergency shelters, transitional housing, indoor emergency housing, and permanent supportive housing in more zones and limit local restrictions to objective standards and administrative review. Supporters, including housing providers, the Attorney General’s Office, King County, and Disability Rights Washington, said local barriers are delaying needed housing, while cities and the Association of Washington Cities argued the bill is too broad and would limit operational agreements and local flexibility. The committee also heard SB 6167, which would bar homebuyers from receiving multiple state-funded down payment assistance loans or grants. The sponsor said the bill is meant to maximize limited assistance dollars for more households, but opponents from housing nonprofits, advocates, and a homeless veteran said it would reduce access to homeownership, especially for Black households and families needing layered assistance in high-cost markets. Finally, the committee returned to SB 6205 testimony, where supporters said the bill would prevent self-dealing and misuse of grant funds, while one testifier urged more investigation and oversight resources. No final action was taken on the public hearing bills during the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• And I look forward to all of those measures failing.
• Because as I look at your language, it's no tax levy passed prior to 1975.
• And so, I guess, would it be accurate to say in the absence of passing this bill...
• Sorry, I failed to bring the fiscal note with me when I walked down here.
• Sorry, I failed to bring the fiscal note with me when I walked down here.

Keywords: 959, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Professional driver education programs are specifically designed to address fail...
• Professional driver education programs are specifically designed to address fail... Sorry.
• Professional driver education programs are specifically designed to address fail. Sorry.
• I moved to send House Bill 628 to the floor with the due pass recommendation.”
• Motion passes.” “Motion passes. Thank you. Next up we’ve got a gubernatorial appointment.

Summary: The Senate Transportation Committee heard House Bill 628 from Representative Ron Mendive, which would allow urban school districts to offer both school-based driver education and parent-taught driver training, rather than forcing districts to choose one or the other. Mendive said the bill also removes a reference to IDLA as a listed online provider while leaving other approved online classroom options in place. He argued the change would help districts like Coeur d’Alene restart driver’s ed while still letting parents teach, and said insurance treatment and the state licensing test would not change. Several witnesses opposed the bill. Lisa Brady, Lori Salders, Tanya Hosvite of Phillips Driving School, and Marissa Keith all argued that expanding parent-led instruction statewide would weaken driver education standards, reduce professional oversight, and create safety risks for teen drivers and other road users. They emphasized that professional instructors receive continuing education, use dual-control vehicles, and are better equipped to teach hazard perception, defensive driving, and urban driving conditions. Mendive responded that parents already provide most of the required 50 hours of practice, that the bill only changes the six hours of instructor-led training, and that parents have their children’s best interests in mind. After discussion, Senator Kaiser moved to send HB 628 to the floor with a do-pass recommendation, and Senator Hart seconded. Senators debated whether urban areas still needed the extra professional instruction, with some members citing local traffic safety concerns and others noting scheduling flexibility for families. The committee voted in favor of the motion, with three recorded in opposition. The hearing also included an interview of gubernatorial appointee Gaston Patterson for the Aeronautics Advisory Board, who described his aviation background and the board’s advisory role, and a brief introduction from new Senate page Olivia Earle. The meeting then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• Do pass. Okay. Thank you.
• Do pass. pass. pass. &gt;&gt; Okay.<00:10:47.839><c> Thank</c><00:10:48.079><c> you.
• . failing. failing.
• As the saying goes, failing to plan is planning to fail.
• saying goes, failing to plan is planning to<00:44:16.079><c> fail.

Bills: HB0078, SF0012, SF0013, SF0052, SF0069, SF0070

Keywords: forest health, grant program, state forester, wildfire prevention, environmental conservation, habitat improvement, military, national guard, reenlistment, extension bonus, funding, Wyoming, Wyoming National Guard, recruitment, referral bonus, military service, eligibility expansion, incentive program, wildlife management, environmental restoration

Transcript Highlights:

• Pass. Senator Finchem. Pass. Senator Kuby. Can you explain my vote? You may.
• Pass. Senator Finsham? Senator QB? You may.
• I received a due pass recommendation.
• Pass. Senator Hernandez? No. Senator Finchow? Pass. Senator Qie. Senator Leach. Senator Warner.
• Additionally, the bill clarifies that a person fails to obey a red light signal when the person fails

Bills: SB1001, SB1035, SB1056, SB1065, SB1138, SB1161, SB1204, SB1207, SB1248, SB1274, SB1284, SCM1002, SCM1006, SCR1020

Keywords: appropriation, economic security, blind individuals, older adults, state funding, Arizona Department of Corrections, ADC, corrections, prison, jail, correctional officers, prison guards, staffing, retention, salary increase, pay raise, wage increase, general fund, state budget, private prisons

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> pass. Is there a second? pass. Is there a second?
• </c> &gt;&gt; Pass it out now. &gt;&gt; Pass it out now.
• The amendment fails on a vote of 9-7. We're back to the underlying motion of ought to pass.
• I'm sorry, uh, to pass ought to pass.
• </c> pass on 11 House Bill 1125. pass on 11 House Bill 1125.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So we know that this is an important bill that's going to pass.
• Right here in New England, Connecticut was early to pass regulations.
• As this committee works to pass a legislative package designed to boost the Massachusetts economy, I
• Passing a statewide ban is a zero-cost stimulus package.
• You have to fail it twice within 10 points to get your provisional license.

Keywords: 1212, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It's being passed out now.
• Not if it doesn't pass us. Unless his bill passes.
• Well, this is only applicable if his bill passes. If the bill passes... I'm confused there.
• So if it passes, it would...
• A yes vote is for passing House Bill 6 and a no vote is against passing House Bill 6.

Summary: The committee took up public comment on a package of similar local-option bills related to carbon capture and sequestration, including House Bills 5, 6, 497, 498, 501, and 504. The bills would let parishes, or in some cases specific parishes such as Rapides and Livingston, decide by local vote whether Class VI wells, CO2 sequestration, and related pipeline infrastructure could be permitted. The chair grouped the bills together for testimony, adopted a three-minute public comment rule, and noted that the bills were not yet under consideration for a vote during the public-comment portion. Supporters, including Speaker Pro Tem Mike Johnson, parish officials, local activists, and residents, argued that communities affected by carbon capture projects should have a direct voice through local option elections. They said the bills were about self-determination, local control, and allowing residents to decide whether the risks are worth the benefits. Several speakers said their parishes had passed resolutions opposing carbon capture or asking for local choice, while others emphasized concerns about eminent domain, aquifer protection, lack of public understanding, and the need for more information about project impacts and financial benefits. Some supporters also said a local vote would force industry to engage more directly with communities and could improve transparency. Opponents, including representatives of the Department of Conservation and Energy, the Louisiana Chemistry Association, the Louisiana Mid-Continent Oil and Gas Association, and the Louisiana Association of Business and Industry, warned that the bills would create uncertainty, undermine Louisiana’s primacy over Class VI permitting, and invite litigation under federal preemption and the Supremacy Clause. They said the state already has a strict permitting process with public input and technical review, and that allowing parish-by-parish approval could delay or block billions of dollars in investment, jobs, and export-related projects. The department testified that if the state adopted a local-option referendum system, EPA could determine Louisiana was not implementing the program consistently and could move to remove primacy. No committee vote was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> pass the bill HR 36? pass the bill HR 36?
• </c> the rules and pass the rules and pass HR1540?
• The bill is passed. rules are suspended. The bill is passed.
• The bill is passed. Without suspended. The bill is passed.
• pass pass HR180?

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Monday, May 5, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair's recommendation is to pass with amendments. Chair and Vice Chair will vote.
• Chair's recommendation is to pass this as is. Members, any comments? Vice Chair, for the vote.
• Chair's recommendation is to pass unamended, noting the excused absence of Representative Purick.
• </c><01:02:45.240><c> with</c> chair's recommendation is to pass with chair's recommendation is to pass
• </c><01:03:47.319><c> with</c> chair's recommendation is to pass with chair's recommendation is to pass

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on HB 818 HD1, which would establish the Waiawa Community Development District. The Attorney General’s office said the bill may not comply with requirements for a special fund, and DLNR asked for further amendments so lease revenues would remain with DLNR while it continues managing the lands. DLNR cited ongoing costs, including the Uncle Billy’s demolition debt and management needs at Banyan Drive/Banyan Country Club. HCDA/Waiawa representatives supported the bill, agreed that DLNR should keep lease revenues while it remains the land manager, and said a future transfer of land management would change where revenues should go. Members focused on whether removing lease revenue would undercut the bill and on how existing and future revenues should be allocated. The committee then took up HB 338 HD1 and HB 339 HD1 on renewable energy-related utility transactions and procurement. Testimony came from the Consumer Advocate, the State Energy Office, the Public Utilities Commission, Hawaiian Electric, IBEW Local 1260, Ulupono Initiative, and Life of the Land. Supporters generally backed the measures, while some asked for labor-related strengthening language. Discussion centered on how the PUC should handle competing bids or offers in utility merger or acquisition situations, with concerns raised about NDAs, timing, and whether the original version or amended language better allowed public and intervenor participation. A witness from Life of the Land argued that utilities should not negotiate under NDA in a way that blocks later public competition, and a PUC-related witness said the current language was changed from the original to address PUC testimony. Finally, the committee heard HB 1467 HD1 on housing resiliency. OIP was not present, while B&F raised concerns about placing federal funds into a special fund, saying federal grant money should remain in a separate P fund for transparency, accountability, and single-audit compliance. State agencies and groups including OPSD, Hawaii Emergency Management Agency, the Climate Advisory Team, and Hawaii Realtors supported the measure. Testimony emphasized that many older roofs lack hurricane clips and that strengthening homes could reduce disaster sheltering and temporary housing costs. IBEW Local 1260 supported the bill but argued that building to current standards upfront is preferable to retrofitting later. Members questioned funding structure, eligibility, and whether the program should be needs-based; the bill was described as limited to households under 140% AMI. No votes or final actions were taken in the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• The Senate has already heard and passed the companions, and so the House has just come over.
• A consequence of this bill failing? The Chair's not advised. Could you ask for help?
• Well, we would find out if it failed.
• But if it failed, there would be no hearing and the bill wouldn't pass. Isn't that right?

Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 10, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB17, HB7, HB7, HB15, HB15, HB27, HB1, HB7, HB15, HB18, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB17, HB27, HB1, SB8, HCR13, SB2, SB5, SB10

Keywords: disaster relief, flood preparedness, emergency funding, local government support, meteorological forecasting, school assessment, public education, accountability, transparency, education standards, STAAR, Texas Education Agency, TEA, public school accountability, school ratings, A-F ratings, assessment reform, student testing, benchmark tests, interim assessments

Transcript Highlights:

• The Senate has already heard and passed the companions, and so the House companions have just come over
• What would be the consequence of this bill failing? Chair is not advised. Could you ask for help?
• Well, we'll find out if it failed, but if it failed, there would be no hearing and the bill wouldn't
• pass, isn't that right?

Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 10

Keywords: disaster relief, flood preparedness, emergency funding, local government support, meteorological forecasting

Transcript Highlights:

• 1128 do pass as amended; Senate Bill 1170 do pass.
• You have failed to pass Senate Bill 1170.
• You have failed to pass Senate Bill 1021.
• Motion to reconsider: I move that the Senate reconsider its actions whereby it failed to pass Senate
• I move that the Senate reconsider its actions whereby it failed to pass Senate Bill 1021 on third reading

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> to pass on Senate Bill 2 ought to pass to pass on Senate Bill 2 ought to pass as<00:31:48.880><c
• </c> the motion of ought to pass as amended. the motion of ought to pass as amended.
• </c><00:32:04.640><c> as</c> ought to pass as ought to pass as amended?
• We've already passed it once.
• So, um further discussion on the amendment. pass. Is there a second? Representative pass.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> Melissa was that Gilbert failed. Melissa was that Gilbert failed.
• </c> "Gilbert failed his test. "Gilbert failed his test.
• The failings of the current system are numerous.
• That didn't pass, but instead we turned that into a study implementation.
• </c> in a text that a bill that we passed in a text that a bill that we passed last<01:33:19.040><c>

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee first took up House File 3939, a bill to support a Helping Paws service-dog litter named in honor of Gilbert and the Hortman family. Testimony from Helping Paws and service-dog graduate Angie Foley described the organization’s work, the significance of the “Guided by Gilbert” litter, and how the funding would help train dogs that provide independence and support to people with disabilities, veterans, and others. Members from both parties spoke warmly about Speaker Hortman’s connection to the organization and Gilbert, and the bill was laid over for possible inclusion. The committee then considered House File 3769, the Department of Corrections’ technical omnibus bill, with an A1 amendment adopted to clarify tuberculosis testing language. The bill updates TB screening procedures in correctional facilities, including how refusals are handled, and adds Quantiferon Gold Plus testing as an option alongside existing methods. Members discussed whether the bill would create costs for counties and jails, with some noting added testing and segregation costs and others arguing the changes would improve accuracy and reduce time in restrictive housing. The bill, as amended, was recommended to the general register. House File 3978 was next, a technical cleanup bill for a provider wellness program created last year. The bill expands eligibility and confidentiality protections from physicians to all health care providers, while supporters said the program is meant to address burnout and mental health strain in the workforce and does not require new money. Some members questioned whether the change was redundant or would broaden the program without additional funding, but the Minnesota Medical Association testified that the program is separate from insurance and was intended to serve all providers. The bill was recommended to the general register. Finally, the committee began House File 3476, which Rep. Liebling described as a cleanup bill related to Minnesota’s Medicaid managed care system and public program oversight. She argued that the state spends billions through managed care organizations and that the system has never been proven better than direct payment, setting up a broader discussion of the bill’s purpose and the state’s oversight of public health care spending.

Transcript Highlights:

• When schools fail to take proper action, victims suffer.
• If Texas passes HB 1481, we will be the largest state to pass a bell-to-bell, no-cell bill.
• I know when we did work hard to get David's Law passed to help prevent bullying.
• So this is a must-pass bill for the session. Thank you very much. Thank you all.
• They fail to see that because social media only shows the perfect.

Bills: HB126, HB121

Keywords: election laws, attorney general, prosecution, criminal offenses, voting integrity, education, property values, school districts, comptroller, funding formula

Summary: The Senate Committee on Education K-16 met to hear testimony on a full agenda of education-related bills. Several measures were laid out and left pending, including HB 322 to allow JET Grant funds to be used for subscription-based and ongoing technology costs for career and technical education; HB 3062 to require fentanyl and drug-poisoning prevention instruction for entering college students; HB 121 to update school safety laws, including TEA peace officer commissions, annual renewal of certain safety exceptions, new reporting requirements, and special education behavior threat assessment changes; HB 3627 to let the State Board of Education chair employ staff; HB 5515 to curb inflated shipping and handling charges on instructional materials; HB 2674 to prohibit new state regulation of homeschool programs; HB 2310 to require a statewide strategic plan for early learning and inclusion for young children with disabilities; HB 367 to standardize documentation for excused absences due to serious illness; HB 1178 to speed certification for out-of-state educators and military spouses; and HB 1481 to expand cell phone restrictions to the full school day. Testimony was generally supportive on most bills, with some concerns raised on HB 121 about school district police departments investigating misconduct and on HB 2674 about how it would interact with the new ESA program in SB 2. HB 5515 drew support from instructional materials coordinators who described extreme shipping invoices and argued the bill would restore transparency and fiscal responsibility. HB 2310 was supported by disability advocates and early learning groups, who said a coordinated state plan would improve access and inclusion for children with disabilities. HB 367 was presented as a simple clarification to reduce confusion for medically vulnerable students and families, and HB 1178 was described by TEA as a modest pathway that would help bring experienced out-of-state teachers into Texas schools more quickly. HB 126, updating Texas’ NIL law to align with the pending House settlement and allow direct payments and pre-enrollment NIL agreements, received extensive testimony from university counsel and committee questioning about the settlement, recruiting, and future college athletics rules. HB 1481, expanding school cell phone restrictions from instructional time to the entire school day, drew strong support from parents, students, educators, and advocates who linked phones to distraction, cyberbullying, and mental health harms; one teacher asked for flexibility so phones could still be used for limited academic tasks. No bills were voted out; each measure heard was left pending subject to the call of the chair, and the committee then recessed to attend the floor session.