Video & Transcript Research : 'First Amendment rights'

Page 42 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services Apr 14th, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • All right, thank you very much.
  • All right.
  • Isn't that right? That's right. But also, I would say that we've heard a lot about fraud.
  • All right, thank you. Members, any other questions? All right. Thank you very much. Thank you.
  • Stagner, we'll let you go first.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • By Senator Hancock, okay, all right, okay, there is A substitute Senator King moves, yes, right, there
  • This gave Texans... in certain rights, right to know, right to correct, right to delete.
  • Senator, if you want to come up on the dice or sit right there, are Or you can say right where you're
  • Senator Parker is right next door. He is coming over as he's right next door, so he's running.
  • Having a good morning. 565 566 All right. Thank you. Parker? Can I just have Cole first? Yeah.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Judiciary Feb 16th, 2026 at 11:18 pm

House Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • All right.
  • We have an amendment. Yes, Madam Chair, does the committee have the amendment?
  • That's the right word.
  • All right, we're going to go on to Senate Bill 100, and we have an amendment.
  • And first on the list, we have Representative. Would you like to explain your amendment?
Bills: SB38, SB17, SB41, SB264
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Agriculture and Wildlife Feb 16th, 2026 at 10:00 am

Agriculture and Wildlife

Transcript Highlights:
  • That is exactly right.
  • But with that, right. Now we're gonna.
  • I think I'd be willing to amend that part of the bill.
  • Would the author be willing to make an amendment right now to change it to 1500 eggs per month?
  • lease rights can cross each other on property, but if I have the right to be there, then I should have
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Judiciary Feb 6th, 2026 at 05:05 pm

Senate Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • You came right up next to me and said, what is this additional time for amendments?
  • So there was no limitation of five minutes on the consideration of the amendments. All right.
  • And I told you I would recognize you as many times as you asked to be recognized on amendments, right
  • Right?
  • That's what it does, right? So a couple things. First of all, I want to be real clear.
Bills: SB30, SB43, SB50, SB136
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Criminal Judiciary REVISED: Links added Feb 3rd, 2026 at 03:00 pm

Criminal Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • All right, please open the queue for voting. Announce the vote.
  • Right, we will show this bill out as they do pass. Thank you, Representative Olson.
  • I didn't knock, so I just opened the door. because I thought it was at the right house.
  • It's just a drafting procedure that we do right. Any further questions? None.
  • All right, before we adjourn, just one again reiterate, we've got a lot of bills.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Rules Feb 2nd, 2026 at 09:12 am

Senate Rules

TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Senate Session (Part II) Aug 27th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Lord, grant us clarity of mind, humility of heart, and courage to do what is right.
Bills: SB3, SB16
Summary: The Senate opened with an invocation by Senator Hagenbuch, who asked for wisdom, humility, courage, and guidance in serving Texas and conducting the chamber’s work with integrity and respect. After the prayer, the House messenger reported that the House had passed several congratulatory and commemorative resolutions, including HCR 2 honoring the victims of the July 2025 Hill Country floods, HCR 3 marking the dedication of the Children’s Emergency Relief International George M. Cowden Building in Austin, HCR 4 congratulating Ricky and Anne Lowe on their 47th wedding anniversary, and HCR 5 recognizing Don Sparks of Midland for receiving the 2025 Chief Roughneck Award. Following the House message, the Senate announced a brief recess while awaiting completion of the House calendar. Senator Zaffirini then moved that the Senate stand in recess until 4:00 p.m. on Wednesday, August 27, and the motion was adopted without objection.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • going on in their life, and we're concerned for that, and we're not there as much as we need to be right
  • The room right above our heads. All right, Mr.
  • That will be 34 in the civil rights room at 4:30. Thank you. Members, we're about to take a recess.
Bills: SB 2, SB 3, SB 10, SB 16
NV
Transcript Highlights:
  • She said she is a strong advocate of the First Amendment, but is also very conservative when it comes
  • And we wanted to write our law very carefully so that we avoided those First Amendment issues.
  • And going back to my first question, if that's all right, but is there any evidence that the items listed
  • One of the reasons why is because we don't want to be accused of a bridge in the First Amendment.
  • down, significant First Amendment violations remain.
Bills: AB52, AB76, AB163, AB388, AB483
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Judiciary Committee Apr 30th, 2025

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • All right. So you'll see an amendment to SB 248.
  • Miss offered that amendment. Is there a second to that amendment? Thank you. All right.
  • All right, ladies and gentlemen, the amendment is as it has been presented.
  • All in favor of the amendment, please say "I." I. Any opposed? Opposed. All right.
  • As amended. All right. Move motion for favor report. Yes, sir. Mr. Hy.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Right down on 71 by the Austin Airport, they unveiled the first test structure fabricated right here
  • Right down on 71 by the Austin Airport, they unveiled the first test structure fabricated right here
  • That's right. 2030. That's right. Uh, and I...
  • I mean, it's risky, right?
  • Our goal is to provide power to Texas, right, to help enable these first... ...of a kind demonstrations
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • All right. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, members.
  • Coastal County right now. They're in Austin.
  • You're on 2571 too, right? Yes. Okay.
  • I'll first point out two things that we like in the bill.
  • All right. Thank you.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Jurisprudence Mar 26th, 2025

Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • All right. Welcome. We'll start on my left, your right. So pull that microphone close.
  • All right. All right, go ahead. Thanks. So, good morning, Chairman Hughes and senators.
  • These rights are fundamental, inherent rights, and they're unalienable.
  • So that was my first experience.
  • We just want to get the paperwork right? Yes. You all had to go ahead and vote right again.
Summary: The Senate Committee on Jurisprudence heard several family-law and probate bills. Senate Bill 2052 would codify a rebuttable presumption that a parent acts in the best interest of a child and require clear and convincing evidence to overcome that presumption in disputes involving non-parents; the author and several witnesses supported the bill as a clarification of existing case law, while one witness suggested refining the modification language. Public testimony was closed and the bill was left pending. The committee also heard Senate Bill 1923, which would allow child support to follow a child placed temporarily with kin or fictive kin under a parental child safety placement or authorization agreement; the bill’s author and a grandparent caregiver testified in support, while one witness suggested the Attorney General could handle the change administratively. That bill was also left pending. Senate Bill 1838 would standardize fee schedules and compensation rules for attorneys ad litem and related court-appointed counsel in DFPS child-protection cases. The author said the bill would clarify unclear current law, and witnesses from the Texas Indigent Defense Commission and family-defense bar supported it, though one asked that expert-witness expenses be expressly included. Senate Bill 387 would raise the bond requirement for county judges handling guardianship proceedings to at least $500,000; the author described it as a refiling of a prior bill that passed unanimously but was vetoed, and a statutory probate judge testified in support. Senate Bill 1839 would require original or paper wills to be delivered to the transferee court when probate proceedings are transferred; the committee substitute broadened the delivery methods, and the district clerk witness supported the change. All three bills were left pending. The committee also took up Senate Bill 1536, which had previously been voted out with the wrong committee substitute; members reconsidered the vote, adopted the corrected substitute, and then voted 3-0 to report the bill favorably to the full Senate, with local and contested calendar certification. Finally, Senate Bill 1940 would create a transfer-on-death mechanism for manufactured homes classified as personal property, similar to existing tools for real property and vehicles; the author and an estate-planning attorney testified that it would streamline transfers and reduce probate costs. A non-substantive committee substitute was still being prepared, and the bill was left pending.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry Feb 12th, 2025

Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry

Transcript Highlights:
  • All right, sounds good. All right, with that, we'll get into it and go with the next speakers.
  • We do have an amendment that we... We do have an amendment that we need to add on.
  • If I can offer the amendment, we could... Would you like me to explain the amendment?
  • Chair: All right, the amendment is adopted. Now we're on the bill.
  • So I like that amendment.
Bills: SB110, SB64, SB42
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

ECD Public Hearing - Fri Apr 17, 2026 @ 8:30 AM HST

Economic Development & Technology

Transcript Highlights:
  • All right, let's move to SCR 47. All right, let's move to SCR 47.
  • All right. All right. Um, Chair's recommendation is to pass SCR 184 as is. Chair votes aye.
  • Did you want to do the tech amendment?
  • make an amendment for this if we make an amendment for this resolution resolution resolution the<00:25
  • :37.160> resolution<00:25:38.240> as<00:25:38.520> amended the resolution as amended
Summary: The committee met in Room 430 on April 17 at 8:30 a.m. and heard several resolutions focused on Hawaii’s sister-state and international relationships. Measures discussed included SCR 184, SCR 169 SD1, SCR 47, SCR 57 SD1, SCR 170 SD1, and SCR 163 SD1. Testimony generally supported expanding or formalizing ties with Japanese prefectures and other partners, including Yamaguchi, Okayama, and Aotearoa/New Zealand, as well as maintaining the Hawaii-Taiwan relationship. DBED’s Dennis Ling explained that sister-state agreements provide a framework for broader government, nonprofit, and private-sector relationships, and cited existing exchanges in transportation, health, education, culinary rice development, biosecurity, and food innovation. Catherine Stanway of the Division of Forestry and Wildlife supported the Aotearoa measure for predator control, biosecurity, and conservation cooperation. Jerry Chang of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Office testified in support of the Taiwan resolution, noting 33 years of sister-state ties and ongoing cooperation in education, culture, economy, and disaster management. One witness raised a concern about language in SCR 57 SD1 related to double taxation, saying that portion did not relate to the sister-state relationship, but the committee chose not to amend the measure to avoid possible delay or conference issues. A committee member also asked about how sister-state relationships work and whether other states have similar country-level arrangements; Ling said Hawaii has an MOU with Israel and mentioned Singapore as another possible partner, while noting that such arrangements often depend on the governor and are not standardized across states. After testimony, the committee voted to recommend passage of all measures as is. SCR 184, SCR 169 SD1, SCR 47, SCR 57 SD1, SCR 170 SD1, and SCR 163 SD1 were all adopted by the committee without amendments. Some members were excused during the hearing, and the meeting adjourned after the final vote.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/09/2026 - House Health & Human Services

Health & Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • All right, members, any questions? All right. Members, any questions for Senator Werner?
  • All right, any other speakers? No. All right, seeing no further discussion, Mr.
  • You couldn't pronounce it, right? All right, any other speakers?
  • All right, Mr. Vice Chair, next speaker: Irene Eckowitz. Notes. All right, Mr.
  • Exactly right. All right. Other questions for Mr. Gardner?
Summary: The committee heard and advanced a series of health and human services bills, with most receiving unanimous or near-unanimous support. SB 1113 would allow screening or evaluation agency employees, under contract with a county, to personally serve court documents in involuntary mental health proceedings instead of requiring police officers; supporters said it would reduce burdens on law enforcement and be less disruptive for patients. An amendment clarifying county contracts and reimbursement was adopted, and the bill passed 12-0. SB 1122 would limit AHCCCS from imposing over-100% prepayment review on certain behavioral health providers serving American Indian Health Program members unless a corrective action plan is in place; AHCCCS was neutral and said it could implement the bill with additional staffing, and it passed 12-0. SB 1123 would remove a board-certification requirement so trained, licensed forensic pathologists can supervise pathology trainees during the period before board exam results are available; Maricopa County supported it as a workforce and efficiency measure, and it passed 12-0. SB 1125 would require DCS to make annual efforts to enter MOUs with Arizona tribes and improve communication on tribal children in state care; DCS said it was already working on several pending MOUs, and the bill passed 12-0. The committee also approved several bills related to cancer screening and mental health. SB 1165 would prohibit cost-sharing for diagnostic and supplemental breast cancer screening services in the commercial market; the sponsor and advocates said it would remove financial barriers that delay diagnosis, and it passed 12-0 amid personal testimony from members and the chair. SB 1243 would require notice to a patient’s guardian before discharge from court-ordered treatment and allow guardians to seek continuation of treatment; supporters said it closes dangerous gaps when treatment orders expire, and it passed 10-0 with two absent. SB 1318 would repeal a state breast-density notice requirement that now overlaps with a federal FDA standard; ADHS said the change would reduce confusion and duplicate notices, and it passed 11-0 with one absent. SB 1188 would align Arizona controlled-substance schedules with federal FDA/DEA scheduling changes; supporters said it would speed access to new treatments, while one member voted no over concerns about relying on federal review, and it passed 8-2. Additional bills addressed privacy and assisted-living referrals. SB 1193 would bar DHS from selling or disclosing EMT personal identifying information for commercial purposes without consent, while still allowing de-identified data; the sponsor’s representative said the bill arose after DHS said vendor access to licensee data was not prohibited, and members discussed whether broader privacy protections should apply to other workers as well. It passed 10-0 with two absent. SB 1477 would require referral agencies serving assisted living facilities or homes to verify background-screening practices, maintain insurance, and provide documentation regarding APS registry status; the bill’s supporters said it raises standards for senior placement services, a technical amendment was adopted, and the bill passed 10-0 with two absent.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • So, you know, for the question, is the first and the second will there be debate?
  • I think that's right.
  • First, second, the debate. See no debate. Please open the cue for a vote.
  • Right?
  • The reason it wouldn't go under insurance is because it's not insurance, right?