Video & Transcript : 'judicial trust' :

Page 46 of 500
VT

Vermont 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Session - 2026-03-12 - 1:00PM

Vermont Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • And it was the probate and trust law section of the Vermont Bar that set up the committee to review the
  • So somebody within a trust acting as the trustee for a trust cannot disclaim that property that might
  • be coming to the trust.
  • If it ended up going to a tax sale or judicial sale, but it wouldn't, but I believe the reporter said
  • </c><00:57:05.680><c> and</c> judicial warrant for that reason. and judicial warrant for that reason.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Apr 16th, 2026 at 09:30 am

Oklahoma Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Zero information to go on—they trust us up here.
  • Members, House Bill 4072 creates the Taxpayer Endowment Trust Fund.
  • the people with their own money more than we trust boards, bureaucracies, and lobbyists.
  • Their own money more than we trust boards, bureaucracies, and lobbyists.
  • I would like everyone to notice what the purpose of this Endowment Trust Act is.
AL

Alabama 2026 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Finance and Taxation Education Committee Apr 1st, 2026

Finance and Taxation Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • bill, as we look at it now, it could be anywhere from $20 million to $30 million to the Education Trust
  • 04.280><c> education</c> from 20 to 30 million to the education from 20 to 30 million to the education trust
  • </c> trust fund. trust fund.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Privacy, Digital Technologies, and Consumer Protection Committee Apr 13th, 2026

Privacy, Digital Technologies, and Consumer Protection

Transcript Highlights:
  • guess the concern would be that there'd be a flood of lawsuits filed in the state, clogging up our judicial
  • guess the concern would be that there'd be a flood of lawsuits filed in the state, plugging up our judicial
  • system at this point in time. ...in the state, plugging up our judicial system at this point in time
  • I think I would rather not plug up the judicial system.
  • Allowing and trusting this stuff that I could show you and read the horrific stuff that's online and
Summary: The committee heard several privacy, technology, and public safety bills. SB 898 would require manufacturers of connected consumer products to disclose how long software support will last and to notify consumers when support is nearing its end; Consumer Reports supported the measure, while members raised concerns about private enforcement, notice mechanics, and replacement obligations for leased devices. The bill was amended and passed 5-1 to Judiciary, with the measure placed on call. SB 1279 would authorize Long Beach to install additional speed safety cameras on Pacific Coast Highway under the same privacy and equity guardrails as the existing pilot program, including limits on data use, no facial recognition, warning periods, and reduced fees for low-income recipients. Supporters cited severe crashes and fatalities on PCH, while opponents raised civil liberties and due process concerns and questioned how the system identifies the actual driver. The committee approved the bill 6-2 and placed it on call. SB 1111, the Artificial Intelligence Abuse Protection Act, would create civil remedies for non-consensual AI voice, image, and video cloning and digital replicas. Support came from SAG-AFTRA and Common Sense Media, and members discussed concerns about background images and employer liability, including a request to preserve a rebuttable presumption for good-faith employers. The bill passed 7-1 to Public Safety and was placed on call. SB 1217 would create a DOJ-run clearinghouse for survivors of non-consensual intimate imagery and deepfakes to request removal from online platforms; survivors and advocacy groups testified in strong support, and members discussed privacy, cybersecurity, funding, and the lack of a private right of action. It passed 8-0 to Public Safety and was placed on call. The committee also heard SB 1095, which would require fusion centers and participating agencies to adopt MOUs barring use of sensitive personal information for immigration enforcement or racial/identity profiling, require annual reporting, and allow audits and inspections. Supporters argued fusion centers have operated with too little oversight and have been used to circumvent state privacy and immigration laws; some members supported the transparency goals while others raised concerns about operational ambiguity and the bill’s interaction with existing law. The discussion continued, with the author and members debating the scope of permissible information sharing and enforcement consequences for violations.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Civil Rights & Judiciary Dec 5th, 2025 at 10:30 am

Civil Rights & Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • But yes, and they're a quasi-judicial role.
  • You know, we have a non-uniform judicial system.
  • You know, we have a non-uniform judicial system.
  • They reduce recidivism and build community trust in the judicial system and the process.
  • They reduce recidivism and build community trust in the judicial system and the process.
Summary: The work session began with testimony on expanding opportunities in the legal profession, especially in response to rural attorney shortages and public service recruitment. Washington State Bar Association Executive Director Tara Nevitt described a growing but aging attorney workforce, noted that younger attorneys have declined, and outlined efforts including supervised practice as an alternative to the bar exam, reduced admission-by-motion experience requirements, expansion of the law clerk program, rural job fairs and grants, and a pilot program for innovative legal service delivery. Members asked about bar passage standards, loan repayment assistance, and the former limited license legal technician program. Representatives from the University of Washington, Seattle University, and Gonzaga discussed law school pipelines into public service and rural practice. They described early outreach to students, loan repayment assistance and scholarships, public service stipends, clinics and externships, and partnerships that place students in government, nonprofit, prosecution, and defense roles. Seattle University highlighted its Flex JD and hybrid hub model in rural communities; Gonzaga presented data showing many graduates remain in Washington and enter public interest work; and UW emphasized that unpaid internships and debt remain barriers. The Washington Association of Prosecuting Attorneys and the Office of Public Defense both testified that prosecutor and defender vacancies are severe in rural counties, and that salary, hiring bonuses, housing support, internships, and loan repayment programs are important tools. The Office of Public Defense said its new recruitment and retention program, funded by SB 5780, has already placed interns in underserved counties and helped some commit to future jobs there. The Washington State Bar’s law clerk program was also described as a pathway that helps people train and remain in their home communities. The committee then shifted to family law, guardians, and guardianships. On guardian ad litem practice in Title 26 cases, Northwest Justice Project and private family law practitioners said training has improved since 2018, but concerns remain about inconsistent investigations, bias, inadequate domestic violence training, lack of oversight, high costs, and uneven county practices. They suggested more robust training, better accountability, and possible use of mental health professionals for custody evaluations. For minor guardianships under the Uniform Guardianship Act, a Superior Court judge said filings have increased and courts struggle to find qualified attorneys and court visitors, while the Administrative Office of the Courts said its $3 million annual reimbursement program for local courts is running out earlier each year and that minor guardianship costs make up most of the spending. The Office of Public Guardianship reported rising demand for adult guardianship services, noting that recent legislation expanded its caseload capacity and added a navigator role, but that referrals and active cases continue to grow statewide.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • This is a common-sense reform to restore transparency, strengthen taxpayer trust, and give the public
  • This bill strengthens our judicial system across the state and encompasses new courts, changes to judicial
  • It fixes alleged counts, citation errors, and adds the 501st Judicial Court in Fort Bend County, giving
  • I think we need to make sure that civilians and police officers are feeling united and trusted.
  • By disbanding these boards and taking that chance, we are going to erode away that trust in the police
Bills: HB17 , HB16 , SB 10 , HB27 , HB23 , SB 15 , SB 18 , HB17 , HB16 , SB10 , HB27 , HB23 , SB15 , SB18
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • We have to trust our government to basically make a wrong. right. But what is that right?
  • reform bill that is tied to the judicial pay raise, by the way.
  • So this is not a judicial issue. This is a funding issue by local government.
  • We're the government and people need to trust us.
  • We also ask the bill to define the word pending because the judicial interpretation of pending is the
Bills: SB9 , SB1047 , SB1048 , SJR17 , SJR49 , SB40 , SJR1 , SJR5 , SB 9 , SB 40 , SJR 1
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Judiciary (09/10/2025)

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Supreme Court and the judicial branch may have a problem with that.
  • </c> um interest on lawyers trust accounts. um interest on lawyers trust accounts.
  • </c> a problem with interest on lawyers trust a problem with interest on lawyers trust accounts<00:21
  • </c> government whether it's the judicial government whether it's the judicial branch<00:21:26.320><c
  • The supreme court uh<00:22:50.159><c> and</c><00:22:50.320><c> the</c><00:22:50.480><c> judicial</c><
Summary: The committee began by explaining that the meeting was a work session and that votes would only be taken where there was clear consensus. CACR 6, the proposed constitutional amendment on a “right to compute,” was discussed first but not acted on because the prime sponsor was absent. Members raised concerns about whether the issue belonged in the constitution and what the amendment would mean in practice, and the chair recessed the matter for a future meeting. HB 74, concerning the definition of “citizen” for the right-to-know law and disclosure of preliminary drafts circulated to a quorum or majority of a public body, drew little support. Members noted the Senate’s prior rejection of a related bill and agreed the proposal was unlikely to advance. A motion to ITL the bill passed unanimously by roll call, 15-0, and the bill was placed on the consent calendar. HB 232, dealing with rights of conscience for medical professionals, was also recessed. Members said they had not yet seen the amendment, which was described as narrowing the bill to abortion-related issues and limiting penalties. Several members said they could not judge the bill without the amendment and expected disagreement, so the chair recessed it. HB 253, on interest-bearing pooled trust accounts maintained by lawyers, was discussed at length; the chair said the bill did not address the underlying IOLTA issue and would likely create conflict with the bar and judiciary. Members cited existing Supreme Court procedures and suggested the bill was unnecessary. A straw vote showed support for interim study and ITL, and the committee ultimately voted 15-0 to place HB 253 on consent. HB 293, aimed at preventing minors from accessing obscene material on internet-connected devices, prompted substantial debate. Members generally supported the goal but objected to the bill’s private right of action, its focus on manufacturers rather than content providers or internet platforms, uncertainty about the filtering technology required, and concerns about defining obscenity on a national rather than community basis. The committee discussed forming a subcommittee to work on the bill further, and members volunteered to serve, indicating the issue would be revisited rather than voted on immediately.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • And I trust my neighbors and my constituents.
  • They are people that we trust.
  • They are people that we trust, or we should trust them, especially if they've got that SDA card.
  • These are agencies that we absolutely trust.
  • never been, you know, elected or given trust by the people.
Summary: The committee heard and advanced a wide range of bills covering property, criminal justice, public safety, courts, insurance, housing, and family law. Early measures included HB 4343, which would let district courts set appraiser fees in condemnation cases at levels more comparable to private appraisers, and HB 4125, restoring firearm rights to certain nonviolent felons after meeting requirements. The committee also approved HB 4126 on liability protections for dirt bike tracks, HB 3471 expanding information protections for ongoing investigations by OBN, ABLE, and the Corporation Commission, and HB 3407 clarifying the process for abandoned manufactured homes on private property. Several bills were advanced on recorded votes, generally with strong support, including HB 2933, an omnibus insurance consumer protection bill, and HB 3453, which shifts the burden of proof in eminent domain cases to the condemning authority after amendment. A major point of debate was HB 3094, which would allow SDA license holders to carry firearms in the Capitol. Representative Jenkins argued the bill would align Oklahoma with other states and protect constituents who must leave firearms in vehicles; Department of Public Safety Director Tipton opposed it, citing safety, threat-assessment, and manpower concerns. Committee members questioned the bill’s practical effects, including screening, tracking, and whether the Capitol is truly a gun-free zone. The motion to advance HB 3094 failed on a 4-5 vote. The committee also rejected HB 3727, which would impose a four-year waiting period before former legislators could register as lobbyists, after members raised constitutional and free-speech concerns and the sponsor defended it as a revolving-door restriction. Other notable measures included HB 3845, restoring a driver’s license revocation tool for chronic child-support delinquency; HB 1453, barring foreign entities and individuals tied to designated countries from owning Oklahoma real property or agricultural land and requiring divestment; HB 387, extending garnishment timelines to 30 days; HB 2941, creating overdose reporting and fentanyl-related death presumptions; HB 2959, tightening mandatory child-abuse reporting from schools to law enforcement; and HB 2945, creating a civil qui tam action against trafficking in abortion-inducing drugs, which drew extensive questions about standing, privacy, enforcement, and intent but ultimately failed 3-5. The committee also advanced bills on child custody interview standards, workplace violence protective orders, utility debt collection through tax refunds, eviction mediation to stabilize housing for children, AI chatbot protections for children, supported decision-making for adults with disabilities, commercial receiverships, charitable reporting protections, notice publication errors for municipalities, uniform wage garnishment procedures, and ending cost arrest warrants for unpaid court fines and fees. Most bills were reported out by recorded vote, often with sponsors noting they would continue working on language with stakeholders.
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Jan 14th, 2025

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm Judge Mark Mahan from the Fourth Judicial Circuit.
  • So yes, there is judicial supervision.
  • In 2021, the judicial branch began studying improper litigation and its impact The judicial branch began
  • branch, and these emanate sometimes from court action itself, the judicial certification For the judicial
  • Next is the judicial certification opinion.
Committee: Senate Judiciary
Summary: The Judiciary Committee met with a quorum present and heard several Office of the State Courts Administrator presentations. Judge Mark Mahan discussed the impact of 2023’s HB 837 litigation reforms on court operations, explaining that the law’s changes to comparative negligence, filing deadlines, collateral source evidence, premises liability, bad faith claims, attorney’s fees, and offer-of-judgment rules triggered a major March 2023 civil filing surge. He described how filings tripled statewide, with especially large increases in auto negligence and premises liability cases, and outlined how circuits responded through active case management, added resources, and workflow changes. Members asked whether the bill’s immediate effective date contributed to the surge and whether clearance rates would normalize over time; Judge Mahan said the court system viewed its response as a success and expected rates to settle as the backlog is worked through. The committee then received a presentation on problem-solving courts from Jennifer Grandal and Judge Nina Richardson. Grandal reviewed Florida’s drug courts, mental health courts, veterans courts, dependency and early childhood courts, noting statewide best-practice standards, annual reporting requirements, funding sources, and data collection systems. Judge Richardson gave a local perspective on treatment courts, emphasizing that they address underlying mental health and substance use issues, rely on judicial supervision and sanctions as well as incentives, and help participants achieve recovery and avoid reoffending. She said the programs are accountable, transparent, and effective, and thanked the Legislature for continued support. Finally, Judge Rachel Nordby and Eric McClure outlined the judicial branch’s legislative agenda. Nordby summarized the Supreme Court workgroup’s recommendations to expand Florida’s vexatious litigant law, including broader coverage, fewer qualifying adverse cases, a longer lookback period, and a public records exemption for stricken defamatory or sham material. McClure then highlighted additional agenda items: modernizing the duty-judge statute, expanding senior management retirement eligibility, authorizing additional judgeships based on workload studies, removing the statutory cap on court-ordered nonbinding arbitration compensation, protecting appellate clerks’ personal information, allowing alternative authentication for certain judicial notarizations, and creating a hearsay exception for guardian ad litem reports and testimony. No votes were taken, and the committee adjourned after member introductions and staff introductions.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session May 27th, 2026

California Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • And I recognize that trust and And I recognize that trust and safety can mean, you know, something different
  • Those agencies also need to ensure that they work towards keeping that trust, because trust is at that
  • foundation. ...keeping that trust, because trust is at the foundation of democracy, of our nation.
  • And we need to work towards ensuring that trust stays.
  • This is why judicial discretion is not enough.
FL
Transcript Highlights:
  • LANGUAGE PROBING, ALSO IN THE LANDS ACQUIRED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST
  • THE RULE REFERS TO LAND PREVIOUSLY REQUIRED BY OR MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE TRUST FUND.
  • , LEASED, RENTED, OCCUPIED, OR MAINTAINED BY STATE AGENCIES, WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS, AND THE JUDICIAL
  • OF SOURCES INCLUDING INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY STATE AGENCIES, WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS, AND THE JUDICIAL
  • LEASES, ARE STATE AGENCIES, WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS, STATE UNIVERSITIES, STATE COLLEGES, AND THE JUDICIAL
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session Feb 25th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Trusting you. And one another, with their success and their very lives.
  • To be judge of the 297th Judicial District, Tarrant County, Amy Allen. Fort Worth.
  • To be judge of the 120th Judicial District Court, El Paso County. Ben L. Ivey III, El Paso.
  • To be judge of the 66th Judicial District... County, Justin W. Lewis, Ikelai, Texas.
  • And that is what I think, really, what the goal... should be of our judicial system.
Bills: SB26 , SJR36 , SB26 , SB616 , SB565 , SB384 , SB28 , SR109 , SR122 , SR126 , SR130 , SR136 , SR137 , SR141 , SR142 , SCR20
Summary: The meeting was marked by significant resolutions recognizing various contributions to Texas and celebrating community initiatives. Key discussions included the adoption of resolutions commemorating Texas Hispanic Judges Day and highlighting the 100th anniversary of Memorial Park. Senators expressed appreciation for the judges' dedication and legacy, with notable mentions of individual judges and their impact on the community and legal landscape in Texas. The Senate also honored students and organizations contributing positively to their communities, showcasing the interconnectedness of public service and the legislative process.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session - 04/28/26

Minnesota Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • 36:40.560><c> by</c><00:36:40.720><c> requiring</c><00:36:41.359><c> written</c><00:36:41.600><c> judicial
  • </c> address by requiring written judicial address by requiring written judicial findings<00:36:42.840
  • And<00:37:10.080><c> it</c><00:37:10.200><c> requires</c><00:37:10.640><c> judicial</c><00:37:11.080>
  • <c> training</c><00:37:11.720><c> to</c> And it requires judicial training to And it requires judicial
  • be made whole, and then the homeowner's insurance company can seek reimbursement from the insurance trust
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Public Safety Committee Mar 3rd, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • overtime to establish trust and communication with the victim.
  • trust and maintaining trust.
  • When families are over-scrutinized, trust breaks.
  • When families are over-svelled, trust breaks.
  • This chaos has significantly eroded trust in our local law enforcement.
Summary: The committee heard several public safety bills, with extensive testimony and debate. AB 1535 would add political affiliation as a sentencing aggravator when a felony is motivated by a victim’s actual or perceived political affiliation. The author said the bill is intended to deter political violence while preserving judicial discretion; supporters framed it as a response to rising threats and attacks tied to politics. Opponents, including ACLU Cal Action, Initiate Justice, and public defender groups, argued the term is vague, could sweep in protected speech and association, and would expand punishment without addressing crime prevention. The bill was later moved on a due-pass recommendation and passed on roll call. AB 1656 would add human trafficking to the list of offenses that qualify for good-cause continuances so a vertical prosecutor can stay with a case. The author and a San Diego DA representative said the change would support trauma-informed prosecution and improve continuity for survivors. Most support testimony came from prosecutors, victim advocates, and civil liberties groups, while some public defender and justice organizations remained in opposition or pending review of amendments. The committee ultimately approved the bill on a due-pass-as-amended vote. AB 1589 would allow Level 1 reserve peace officers to use firearm suppressors while on duty, matching the exemption already available to full-time officers. The author and reserve officer witnesses said the bill is a narrow safety measure tied to hearing protection and parity in training and equipment. Opponents, including Brady and ACLU Cal Action, said suppressors are unnecessary, could endanger the public and other officers, and further militarize policing. After discussion about safety, fiscal concerns, and community trust, the committee passed the bill on a due-pass vote. The committee also took up AB 1566, which would align the statutory definition of severe neglect with the structured decision-making tool used by county child welfare agencies. Supporters said the bill would reduce overreporting, racial disparities, and unnecessary family trauma while keeping mandated reporting in place. Opponents, including school resource officer groups, warned it would lower reporting thresholds and risk missing serious abuse. Members debated the impact on child safety versus unnecessary investigations, and the bill was held on call after a split vote. In addition, the committee approved several consent items, including bills on human trafficking data, criminal procedure jurisdiction, firearms/unsafe handguns, and the Hugs Act of 2026.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 2/13/25 - Part 2

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • I trusted them, but instead my eyes have been forced open to their role in this corruption.
  • to them but instead time in life I trust to them but instead my<00:05:01.479><c> eyes</c><00:05:01.880
  • And if you don't think that they're coming after each of us for any delay, trust me, they will.
  • And if you don't think that they're coming after each of us for any delay, trust me, they will.
  • And if you don't think that they're coming after each of us for any delay, trust me, they will.
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Session (Full Formal with Calendar) Jun 21st, 2026 at 11:00 am

Massachusetts Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • You know, I think we really must trust that our school committees...
  • You know, I think we really must trust that our school committees, our superintendents, our educators
  • provision would really undermine... ...this blanket notification provision would really undermine trust
  • At a time where public trust has definitely been lost, this is a way to enhance that trust with collaboration
  • Let's trust our educators to do their job. I'll be voting now on the amendment.
Summary: The Senate resumed debate on Senate No. 2696, An Act Regarding Free Expression, a bill addressing challenges to books and other library materials in school and public libraries. Senators supporting the bill argued it protects free expression and gives students, parents, guardians, and others a court path to challenge removals, while opponents raised concerns about parental rights, school control, and the scope and timing of the review process. Several speakers also emphasized the broader context of book bans and the impact on authors, librarians, and students. A number of amendments were considered. Amendment 4, offered by Senator Creem, was adopted and extended standing to authors and creators to challenge removals of their works, including in municipal libraries. Amendment 5, by Senator DiDomenico, was adopted and limited who may initiate challenges to those connected to the school community. Amendment 6, by Senator Comerford, was adopted to require that challenged materials be considered in their entirety. Amendment 8, by Senator Tarr, proposing parental notification of challenges, was rejected after a roll call. Subsequent Tarr amendments on parental opt-out, reporting, public process, and written policy were also rejected, while Amendment 19, requiring written reasons when librarians remove outdated or successor materials, was rejected as well. Amendment 7, a Ways and Means amendment, was adopted. The Senate then ordered the bill to a third reading and passed it to be engrossed by a roll call vote of 35 in favor and 3 against. The chamber also adopted an order to meet again the following Monday at 11:00 a.m., and then adjourned.