Video & Transcript Research : 'conforming changes'

Page 4 of 500
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Members wishing to vote or change their vote, the chair is preparing to close.
  • Members wishing to vote or change their vote, the chair is preparing to close. Call the vote.
  • Any members wishing to vote or change your vote, chair is preparing to close.
  • Any members wishing to vote or change your vote, chair is preparing to close.
  • Any members wish to vote or change your vote, chair is preparing to close.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Members wishing to vote or change their vote, the chair is preparing to close.
  • Heffner Kennedy, I Members, if you have voted or changed your vote, the chair is preparing to close.
  • Urbs Members, if you vote or change the vote Members, voter changed their vote.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs Apr 2nd, 2025

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • These things change, what, every six months?
  • Well, I have only seen some changes. on social media.
  • And the bill has not changed its principle.
  • Let me get that changed.
  • Wen Chang. Okay. All right.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate County and Municipal Government Committee Jan 14th, 2026

County and Municipal Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • I wanted to note a change in our vice chairman, Senator Hovie. This is going to be fun.
  • So, we're not changing the distribution up the way the bill was...
  • . change. change.
  • And now with the bus driver issue, this really doesn't change what they can make.
  • All we're doing is changing the number that they can make now from 38— is it 40?
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate Judiciary Committee Jan 28th, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • bearing on the changes. bearing on the changes.
  • It doesn't change any of that.
  • It doesn't change any of that.
  • And I'm assuming that was some changes?
  • And I'm assuming that was some changes?
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Health and Welfare May 19th, 2026

Health and Welfare

Transcript Highlights:
  • I changed it to a task force.
  • On line eight, we would change 12 to 11, and on line 10, we'd change 13 to 12.
  • People's opinions change. The way things are done changes.
  • It was just a big change quickly.
  • And that happens oftentimes because there's change in administration, there's change in appropriations
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • I mean they change. Thank you. Seeing no further questions, do I have a motion?
  • What that does is it says for purposes of this bill, we are excusing ourselves from OLA by changing the
  • These changes are moving the mandatory.
  • just curious or I guess I'm concerned that if we don't have enough people, no matter how much we change
  • that we haven't made in changes that are later in policy.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part II) Sep 4th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part III) Sep 2nd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • That's a lot of cleanup, a lot of changes, and yet... ...they all marched this bill through here, marched
  • suggesting that the legislative process, where hearings are held and witnesses testify and bills change
  • This will not change anything that has occurred with regard to any type of files or documents involved
  • Again, this would not change anything that occurred in Uvalde.
  • My last question is this: the McLaughlin amendment, there was a motion to change the table.
AZ
Transcript Highlights:
  • And every year we have the conformity legislation, where we adopt or decouple from the changes that were
  • It is full conformity with the three changes directing the tax savings that the governor criticized because
  • Lewis, we put it in there because it's a policy decision on whether we conform to this change of the
  • Chair, Senator Mesnard, yes, and that was conforming to just all the changes, both above the line and
  • Chair, Senator Mesnard, yes, and that was conforming to just all the changes, both above the line and
Keywords: 1182, all
Summary: The joint House Ways and Means and Senate Finance committees met to hear identical conformity bills, HB 2153 and SB 1106, which would align Arizona tax law with the federal Internal Revenue Code as of Jan. 1, 2026, including some retroactive provisions for tax year 2025. Staff explained that the bills would exclude three federal provisions: the higher federal SALT deduction, the new senior deduction as written in H.R. 1, and the deduction for interest on new car loans. They would instead include a $6,000 retirement-income deduction for taxpayers age 60 and older, a $6,000 Roth IRA contribution deduction, a higher dependent tax credit, and a deduction for child and dependent care expenses above the federal credit. JLBC estimated the package would reduce general fund income tax revenue by about $441.3 million in FY 2026. Members also discussed that the Department of Revenue’s forms had been issued assuming full conformity, and staff and supporters argued the bills were needed quickly to avoid confusion and amended returns during filing season. Committee members and sponsors largely framed the bills as tax relief and a way to provide certainty for taxpayers and preparers. Supporters said the package would help families, seniors, and workers, and noted that the Arizona version was negotiated to keep the overall tax relief roughly comparable to full conformity while shifting benefits away from the SALT deduction and toward child credits, retirement income, and child care. The sponsors also criticized the governor’s executive action and urged prompt passage so taxpayers would know how to file. Opponents argued the bills would reduce state revenue, worsen the budget outlook, and disproportionately benefit higher-income taxpayers and corporations. Several witnesses and members also raised concerns about the child care deduction, the retirement-income deduction, and the business expensing provisions, while supporters responded that the bill was designed to help working families and encourage saving and investment. Public testimony was mixed. The Arizona Society of Certified Public Accountants and the Arizona Free Enterprise Club supported the bills, emphasizing early conformity, filing certainty, and reduced confusion for taxpayers and software providers. Opponents included Save Our Schools Arizona, the Arizona Center for Economic Progress, Opportunity Arizona, and several individuals, who argued the package would deepen budget problems and favor the wealthy. One witness objected to a federal school-choice-related provision she said was being tied to the bill, though committee members said the measure before them was a tax conformity bill and not a school finance bill. The hearing included extended debate over the fiscal impact, the governor’s prior requests for some of the same tax changes, and whether taxpayers would need to file amended returns if the legislature later changed course. The transcript ends during testimony from NFIB, with no final committee vote or action shown in the excerpt.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 2/25/26

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • we'll call mechanical conformed items. we'll call mechanical conformed items.
  • don't conform to federal uh rules. don't conform to federal uh rules.
  • from income if we conformed. from income if we conformed.
  • There is, if there is a cost for conforming to the SALT changes in OBBBA, if Minnesota creates a standalone
  • to the salt is a cost for um conforming to the salt um<00:59:24.000> changes<00:59:24.480>
Bills: HR1, HF387
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Taxes - 02/18/26

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • 2025, introduces changes that Minnesota does<00:16:18.880> not<00:16:19.040> conform<00
  • Current Minnesota law requires a non-conformity adjustment to change all domestic research elections
  • <00:19:50.720> change<00:19:51.039> all non-conformity adjustment. change all non-conformity
  • of<00:46:50.400> conformity conformities uh out of conformity conformities uh out of conformity
  • . conformity. conformity.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Mar 27th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • Amortization is a process whereby a municipality changes the zoning in an area in which a legal conforming
  • The bill also allows a person to resume a non-conforming use within five years if the person changes
  • For a zoning change, that would make something non-conforming?
  • Areas change over time.
  • the non-conforming use.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/04/2026 - House Ways & Means

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • It fully conforms to the Trump tax cuts.
  • with the changes to the federal adjusted gross income, or are we going to decouple on any of those changes
  • You didn't change a thing.
  • It can't pay for the tax conformity deal. It can't pay for her tax conformity bill.
  • So what we're doing now is conforming to part of the 2022 law and conforming to parts of H.R. 1, putting
Summary: The committee first heard House Bill 2785, a tax conformity measure that would update Arizona statutes to conform to the Internal Revenue Code as of January 1, 2026, including retroactive provisions for tax year 2025. The sponsor and supporters said the bill would align state law with tax forms already issued by the Department of Revenue, provide certainty to filers, and deliver about $440 million in tax relief through provisions such as no tax on tips and overtime, a larger standard deduction, and a $6,000 senior deduction. Opponents argued the bill would significantly reduce state revenue, disproportionately benefit higher-income taxpayers, and should be considered alongside a broader budget plan. After debate and an amendment addressing retroactivity and foreign dividends, the committee approved HB 2785 on a 5-4 vote. The committee then took up several Arizona State Retirement System and education savings bills. HB 2089 clarified the health insurance premium benefit subsidy for retirees and passed unanimously. HB 2090 changed the disability determination period for long-term disability benefits from 24 months within a five-year period to a straight 24-month period and passed 8-1. HB 2092 allowed employees over age 65 to waive ARS participation within 30 days of becoming eligible and also passed 8-1. HB 2477 conformed Arizona’s 529 education savings plan to federal law, including expanded uses and a permanent rollover to ABLE accounts and Roth IRAs; testimony supported the cleanup and simplification, but some members raised concerns about the Roth rollover and possible use of transferred ESA funds. HB 2477 passed 5-3 with one present vote, and the committee then adjourned.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/05/2026 - Senate Finance

Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • January 1, 2026, to reflect changes adopted by the U.S.
  • The amendment removes the conformity provision, so it doesn't include any of the business changes that
  • You just changed your income from cash to a big thing.
  • Our bill before did not include conformity on SALT.
  • So we should not conform to all of these things.
Bills: SB1638
Summary: The Senate Finance Committee took up SB 1638, a tax conformity bill that would update Arizona’s tax code to the Internal Revenue Code as of January 1, 2026 and incorporate federal changes from 2025. The bill also included individual income tax subtractions for tips, overtime, seniors, and auto loan interest, along with changes to the standard deduction and charitable contribution deduction. Committee discussion focused heavily on whether Arizona should conform broadly to federal changes or limit the bill to more targeted, temporary provisions. Two amendments were considered. The chair’s amendment was described as clarifying only, addressing retroactivity and foreign dividend language, and it was adopted. Senator Epstein’s amendment would have removed the broader conformity provisions and the modified charitable deduction, limited the standard deduction change to tax year 2025, and kept the individual subtractions; she argued the business-related conformity items mainly benefited corporations and should be negotiated in the budget. Opponents said the amendment would create unnecessary recalculations and uncertainty for taxpayers and businesses, while supporters of the underlying bill said conformity was needed quickly to match Department of Revenue forms and avoid filing-season confusion. Epstein’s amendment failed. Public testimony split along similar lines. Business and tax group representatives supported prompt conformity, saying taxpayers and small businesses needed certainty and that the department’s forms should be codified. Opponents argued the bill would reduce state revenue substantially and mainly benefit higher-income taxpayers and corporations, while diverting money from education, child care, and health care. After debate, the committee voted to move SB 1638 as amended with a do-pass recommendation, passing it by about 4-3, and then adjourned.