Transcript Highlights:

• There is a huge benefit to the local value chain.
• There is a huge benefit to the local value chain.
• </c><00:53:13.839><c> of</c> on on what the right and left limits of on on what the right and left limits
• </c><01:03:25.799><c> that</c> of the bottle to give the benefit that of the bottle to give the benefit
• "Predatory behavior around, um, uh, veterans benefits on Wednesday when we come back.

Committee: Senate Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development

Transcript Highlights:

• So would the proposal that the DNR is proposing limit public input on that land that you acknowledge
• </c> components there is currently limited components there is currently limited available available
• There are pen manufacturers that are using this in limited situations already.
• uh situations already they would limited uh situations already they would need<01:06:31.680><c> more
• </c><01:27:04.080><c> there</c><01:27:04.239><c> in</c> we see that as their benefits there in we see

Committee: House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:

• Beyond the direct clinical benefit for the patient, the CCBHC program are expected to make and document
• Access should be limited to licensed, professionally or provisionally licensed behavioral professionals
• So if we have a critical medication that is time-limited, or a critical medication that, if the patient
• So if we have a critical medication that is time-limited, or a critical medication that, if the patient
• the providers to the prescribers and dispensers is limiting for how a certified community behavioral

Committee: House Joint Committee on Administrative Rules

Transcript Highlights:

• A few that I'll highlight, though, is that limited access to funding and staffing is limiting program
• A few that I'll highlight, though, is that limited access to funding and staffing is limiting program
• So those wraparound supports are also more limited, which makes it challenging to access the other...
• And just based on the requirements alone for Workforce Pell, we're pretty limited in the programs that
• With limited scope and funding, there were over $11 million in unmet housing and slum-and-blight needs

Summary: The Budget Section’s Commerce and Legal Services Division met to review the Department of Commerce base budget for the 2027-29 biennium and to receive an update on Commerce programs. Legislative Council staff first walked the committee through the “blue sheet” base budget summary, explaining the major line items, the large share of federal grant authority in Commerce’s budget, and the continuing appropriations that support several Commerce funds. Members asked how grant funding is coordinated across agencies, and staff said collaboration varies by program but is strong in areas like UAS and LIHEAP. Commerce Commissioner Chris Schilken then presented on current activities, focusing heavily on grant administration, transparency, and economic development programs. Members questioned how grant applicants are selected, whether Commerce tracks applications and return on investment, and how long grant awards take to reach recipients. The commissioner said Commerce uses scoring criteria, outside reviewers, a minimum 30-day application window, and typically completes awards within two to three months. A lengthy exchange followed over whether Commerce should open some grants only to intended recipients versus running competitive application processes; Commerce said it follows best-practice grantmaking and that its attorney in the Attorney General’s office approved that approach. Commerce also highlighted the North Dakota Development Fund, citing long-term investment and job creation results, examples such as Red Trail Energy, Packet Digital, Valiance, Corvent Medical, child care loans, and the Automate ND program. Members asked about acceptable failures, lessons learned, regional economic development coordination, and the expansion of the fund into non-primary sectors. Workforce Director Katie Ralston Howell then outlined a statewide workforce ecosystem review, a new governor’s workforce sub-cabinet, and three task forces focused on simplifying entry, warm handoffs, and data integration. She discussed the in-demand occupations list, Workforce Pell, apprenticeships, and efforts to better connect students with employers and higher education. Commerce also briefly reviewed housing programs and a new housing sub-cabinet. No votes were taken; the committee simply received testimony, asked questions, and adjourned after setting up the next meeting to hear the Attorney General budget in June.

Transcript Highlights:

• The current ban limits consumer education and also raises First Amendment concerns.
• The current ban limits... a time when health care decisions are more complex and personal than ever.
• The current ban limits consumer education and also raises First Amendment concerns.
• So you and I are able to do that. their benefits, talking whatever way we would choose, you and I are
• And we can't limit that language to solely the act of physically selling a product.

Bills: S0052 , S0502 , S0624 , S0758 , S0834 , S0840

Committee: Senate Judiciary

Summary: The committee considered several bills and reported each favorably. SB 624, by Senator Yarborough, would allow batterers intervention programs to offer optional supplemental faith-based activities, with no participant required to take part. Supporters said it would expand provider options and help address a shortage of certified programs; opponents raised concerns about mixing government-ordered programming with religion and about the state’s prior rule change. The bill passed 7-2. The committee also approved CS/SB 834, which repeals a 2022 restriction barring licensed insurance agents from partnering with health care sharing ministries to market or sell their programs. The sponsor and supporters argued the bill restores free speech, consumer choice, and access to faith-based alternatives, while opponents warned about consumer confusion, higher commissions, and weak protections because these ministries are not insurance. After extended debate, the measure passed 8-2. Other measures advanced unanimously or near-unanimously. CS/SB 502, as amended, would give Florida concurrent jurisdiction over certain juvenile offenses on military installations so juveniles can be handled in the state system; it passed 9-0. CS/SB 52 would exempt volunteer armed security for houses of worship from Class D or G licensing requirements, and supporters cited rising threats to churches and the need for organized volunteer security; it passed 9-0. SB 840, a cleanup bill to narrow and clarify last year’s emergency-related land-use restrictions after hurricanes, also passed 9-0, and CS/SB 758, which updates the membership of the Justice Administration Commission, passed 9-0 after an amendment restoring two public defenders to the commission.

Transcript Highlights:

• Each public witness will be given two minutes to provide their testimony, and this two-minute limit also
• The statute does not place time limits on in-school suspension.
• Therefore, for years, in-school suspension had no time limits.
• I believe the strengths of the bill are the removal of the in-school suspension limit of three days,
• These issues prevent us from learning and for kids to actually benefit from what we're teaching.

Bills: SB27 , SB226 , SB326 , SB570 , SB605 , SB870 , SB991 , SB1871 , SB1872 , SB1873 , SB1874 , SB1924 , SB1925 , SB 27

Committees: Senate Education , Senate Education K-16

Keywords: residency, public schools, child safety placement, enrollment, education code, antisemitism, student conduct, education, disciplinary actions, Texas Education Code, truancy, attendance policy, chronic absenteeism, school attendance, student absence notifications, parent notification, home visit, attendance officer, truancy court, school district

Summary: The committee heard a series of school safety and discipline bills, beginning with SB 870, which would codify an attorney general opinion allowing local school boards to decide whether school marshals may openly carry, conceal carry, or store a firearm in a secure safe on campus. The bill was laid out with no public testimony and left pending. The chair then moved to a combined discussion of SB 1871, 1872, 1873, 1874, and 1924, all focused on school discipline, teacher authority, and student safety. Senators Perry and Creighton described the package as a response to rising classroom disruptions, assaults on teachers, and concerns that districts lack effective tools to maintain order. SB 1871 would expand teacher removal authority, require return-to-class plans before a student removed for certain conduct can return, make some serious offenses mandatory for placement in juvenile justice settings, and provide telehealth mental health services through a consortium. SB 1872 would require expulsion to a JJAEP for assaults on teachers or school volunteers and extend certain expulsion-eligible conduct to off-campus offenses. SB 1873 would restore the prior understanding that in-school suspension is not subject to a three-day limit. SB 1874 would grant teachers immunity from disciplinary action for reporting discipline violations or acting in compliance with Chapter 37. SB 1924 would restore authority for local police and school district police to issue Class C citations for school offenses and require criminal referrals for students posing an imminent threat or assaulting a teacher, with a substitute clarifying referral rules when a citation has already been issued. The committee adopted the substitutes for the bills and moved them forward. Invited witnesses from teacher and administrator groups largely supported the overall goal of stronger discipline and safer classrooms, while asking for refinements. The Texas Classroom Teachers Association testified that teachers need more autonomy to remove disruptive or violent students and that classroom removals should not mean removal from learning. Superintendents from San Angelo, Grandview, and Wiley ISDs supported the bills’ emphasis on safety, expanded ISS flexibility, mandatory placement for serious offenses, and telehealth mental health services, but asked for more local control, flexibility for Districts of Innovation, more than one campus behavior coordinator in large districts, clearer timelines for return-to-class plans, and more precise definitions for disruptive conduct. Several witnesses stressed that teacher retention and student learning are being harmed by current discipline problems, while some members raised concerns about vague standards and the risk of overuse or public humiliation through citations and removals.

Transcript Highlights:

• The main one that gives people benefits is mitragynine, and that's among the safest ones.
• </c><00:03:13.280><c> is</c> that gives people benefits is that gives people benefits is mitragynine,
• </c><00:19:15.560><c> to</c> there's any actual medical benefit to there's any actual medical benefit
• </c><00:37:21.520><c> Thank</c> limit little or no jurisdiction.
• Why did your author's amendment just limit it to landlord or landlord's employees?

Committee: Senate Judiciary and Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:

• So that, excuse me, follow-up, so that it doesn't limit them to three unrelated people if you make them
• /c> that excuse me followup so that it that excuse me followup so that it doesn't<00:04:27.280><c> limit
• And when you have a town that's open three days a week for limited hours, it could be 10 weeks.
• No, they're going to try to find ways to limit possibilities, and we're addressing them up front.
• Limit road frontage to 75 feet and 50 feet for setbacks, and the effective date that's the same.

Summary: The subcommittee on SB 170 opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and then worked through the bill section by section, focusing first on a housing-related provision that would prohibit municipalities from requiring occupants to be related by blood or marriage. The chair proposed adding “school enrollment status” as a protected class to prevent towns from limiting where students may live, especially in Durham. Members debated whether that phrase was too vague and whether “educational status,” “enrollment status,” or “school enrollment status” was the best wording. Public testimony raised concerns that adding a new protected class could have broader implications under the state’s anti-discrimination law and could also affect municipal zoning authority, while supporters argued the bill was aimed at preventing local rules that restrict student housing and group living arrangements. The subcommittee did not take a final vote on that language during the discussion. The committee then turned to land-use and subdivision provisions. The Department of Environmental Services testified that its test-pit and related land-development rules are already protective of groundwater and surface water, and that municipalities sometimes impose stricter setbacks or other requirements locally. Builders and housing advocates argued that more stringent local requirements for test pits, well siting, and related approvals add time and cost and can impede housing development, while some municipal concerns were raised about aquifer and wellhead protection overlay districts and local groundwater safeguards. Public testimony also supported making state standards uniform across municipalities, though one speaker noted that local and state review processes can differ and that the bill could simplify approvals. The subcommittee also discussed a road-length provision, with one member supporting limits on municipal caps that could impede development and another suggesting a possible water-and-sewer-capacity qualifier. Additional sections were explained as allowing utilities and infrastructure to be placed in subdivision open spaces or perimeter buffers, and requiring municipalities to act quickly on plan changes after initial review. The chair indicated support for several of the sections as drafted, and the discussion ended with the committee moving through the remaining provisions without recorded final votes in the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• strike-everything amendment to Senate Bill 1503 that expands the persons eligible for the state death benefit
• The Senate amended the bill by specifying that the prohibitions do not limit the local government's authority
• Additionally, it includes that the prohibitions do not limit the local government's authority in applying
• This limits the authority of the municipality in regulating that within this space. Yeah.
• seller of a digital good, including providing a prorated refund to a purchaser of a digital good, and limits

Summary: The meeting was a Republican caucus review of several Senate and House bills, with staff summarizing committee amendments and members indicating whether sponsors concurred with Senate changes. Topics included electronic monitoring in residential rooms (SB 1041), dental school complaint forwarding and licensure exemptions (SB 1168), revitalization district contracts (SB 1189), timeshare salesperson licensing (SB 1274), veterinary telehealth prescribing (SB 1286), insurance zero-estimated-exposure policies (SB 1428), advanced air mobility funds for border security (SB 1457), death benefits for law enforcement pilots (SB 1503), ATV definitions (SB 1519), pet and fowl restrictions in planned communities (SB 1582), and pharmacist independent testing/treatment authority (SB 1713). The caucus also reviewed education-related measures on school district self-insurance procurement (SB 1497) and a strike-everything amendment to SB 1118 that instead allowed duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, and townhomes in historic areas if compatible with surrounding character. The group then considered several blue-sheet House bills. HB 2120 made technical changes to align property-tax disability language with updated statute; the sponsor concurred. HB 2174 changed terminology from advisory organization to modeling and data organization and required model filing; the sponsor concurred. HB 2203 directed ADE to review statutory reporting requirements and report recommendations to the legislature; the sponsor concurred. HB 2383’s Senate amendment simply designated a 2014 trampoline court law as “TIE’s law,” with the sponsor concurring. HB 2877 was amended into an alternative education pathway for certified veterinary technicians, and HB 2875 adjusted municipal and county drone restrictions near airports, expanding the relevant airport buffer and preserving some local authority. Additional bills discussed included HB 2428 on voluntary county emissions-reduction credit permits, HB 2176 on DHS health care institution complaint investigations, and HB 2050 on radiologic technology standards and radiologist assistant supervision. Members discussed that HB 2050’s Senate changes narrowed some supervision provisions to rural counties and critical access hospitals, prompting questions about the scope. Finally, HB 2010 on digital goods refunds was amended to shorten the refund window from 10 years to five years, but a sponsor said the amendment contained a drafting error and refused concurrence, meaning a conference committee would be needed. The caucus then concluded.

Transcript Highlights:

• and never happened eight years ago when the CLCPA was voted on, which was it would require a cost-benefit
• So we should have done a cost-benefit analysis before we voted on this in 2019.
• And I think that we need to make sure that the only cost-benefit analysis that I'm aware of that's been
• This cost-benefit analysis is long overdue.
• The entire scoping plan was a cost-benefit analysis, but we can agree to disagree there.

Committee: Senate Environmental Conservation

Summary: The Senate Environmental Conservation Committee met with a quorum and a very full agenda, moving quickly through a series of environmental and natural resources bills. Early action included approving S.1343B, the clean fuel standard bill, which was referred to Finance with one nay. The committee then took up S.1464A, the Packaging Reduction and Recycling Infrastructure Act, where supporters said it had been heavily amended to address industry concerns and protect public health by reducing packaging waste and toxic chemicals. Opponents, including Senators Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick and Stec, raised concerns about costs, unintended consequences for business, agriculture, dairy, food safety, and consumer prices. Supporters argued the bill would reduce waste, protect people from toxins, and that many farms and dairy operations were exempted. The bill was advanced to Finance with two nays and one without recommendation. The committee also considered several bills tied to climate and energy policy. S.2712, sponsored by Senator Stec, would delay CLCPA implementation for 10 years and require a cost-benefit analysis; Stec argued New York has not adequately studied the law’s costs and cited rising utility bills, while Chair Harckham and others defended the state’s clean energy direction and said the bill would not move forward. S.3652, which would prohibit certain restrictions on motor vehicle sales, and S.5611, which would create a Climate Action Cost Council and limit annual climate-related rulemaking, were both voted down and not referred onward. By contrast, S.797A, the Mohawk River Basin Management Act, advanced to Finance with support from its sponsor, Senator Fahy. The committee then took up S.8933, Senator Helming’s bill to prohibit PFAS in photovoltaic modules. Helming said the bill was a common-sense measure to keep forever chemicals out of solar panels and protect water and soil; Harckham responded that the bill’s timeline would effectively halt the solar industry and said there was no evidence of PFAS leaching from solar panels. The bill was not advanced. The committee also advanced S.9206 on brush-fire area reed removal for Staten Island, S.9280 on open water data, S.9462 on deer management permits, S.963 on Atlantic bonito and false albacore management, and S.9479A on tidal wetlands definitions. In the final portion of the meeting, the committee rapidly approved a long slate of routine end-of-session fisheries and marine resource extender bills, including measures on sharks, lingcod, black sea bass, blueback herring, fluke, scup, commercial food fish licenses, special management areas, American eel, Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, squid, and winter flounder.

Transcript Highlights:

• I improvements will benefit Minnesotans.
• a monthly limit.
• Um so keeping within the monthly limit.
• </c> the implementation of the limit the implementation of the limit and<00:41:59.440><c> then</c><00
• So is there any limit on the Mr. Chair.

Bills: HF3526 , HF3375 , HF3469

Committee: House Human Services Finance and Policy

Keywords: home care, licensing, fines, advisory council, grant program, client safety, healthcare regulation, HF3375, Minnesota disability waiver, waiver rate system, human services, individualized home supports, individualized home supports with training, individualized home supports with family training, positive support services, employment support services, employment development services, employment exploration services, billing limits, service authorization year

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:04:35.680><c> not</c> in my County where I've been limited not in my County where I've been limited
• What are the limitations, Commissioner Barnett?
• </c> they're ask you said there was limit they're ask you said there was limit limitations<01:24:45.280
• ><c> for</c> limitations for limitations for asking<01:24:47.040><c> no</c><01:24:47.560><c> Barnett<
• </c><01:24:51.840><c> as</c> representative there's no limitations as representative there's no limitations

Committee: House Public Safety Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:

• And statewide benefits and burdens of major solid waste facilities.
• It ensures that our state's capacity needs are addressed with projects that deliver a public benefit
• and burdens of and statewide benefits and burdens of major<00:33:51.800><c> solid</c><00:33:52.240><
• and that the deliver a public benefit and that the process<00:34:00.640><c> for</c><00:34:00.800><c>
• </c> without in operation without limiting without in operation without limiting the<00:38:18.600><c>

Committee: Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:

• Do you benefit from &gt;&gt; they they log on. Do you benefit from that? that? that?
• benefit you think this bill has?
• </c> delivering clear benefits. delivering clear benefits.
• . benefits. benefits.
• </c><05:53:52.718><c> benefiting</c><05:53:53.520><c> government</c> think is benefit benefiting government

Committee: House Labor, Industrial and Rehabilitative Services

Summary: The committee first reviewed House Bill 1150, which would require disclosure of complaints to public employees within five business days. Members said the sponsor was still working on an amendment, so the bill was held for another week with the understanding it would be executed next week if no amendment was ready. The chair also outlined the committee’s schedule, including upcoming floor reports and the goal of finishing the remaining committee bills on time. The committee then took up House Bill 1168, concerning employer documentation requirements. Supporters argued the bill would give employers more time to gather payroll records, especially when claims arise years later, and said the current system should be adjusted for fairness to businesses. Opponents, including several members, said payroll records are usually electronic and should be produced quickly so workers waiting on wages are not delayed. The Department of Labor deputy commissioner testified that employers can already request extensions and that further extensions could still be requested under the current process. The committee voted 11-9 to ought to pass HB 1168. Next, House Bill 1250, dealing with notice, documentation, and job reinstatement requirements for leave related to childbirth, postpartum care, and pediatric appointments, was considered. Members said the statute was newly enacted, had been carefully negotiated, and should be allowed to work before being revised. The committee voted 20-0 to recommend inexpedient to legislate, and the bill was placed on the consent calendar. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 1043, which would allow private employers to adopt their own minimum pay policies for report-to-work situations instead of being bound by the current two-hour minimum, so long as the policy is established in advance. The sponsor said the bill would modernize an outdated law and preserve the current default if no policy is adopted. Members raised questions about collective bargaining agreements and whether the bill could weaken existing worker protections, while the sponsor and supporters said it was intended to provide flexibility rather than a mandate. The hearing continued with questions and discussion, but no final vote was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Women and girls represent a high percentage of Minnesotans benefiting from them.
• This is on top of the benefits our court systems feel when parties are actually represented in court,
• This is on top of the benefits our court systems feel when parties are actually represented in court,
• This is on top of the benefits our court systems feel when parties are actually represented in court,
• There had been a disruption to George's Social Security benefits.

Committee: Senate Judiciary and Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:

• , SNAP benefits for example, to the TAP application.
• Approximately 150,000 folks in the metro area apply for SNAP benefits each year.
• > example</c> other benefits SNAP benefits for example other benefits SNAP benefits for example to<01
• </c><01:10:25.360><c> from</c> committee to DCF DCF can uh benefit from committee to DCF DCF can uh benefit
• </c><01:14:37.320><c> the</c> disability would greatly benefit the disability would greatly benefit the

Bills: HF1837 , HF361 , HF2725 , HF2566 , HF2744 , HF1685 , HF501 , HF1889 , HF1389

Committee: House State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:

• And as we've already discussed, stands to benefit from this.
• from that, they would sure tell us that we got a huge benefit out of it.
• And they operate, you know, for the benefit of the St. Louis area.
• My concern was the limited information provided to us by the governor's office.
• The House rule just allows our committee to limit time debate.

Committee: House Budget

Transcript Highlights:

• Public Safety and Corrections, provides relative to qualifications, advertisement, requirements, benefits
• relative to a joint resolution to amend the Constitution relative to state finances, calculation of the limit
• above which certain funds may be restricted for certain purposes, the initial limit, the income tax
• House Bill 824 by Representative Bowie, state finance, this calculation of a limit above which certain
• House Bill 824 by Representative Bowie, State Finance, this calculation of a limit above which certain

Bills: HR192 , HR193 , HR194 , HCR80 , HCR81 , HCR82 , HCR83 , HCR84 , HCR85 , HR188 , HR189 , HR190 , HR191 , SB134 , SB140 , SB281 , SB331 , SB384 , SB389 , SB415 , SB451 , SB458 , SB479 , SB504 , SB523 , HR38 , HR96 , HR160 , HCR31 , HCR61 , SCR19 , HB316 , HB549 , HB578 , HB646 , HB748 , HB798 , HB824 , HB988 , HB989 , HB1001 , HB1032 , HB1081 , HB1108 , HB1129 , HB1140 , HB1157 , HB1186 , HB1192 , HB1195 , HB1198 , HB1222 , HB1244 , SB73 , SB89 , SB128 , SB149 , SB191 , SB196 , SB238 , SB318 , SB340 , HB225 , HR1 , HR17 , HCR5 , HCR4 , HCR47 , HCR32 , HB362 , HB893 , HB990 , HB1007 , HB1153 , HB1243 , HB12 , HB42 , HB205 , HB222 , HB267 , HB324 , HB325 , HB350 , HB478 , HB610 , HB617 , HB745 , HB749 , HB752 , HB797 , HB807 , HB821 , HB896 , HB979 , HB992 , HB1000 , HB1024 , HB1050 , HB1166 , HB1172 , HB1173 , HB1207 , HB1218 , HB1223 , SB162 , SB349 , SB350 , SB382 , SB383 , SB127 , SB244 , SB256 , HB911 , HB306 , HB366 , HB1161 , HB1230 , HB59 , HB481 , HB772 , HB897 , HB1003 , HB1008 , HB1112 , HB1180 , HB1189 , HB181 , HB1118 , HB901 , HR20 , HR74 , HB284 , HB393 , HB458 , HB459 , HB525 , HB577 , HB582 , HB605 , HB614 , HB682 , HB733 , HB773 , HB864 , HB996 , HB1035 , HB1058 , HB1082 , HB1113 , HB1234 , HB1240

Summary: The House convened with a quorum, opened in prayer, and adopted the journal. Members received messages from the Senate on several House bills and Senate bills, and a number of House resolutions were introduced or laid over. The chamber also suspended rules to allow committees to continue meeting while the House was in session. Several local and ceremonial resolutions were taken up, including measures on public health data, carbon sequestration property rights, declining school enrollment, and commendations and condolences. The floor then considered a series of local bills and Senate bills, many of which passed with little or no opposition. Among the House bills approved were measures creating or adjusting local districts and utility-related authorities in Orleans and Jefferson parishes, including bills on the Regency Park Town Home Crime Prevention Security District, Sewage and Water Board procurement and lien authority, the Foulberg-New neighborhood improvement district, and temporary parish burn bans. The House also passed bills on broadband cable price notices, state finance limits, toll exemptions for school board-owned leased vehicles, prestige license plates, and a brain injury designation on driver’s licenses. Senate bills passed included measures on workers’ compensation evidence rules, recreation of the Department of Agriculture and Forestry, a soybean grain research board name change, incumbent worker training, interdict estate planning, and recreational alligator hunting. The most extensive debate centered on Senate Bill 256, which would consolidate Orleans Parish’s separate civil and criminal clerk of court offices into a single Orleans clerk. Supporters argued the change would align Orleans with the rest of the state, improve efficiency, and reduce costs, while preserving employees and services. Opponents raised concerns about the timing, the lack of broader legislative and public involvement, the impact on the recently elected criminal clerk, and possible disruption to court operations and constitutional rights. After lengthy questioning, the bill passed 89-8. The House also heard a personal privilege statement recognizing a school choir visiting the Capitol and later continued with additional Senate bills, including one on workers’ compensation medical review evidence and another on the Department of Agriculture and Forestry.

Transcript Highlights:

• local regulation of small systems, so the intent was to preserve and encourage these systems, not limit
• them, because they do benefit the communities that they serve.
• </c><00:03:01.800><c> them</c><00:03:02.519><c> because</c> these systems not limit them because these
• systems not limit them because they<00:03:02.879><c> do</c><00:03:03.040><c> benefit</c><00:03:03.360
• that they do benefit the communities that they<00:03:04.480><c> serve</c><00:03:05.480><c> the</c><00

Committee: House Energy Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, because of the high level of interest in testifying, can we limit, um, for today's hearings?
• I think that one of the real benefits of having the way you set it up is that we were able to hear from
• </c><00:02:49.519><c> of</c> think that one of the real benefits of think that one of the real benefits
• </c><00:59:37.040><c> Our</c> this low wage with no benefit job.
• Our this low wage with no benefit job.

Committee: Senate Human Services