Transcript Highlights:

• My name is Jenna Seagull here on behalf of the Hawaii Green Infrastructure Authority.
• My name is Jenna Seagull here on behalf of the Hawaii Green Infrastructure Authority.
• Sorry, I don't believe that we're bonding it.
• Um, do you have any opinion on the blank amounts though or whether the $100 million bond would need cash
• is kind of a self-sustainable thing or if it will constantly require money from HHRF to float the bonds

Bills: HB1849, HB2000, HB1753, HB1511, HB276, HB1513, HB2188, HB1876

Keywords: licensing, professional license, individual taxpayer identification number, immigration, state residency, right to repair, wheelchairs, consumer protection, repair providers, device documentation, HB1753, Hawaii Social Media Data Deletion Act, social media, account deletion, data deletion, privacy, consumer privacy, personal information, sensitive personal information, data retention

Summary: The committee on Consumer Protection and Commerce met on February 10, 2026, and heard testimony on several bills. HB 1849 relating to licensing drew comments from DCCA’s Professional and Vocational Licensing Division and the Hawaii Real Estate Commission, both of which stood on written testimony. The Hawaii Coalition for Immigrant Rights testified in strong support, emphasizing that some immigrants, including DACA recipients, are already contributing in Hawaii and that the state should help create pathways for them to remain and advance professionally. No vote or final action was taken on HB 1849 during the portion shown. The committee then heard HB 2000, the wheelchair right-to-repair bill. Encart opposed the measure, arguing that repair delays are largely driven by insurance prior authorization and that wheelchair repairs involve FDA-regulated medical devices where improper repairs could create health risks. Peter Fritz testified in support, saying the bill was modeled on similar laws in other states and that he had personal experience through his sister’s use of a wheelchair. Members questioned whether repairs done outside insurer networks might not be reimbursed, and Fritz said that was a concern but that the need for timely repair outweighed it. The committee also discussed HB 1753 on social media, where DCCA’s Office of Consumer Protection supported the bill but suggested an amendment to the definition of personal information. On HB 1511 relating to consumer protection, DCCA’s Insurance Division supported the bill, while the Alliance for Automotive Innovation and the Hawaii Automobile Dealers Association offered comments seeking to preserve legitimate manufacturer and dealer communications about vehicles, warranties, recalls, and related services. The committee also took up HB 276 HD1 and HB 1513 on condominiums. The Hawaii Real Estate Commission offered comments on HB 276 HD1. For HB 1513, the Hawaii Green Infrastructure Authority supported the bill, but DCCA’s Insurance Division opposed it, warning that diverting HHRF funds could weaken reinsurance arrangements and raise premiums for consumers who rely on the fund. Members questioned whether the proposed condo loan program would need HHRF money and whether the amounts in the bill were necessary, and the division said it opposed using HHRF for that purpose. The committee also heard HB 2188 on housing, where OCP supported the measure and the Hawaii Association of Realtors raised concerns about conflicts with the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the use of tenant screening reports, noting that a working group is already addressing landlord-tenant issues. Members asked OCP to research how other states handle similar laws and whether additional language is needed to avoid federal conflict. Finally, on HB 1876 relating to mental health, the Department of Health’s Adult Mental Health Division supported the bill but said it remains opposed to harmful, non-evidence-based treatment modalities; Pride at Work Hawaii also testified in strong support. No final votes or committee decisions were reported in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• While the agreements this bill would authorize are voluntary on the part of the affected authorities,
• Um How much do bonds factor into Um, Let's start with the rate.
• If if you were going to divide the rate between the bonds.
• OK, again, I want to go back to the bonds. Let's do the, let's do the spending side.
• Versus the bonds of the city.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:14:28.639> No, >> Do the bonds. No, >> Do the bonds.
• The um you mentioned the word bonds earlier, and we have several types of bonds.
• We have the Garvey bonds, the federally paid bonds that are paid with the anticipated federal receipts
• The um you you mentioned the word bonds The um you you mentioned the word bonds earlier<00:31:08.960
• bonds the uh federally uh uh the bonds bonds the uh federally uh uh the bonds that<00:31:36.080>

Keywords: This meeting was recovered from a back up copy and uploaded after the original meeting took place., 958, all

Summary: The committee received an update from the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet on the FY 2025 road fund. Officials reported road fund revenues came in $38.5 million above the enacted estimate, but were down about $11 million from FY 2024, largely because a motor fuels tax rate reduction took effect at the start of FY 2025. Motor vehicle usage tax receipts were stronger than expected, and the cabinet said the road fund ended the year with a $61.6 million surplus, which the budget bill directs to state highway construction. Members also discussed how the motor fuels decline affects formula distributions to cities, counties, and rural/secondary roads, with officials saying about $122.8 million had been planned for revenue sharing but was not distributed because receipts were lower than forecast. Members asked about broader revenue trends, including fuel efficiency, electric vehicles, and the removal of a hybrid fee. Cabinet officials said improved fuel efficiency and CAFE standards reduce gasoline consumption and therefore fuel tax receipts, while EVs and plug-in hybrids are subject to a user fee. They also said toll revenues from the Louisville bridges are covering bills and commitments, though they did not have detailed figures at hand. On project delivery, officials said delays are often caused by right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation, and the large volume of projects in the highway plan, and that much of the work happens behind the scenes before construction begins. The committee also reviewed the cabinet’s cash management approach, which was adopted after 2000 to avoid setting aside full project costs all at once and to keep the road fund cash balance above a required minimum. Officials said the balance typically rises in winter and falls in summer as project bills come due, and that the current balance was about $166 million. They also reported that project awards for the year were nearing $998 million and expected to exceed last year’s total. No formal votes or legislative actions were taken beyond approving the prior meeting minutes.

Transcript Highlights:

• They can't have a bond here.
• bonded out, they could go outside of the jail.
• Again, our mental health authority CEO is in the room.
• It's authorized under Section 8.
• Our mortgage revenue bond program is supported by revenue bonds, not general obligation debt, secured

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Subdivision five is the permission, the authority to issue bonds for the project, and the commissioner
• <00:15:47.400> to<00:15:47.600> issue<00:15:47.880> bonds permission the authority
• to issue bonds permission the authority to issue bonds for<00:15:48.520> the for the for the
• And then number eight: debt service on bonds authorized and issued under subdivision nine.
• > under uh on bonds authorized and issues under uh on bonds authorized and issues under subdivision

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The commissioner may require a surety bond.
• The bill also requires a surety bond, but a surety bond does not prevent fraud.
• prevent bond, but a shity bond does not prevent bond, but a shity bond does not prevent fraud
• My name is Sandra Bond. I got married, so it used to be Donahue.
• <00:23:06.400> The with is the shity bond language. The with is the shity bond language.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• The author, 30 seconds. The author cites amendments.
• I personally went to the author.
• The author noted, all debate. I encourage the author to speak with Mr. Ramos.
• And I appreciate the author.
• So I commend the author.

Summary: The Assembly convened after a quorum call, prayer, and Pledge of Allegiance, then moved through a long floor file of bills. Early measures passed with little or no debate, including AB 698 on local transfer taxes and affordable housing analysis, AB 456 on mobile home sales, AB 1129 on reportable infant health conditions, AB 69 on Fair Plan insurance notices and voluntary market searches, AB 357 on expedited student and faculty housing permits, AB 383 on firearms code cleanups, AB 426 on drones interfering with emergency response, AB 825 on energy affordability and transmission financing, and AB 699 on ballot transparency for local tax and bond measures. Most of these bills passed unanimously or with strong bipartisan margins, while AB 825 drew the most extended debate over whether it would lower costs or expand state control of energy infrastructure; it ultimately passed 45-5. The most contentious item was AB 84, which would strengthen oversight of non-classroom-based charter schools and tighten accountability for charter spending and operations. Supporters argued it was needed to stop fraud and misuse of public education dollars, citing major scandals and audit findings, while opponents warned it would harm legitimate charter schools, reduce educational options, and disproportionately affect rural and special-needs students. Several members said they supported the bill only to keep negotiations going, and others urged more targeted or delayed action. After extensive debate and multiple amendments, the Assembly passed AB 84 on a 41-22 vote. The chamber also took up AB 610, a housing bill that would require cities and counties to disclose planned housing restrictions and limit new constraints for three years after housing element approval. The author framed it as a certainty and transparency measure to help address the state’s housing shortage, while noting continued discussions with local governments and housing advocates. The transcript ends with the bill’s presentation and request for an aye vote, with no final vote shown in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• Yes, we did just pass a bill for bonding, but that is to address projects from start to finish.
• The bonding bill will help with construction.
• So as the bonding package, I didn't like the bonding package because I didn't think the bonding package
• Some of it comes from bonding. Some of it can come from general fund money that we have.
• Some of it comes from bonding. Some of it can come from general fund money that we have.

Bills: SB251, SB150, SB154, SB73, SB111, SB172, SB76, SB181, SB235

Keywords: horse racing, program training, program owning, state licensing, racehorses, regulation, local news, newspaper printing, journalism, media tax credit, print media, digital news, news publisher, newsprint, press operator, printing industry, local journalism, tax credit, income tax, corporate income tax

Transcript Highlights:

• Members, questions of the author. Mr. Chairman. Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members.
• Senator's questions with author.
• Members, questions of the author?
• Any other questions of the author? Hearing none, we're going to open up public testimony.
• Otherwise, bonds are more volatile and issuers have difficulty borrowing cheaply.

Bills: SB483, SB522, SB783, SB1239, SB1254, SB1255, SB1259, SB1341, SB1664, SB1762, SB1856, SB1877, SB1977

Keywords: utility, proprietary information, customer data, data protection, electric service, customer information, emergency communication, electric utility, privacy, certification, public accountants, interstate licensing, accounting, regulatory amendment, energy efficiency, construction regulations, building codes, Texas, sustainability, cost-effectiveness

Summary: The Senate Business and Commerce Committee met with a quorum and first took up pending business, voting out several bills. Senate Bills 1697, 1569, 1202 as substituted, 1029, 1364, 1185, 924, 1008 as substituted, 264, 1376, and 1358 as substituted were reported favorably, with some sent to the local and uncontested calendar. The committee also adopted a substitute for SB 1202 and later corrected votes on several measures. SB 924 and SB 1376 drew some opposition, while the rest of the pending bills were reported without dissent or with limited nays. The committee then heard testimony on SB 1856, which would create an annual capacity-cost recovery rider for Entergy Texas customers in the MISO region. The author and Entergy argued the bill would better match rates to actual capacity costs and improve transparency, while the Texas Association of Manufacturers and the Public Utility Commission raised concerns about the short 10-day review period, rider proliferation, and the preference for full rate cases over piecemeal adjustments. The bill was left pending. The committee also heard and left pending SB 522 on CPA reciprocity, SB 1664 requiring TDUs to provide clearer, standalone rate-change disclosures, SB 1877 expanding OPUC’s access to market data, SB 1254 and SB 1255 as TDLR cleanup bills on professional employer organizations and mold assessors, SB 1341 updating manufactured housing rules, SB 1239 on sovereign debt and Texas governing law, and SB 1259 streamlining the surveyor-in-training licensing process. Additional bills discussed included SB 1977, which would cap recoverable legal expenses in electric, water, and sewer rate cases; OPUC and some consumer advocates supported the idea as a way to reduce ratepayer costs, while utility representatives warned it could discourage participation and increase rate shock. The committee also heard SB 1762 clarifying that geothermal energy conservation wells are not battery resources, and SB 783 allowing SECO to proceed with future energy-code rulemaking for state-funded buildings. Both drew supportive testimony from industry and environmental groups. All remaining bills heard during the meeting were left pending, and the committee recessed subject to the call of the chair.

Transcript Highlights:

• All right, so I think the biggest picture is we—this is paid out of bond money.
• As Karen said, since it was through the bond, we were instructed not to put it in ASIS.
• Number 15, DTSS Building Authority, with Pettit and Pettit Consulting.
• Number four, Department of Health, with Little Rock Ambulance Authority.
• Contract 163 is with the DTSS Building Authority and Miracle Window Cleaning.

Summary: The committee met to review a supplemental agenda, procurement rule revisions, methods of finance, discretionary grants, contracts, and a member disclosure. The Office of State Procurement presented rule changes tied to 2025 legislative changes, including Act 782, with updates to sole-source definitions, unrealistic bids, protest requirements, debarment procedures, and recodification references; the committee voted to accept the supplemental agenda and approve the rules. Members also approved eight methods of finance covering university repairs, equipment replacement, property purchase, and capital projects, along with a large slate of discretionary grants for courts, health, DHS, historic preservation, and tobacco prevention programs. The committee then reviewed RFQs and six ratifications. The ratifications included a Workforce Connections payment to ACT WorkKeys, Department of Health costs from an ice-storm-related water leak, a large Department of Public Safety ratification for Motorola’s Arkansas Wireless Information Network upgrade, Veterans Affairs HVAC and medical-service payments, and a UA Little Rock painting contract. The Department of Public Safety ratification drew extended questioning about why the expired Motorola contract had not been renewed sooner and why the issue took months to reach the committee; agency officials said the project was bond-funded, had not been tracked in ASIS, and involved ongoing negotiations and system updates. Despite concerns, the committee approved the ratifications. Members also reviewed a long list of construction, intergovernmental, out-of-state, and in-state contracts, including numerous university, DHS, health, corrections, and state agency agreements. Several contracts were discussed in more detail, including an SAU custodial contract question about sales tax and transparency reporting, and Department of Corrections aerial application contracts for Tucker and Cummins farms, which officials said served separate facilities in different parts of the state. The committee approved the contract lists, reviewed reports, and accepted a disclosure from Representative Andrew Collins regarding his investment interest in a company leasing property to Arkansas Rehabilitation Services before adjourning.

Transcript Highlights:

• Since the bonds had been sold, UC has identified some debt service savings.
• The remaining beds have to pay for the market rate bond on that project.
• We take out what's called lease revenue bonds, which are bonds that are repaid with the student rental
• The last time we got a GO bond was 2006.
• That's an authorization currently in statute. Thank you. Appreciate that. Okay.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Joy, for the author of the bill, or for the author of the amendment—sorry, for the author of the bill—regarding
• Are you the author?
• bonds.
• bonds.
• bonds.

Bills: HF5

Keywords: tax modification, transportation funding, electric vehicle tax, Social Security subtraction, retail delivery fee, motor vehicle registration, state budget, transportation policy, 1183, house

Summary: The Transportation Committee resumed consideration of House File 5, which would reduce transportation-related revenues while also providing tax relief, including a subtraction for Social Security income, elimination of the delivery fee, and a cap on automatic gas tax indexing. The committee adopted the A1 author’s amendment, which added the phrase “using existing resources,” and then proceeded to public testimony. Representative Joy described the bill as making Minnesota more affordable, while several members and testifiers raised concerns about the impact on transportation funding and road maintenance. MnDOT Commissioner Nancy Doppenberg testified that reductions in planned transportation investments would worsen pavement, bridge, and roadway conditions, reduce construction projects and jobs, and add to an already large funding gap. Committee discussion focused on the estimated revenue losses from the bill, including about $45 million in fiscal year 2026 and $55 million annually from repealing the delivery fee, plus additional losses from capping gas tax indexing, for a combined transportation revenue reduction of about $131 million in the 2026-27 biennium. Members also asked about bridge aesthetics, paint, transit impacts, and whether other mandates and cost increases should be considered alongside revenue reductions. Supporters of the delivery fee repeal, including the Minnesota Grocers Association and Minnesota Retailers Association, argued the fee is costly to administer, confusing to consumers, and disproportionately burdens small businesses and lower-income or disabled consumers who rely on delivery. The Minnesota Association of Townships and the Minnesota Transportation Alliance emphasized that rural and local governments face major road and bridge funding needs and warned that reducing revenue would shift costs to property taxpayers or leave projects unfunded. No final vote on the bill was taken in the portion of the meeting provided; the committee continued with testimony and member questions.

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, in the transportation program, we utilized $1.75 million in additional TID bond funds.
• if the um... ...if the General Assembly authorizes the use of transportation infrastructure bonds in
• We extend AOT's public-private partnership authority until 2029.
• We advance um um the bonding We advance the bonding that we had proposed in the Senate.
• Senator Bond, yes.

Keywords: 927, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• of, and what we found out is after this bill passed, we increased the surety bonds for all operators
• With House Bill 1369, all operators had to pay $25,000 surety bond, no matter if they had one well or
• What we found is the surety bonds cost maybe 2 or 3% of the value of the bond.
• But, what the issue is, some of these smaller operators couldn't get a bond due to financial reasons,
• When it says the election, what it means is they're a bond election.

Keywords: 914, all

Transcript Highlights:

• interpreting that bonds are never interpreting that bonds are never subject<00:45:51.680> to<
• When you start working on a bond, first of all, the prior year you get estimates from the Bond Bank in
• year you get estimates from the Bond year you get estimates from the Bond Bank<01:07:59.920>
• Bonds require public hearings.
• Who would like to author the minority report? Representative Colby will author the minority report.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Once the Legislature authorizes them, the Water Trust Board sends a final list to the Finance Authority
• Finance Authority for September funding.
• We have authorized and recommended that the legislature authorize every eligible project since 2022,
• And authorizations.
• And I can report now that both the Water Trust Board and the Finance Authority The Authority has updated

Transcript Highlights:

• authorization on the Senate side.
• This is the authorization for the Metropolitan Council to issue bonding for certain transit projects.
• Section 68 and section 69 are certain limitations and analyses as required of that bonding authorization
• Section 69 in particular is just a cross-reference to limit bonding authority on light rail transit projects
• that authorization uh of um of bonding that authorization uh of um of bonding for<01:10:23.840><

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• . >> House Bill 143, an act relating to fiduciary bonds. >> Representative Elliott. >> Gentleman from
• <00:06:36.560> Representative<00:06:37.120> Elliott, fiduciary bonds.
• Representative Elliott, fiduciary bonds.
• Authority and declaring an emergency. Authority and declaring an emergency.
• then change changes the PSC's authority then change changes the PSC's authority as<00:26:47.679>

Keywords: Convene 00:00 Senate Message 05:04 Orders of the Day 06:01 HB 143 06:11 HB 164 08:07 HB 314 11:07 HB 398 21:17 Motions, Petitions, and Communications 29:02 Introduction of New Bills and Resolutions 34:01 Recess for ConC/Rules Meeting 35:40 ConC/Rules Report 40:15 Floor Amendments 41:15 Adjournment 41:26, 958, all

Summary: The House convened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, and a roll call showing 95 members present. The chamber approved the prior journal, received notice that the Senate had passed Senate Bills 20 and 68 and requested concurrence, and then moved to floor action on several bills. House Bill 143, relating to fiduciary bonds, was explained as removing the requirement that a fiduciary sign a bond in the presence of a court clerk or notary public; it passed 94-0. House Bill 164, relating to hearing aid coverage and related services, was described as increasing the coverage cap from $1,400 to $2,500, updating the definition of hearing aid, and adding network adequacy requirements; it passed 93-0 with one abstention. The House then considered House Bill 314, relating to the Kentucky Communications Network Authority and declared an emergency. Supporters said the bill was intended to address long-standing concerns about KentuckyWired management and oversight. A committee substitute and floor amendment were adopted, and the bill was explained as moving KCNA into the Finance and Administration Cabinet, transferring its functions to the Commonwealth Office of Technology, abolishing the separate executive director position, and reconstituting the board with new members and appointments. The bill passed 80-13. House Bill 398, relating to decommissioning costs for electric generating units, was presented as allowing terminal net salvage to be included in rates so utilities can recover end-of-life plant costs over time rather than through larger future spikes; after questions about PSC authority and safeguards, it passed 78-15. After the orders of the day concluded, members made announcements about upcoming committee meetings and a birthday recognition. House Resolution 7, recognizing guiding principles for elections in Kentucky, was reported as having passed unanimously in committee and was adopted without objection. The House also received the report of the Committee on Committees and the Rules Committee, which referred several bills and resolutions to standing committees and posted House Bills 194 and 393 for the next regular orders. The chamber then adjourned until 2 p.m. Tuesday, February 3, 2026.

Transcript Highlights:

• Professional bail bonds, please. pre-employment screening at the three pre-employment screening at the
• And the third is with the Tomi Health Care Authority, doing business as Whitfield Regional Hospital.
• As you can bankruptcy and bond matter.
• <00:34:12.000> and had a $15 million performance bond and had a $15 million performance bond
• Human resources. performance bond, you're hoping to performance bond, you're hoping to recoup<00:48:49.680

Keywords: 924, joint, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This amendment requires a $1 million bond to be posted when a proposed amendment is submitted to the
• Secretary of State, but the bond may be waived if it would impose an undue burden on the resources of
• If they do, the waiver is revoked and the bond becomes due immediately.
• How much money does one of these organizations actually have to put down to get a million dollar bond
• Senator Grohl: It is not authorized under the bill that they would meet after that.

Summary: The Senate Committee on Ethics and Elections heard SPB 7016, a bill revising Florida’s citizen initiative petition process to address fraud, voter information, and ballot integrity. The bill and its amendments would add sponsor bonds and deposit requirements, require more identifying information from signers and circulators, bar certain felons and non-citizens from circulating petitions, require circulator training, shorten the time to submit signed petitions, require notices to voters whose signatures are verified, and change how financial impact statements are handled. Several amendments were adopted, including a $1 million bond framework, 10-point font and page limits for petition forms, a ban on incentive-based pay tied to petition counts or speed, removal of a requirement that fraud be proven by criminal conviction before administrative fines, county deposit and payment procedures for supervisors of elections, invalidation of petitions gathered by ineligible circulators, training requirements within 30 days, and a prohibition on public funds being used to advocate for or against constitutional amendments. Committee discussion focused heavily on implementation and fairness. Supporters, including the sponsor and the Florida Chamber of Commerce, argued the bill was needed to deter fraud, protect voter information, and ensure sponsors—not taxpayers—bear the costs of the initiative process. Supervisors of elections testified that county taxpayers should not subsidize petition verification, but also warned that some provisions would be difficult to implement quickly because of software and operational constraints. Senators raised questions about the bond cost, the 10-day submission deadline, notice to voters whose petitions are invalidated, the effect on returning citizens, and whether the bill could disenfranchise voters who sign petitions in good faith. Public testimony was overwhelmingly opposed. Common Cause, the League of Women Voters, NAACP Florida, Florida Rising, Equality Florida, All Voting Is Local, and other advocates said the bill would suppress grassroots participation, criminalize volunteers, create costly barriers, and favor wealthy or corporate interests. They objected especially to the bond, the new signer identification requirements, the shorter submission window, and the lack of notice when a petition is invalidated. A few supporters, including the Florida Chamber, backed the measure as a safeguard against fraud and outside influence. After debate, the committee did not reach a final vote on the bill in the portion provided, but the bill remained before the committee as amended.