Video & Transcript Research : 'cold case'

Page 4 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Environmental Regulation Apr 17th, 2025

Environmental Regulation

Transcript Highlights:
  • Also seeing cases similar to affecting cattle, horses, and other ranch animals.
  • It's also the case that in some cases, some of these permits have conventional information.
  • So, in this case, our process is with the contested case hearing, so we're not objecting. to the fact
  • It's more on the contested case hearing process that would go to a judge. Making sure that the.
  • There are, I wouldn't characterize them as delays, time in the contested case hearing part.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 3/25/25

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • It also allows DCT to review situations on a case-by-case basis to determine if a downward adjustment
  • It also allows DCT to review situations on a case-by-case basis to determine if a downward adjustment
  • I can tell you that in some cases it was pretty extreme.
  • Peter to address that greatest need, which does mean in some cases people who have that lower acuity
  • need which does mean in some cases need which does mean in some cases people<00:42:19.599> who
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Human Services Mar 11th, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • , it just doesn't flow like it's supposed to, and, and in some cases it would, in many cases, it would
  • Is, is the question, um, the, the child, it's not a DFPS case?
  • In these particular cases, these, these statutes that this bill is addressing.
  • And then I I had an open CPS case and then once that case was closed, I became informal.
  • It was a Massachusetts case. The child had been removed to Massachusetts.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Apr 8th, 2025

Alabama House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • employees, they're they're covered like employees, they're they're covered like a typical workers comp case
  • Yes. a typical workers comp case. Yes. Yes. a typical workers comp case. Yes. Yes. Okay. Thank you.
  • in assists investigators and prosecutors in assists investigators and prosecutors in building their cases
  • against dangerous building their cases against dangerous building their cases against dangerous individuals
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session Apr 8th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • But in this particular case, again, it's an executive agency that would be looking at all of the rules
  • They've seen, in some cases, up to seven times quicker. Think about that.
  • this state, we have here in Texas allowed for sanctioned blood money, for hush money in these awful cases
  • method of compensation. that they would like to promote, and that would be subject to a contested case
  • In all these cases.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Human Services Mar 18th, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • I was assisting other deaf clients with disabilities to work on their cases.
  • Those screeners will use intake processes, case files, their colleagues, child protective services, juvenile
  • They use known data that are in their case files, and it is not meant to be a one-time assessment.
  • They thought that we were going to screen everybody, but it, but it's that's not the case.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Committee Meeting - 2025-04-01

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • It happens in many cases in the case that we're trying to address, State v. Johnson.
  • We were concerned about resources and the number of cases.
  • A case of wage theft to the county attorney's office.
  • Types of cases.
  • Prosecutors are trying to look into the case.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 4/1/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • It happens in many cases. In the case that we're trying to address, State v.
  • It happens in many cases. In the case that we're trying to address, State v.
  • It happens in many cases. In the case that we're trying to address, State v.
  • Uh in the case that we're many cases.
  • of cases.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/04/2026 - Senate Government

Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Currently, we refer fraudulent claims for prosecution, but not ineligible cases.
  • Chair, Senator Kuby, I think, again, we would have to look at the individual case-by-case terms of the
  • And we found out what the reason why was in that case.
  • That is just not the case.
  • So let's just talk from a cold, solely economic point of view.
Summary: The committee first heard SB 1036, which would tighten unemployment insurance eligibility by requiring five weekly work-search actions, weekly reporting to DES, cross-checks against outside data sets before payment, and employer reporting when former employees refuse work or return-to-work offers. The sponsor and supporters said the bill is aimed at reducing fraud and overpayments and encouraging faster reemployment, while DES said it was neutral but warned of implementation costs, added workload, and possible impacts on apprenticeship programs and appeals. After a technical amendment was adopted, the bill received a do-pass as amended recommendation on a 4-3 vote. The committee then considered SB 1054, a strike-everything amendment dealing with city and town emergency measures. The bill would make local emergency ordinances and resolutions subject to referendum, with a 30-day filing window and a ballot vote determining whether the measure remains in effect. Mayors and council members from Payson testified in support, describing repeated use of emergency clauses to pass tax and bond measures and arguing the practice undermines the constitutional referendum right; the League of Arizona Cities and Towns opposed the bill, saying it would defeat the purpose of emergency powers and slow city responses to true crises. The committee adopted the amendment and gave the bill a do-pass as amended recommendation on a 4-2 vote. Next, SCR 1022 was heard, proposing to increase the House from 60 to 90 members, with three House districts nested within each Senate district, subject to voter approval and delayed applicability. The sponsor argued the change would improve representation by reducing the number of constituents per legislator and make Arizona more in line with other states; some members raised concerns about cost, logistics, and the need for more study, while one public witness strongly supported the measure. After adopting an amendment delaying implementation from 2033 to 2043, the resolution received a do-pass as amended recommendation on a 5-2 vote. The committee also approved SB 1271, which would bar municipalities from penalizing businesses based on the number of emergency-service calls or the value of stolen or damaged property, with exceptions for malicious, knowingly false, or frivolous calls. Supporters said the bill protects businesses from being discouraged from calling 911, and the Goldwater Institute said it would preserve access to emergency services while still allowing action on false alarms; the bill passed 6-1. SB 1437, requiring public records to be provided in the least expensive manner possible and electronically when requested, also passed unanimously after testimony from Goldwater about high fees and delays for electronic records. Finally, the committee began hearing SB 1439, a strike-everything amendment creating a Conservative Grassroots Network special license plate and fund, but the transcript cuts off before testimony or action on that item.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • And if that's the case, then that means that other providers, which be social workers, which would be
  • And if that's the case, then that means that other providers, which be social workers, which would be
  • And if that's the case, then that means that other providers, which be social workers, which would be
  • Um, we have other cases cited in our testimony.
  • We do have the auditor’s report, which says that it is supportive in cases of medical necessity.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on SB 2047, relating to pharmacy benefit managers. The Insurance Division said the bill would require new enforcement resources and estimated an appropriation of about $1.5 million and five positions. Kaiser Permanente asked for an amendment to exclude HMOs from the definition of third-party PBMs, saying the bill should not interfere with integrated care models. PCMA and the Hawaii Pharmacist Association supported narrowing amendments, with pharmacists objecting to section 3 and warning the bill as amended could create major operational burdens and a significant general fund cost. No vote was taken in the portion provided, and the chair moved on to the next measure after questions. The committee then took up SB 2080, which would allow Hawaii to join the psychology interjurisdictional compact. Supporters, including DCR, the Hawaii Association of Health Plans, the Hawaii State Association of Counties, the Grassroot Institute, and others, said the compact would expand access to psychology services, especially for people in rural areas or those needing continuity of care while traveling. Opponents, including the Board of Psychology and a Shamanad University psychology professor, raised concerns about client safety, crisis-response procedures, enforcement costs, FBI background checks, and possible loss of state control over training and specialization standards. The board said Hawaii’s current 1,900-hour internship/postdoc requirement is higher than the compact’s standard and that the state is still implementing a separate provisional licensing law that may address some access issues. The discussion focused on whether the compact would meaningfully reduce shortages and whether Hawaii should instead pursue changes within its existing licensing system. Finally, the committee heard SB 2277 on hospital price transparency. The Office of Consumer Protection initially noted the bill could require significant staffing, but later testimony from SHIP suggested the measure could be handled more simply by working with the Healthcare Association of Hawaii and publicly posting violations. The Healthcare Association of Hawaii opposed the bill, arguing hospitals already must comply with federal CMS transparency rules and that adding state requirements would increase costs and legal exposure, especially if violations were treated as unfair or deceptive trade practices. Steve Fenberg testified in support, saying the bill would simply codify existing federal requirements in state law and that he was open to amendments removing state enforcement and the unfair trade practice language. No final action was taken in the excerpt provided.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 3/5/26

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • But there is a gap in current federal statutes and case law.
  • ,<00:32:20.159> we you know, I feel like in this case, we you know, I feel like in this case
  • Um so I think that if you would case.
  • He said he had a representative there in case there were questions.
  • here in case there are any<01:37:02.960> questions.
Summary: The committee first attempted to approve minutes from February 24 and March 3, but members identified multiple spelling errors in names, so approval was held and the motion withdrawn. The committee then took up House File 3477, a bill by Representative Long proposing a civil remedy for constitutional violations by government actors, including federal actors. An author’s amendment (A4) was adopted to remove a subdivision and clarify retroactivity. In discussion, members raised concerns about Supremacy Clause and immigration-related issues; the author responded that the bill applies evenly to state and federal actors and is meant to enforce constitutional rights, not immigration law. After debate, the motion to re-refer the bill to the general register failed on a 6-7 vote, with one member excused. The committee next heard House File 3480, authored by Representative Howard, which would commission an independent economic impact study of Operation Metro Surge. An A2 amendment was adopted to add a dollar amount for the study and clarify timing. Representative Howard said the study would help the legislature understand statewide impacts and noted reported harm to businesses, child care, schools, and local governments. Testimony in support came from Laura Santiago, reading a statement from Christopher Gomez of Willmar, who described ICE agents entering his family’s restaurant, the detention and deportation of family members, and resulting business losses. Rachel Ser, Minneapolis emergency management director, cited a preliminary city assessment estimating major impacts including food insecurity, lost wages, business revenue losses, hotel cancellations, and rental assistance needs. Some members questioned the cost and usefulness of the study, while others said suburban and greater Minnesota communities also wanted the data. The transcript ends during continued discussion of the bill.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate Education Policy Committee Feb 11th, 2026

Education Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • with you know that some of the realities or maybe it needs to be certain age groups that that's the case
  • c><00:02:00.000> that<00:02:00.320> that's<00:02:00.560> the<00:02:00.799> case
  • certain age groups that that's the case certain age groups that that's the case because<00:02:02.320
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee 3/18/25

Public Safety Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:30:38.279> we<00:30:38.440> do this particular case we do this particular case
  • Well, in that case, sure.
  • <00:54:14.920> are sure that sexual assault uh cases are sure that sexual assault uh cases
  • <00:57:04.520> that criminal sexual conduct case that criminal sexual conduct case that occurred
  • <00:57:43.400> with better handle these type of cases with better handle these type of cases
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

HSH Public Hearing - Tue Feb 3, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST

Human Services & Homelessness

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, we've already had discussions with the re-entry group and facilitating that work with the case managers
  • So, we've already had discussions with the re-entry group and facilitating that work with the case managers
  • , skyrocketing, and in some cases, skyrocketing, and in some cases, insurance<01:06:24.920> is
  • And so, you know, it's things like that where insurance has to gauge towards the worst-case scenario.
  • has to gauge towards the worst-case has to gauge towards the worst-case scenario.<01:16:57.400><
Summary: The committee opened its first meeting of the 2020 session and heard testimony on several measures, beginning with HB 1518, which would allow people incarcerated and nearing release to apply for SNAP benefits before release. The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and the Department of Human Services said they support the bill and are already piloting a pre-release application process at two facilities, with plans to expand it. The Attorney General’s Office supported the intent but noted a technical issue: one section of the bill appears to affect TANF as well as SNAP, while the title refers only to SNAP. A wide range of advocates, including Catholic Charities, the Hawaii Public Health Institute, Hawaii Hunger Action Network, Drug Policy Forum of Hawaii, Hawaii Children’s Action Network, ACLU of Hawaii, and others, testified in strong support, emphasizing food insecurity after release, reentry stability, and reduced recidivism. The committee did not take a vote during the hearing. The committee then heard HB 1747, which would direct the Department of Human Services to seek federal waivers or extensions related to restricting certain SNAP purchases, including sugary drinks. DHS said it had already been approved for a narrow demonstration waiver and was working with retailers on implementation, with a target date of August 1. Supporters of the measure argued it would promote healthier choices, while opponents, including Hawaii Appleseed, the Hawaii Public Health Institute, Hawaii Children’s Action Network, and the Hawaii Food Industry Association, said such restrictions are ineffective, stigmatize low-income residents, create burdens for retailers and DHS, and may be difficult to implement. Members asked DHS to clarify the scope of the waiver and confirmed it applies to sugary drinks and beverages containing more than 10 grams of sugar. Finally, the committee took up HB 1705, which would allow licensed mental health counselors to serve as child custody evaluators, but there was no testimony from the relevant agencies and the item was quickly set aside. The committee also heard HB 1565, which would establish a judiciary working group to improve family court processes and legal representation for youth in the child welfare system. The Attorney General’s Office offered minor technical amendments, and supporters from the Office of Wellness and Resilience, High Hopes Hawaii, Hawaii Children’s Action Network, and a social work student described the need for legal representation, citing better reunification and stability outcomes and the importance of youth voice in court proceedings. No votes or final actions were taken in the portion of the meeting provided.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/28/2026 - House Judiciary

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's personally, I've seen personal cases here in Arizona, and it's happening every day.
  • And then, tragically, in some cases, we know that it will lead to suicide.
  • In the case of the passenger of the motor vehicle, In the case of the passenger of the motor vehicle,
  • This case shed light on this law, and this is how it became unconstitutionally vague.
  • This case shed light on this law and this is how it became unconstitutionally vague.
Summary: The Judiciary Committee heard and advanced several bills. HB 2763 would require legislative approval before the Arizona Game and Fish Commission could close a state-run shooting range. Supporters, including the sponsor, a Prescott doctor, gun-rights advocates, and Game and Fish, argued that range closures can push shooting into unsafe desert areas and that the legislature should have a voice; the bill passed 8-1. HB 2417 would let courts, at a defendant’s request, use speed-inhibiting devices instead of license suspension for certain speeding and racing offenses. The sponsor and supporters said it would help people keep working and reduce recidivism, while an Arizona Trucking Association representative warned the bill was overbroad and conflicted with federal law; the committee adopted an amendment and passed the bill 7-2. HB 2345 created a felony for unlawfully present persons possessing falsified CDLs and imposed vehicle forfeiture and employer penalties; trucking industry testimony said it was preempted by federal law and unenforceable, but the sponsor said he would keep working on it, and the bill passed 5-3 with one present after amendment. The committee also considered HB 2666, which increases penalties for sexual extortion involving victims ages 15-17. The sponsor and supporters from the anti-trafficking community and county attorney’s office said the bill responds to a serious and growing online exploitation problem affecting teens. Defense and juvenile-justice concerns focused on whether the bill could sweep in minors, create mandatory consecutive sentences, and fail to account for age-related defenses; the sponsor and supporters said they were open to discussing amendments, but the bill passed 8-0 with one present. HB 2175 would add political expression and political affiliation to Arizona’s bias-crime sentencing enhancements and create new misdemeanor-level enhancements for certain bias-motivated offenses. The sponsor, ADL, and county attorney’s office said it fills gaps and targets conduct, not speech; the ACLU and defense testimony warned it could chill speech and give prosecutors too much discretion. The bill passed 6-2 after amendment. HB 2186 would allow a passenger in a traffic stop to satisfy identity requirements by verbally providing name and date of birth rather than producing physical ID. The sponsor said it was meant to fix an unconstitutional-vagueness problem and clarify the law after a prior court issue; there was little opposition, and it passed 7-0 with one present. The committee also began hearing HB 2364, which would add penalties for distributing or receiving abortion-inducing drugs by courier, delivery, or rail service; the sponsor said it would strengthen enforcement of existing Arizona restrictions, but the transcript cuts off before testimony, debate, or any vote on that bill.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Children and Families Finance and Policy Committee 3/19/25

Children and Families Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • This time the judge ruled that a CPS case should be opened against us.
  • We are lucky to have two very dedicated case managers.
  • One who very dedicated case managers.
  • Significant aspects of my case could have been changed for the better.
  • <01:47:04.719> and the ongoing injustices in my case and the ongoing injustices in my case
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Health and Human Services REVISED Apr 20th, 2026 at 02:00 pm

Health and Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • As I mentioned, every committee, but in case you forgot, please put your cellphones on silent or vibrate
  • Those cases have resulted in respiratory issues, seizure-like symptoms, and often emergency hospitalizations
  • Members, House Bill 4275 will allow case Senator McIntosh, Senator Nice, Senator Pugh, Senator Reinhart
  • There have been some cases where children have actually been removed from their homes.