Transcript Highlights:

• I'm in agreement with Representative Beham that I wouldn't imagine that would be put aside.
• So that is part of a plea agreement. I and...
• So that is part of a plea agreement. I and “Am I far off on this?
• So that is part of a plea agreement, and they get a fine, and more to the point, at least from my point
• “I want to be clear, so there's an agreement between the reporting agencies?” “Yes.

Committee: House Judiciary

Summary: The House Committee on Judiciary met on March 19, 2006, and considered a series of mostly local and judicial bills. Early action included HB 436, which authorizes appointment of honorably discharged veterans as park wardens; supporters said it would give veterans meaningful service roles and improve park safety. The committee adopted an amendment requiring honorable discharge, employment qualification compliance if hired by a public entity, and firearms training where applicable, then reported the bill favorably. The committee also advanced HB 16, extending the jurisdiction of the City Court of Franklin, and HB 44, which shifts certain blight-related hearings in St. Bernard Parish from the Bureau of Administrative Adjudication to justices of the peace and constables; members asked about appeals, fines, jurisdictional limits, and whether the change would affect HOAs, and the bill was reported favorably. Members then approved HB 61 creating Battle of New Orleans Day, with an amendment clarifying holiday language and adding a detailed historical commemoration of the battle and its diverse forces. HB 233, which raises juror mileage reimbursement from 16 cents per mile to the state travel rate, drew support but also concern about the cost to local governments; the sponsor and members discussed the fiscal impact, and the bill was reported favorably. HB 164, expanding commissioner powers in the 15th Judicial District Court, was also reported favorably after testimony that it would help manage caseloads and mirror procedures used in other districts. HB 455, defining public works employees as first responders for coordination and recognition purposes, generated extensive questions about emergency authority, FEMA reimbursement, workers’ compensation, liability, and unintended consequences; the committee deferred the bill to a later meeting for further review. The committee also approved HB 242, authorizing deputy constables in St. Tammany Parish at no state cost, and HB 10, making the Friday of the International Rice Festival a legal holiday in Acadia Parish. HB 9, designating Shreveport as the stuffed shrimp capital of Louisiana, was reported favorably after light discussion. HB 571, which would make permanent the complex litigation section program in the 19th Judicial District Court, was supported by judges and court staff who said it improves efficiency in large cases such as asbestos and hurricane litigation; it was reported favorably. Finally, HB 16 and several other local measures moved forward without objection, while the committee also heard a deeply personal presentation on HB 61 designating February 24 as SCN2A Awareness Day, later amended to honor Emily Catherine Diedon by name; members expressed sympathy, discussed genetic testing and access to care, and reported the bill favorably as amended.

Transcript Highlights:

• I assume there are constraints and ethics and those types of things when the cooperative agreements are
• If you look at the bill as written specifically, it says any cooperative agreement shall provide for
• again, I'm trusting that my school board's going to iron out those rules within their contractual agreements
• And at the end of the day, we could not find that agreement.
• We will work as much as possible to try to find agreements, find places where we can find agreements.

Bills: HB28 , HB50 , HB196 , HB268 , HB271 , HB285 , HB316 , HB649 , HB807

Committee: House Education

Keywords: teacher certification, certification appeals, BESE, State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education, Teacher Certification Appeals Council, educator licensure, teaching license, teacher licensure, appeals process, certification denial, administrative appeal, special meeting, board president, retroactive application, education board, Louisiana teachers, Department of Education, statutory entities, re-creation, termination date

Transcript Highlights:

• But for everyone to recognize the benefits, and for everyone to be on the same page and to have agreement
• But I hope that there's 13 agreements on what this bill means.
• But I hope that there's 13 agreements on what this bill means because there was agreement for the last
• But I hope that there's 13 agreements on what this bill means because there was agreement for the last

Bills: SB100 , SB100

Committees: Senate Senate Judiciary , Senate House Judiciary

Keywords: burglary, aggravated burglary, dwelling, criminal law, property rights

Transcript Highlights:

• should provide assurance to the people of New Hampshire that even when our government cannot reach agreement
• should provide assurance to the people of New Hampshire that even when our government cannot reach agreement
• even when our government<00:24:54.640><c> cannot</c><00:24:54.960><c> reach</c><00:24:55.200><c> agreement
• </c><00:24:55.600><c> on</c><00:24:55.760><c> the</c> government cannot reach agreement on the government
• cannot reach agreement on the state<00:24:56.080><c> budget,</c><00:24:56.720><c> the</c><00:24:56.960

Committee: Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm glad we've come to an agreement every now and then. >> Senator Coleman-Madison, wasn't there a lawsuit
• I'm glad we've come to an agreement every now and then.
• I'm glad we've come to an agreement every now and then.
• I'm glad we've come to an agreement every now and then. >> Senator Coleman-Madison, wasn't there a lawsuit
• I'm glad we've come to an agreement every now and then. >> Senator Coleman-Madison, wasn't there a lawsuit

Bills: SB61 , SB8 , SB58 , SB60 , SB167 , SB61 , SB8 , SB58 , SB60 , SB167

Committee: Senate Finance and Taxation General Fund

Keywords: school psychologist, school psychology, interstate compact, licensure compact, license reciprocity, portable license, equivalent license, professional licensing, psychology board, school mental health, student services, educational services, interstate practice, reciprocal licensing, background check, continuing education, workforce shortage, military spouse, active duty military, compact commission

Transcript Highlights:

• permitted to use June accelerated as a revenue source or whether we need to stay with the leaders agreement
• um uh we need to stay with<00:01:33.280><c> the</c><00:01:33.600><c> leaders</c><00:01:34.280><c> agreement
• </c><00:01:35.280><c> which</c><00:01:35.920><c> only</c> with the leaders agreement which only with
• the leaders agreement which only called<00:01:36.560><c> for</c><00:01:38.000><c> um</c><00:01:38.320
• It is just here are some ideas that we hope that by tomorrow we could come to agreement on some of them

Transcript Highlights:

• All right, everybody in agreement. Okay. Do any harm? Not prohibited in the other. Okay.
• All right,<00:12:25.760><c> everybody</c><00:12:26.240><c> in</c><00:12:26.480><c> agreement.
• </c> right, everybody in agreement. right, everybody in agreement. Okay.<00:12:29.279><c> Okay.
• wondering if there's some opportunity to compromise on this, because it sounds to me like there is agreement
• think that the point was made that adding corrections in here, adding DCYF maybe we could come to agreement

Summary: The committee first took up several Senate messages on House bills. It recommended non-concurrence and a committee conference on HB 428 after Representative Pearson raised a constitutional concern about a retroactive provision in the building code bill. It also recommended non-concurrence on HB 156, which had been rewritten by the Senate to create a permanent subcommittee related to food/procurement; members said they did not want to create a permanent subcommittee and preferred to let the issue return next year if needed. On HB 85, concerning temporary student licenses for respiratory therapists, the committee concurred with a Senate rewrite that added restrictions but preserved the bill’s main purpose. On HB 82, a cleanup bill for occupational licensing, the committee concurred with a Senate amendment explicitly allowing the electricians board to create subcommittees, with members noting they did not think the authority was necessary but that it would not do harm. The committee then considered SB 178 on laboratory water testing. Representative Leyon offered amendment 2025-1743H to clarify how fees would be deposited and to direct a portion of certain fees and grants into a non-lapsing lab equipment and replacement fund rather than the general fund. Members said the amendment made the bill’s fiscal flow easier to understand. The amendment passed unanimously, and the committee then voted ought to pass as amended on SB 178, also unanimously, and placed it on consent. For SB 180, dealing with Coos County distressed-area designation, the committee adopted amendment 1748H to remove a provision requiring commissioners to give extra consideration to Coos County and to add a 20-year sunset on the designation. The amendment passed 14-2, and the committee then voted ought to pass as amended 15-1; Representative Schmidt said he would file a minority report because he viewed the provision as unenforceable rather than objectionable. The committee also voted to retain SB 185, which concerned OPLC-related issues, so the agency could continue working on a policy and report back later; that motion passed 16-0. Finally, the committee voted inexpedient to legislate on SB 198, establishing New Hampshire Service Dog Week, after debate over whether the recognition should be statutory or left to a gubernatorial proclamation. Supporters argued the bill would raise awareness and help promote service dogs, while opponents said the effort could continue without a statute and that special-day statutes often lose attention once enacted. The committee also voted inexpedient to legislate on SB 182 after extensive discussion of proposed changes to the maternal mortality review process. Opponents argued the bill would broaden access to personally identifiable information, change panel structure, and affect data comparability; supporters said it was a housekeeping update requested by DHS that would add DCYF and Corrections and improve review of maternal deaths. The ITL motion passed 10-6, and Representative Long said he would file a minority report and explain the committee’s reasoning to the bill’s sponsor.

Transcript Highlights:

• passing early tax bills off the floor of the House of Representatives that do not have negotiation and agreement
• passing early tax bills off the floor of the House of Representatives that do not have negotiation and agreement
• taken, and as far as going to Ways and Means, it goes to floor, doesn't become law if there's no agreement
• doesn't become law if there's<00:42:08.840><c> no</c> there's no there's no uh,<00:42:09.920><c> agreement
• </c><00:42:12.160><c> So,</c> uh, agreement with the 68 votes. So, uh, agreement with the 68 votes.

Summary: House File 18 was taken up in committee, with the chair noting a preference to hear testimony from people who had traveled farther before hearing from lobbyists or other local witnesses. Representative Engan presented the bill as a family-support measure that would exempt certain infant care items from sales tax, arguing that the cost of raising children has risen sharply and that the bill would provide immediate relief to parents. He cited examples of potential savings on cribs, mattresses, strollers, and baby bottles, and said he was open to expanding the list of covered items. Chair Gomez offered a DE1 amendment that would replace the blanket sales tax exemption with an expansion of Minnesota’s child tax credit, arguing that the child-rearing cost burden is better addressed through targeted assistance rather than a broad exemption that could also benefit higher-income purchasers. After discussing the policy differences and the fiscal impact, Gomez withdrew the amendment. Members then asked questions about the bill’s scope, whether luxury items should be excluded, and why the exemption was limited to baby items rather than older children’s needs. Engan said he would be open to excluding luxury items and to discussing broader expansions, including school supplies. The committee then heard testimony in support from Sarah Gangelhoff of the Women’s Foundation of Minnesota, who said the bill would help families facing high housing, food, and child care costs and would especially benefit women and single-mother households. Maggie Hanggi of the Minnesota Catholic Conference also supported the bill, saying the tax relief could help families afford essential infant items and reduce fear for prospective parents. Members raised concerns about whether tax exemptions effectively reach the families most in need, with one member noting that low-income families may not even be in a position to shop for these items; Engan responded that the savings would still be real for those who do purchase them. No final vote or disposition on the bill was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• We understand that this would actually be better done through an agreement, but we'd ask the committee
• And I believe it was mentioned in UPW's testimony regarding an agreement to set up a program that's being
• The first is a supplemental agreement. The second is an MOU.
• The difference being the supplemental agreement expires with the expiration of the master contract, right
• The first is a supplemental agreement. The second is an MOU.

Committee: House Labor

Transcript Highlights:

• certified mail or by electronic mail to an address designated for notice in the lease or management agreement
• certified mail or by electronic mail to an address designated for notice in the lease or management agreement
• certified mail or by electronic mail to an address designated for notice in the lease or management agreement
• certified mail or by electronic mail to an address designated for notice in the lease or management agreement
• The lease or management agreement.

Summary: The Judiciary Committee heard testimony on several bills related to bribery and public corruption. On SB 2249, which would increase penalties for bribery under certain circumstances, the Honolulu Prosecutor’s Office and Honolulu Police Department supported the measure, arguing that Hawaii’s current class B felony penalty is probationable and too weak to secure cooperation in corruption cases, especially after the U.S. Supreme Court’s Snyder decision narrowed federal bribery prosecutions. The Public Defender opposed the bill, arguing that elevating bribery to a class A felony and making it non-probationable was excessive, overbroad, and would remove judicial discretion. Multiple individuals also testified in support. Committee members questioned the prosecutor about removing deferred acceptance of plea provisions and asked HPD about the $20,000 threshold; the prosecutor said alternative charges could still be used in plea bargaining, and HPD said the threshold aligns with first-degree theft. The committee also discussed how current law tolls the bribery statute of limitations while an official remains in office, with the prosecutor explaining it can extend up to six years total. The committee then heard SB 2494, which would set a nine-year statute of limitations for bribery offenses. The Public Defender opposed the extension, saying the justification based on the length of federal investigations was too broad and that bribery already has a longer limitations period than most felonies. The Honolulu Prosecutor’s Office supported the bill, saying bribery cases often involve coordination with federal investigators, that federal and state evidence-gathering methods may differ, and that a longer period would help ensure admissible evidence and allow state prosecution when federal law no longer applies. Members asked whether there were public examples of cases lost to the current limitations period; the prosecutor said he was not aware of any publicly available examples, but maintained nine years was a reasonable period. The committee also considered SB 2737, which would create a misdemeanor for failure by a state or county elected official to report bribery. The Department of the Attorney General offered comments and suggested changing the term to “public servant” for consistency with existing law. The Honolulu Prosecutor’s Office supported the intent but warned the reporting requirement could create Fifth Amendment issues for witnesses who might otherwise be useful in grand jury proceedings. The bill drew broad public support, with 33 supporters and no opposition noted. Finally, the committee took up SB 3071, which revises sex trafficking and promoting prostitution statutes by redefining “profits from prostitution” and adding an affirmative defense for certain lawful transactions. The Public Defender opposed the measure, saying it still could reach people without the required criminal intent and that the affirmative defense language could be applied unevenly. The Attorney General and Honolulu Prosecutor supported the bill, saying it better addresses concerns raised by the State v. Ibarra decision while closing loopholes that allow traffickers to disguise profits as loans or gifts. The prosecutor emphasized that traffickers are sophisticated and can structure transactions to evade current law.

Transcript Highlights:

• It gets the department in line to an agreement.
• </c><00:02:16.239><c> It</c> department in line to an agreement.
• It department in line to an agreement.
• It's a simple direct agreement between a patient and their doctor.
• <00:04:56.080><c> a</c> simple direct agreement between a simple direct agreement between a patient<00

Bills: HF2400 , HF1724 , HF3437 , HF4333 , HF2874 , HF4052

Committee: House Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><01:22:25.120><c> um</c> a settlement, come to an agreement um a settlement, come to an agreement
• I think it requires both sides to come to an agreement that, okay, we need more time.
• </c><01:43:41.520><c> in</c> adjuster side, come to an agreement in adjuster side, come to an agreement
• </c> the state of non-contractual agreements the state of non-contractual agreements are<02:14:00.400
• </c><02:24:48.640><c> or</c> collective bargaining agreement or collective bargaining agreement or personnel

Committee: House Labor, Industrial and Rehabilitative Services

Transcript Highlights:

• Pro Tem, about the intent of preempting the court's decisions, but the agreement...
• The agreement that I just read actually speaks to the agreement from the state of Alabama not to appeal
• You, you sign an agreement... Order. You sign an agreement not to appeal?
• As leader Daniel stated, the court has not instructed Alabama to do anything but comply with the agreement
• In addition, the court adopts the recitation of the party's arguments and agreements, findings of fact

Transcript Highlights:

• But we were having a member prepared, the bill's going to change slightly, but it is an agreement between
• The bill's going to change slightly, but it is an agreement between the Indigent Defender Fund and LMA
• even understand that that was a contract that he pled guilty to, the understanding that was the agreement
• Again, I wasn't around four years ago in 2022 when they made that agreement, so I'm not privy to those
• to see more work done on this with people like you and ARC and others just to get to a place of agreement

Committee: House Administration of Criminal Justice

Summary: The committee first handled several housekeeping items, voluntarily deferring HB 123, HB 255, and HB 994 without objection. It then took up SCR 3 by Senator Brock Myers, which would delay and revise implementation of a state police rule affecting criminal history background checks for licensed ambulance personnel and certain health care workers. After adopting Amendment Set 434 to remove a provision involving parish and local law enforcement checks, the committee reported SCR 3 as amended favorably. The committee also heard HB 978 by Rep. Lecombe, which as amended raises the population threshold for municipalities required to remit certain special costs to the District Indigent Defender Fund from under 5,000 to under 9,000; with support from the town of Addis and related stakeholders, the bill was reported favorably as amended. The committee then considered HB 967 by Rep. Moore, which sought to remove language limiting parole eligibility for certain pre-July 2, 1973 life-sentenced offenders to those who had pleaded guilty, thereby allowing a small group of elderly inmates convicted at trial to seek parole consideration. Supporters argued the bill would only create an opportunity for review, not release, and cited rehabilitation and fairness concerns; opponents, including district attorneys and corrections officials, argued the 2022 law already addressed the intended group and that the current bill would reopen cases involving serious violent crimes. After extended debate, the motion to report HB 967 favorably failed on an 8-3 vote. Finally, the committee took up HB 1107 by Rep. Melerine, a bill on determining intellectual disability in capital cases. The bill, as amended, raised the burden of proof to clear and convincing evidence, set an IQ threshold framework, required expert reports and Daubert-type reliability review, and limited the article to post-conviction capital cases. The Attorney General’s office and district attorneys supported the bill as a way to create clearer procedures and speed resolution of Atkins claims, while criminal defense lawyers, disability advocates, clergy, and medical experts opposed it as inconsistent with current clinical standards and potentially unconstitutional, warning that rigid IQ cutoffs and presumptions could wrongly expose people with intellectual disabilities to execution. The transcript ends during closing remarks on HB 1107, with no final committee vote shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• I appreciate the work that you've done making sure that both parties are in agreement with all of the
• And what they do is they transfer that purchase agreement to this new buyer. for $200,000.
• And what they do is they transfer that purchase agreement to this new buyer. ...do is they transfer that
• purchase agreement to this new buyer.
• just trying to put a little clarity in this just to make sure that everybody knows what kind of agreement

Transcript Highlights:

• Minnesota State is our community colleges, your regional comprehensives, and with the reciprocity agreements
• ><c> some</c><00:12:39.760><c> of</c><00:12:39.839><c> the</c><00:12:40.079><c> surrounding</c> agreements
• with some of the surrounding agreements with some of the surrounding states,<00:12:41.440><c> um</c>
• </c><00:15:00.320><c> I'm</c><00:15:00.560><c> looking</c><00:15:00.639><c> to</c> reciprocity agreements
• I'm looking to reciprocity agreements.

Transcript Highlights:

• working, and we have gotten some returns on the data-sharing agreements.
• On the Medicaid and... ...and we have gotten some returns on the data-sharing agreements.
• They’re going to take a plea agreement to come to the reentry court program.
• The DA has to consent to that plea agreement as well.
• We're redoing our MOU and updating our data-sharing agreement to get more of those codes.

Committee: House Administration of Criminal Justice

Summary: The committee held an oversight discussion on Louisiana’s reentry landscape, with Chair Villio emphasizing that the hearing was informational only and that no bills were being considered. Department of Public Safety and Corrections officials outlined the state’s reentry mission and current programming in state facilities, local jails, regional reentry centers, and STEP facilities. They described services including literacy and GED preparation, career and technical education, industry certifications, postsecondary partnerships, mental health and substance abuse treatment, victim impact and trauma programming, and pre-release assistance such as state IDs, birth certificates, Social Security cards, Medicaid, SNAP, and driver’s licenses. Officials also discussed a new data-sharing MOU with DCFS for child support matters and a planned “return portal” with Louisiana Works to connect incarcerated people to jobs and training aligned with labor market needs. A major focus was the reentry court program at Angola for men and at the Louisiana Correctional Institute for Women. Assistant Secretary DeLouche and Assistant Warden Easley explained that the program is limited to nine judicial districts, requires judge and district attorney consent, and includes a two-year institutional phase followed by three years of intensive supervised probation. Participants must earn a HiSET if needed, complete multiple certifications and life-skills programs, and then petition for resentencing; officials said the program’s current recidivism rate is under 14 percent. They also highlighted specialized offerings such as vocational mentoring, a Braille transcription and repair program, and family-focused events like a father-daughter dance. Testimony from employers and local officials was broadly supportive. Eric Lane described hiring formerly incarcerated workers through the parole project and said the program solved problems he had seen with halfway-house placements by helping people secure housing, IDs, and licenses before release. Sheriff Kevin Cobb said sheriffs are active partners, with 51 of 64 parishes offering some form of programming and more than 75 percent of local facilities providing services; he stressed that local jail programming has grown over time and that data collection is improving. Members repeatedly asked for more data on recidivism, employment outcomes, and what programs are available by parish, and several praised the department and sheriffs for the work already being done. No votes were taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• to control training data licensing markets, and that was an important issue on which they were in agreement
• It's difficult to enter a licensing agreement where you have no idea what the other side has actually
• Or it's Reddit, who signed a license agreement for content they don't themselves own, but they're getting
• And that agreement moves us closer.
• And that agreement moves us closer. confirmed match labeling within two hours have disputed and human

Summary: The Senate Judiciary Committee and Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee held an informational hearing at Stanford on the intersection of artificial intelligence, copyright, transparency, and California’s creative economy. Chairs and members emphasized that the hearing was not on a specific bill and would not include a vote, but was intended to gather information ahead of the next legislative session. Opening remarks stressed the tension between protecting artists’ intellectual property and allowing AI innovation to continue in California, with several members noting the state’s outsized role in both the tech and entertainment sectors. The first panel featured Professor Pamela Samuelson and Stanford researcher Rishi Bommasani. Samuelson reviewed the current copyright litigation landscape, including dozens of lawsuits against generative AI companies, and explained that fair use will likely be central, especially the market-effects factor. She said state action is constrained by federal copyright preemption, but transparency, privacy, and deepfake-related regulation may still be possible. Bommasani described widespread opacity around training data among major California AI companies, discussed AB 2013 and the EU AI Act as transparency models, and warned that disclosure rules face enforcement and design challenges. Members asked about market dilution theories, open-source models, user data, machine unlearning, and what California can do without conflicting with federal law. The second panel included SAG-AFTRA board member Jason George, Animation Guild president Danny Lynn, and OpenAI copyright counsel Mark Gray. George and Lynn argued that AI training on performers’ and artists’ work without consent or compensation is already harming careers, devaluing creative labor, and enabling digital replicas and style imitation; both supported stronger transparency so rights holders can identify when their work is used and negotiate licenses. Gray said AI is increasingly being used as a productivity tool and pointed to growing partnerships between AI companies and publishers, studios, and record labels, while acknowledging concerns about deepfakes and specific harmful uses. Committee members pressed him on labeling AI-generated content, training-data disclosure, and how to protect creators while still encouraging innovation. No formal action or vote was taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, this bill, Senate Bill 402FN, eliminates certain non-compete agreements for physician associates.
• </c> agreements for physician associates. agreements for physician associates.
• And it eliminates, as Senator Gray said in his introduction, the non-compete agreements for physician
• This bill eliminates non-compete agreements for physician associates going forward with no impact on
• </c> that everybody's doing this in agreement that everybody's doing this in agreement in<03:05:39.120

Committee: House Executive Departments and Administration

Summary: The committee first held a public hearing and then an executive session on Senate Bill 401, which DHHS described as a cleanup bill. Testimony from the department explained that the bill would repeal obsolete reporting requirements tied to a repealed municipal reimbursement program and to the now-repealed commission on demographic trends. No one testified in opposition, and the committee voted 12-0 ought to pass, placing the bill on the consent calendar. The committee then heard Senate Bill 402, which would eliminate certain non-compete agreements for physician associates going forward. Senator Gray introduced the bill, and a representative of the New Hampshire Society of Physician Associates said it would improve workforce recruitment and access to care without changing scope of practice or affecting existing agreements. Committee members asked about the length of current restrictions and whether the change would make New Hampshire more attractive to PAs. The committee voted 12-0 ought to pass and sent the bill to the consent calendar. Next, the committee took up Senate Bill 426, which would repeal the permissible fireworks committee. Senator Uler and the deputy state fire marshal said the committee’s original purpose had been overtaken by later changes adopting federal fireworks standards, and that the fire marshal now has the necessary authority. The committee voted 12-0 ought to pass and placed the bill on the consent calendar. Finally, the committee began hearing Senate Bill 469, a DMV modernization bill allowing electronic signatures in place of wet signatures for certain motor vehicle title and registration processes. Senator Lang, Carvana, the New Hampshire Auto Dealers Association, Copart, and DMV staff all supported the measure, saying it would reduce delays, errors, and paperwork burdens. Members asked about AI, consumer protections, costs, and how electronic signatures would work in practice, including in cases involving deceased owners. The transcript cuts off during that hearing before any committee action on SB 469.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> add in um joint maintenance agreements add in um joint maintenance agreements and<01:09:59.840><
• Um, the second is related to their agreement, the parents' agreement, with certain questions, and we
• Um, the second is related to their agreement, the parents' agreement, with certain questions, and we
• Um, the second is related to their agreement, the parents' agreement, with certain questions, and we
• c> certain</c><02:53:16.520><c> questions</c> agreement that is with certain questions agreement that

Committee: Senate Education