Video & Transcript Research : 'commission rules'

Page 47 of 500
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Natural Resources May 21st, 2026

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Commission to no longer allow anyone to harvest these over-slot redfish.
  • As it stands, the commission is a statutorily sole authority over WMA rules. Yes, sir.
  • Uh, 2022, the commission did APA rulemaking.
  • Uh, 2022, the commission did APA rulemaking.
  • We let the rule go through, if I remember right.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Business and Insurance 2ND REVISED Apr 16th, 2026 at 09:30 am

Business and Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • I think the tax commission will love this because it's just easier.
  • This is my 3rd term on the athletic commission.
  • And many of you know Brandon Labe, who's at the Abbel Commission.
  • He has served on the athletic commission for a number of years.
  • I was an inspector for the commission for 10 years.
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

House Legislative Session Day 59 (4-14-26) - Part 1

Kentucky House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Free speech has time, place, and manner rules.
  • Free speech has time, place, and manner rules.
  • The Kentucky Commission on Women has never had an appropriation.
  • Uh, second had to do with following federal rules.
  • be taken from the committee on rules be taken from the committee on rules placed<01:43:28.239>
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Energy Finance and Policy Committee 3/26/26

Energy Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • And secondly, that the public utility demonstrates to the Public Utilities Commission that more than
  • :39.760> than<00:09:39.880> 3%<00:09:40.520> of<00:09:40.720> their Commission
  • that more than 3% of their Commission that more than 3% of their current<00:09:41.280> retail
  • may<00:21:08.680> modify<00:21:09.240> or<00:21:09.360> delay says the commission
  • may modify or delay says the commission may modify or delay the<00:21:09.840> implementation<
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/25/2026 - House Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • Same rules apply: we'll have three minutes, or two minutes, three minutes each.
  • After three years, they have ruled that China...
  • I think, according to House rules, any point of order—if you have a protest, House Rule 20—you can write
  • It renames the IRC to the Fair and Independent Redistricting Commission, prohibits the commission from
  • now is that think the big flaw in our redistricting Commission now is the Commission on Appellate Court
Summary: The committee first heard a lengthy presentation and discussion focused on Arizona State University’s foreign research ties, especially collaborations and funding connected to China and Chinese military-affiliated institutions. The presenter argued that ASU and the Arizona Board of Regents had not been transparent about foreign gifts, contracts, and research partnerships, citing federal reporting forms, the Wolf Amendment, export-control concerns, and alleged links to dual-use technologies such as quantum systems, AI, robotics, microelectronics, and biosecurity. A witness from American Global Strategies testified in support, saying the bill would help protect U.S. research security and national security by imposing state-level guardrails on sensitive collaborations. After questions, the committee considered a strike-everything amendment to SB 1060 that would bar public universities from entering into or continuing certain loans, gifts, contracts, research partnerships, or sponsored projects involving the PRC, the CCP, and listed Chinese military-linked universities, require ABOR review and approval, and impose reporting and budget penalties. The amendment was withdrawn, and the committee instead took up SB 1327, which directs ABOR to require university research security policies and to report annually on those policies and on foreign contributions over $250,000; SB 1327 received a 4-2 do-pass recommendation, with Del Santos, Hernandez, and Márquez voting no and Kolodin, Powell, Keshel, and Gillette voting yes. The committee then heard SB 1803, a veterans bill regulating unrecognized persons who assist with VA disability claims. The sponsor and industry witnesses said the bill would protect veterans from bad actors by requiring disclosures, capping fees, banning certain practices, and filing service agreements with the Attorney General, while opponents argued it could restrict consumer choice, resemble a price ceiling, and still allow non-attorneys to engage in the unauthorized practice of law. After extensive debate over contingent fees, legal ethics, and whether the bill was too favorable to one company, the committee continued the hearing with additional testimony and questions.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/17/2026 - House Commerce

Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • And it ensures localities follow their own rules.
  • Well, how do you think the city and the county are going to rule? ...or the county?
  • Well, how do you think the city and the county are going to rule on a ruling that they already made?
  • Nollan versus the California Coastal Commission required an essential nexus.
  • California Coastal Commission required an essential nexus.
Summary: The committee heard Senate Bill 1566, which would prohibit municipalities and counties from maliciously delaying licensing, permits, or approvals, authorize the Attorney General to enforce the prohibition, and provide expedited judicial review. The sponsor said the bill is intended to address affordability by preventing intentional government delays in housing and business approvals. County representatives supported the goal but opposed the bill as drafted, arguing the county language differed from the city/town language and could sweep in ordinary processing delays or incomplete applications; the sponsor said a floor amendment would fix the county language. Testimony from supporters described long permit and parcel-number delays and argued the bill would give applicants a remedy against intentional obstruction. The committee recommended the bill do pass by a 7-3 vote, with one present and one absent. The committee then heard Senate Bill 1787, which would require written notice for exactions imposed on development projects, allow individualized determinations, and create an appeal path including judicial review. The sponsor framed it as a takings and affordability measure to stop unrelated or excessive exactions from being imposed on housing projects. Cities and counties opposed the bill, saying existing law already requires nexus and proportionality, already provides an appeal process, and that the bill would create a duplicative Attorney General review and confusion, especially for mixed-use projects. Supporters, including Pacific Legal Foundation, the Home Builders Association, and a homeowner who described a costly infrastructure demand on her property, argued the bill would curb extortionate demands and make the process fairer. The committee passed the bill 7-2 with one present and one absent. Senate Bill 1478, a liquor-regulation cleanup bill, was also heard and received broad support. The measure makes technical changes to liquor statutes, including clarifying interim permits, repealing a federal food-safety preemption provision, and updating definitions such as cider and production terminology. Industry stakeholders said the bill was the product of months of consensus work and mostly technical corrections. It passed unanimously, 10-0. Finally, the committee heard Senate Bill 1431, which would limit municipal control over home design features and prohibit certain required shared amenities that would necessitate HOA maintenance. The sponsor and supporters argued the bill would reduce housing costs by preventing subjective aesthetic mandates and unnecessary HOA-driven requirements, while opponents from cities and neighborhood groups warned it would undermine local control, crime-prevention design standards, neighborhood character, and quality. Home builders and property-rights advocates said the bill would expand consumer choice and reduce costs, while critics argued it could lead to lower-quality housing and remove local recourse. The bill was not reported out in the portion provided, and testimony continued with no final vote shown.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 3/5/26

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:45:54.800> to requirements to this commission to requirements to this commission to include
  • <00:46:49.680> looking<00:46:50.079> at commission is specific to looking at commission
  • > on<00:47:31.200> data the legislative commission on data the legislative commission on
  • are under the rules of the House here. are under the rules of the House here.
  • the rules of the house. the rules of the house.
Summary: The committee first attempted to approve minutes from February 24 and March 3, but members identified multiple spelling errors in names, so approval was held and the motion withdrawn. The committee then took up House File 3477, a bill by Representative Long proposing a civil remedy for constitutional violations by government actors, including federal actors. An author’s amendment (A4) was adopted to remove a subdivision and clarify retroactivity. In discussion, members raised concerns about Supremacy Clause and immigration-related issues; the author responded that the bill applies evenly to state and federal actors and is meant to enforce constitutional rights, not immigration law. After debate, the motion to re-refer the bill to the general register failed on a 6-7 vote, with one member excused. The committee next heard House File 3480, authored by Representative Howard, which would commission an independent economic impact study of Operation Metro Surge. An A2 amendment was adopted to add a dollar amount for the study and clarify timing. Representative Howard said the study would help the legislature understand statewide impacts and noted reported harm to businesses, child care, schools, and local governments. Testimony in support came from Laura Santiago, reading a statement from Christopher Gomez of Willmar, who described ICE agents entering his family’s restaurant, the detention and deportation of family members, and resulting business losses. Rachel Ser, Minneapolis emergency management director, cited a preliminary city assessment estimating major impacts including food insecurity, lost wages, business revenue losses, hotel cancellations, and rental assistance needs. Some members questioned the cost and usefulness of the study, while others said suburban and greater Minnesota communities also wanted the data. The transcript ends during continued discussion of the bill.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Aeronautics and Transportation Feb 23rd, 2026 at 10:00 am

Aeronautics and Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • gonna reference page 10, starting at line 11, where it says that Service Oklahoma shall promulgate the Rules
  • Required or is that just gonna be dependent on the rules that Service Oklahoma promulgates?
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Judiciary Feb 11th, 2026 at 05:05 pm

House Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • So I'd like the idea of a salary commission, something I think about.
  • Frank Zubia, with the New Mexico Crime Victims Reparation Commission, Director.
  • Again, Frank Zubia, Director for the New Mexico Crime Victims Reparation Commission.
  • So I wish I had my rule person... I believe I'm hoping it is a friendly amendment.
  • So I wish I had my rule person over here. How do we amend a committee substitute?
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WAL Public Hearing - Tue Feb 10, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST

Water & Land

Transcript Highlights:
  • use commission. use commission.
  • , >> for the chair of the lanes commission, >> for the chair of the lanes commission,
  • to send to the land use commission. to send to the land use commission.
  • evidence and explain to the commission evidence and explain to the commission why<00:51:39.599><
  • . commission. commission.
Summary: The committee on Water and Land met on February 10, 2026, with Chair Mark Hashem outlining strict testimony rules and noting a time constraint because of later hearings and floor session obligations. The committee then took up several bills, hearing mostly supportive testimony on HB 1881 relating to land use, HB 2218 relating to DLNR/community management, and HB 1956 relating to freshwater waves, while HB 1845 relating to the Land Use Commission drew legal concerns and opposition. HB 2151 relating to building materials had no substantive testimony presented in the excerpt, and the committee moved through it quickly. On HB 1881, testimony focused on protecting North Shore lands from overdevelopment. A supporter described the area as valuable precisely because it remains largely undeveloped, and a member asked whether the bill’s restrictions on “finculars” would affect existing or future private residential installations; the response suggested the bill was aimed at future commercial uses and that grandfathering or personal-use exceptions might be possible, but the exact wording would need legal refinement. HB 2218 received broad support from OHA, DLNR, Kua, Sierra Club, Hui Maka Aana, the Honlay Initiative, and others, who said the measure would expand community-based co-management across DLNR divisions, build on existing park partnerships, and produce real benefits such as better stewardship, safer access, local jobs, and stronger community trust. Members asked about the bill’s five-year review structure, how multiple community groups would be handled, and whether the model could apply to ocean or nearshore areas; DLNR said the board would retain authority, agreements would be non-exclusive and subject to review, and the department was still working through how the approach would function across different divisions and marine settings. For HB 1956, the Attorney General offered technical comments, urging clearer definitions of “residing” and “freshwater way,” clearer timing for citations and arrests, and more explicit procedural safeguards and agency roles. On HB 1845, the Attorney General and Land Use Commission raised concerns that the bill could conflict with constitutional protections for important agricultural lands and could not be reconciled with existing voting requirements; the LUC also said commissioners cannot vote by proxy under sunshine law and warned that the bill could allow too few commissioners to approve major boundary changes. Members questioned how the bill would work in counties without designated important agricultural lands, and the LUC explained that Kauai is the only county to have completed the IAL process, while the broader statutory process remains county-driven and has been the subject of litigation. No votes or final committee actions were taken in the excerpt.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Natural Resources May 21st, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate Bill 2440 also required the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to establish a form and
  • Senate Bill 1855 requires TCEQ to establish by rule what constitutes credible evidence of groundwater
  • It's not mentioned anywhere else insta in the statute, NTCEQ rules. We actually, I.
  • Uh, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality has been very cooperative working with these districts
AL
Transcript Highlights:
  • When they're fully funded, it would provide millions of dollars for County roads and the county commission
  • If the resort project has not provided billions to the county commission, a memorandum of understanding
  • I believe this is different because we are an organization that follows our rules established by our
  • legislative process that allows all eight districts, Class 1A through 7A, to propose and pass the rules
  • NIL would necessitate significant adjustments to many existing member-written rules.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Licensing & Administrative Procedures Apr 22nd, 2025

Licensing & Administrative Procedures

Transcript Highlights:
  • McLaughlin's bill relating to the criminal and licensing consequences for the commission of certain offenses
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 3rd, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • We here at the City of Justin wholeheartedly support the bill and hope that the committee also rules
  • The bill gives cities under 10,000 a 60-day rule.
  • Sort of more nuanced and thoughtful and just not an across-the-board, 1,400 is the rule.
  • They can come to their zoning commission and express their concern.
  • Because there's no rule that says that you have to build a big house.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 3rd, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • Next, not allowing planning and zoning commission to be an advisory committee for impact fees could be
  • The city mandated commercial parking rules force burdensome costs on entrepreneurs and large businesses
  • Unwind the outdated parking rules that needlessly strangle commerce statewide.
  • The reforms considered by the Zoning Commission was a years-long undertaking that would effectively be
  • rules or the business itself or the property owner. This is not about no parking.