Transcript Highlights:

• Each suit had 8 to 9 claims. That's 90 claims.
• Each suit had 8 to 9 claims. That's 90 claims.
• to go through all 90 and figure taking it away from handling other claimant's claims to go through all
• I think the other important point is we talked about 50,000 claims, PIP claims.
• It's going to hold people accountable in the future for auto body labor rates to adjust with inflation

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Financial Services Committee heard testimony on several insurance, transportation, and labor-related bills. Senator Edwards supported bills addressing app-based delivery workers, arguing that food-delivery drivers should be treated as employees with protections and mileage reimbursement, and that a small surcharge on app-based deliveries could raise revenue for the Commonwealth and localities. Kevin Brousseau of the Massachusetts AFL-CIO also backed the delivery-worker bill, saying it would preserve employee status, add data transparency, and create a process for challenging deactivations. MAPC supported a bill to change transportation network company fees from a flat per-ride charge to a percentage-based assessment, saying the current fee is outdated and that a higher fee could raise more transportation revenue and help address congestion and emissions. A large portion of the hearing focused on auto insurance and collision repair issues. Insurance industry witnesses supported a bill to limit attorney’s fees in PIP cases by giving insurers 30 days after a complaint is served to pay amounts due without fee exposure, arguing that PIP litigation has surged, is clogging courts, and is being driven by out-of-state firms. They also opposed auto body labor-rate bills, saying the market is already adjusting and that a statutory floor is unnecessary. In contrast, auto body shop representatives and the Alliance of Automotive Service Providers of Massachusetts urged favorable action on bills to raise and regularly update collision repair labor rates, saying current reimbursement levels are far below market, have not kept pace with inflation or vehicle technology, and are making it hard to retain workers and keep small shops open. One witness also supported a bill to limit insurance surcharge points for low-damage accidents or minor moving violations. Committee members asked questions about deactivation rights for delivery workers, the mechanics of the PIP litigation issue, and the gap between body-shop and mechanical labor rates. Testimony emphasized that current auto body reimbursement rates are around the mid-$40s per hour, while mechanical work can be reimbursed at much higher rates, and that advisory-board discussions have produced only limited progress. At the end of the hearing, the chairs asked if anyone else wished to testify, then moved to close the hearing; the motion was seconded and approved unanimously.

Transcript Highlights:

• <c> Um,</c> In recent years, we've had some ongoing In recent years, we've had some ongoing large claims
• This bill is in part an attempt to remedy that problem of catastrophic claims, and I we appreciate that
• This bill is in part an attempt to remedy that problem of catastrophic claims, and I we appreciate that
• I'm guessing that we have above-average insurance premiums because we've had catastrophic claims.
• I'm guessing that we have above-average insurance premiums because we've had catastrophic claims.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• House Bill 1162, by Representative Boudreaux, payment adjustment of insurance claims, verification of
• to evaluation of claims.
• The fee adjustments are between $5 and at most $35, and not all fees have been adjusted.
• The fee adjustments are between $5 and at most $35, and not all fees have been adjusted.
• , public adjusters, and insurance appraisers.

Bills: HR91, HR92, HR93, HCR44, HR84, HR85, HR86, HR87, HR88, HR89, HR90, HCR42, HCR43, SCR21, HB483, HB484, HB893, HB1087, HB1088, HB1089, HB1090, HB1091, HB1092, HB1093, HB1094, HB1095, HB1096, HB1097, HB1098, HB1099, HB1100, HB1101, HB1102, HB1103, HB1104, HB1105, HB1106, HB1107, HB1108, HB1109, HB1110, HB1111, HB1112, HB1113, HB1114, HB1116, HB1117, HB1118, HB1119, HB1120, HB1121, HB1122, HB1123, HB1124, HB1125, HB1126, HB1127, HB1128, HB1129, HB1130, HB1131, HB1132, HB1133, HB1134, HB1135, HB1136, HB1137, HB1138, HB1139, HB1140, HB1141, HB1142, HB1143, HB1144, HB1145, HB1146, HB1147, HB1148, HB1149, HB1150, HB1151, HB1152, HB1153, HB1154, HB1155, HB1156, HB1157, HB1158, HB1159, HB1160, HB1161, HB1162, HB1163, HB1164, HB1165, HB1166, HB1167, HB1168, HB1169, HB1170, HB1171, HB1172, HB1173, HB1174, HB1175, HB1176, HB1177, HB1178, HB1179, HB1180, HB1181, HB1182, HB1183, HB1184, HB1185, HB1186, HB1187, HB1188, HB1189, HB1190, HB1191, HB1192, HB1193, HB1194, HB1195, HB1196, HB1197, HB1198, HB1199, HB1200, HB1201, HB1202, HB1203, HB1204, HB1205, HB1206, HB1207, HB1208, HB1209, HB1210, HB1211, HB1212, HB1213, HB1214, HB1215, HB1216, HB1217, HB1218, HB1219, HB1220, HB1221, HB1222, HB1223, HB1224, HB1225, HB1226, HB1227, HB1228, HB1229, HB1230, HB1231, SB1, SB54, SB82, SB87, SB92, SB93, SB99, SB104, SB113, SB114, SB115, SB123, SB129, SB133, SB161, SB162, SB224, SB236, SB275, SB280, SB289, SB305, SB310, SB325, SB330, SB339, SB350, SB359, SB382, SB410, SB412, HCR10, HB54, HB55, HB67, HB73, HB125, HB133, HB158, HB168, HB169, HB191, HB195, HB205, HB225, HB245, HB280, HB283, HB296, HB319, HB325, HB339, HB399, HB407, HB448, HB482, HB550, HB591, HB821, HB826, HB992, HB995, HB1085, HB1086, HR15, HR20, HCR14, HCR6, HCR19, HB861, HB889, HB904, HB907, HB908, HB929, HB1009, HB13, HB23, HB25, HB32, HB41, HB90, HB120, HB121, HB122, HB127, HB138, HB139, HB141, HB179, HB187, HB213, HB247, HB286, HB332, HB344, HB357, HB367, HB370, HB462, HB505, HB527, HB537, HB605, HB680, HB681, HB725, HB780, HB782, HB847, HB892, HB911, HB916, HB1012, HB81, HB134, HB154, HB163, HB170, HB194, HB217, HB220, HB254, HB259, HB290, HB308, HB311, HB360, HB382, HB401, HB410, HB417, HB463, HB575, HB592, HB718, HB723, HB750, HB755, HB776, HB812, HB844, HB882, HB888, HB961, HB966, HB980, HB228, HB289, HB735, HB796, HB284, HB301, HB722, HB468, HB546, HB746, HB842, HB923, HB46, HB166, HB349, HB352, HB436, HB588, HB140, HB429, HB827, HB953, HB901, HB9, HB52, HB58, HB193, HB400, HB570, HB577, HB582, HB733, HB747, HB868, HB952

Keywords: Tulane University, education, research, economic impact, healthcare, Louisiana, condolences, memorial, community service, faith, legacy, centenarian, tribute, honor, longevity, philanthropy, youth leadership, fundraising, nonprofits, physical therapy

Transcript Highlights:

• And that's because this bill, while it adjusts Minnesota care and the health care access fund and spends
• A higher-than-requested operating adjustment at the Minnesota Department of Health in the DE2 includes
• But in $22 billion in claims, they lost money.
• is high-claims payments—that's what they're doing.
• These are just high claims. That's all.

Bills: HF2435

Keywords: healthcare, dementia services, public health funding, opioid prevention, women's health, community health boards, mental health

Transcript Highlights:

• They claim that this is a red flag bill, which is and they claim that it denies due process.
• They claim that this is a red flag bill, which is and they claim that it denies due process.
• They claim that this is a red flag bill, which is and they claim that it denies due process.
• They claim that this is a red flag bill, which is and they claim that it denies due process.
• They claim that this is a red flag bill, which is and they claim that it denies due process.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• all of the states that they have been provisionally selected across the country, wanting certain adjustments
• This is to meet projections for the unclaimed property claims.
• Most cite the salary adjustments that came from implementation of the pay plan within Class and Compact
• going to be able to do with that billion dollars over the next five years to hopefully drive down claims
• costs not only for Medicaid but also for private insurers as well. ...down claims costs not only for

Keywords: 1204, all

Transcript Highlights:

• To ensure claims continue to be paid from the Palisades and Eaton fires.
• This measure provides the Fair Plan additional resources to ensure they have adequate claims.
• And public adjusters do great work for so many homeowners, so many of them are being helped.
• Right now by public adjusters, however, gaps in the law have led to abuses from public adjusters to homeowners
• It actually caps public adjuster fees, and it strengthens contract transparency.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The third is early dismissal of invalid claims.
• So, you know, most claims that are denied, Most claims that are denied go to a hearing within a year
• Like fraudulent claims, I guess?
• It's usually the first claim out of the shoot, and you have to claim it as a defense right away anyway
• It's usually the first claim out of the shoot, and you have to claim it as a defense right away anyway

Keywords: 959, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, on line 31 you can see that what we do to adjust for that is we just subtract the inflation amount
• Um, and then either the claim is denied or it moves along and the assessment's taken and the process
• Representative Burkel: The fence claims and the crop damage that a herd of elk can do in a short time
• </c><00:13:48.720><c> and</c><00:13:48.959><c> and</c> um you know submitting a claim and and um you
• Um once the claim forms are happens.

Bills: HF601

Keywords: agriculture, depredation compensation, livestock, crop damage, elk, wolves, wildlife management, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> those claims. those claims.
• </c> It may require some companies to adjust It may require some companies to adjust how<01:57:24.560
• monthly gross an get to an adjusted monthly gross an adjusted<02:09:55.760><c> month</c><02:09:56.159
• </c> are removed um it which is the claim are removed um it which is the claim that<02:22:20.560><c>
• </c> those adjustments. those adjustments.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And it means that some claims are not being pursued by those agencies.
• The annual fee adjustments proposed will not be automatic.
• The annual fee adjustments proposed will not be automatic.
• That gets adjusted, right, to actuals over time.
• We're going to analyze those, right, and adjust accordingly.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> ensure that exemption and refund claim ensure that exemption and refund claim are<01:21:25.000><
• </c> um that doax notes that refund claims um that doax notes that refund claims under<01:22:13.199><
• </c> limitation so if you're filing a claim limitation so if you're filing a claim more<01:24:54.600>
• </c> in their best interest to really claim in their best interest to really claim this<01:26:28.440>
• </c> this then they're going to be claiming this then they're going to be claiming it<01:26:29.400><c

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee on Economic Development and Technology met on March 12, 2025, and heard testimony on several measures. On SB 9, the Hawaii Food Industry Association, the Chamber of Commerce, and the Hawaii Technology Development Corporation testified in support, and there were no questions or objections. On SB 148, the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs offered comments, and a member of the public testified in support of combining boxing and MMA oversight into a single combat sports commission, with amendments to preserve safety standards and separate or distinct treatment for the two sports. Committee discussion focused on whether proposed requirements were primarily safety-related or cost-related, how to handle smaller events, and whether a one-year implementation delay was necessary; the department said many safety provisions already exist in the MMA program, that it was open to continued discussion on costs, and that it needed time to combine rules and appoint new commissioners. The chair suggested possible amendments to account for event size and to reduce burdens on smaller events. The committee then heard SB 816, which drew extensive testimony on providing legal representation for immigrants in immigration proceedings. Supporters included the Hawaii State LGBTQ+ Commission, ACU Hawaii, the Refugee and Immigration Law Clinic, the Legal Clinic, Hawaii Friends of Civil Rights, the Hawaiʻi Coalition for Immigrant Rights, Pride at Work Hawaii, and others. Supporters argued that immigration cases can be as serious as criminal cases, that counsel is essential for due process, and that representation improves outcomes; several also emphasized the economic importance of immigrants to Hawaii. One supporter noted a suggested amendment to include training for attorneys and partners doing deportation defense and asylum work. Opposition came from a Navy veteran who argued the bill would use state resources for a federal issue, create inequities, and impose fiscal burdens. The chair noted 69 testimonies in support and 44 in opposition, and later an additional supporter brought the total to 70 in support. No vote was taken in the portion of the meeting provided. The committee also heard SB 125, with the Department of Economic Development, the Agreed Business Development Corporation, and the Hawaii Food Industry Association in support, and the Tax Foundation of Hawaii offering technical comments about complicated nested definitions in the bill. Testimony on SB 125 focused on updating the Enterprise Zone Program so local manufacturers selling directly to retail could qualify, along with value-added products and certain health-related sectors. Finally, on SB 732, the State of Hawaii Creative Industries testified with comments, raising concerns about county permit-fee waivers, implementation timing, and the bill’s lack of a carry-forward provision for the film tax credit. The witness said uncertainty in the credit was already causing productions to delay coming to Hawaii and urged stability to support the industry and local workers. The committee then moved on to additional testimony on the measure.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:28:47.320><c> audits</c> result of payment adjustments audits result of payment adjustments audits
• </c><00:28:52.080><c> the</c> provider submits the claim the provider submits the claim the Department
• </c><00:29:10.600><c> any</c> provider submits additional claims any provider submits additional claims
• </c><00:35:33.880><c> were</c> can't see why those adjustments were can't see why those adjustments were
• </c> implementing process to assess claims implementing process to assess claims before<00:55:55.520>

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We have inpatient and outpatient claims, which accounts for $688 million.
• We have inpatient and outpatient claims, which accounts for $688 million.
• Just one thing when I was looking over the per diem claims and fees, some exhibits...
• And so we do have a mechanism that if a claim is, Every week.
• But when they do make an adjustment, do they continue to make adjustments, you know, for the haves and

Summary: The subcommittee met to review Arkansas DHS hospital spending and reimbursement methods, with Secretary Janet Mann and Deputy Secretary Misty Eubanks explaining Medicaid hospital payments. They described fee-for-service per diem payments, cost settlements, and the upper payment limit (UPL) program, noting that SFY 2025 hospital payments included $688 million in inpatient/outpatient claims, $473 million in UPL payments, $248 million in cost settlements, and about $47 million in other payments such as graduate medical education and disproportionate share hospital funds. Members asked about why per diem rates vary, how cost settlements work, why UPL applies mainly to private hospitals, and how assessment fees are structured and funded. DHS said the hospital assessment fee is broad-based and uniform, used as the state share to draw federal funds, and that supplemental hospital payments after federal match totaled $548 million with no general revenue used. The Arkansas Hospital Association’s Jody Ann Tritt then gave a broader overview of the hospital landscape, explaining the different hospital types in the state, including critical access hospitals, rural emergency hospitals, PPS hospitals, and specialty hospitals. She said Arkansas hospitals face financial strain, citing a negative 5.18% patient service margin statewide and lower reimbursement than surrounding states. She argued that Arkansas hospitals are paid less than hospitals in neighboring states for similar services, that commercial payer rates and administrative burdens are a major problem, and that Medicaid and Medicare rates remain below cost even with UPL support. She also said hospitals are the backbone of community care, provide emergency and public health functions, and are looking for ways to invest in technology and telehealth but often lack the revenue to do so. Members pressed for clearer data on hospital finances, reimbursement adequacy, and the impact of commercial insurers. Tritt said the association had just authorized a statewide survey to gather updated financial information from hospitals, which she said would take about a year to complete. She also explained that Medicaid pays weekly, Medicare and commercial plans can involve delays and denials, and that hospitals often spend significant resources on revenue cycle work. The discussion ended with a brief update on assisted living reimbursement: DHS said one facility, The Pillars of the Community in Crossett, had announced closure, nine Living Choices waiver clients were being transitioned, and the updated rate study would be available after cost reports are collected, likely before the end of the fiscal year. The meeting then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• That's a loss and loss adjustment sense expense box.
• So the cap as liquid position and its claims paying capacity is is really important because and what
• So those claims may get settle quicker if you're only left with a slab.
• And certainly companies can claim is a trade secret.
• So you're saying that that as a taxpayer, I cannot see if they claim a trade secret.

Transcript Highlights:

• adjusting entries to the financial statements during the audit.
• And so in order to make sure that it is, we proposed an audit adjustment.
• adjustment that we made.
• We did adjust the part-time care to 50% of full-time care.
• And we did adjust the percentage of those payments to Step four, and we'd adjust the percentage of those

Summary: The committee met to receive a series of audit presentations, beginning with the statewide Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) for fiscal year 2025. The State Auditor’s Office and OMB reported a clean, unmodified opinion for the state, with strong financial results including a $40.6 billion net position, $30.99 billion in assets, $1.81 billion in liabilities, and continued Legacy Fund growth. OMB also explained the new GASB 101 compensated-absences reporting change and discussed pension-liability fluctuations tied to discount-rate assumptions and investment performance. Members asked about how the state compares to others and about the effect of short-term commodity price swings, and OMB said the report reflects actual fiscal-year results rather than forecasts. The committee then heard the University System audit, which also received a clean opinion but included four findings: misreporting of Strategic Investment and Improvements Fund revenue, insufficient monitoring of service organizations at CTS, NDSU, and UND, improper bank reconciliations at Dakota College of Bottineau, Dickinson State, and Williston State, and investment/cash reconciliation problems at Bismarck State College related to bond proceeds. University officials agreed with the findings and said corrective actions were underway, including internal review of bank reconciliations. Members raised questions about NDSU’s use of certificates of deposit, and university staff explained that CDs are used to earn interest on funds being accumulated for future projects. Several other audits were presented, most with clean opinions and no findings, including the State Auditor’s Office, Workforce Safety and Insurance, Housing Finance Agency, Housing Incentive Fund, Job Service North Dakota, the Retirement and Investment Office, PERS, the Center for Distance Education, the Commission on Legal Counsel for Indigents, the Ethics Commission, and the Office of Administrative Hearings. Notable exceptions included a State Fair Association audit with an adverse opinion on the foundation component unit because its financial statements were not available for audit, and a Securities Department performance audit finding that performance-based pay increases and bonuses were issued without required evaluations. The committee also discussed the State Auditor’s future needs, including more staff capacity, data analytics, cybersecurity reviews, possible subpoena authority, independent legal counsel, and whether some audits—such as the Ethics Commission and State Fair—should be handled by independent third parties or under different statutory arrangements.

Transcript Highlights:

• This bill adjusts fiscal years 26-27 appropriation for the Department of Human Services, Department of
• This will get us through some of the adjustments that's needed.
• </c> get us through some of the adjustments get us through some of the adjustments that's<00:09:44.480
• ><00:13:01.120><c> and</c><00:13:01.520><c> perhaps</c><00:13:02.200><c> the</c><00:13:02.360><c> claims
• </c> AG's office, and perhaps the claims AG's office, and perhaps the claims bill,<00:13:03.760><c> which

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• There are many different policy options the legislature could take, such as adjusting who is served in
• Does that mean that 98% of the claims were filed by someone other than the worker? And if so, who?
• Beneficiaries can claim the credits in the year after revenue approves them.
• Between 2019 and 2024, they claimed $19.2 million in credits, and it is likely that they will claim the
• To date, there have been six tenants that have claimed the exemption.

Summary: The committee met on July 15, 2026, but initially lacked a quorum, so it could not adopt prior minutes. Chair Jerry Pollett welcomed new member Senator Victoria Hunt and new JLARC staff, and noted national recognition for recent JLARC reports. The meeting then moved into a series of preliminary audit presentations and an agency strategic management update, with committee members asking questions after each item. JLARC presented a preliminary audit of DCYF’s Juvenile Rehabilitation programs. Staff concluded that crowding, staffing shortages, weak risk assessments, and inconsistent programming combine to create unsafe conditions. The report found that most youth are housed in two large secure facilities operating near or above capacity, incidents rise as population rises, 47% of frontline staff leave within a year, current assessment tools are not valid for the population, and program access depends more on facility than individual need. JLARC made one recommendation to the legislature to address crowding and seven to DCYF, including improving retention, training, incident response procedures, validated assessments, program alignment, and data quality. DCYF Secretary Ross Hunter said the agency agreed overcrowding is a serious problem, described ongoing efforts to improve staffing and safety, and said a detailed response would be provided later. Committee members raised concerns about education access, retaliation against staff or youth who participated in the audit, and whether JR-25 has helped or worsened conditions. JLARC then presented a preliminary audit of Labor and Industries’ enforcement of farm worker labor laws. The audit found that L&I generally meets inspection timelines for health and safety complaints, but not for wage and hour or retaliation complaints, where delays are driven largely by time before assignment to an investigator. Staff said complaint volume exceeds capacity, though the agency has added staff, created screening processes, and reorganized workloads, and 2026 legislation now allows prioritization of complaints and broader investigations. JLARC recommended that L&I report back in December 2026 and December 2027 on backlog reduction and implementation of the new law. An L&I representative said the agency is hiring additional staff and will provide a formal response later. The committee also received a JLARC overview and Department of Health strategic management plan update on hospital data reporting, inspections, complaints, and adverse event reporting. DOH reported measurable progress on inspection compliance, new staffing and licensing systems, translated complaint forms, and plans for future work on language access, adverse event reporting, and financial data dashboards. After lunch, JLARC began its 2026 tax preference performance reviews. The first review covered the Main Street tax credit, which JLARC said has helped increase the number of Main Street communities and businesses, with positive growth near designated districts; JLARC recommended continuing the preference and improving business-count data. The second review covered the equitable access to credit program, which JLARC said appears to support underserved communities by funding loans through CDFIs; JLARC recommended continuing the preference beyond its 2027 expiration. The committee began questions on the program mechanics and the role of the Community Reinvestment Act, and the presentation was still underway when the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• In other words, the adjustments essentially offset. Mr. Chairman, Mr.
• Chairman, when we adjust the room again, I have a comment to make.
• The following year, we made up those adjustments. Mr.
• There'll be no adjustment necessary.
• Full conformity—our starting point is federal adjusted gross income.

Summary: The joint House Ways and Means and Senate Finance committees met to hear identical Arizona tax conformity bills, HB 2153 and SB 1106, which would conform state tax law to the federal Internal Revenue Code as of Jan. 1, 2026, with some provisions applied retroactively to tax year 2025. Staff explained that the bills exclude the federal senior deduction for those 65 and older, the higher state and local tax deduction, and the new car loan interest deduction, while including a $6,000 retirement-income deduction for taxpayers 60 and older, a $6,000 Roth IRA contribution deduction, a higher dependent tax credit, and a deduction for child and dependent care expenses above the federal credit. The JLBC fiscal note estimated a $441.3 million general fund revenue loss in FY 2026, and members discussed that this was roughly the same as full conformity because the bill’s adjustments offset some of the federal changes. Bill sponsors and supporters argued the measure should be enacted early to give taxpayers and tax preparers certainty before filing season, noting that the Department of Revenue had already issued forms assuming conformity and that delay could force amended returns. They said the bill reflects a negotiated package that preserves most of the federal tax relief while tailoring it for Arizona, especially by lowering the senior deduction age to 60 and replacing the auto loan deduction with family-focused provisions such as the higher child credit and child care deduction. The Arizona Society of CPAs and the Arizona Free Enterprise Club supported the bills, emphasizing the need for early conformity and fewer filing complications. Opponents, including Save Our Schools Arizona, the Arizona Center for Economic Progress, Opportunity Arizona, and several individuals, argued the package would reduce state revenue, worsen the structural deficit, and mainly benefit higher-income taxpayers and corporations. Some witnesses criticized the inclusion of federal school-choice-related provisions and warned about uncertainty around future federal guidance, while others said the bill should not move ahead before the budget process. Members also debated whether taxpayers would need to file amended returns if the state later diverged from the Department of Revenue forms, and whether the senior and child care provisions were targeted or equitable. The transcript ends during public testimony, with no final committee vote or action shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• All claims below that threshold or above it are paid entirely by a health plan.
• All claims below that threshold or above it are paid entirely by a health plan.
• </c> Insurers have had to adjust quickly. Insurers have had to adjust quickly.
• Reinsurance payments go directly towards covering high-cost claims.
• . claims. claims.

Keywords: 1183, house