Video & Transcript Research : 'Water Code Section 16.343'

Page 53 of 500
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/26/2026 - House Public Safety & Law Enforcement

Public Safety & Law Enforcement

Transcript Highlights:
  • heard what the subject of this bill is, and that even some fire departments are going back to just water
  • said firefighters are exposed to PFAS from multiple occupational sources, including AFFF, drinking water
  • He added that drinking bottled water at the fire station, compared with tap water, was associated with
  • table, and the water table.
  • provisions of Section 35-190, Arizona Revised Statutes, relating to lapsing of appropriations until
Summary: The committee first heard HB 2641, which would ban firefighting foam containing intentionally added PFAS chemicals. The sponsor said the bill was intended to protect firefighters and the public from carcinogenic and persistent chemicals that can contaminate groundwater, and noted Arizona had already banned the foam for training. A University of Arizona public health researcher testified that firefighters have higher PFAS levels than the general public and that AFFF use is associated with elevated exposure, while a firefighters’ association representative said alternatives exist and that the bill would remove uncertainty for departments. The committee passed HB 2641 unanimously, 15-0. The committee then heard HB 2602, a $24,000 appropriation for a 10% pay increase for Department of Public Safety employees in fiscal year 2027. The sponsor and supporters from the Arizona Troopers Association argued the raise was needed for recruitment and retention, citing vacancies, departures, and the cost of training new troopers. Several members supported the idea but raised concerns about the budget impact and the broader issue of pay disparities across agencies and state employees. The bill received a do pass recommendation on a 10-0-3 vote, with two members voting no and three voting present. Finally, the committee considered HB 2225, which would appropriate $10 million for capital costs at the Northern Arizona Regional Training Academy in Yavapai County and keep the funds from lapsing until 2029. The sponsor and Yavapai County law enforcement witnesses said the academy is overcrowded, serves multiple agencies across northern Arizona, reduces travel and lodging costs, and provides both basic and in-service training. Some members questioned whether the state should fund a county-based facility and raised concerns about the size and structure of the appropriation, while others supported the training mission but wanted the issue handled in the budget process. The committee voted to give HB 2225 a do pass recommendation, with several members voting no or present.
TX
Summary: The committee considered several House bills dealing with family law and civil procedure. House Bill 1916, concerning a court’s jurisdiction in suits to divide property not divided on dissolution of marriage, was reported favorably on a 4-0 vote and recommended for the local and uncontested calendar. House Bill 1973, addressing proof of the identity of a child’s parents in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship, was also adopted with a committee substitute, reported favorably 4-0, and sent to the local and uncontested calendar. House Bill 2524, on recovery of fees, court costs, and expenses in family law proceedings, and House Bill 2530, on special appointments in suits affecting the parent-child relationship, each received favorable 4-0 votes and were likewise recommended for the local and uncontested calendar. The committee then took up House Bill 3180, which was reported favorably 4-0 and recommended for the local and uncontested calendar. The most detailed discussion centered on House Bill 40, relating to updates to business courts. Senator Hughes explained a committee amendment that made conforming changes requested by the Finance Committee and removed language creating two new judgeships, replacing it with a different judge allocation. The amendment was adopted, the amended committee substitute was adopted, and the bill was reported favorably on a 4-0 vote and sent to the local and uncontested calendar. At the end of the meeting, members briefly clarified procedural details about the House Bill 40 amendment and then closed out the agenda. The committee also noted a correction to an earlier reference to Bartleby the Scrivener, and the Chair recessed the Committee on Jurisprudence subject to the call of the chair.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Jurisprudence (Part I) May 21st, 2025

Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Code, 153.010, is the section that authorized...
  • Section 153.010 is the section that authorizes the court to order any type of family counseling.
  • And I don't understand why that section was cut.
  • And I don't understand why that section was cut.
  • Senator Johnson, my comment—I think you asked if we had any opinion of that section.
Summary: The committee heard several House bills, most of them relating to family law and court procedure, and left each bill pending after testimony. House Bill 1916 would clarify that the court that issued a final divorce decree retains exclusive jurisdiction over later actions involving undivided property. House Bill 1973 would require a certified birth certificate, if reasonably available, to be filed with a SAPCR petition or allow alternative proof of parentage while keeping the information confidential. House Bill 2530 would add qualifications and procedural safeguards for appointing amicus attorneys in SAPCR cases, including notice and hearing requirements, minimum qualifications, conflict rules, and limits on what amicus attorneys may do. House Bill 2524 would make Family Code references to attorney’s fees consistent by using “reasonable and necessary” language. House Bill 3180 would correct a scrivener’s error in the civil discovery rules by changing “settlement” to “statement.” The committee also heard House Bill 4213, which would change the interest rate on overdue child support from the current 6 percent simple interest to a fixed 5 percent and require the Attorney General to report on the impact of the change. Testimony was sharply divided: supporters argued lower interest could improve collections and help low-income obligors catch up, citing research and the size of child-support arrearages; opponents said lowering the rate would reduce incentives to pay and harm custodial parents and children. The Attorney General’s office raised implementation concerns about a House version that would have created a variable rate, while the committee substitute was described as restoring a simple fixed rate. After testimony, the bill was left pending. The committee also discussed House Bill 40, updating business court provisions and supplemental jurisdiction; House Bill 3421, streamlining probate procedures for original wills and copies; and House Bill 417, clarifying venue for lawsuits involving private transfer fees on real property. Each drew limited testimony and was left pending. Finally, House Bill 3783 drew extensive testimony on court-ordered counseling and reunification therapy in family cases. The sponsor and supporters said the bill would protect children and abuse victims from coercive, unregulated reunification practices, while opponents argued it was too broad, could interfere with legitimate therapy and judicial discretion, and might affect military families and other high-conflict cases. The committee heard testimony from judges, therapists, parents, survivors, and advocates, but took no final action and left the bill pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services May 19th, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • It really makes one significant change under the current education code requirements.
  • It's just amending the code to say that, in addition to the total principal amount of the debt obligations
Bills: SB414, SB621, SB2395
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Education May 15th, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • Section 264.902 of the Texas Family Code created parental child safety placement agreements, safety placement
  • of the law." of the Education Code.
  • It closes a loophole in the Texas Education Code by making it clear that anabolic steroids prescribed
  • Policies are filed within the attendance code because it allows for that excused absence.
  • And get to that section, accountable for making up for any missed work.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Apr 25th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, this is, uh, Representative Raymond's bill relating to the generation of electric power by water
  • So subsection B starts section not notwithstanding any other law, subsection A does not prohibit.
  • But subsection 4, by my reading is a distinct section that.
  • That violates this section. What, what does that mean?
  • So as you'll see here on my notes, um, I've got section 6, which you just referenced, um, circled.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections May 8th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • The bill provides common-sense safeguards into the election code.
  • Just to add the EIC in that section. That's all. All right, thanks for that input.
  • The bill completely ignores Election Code 84.007, which requires a hard copy of the application to be
  • The section of the code that y'all are amending to put the dates forward was set up for a bill.
  • Most recently, in 2023, Senator Blanco and Representative Buckley amended this section.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Delivery of Government Efficiency May 7th, 2025

Delivery of Government Efficiency

Transcript Highlights:
  • The bill amends the federal government code to include both current and former administrative law judges
  • The current fee-for-service model within the code has led to. to fragmented billing and unpredictable
  • I'd like to highlight three key parts of the First, it will establish an AI code of ethics to be adopted
  • It establishes a comprehensive code of ethics, as was mentioned previously, and the bill also calls for
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The other authorized user on the account, as directed by the Code of Federal Regulations, requires retail
  • little to no procedural guidelines on the impeachment process. impeachment contained in Government Code
  • SJR 68 creates a new constitutional provision under Article 15, Section 7. which would authorize the
  • Article 3, section 22.
  • To just what, to push me into a box that I'll just get like V-coded to death or like what?
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The other authorized user on the account, as directed by the Code of Federal Regulations, requires retail
  • little to no procedural guidelines on the impeachment process. impeachment contained in Government Code
  • SJR 68 creates a new constitutional provision under Article 15, Section 7. which would authorize the
  • Article 3, section 22. states that a member who has a personal or private interest in any measure or
  • To just what, to push me into a box that I'll just get like V-coded to death or like what?
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part II) Apr 3rd, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Statutory impeachment, contained in Government Code Chapter 665, applies to a state officer, a head of
  • S.J.R. 68 reaffirms Article 4, Section 16 of the Texas Constitution.
  • S.J.R. 68 reaffirms Article 4, Section 16 of the Texas Constitution, that the lieutenant governor will
  • Article 3, Section 22, states that a member who has a personal or private interest in any measure or
  • Article 3, Section 22, states that a member who has a personal or private interest in any measure or
Summary: The committee first heard Senate Bill 1183, by Senator Creighton, which would require Lone Star Cards used for SNAP and TANF benefits to display the recipient’s name and photo, add fraud-reporting information, and require HHSC to track replacement-card requests. Creighton argued the bill would reduce fraud and protect taxpayer dollars, citing Texas SNAP theft and overpayment data. HHSC testified that photo IDs on the card are technically possible and explained how authorized secondary users are added. Dr. Amber O’Connor of Every Texan testified against the bill, saying SNAP fraud is a small share of expenditures, that the proposal would be costly and ineffective, and that federal rules limit mandatory photo requirements. Public testimony closed and SB 1183 was left pending. The committee then heard Senate Bill 1184, also by Senator Creighton, which would lower from 20 years to 10 years the minimum age of collectible wine that Texas collectors may sell to permitted restaurants. Supporters said the change would help Texas restaurants access desirable vintages, keep collectible wine in-state, and align with market demand; invited witnesses from the wine industry testified in favor. No opposition was heard, public testimony closed, and SB 1184 was left pending. Next, Senator Birdwell laid out Senate Bill 2051 and Senate Joint Resolution 68, both aimed at revising Texas impeachment procedures in response to issues identified during the 2023 impeachment process. The measures would clarify constitutional and statutory impeachment authority, require sworn testimony, extend review periods for House members, address conflicts of interest and presiding officers, require cost reporting, and modify rules for impeaching the governor or lieutenant governor. A committee substitute added protections for the accused, longer review periods, and a fallback presiding-officer option. Witnesses generally supported stronger accountability but raised questions about whether the language should also cover retired or visiting judges. Both measures were left pending after testimony. The committee also heard Senate Bill 1577, which would expand Texas Motor Speedway’s alcohol sales authority to include distilled spirits and remove certain event and concession limits; the Speedway’s representative supported the bill and it was left pending. Later, the committee heard Senate Concurrent Resolution 42 and Senate Bill 240, which would recognize only two sexes and restrict access to sex-designated private spaces in public facilities based on biological sex. Supporters argued the measures were needed to protect women’s privacy and safety, including in schools and shelters, while opponents warned about enforcement problems, privacy concerns, and impacts on transgender Texans and others who do not fit stereotypical sex traits. After extensive testimony, both measures were left pending. The committee then took up multiple pending bills and reported several favorably, including SB 511, SB 33, SB 510, SB 871, SB 2024, SB 2166, SJR 27, SJR 40, SB 1313, SB 1314, SB 1316, SB 1541, SB 2420, SB 1999, SB 2309, SB 1860, and SB 2429, with some also certified for the local and uncontested calendar.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Apr 2nd, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • CECO has full authority to adopt energy, water, high performance building code standards for state funded
  • buildings, and the ability to implement the latest energy codes for the International Code Council.EECO
  • Residential Code.
  • So if there's something crazy in those codes that doesn't work for Texas, they can amend that code.
  • It amends the Texas Education code to add sections specifically addressing anti-Semitic motivations and
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs Apr 2nd, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Hotel occupancy taxes under the Texas Tax Code Section 351.004 remain unaffected.
  • Restaurants comply with health codes. Home-based businesses get...
  • And so it has to do with the section two with the date January 1st, 2027.
  • I serve as the managing partner of Code Concepts Group, where my partner and I...
  • Following that code, these systems should be safe.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Boards, Agencies and Commissions Committee Feb 12th, 2025

Boards, Agencies and Commissions

Transcript Highlights:
  • educational institution governed..." ...by a Board of Trustees or other similar governing body pursuant to section
  • This section relates to criminal penalties, removes reference to $1,000, and clarifies the penalty language
  • On line 726 of page 26, this section addresses issues number three and five.