Video & Transcript : 'reasonable safeguards' :
Page 40 of 500
TX
Texas 89th Regular
Delivery of Government Efficiency Mar 19th, 2025
Delivery of Government Efficiency
Transcript Highlights:
- And is there any reason they didn't testify today or feedback from?
- In the state, and some of it's for pay, some of it's for other reasons.
- You're absolutely correct, which is one reason we have temporary FTEs.
- What safeguards prevent hospitals from over-reporting?
- And I guess the reasoning is, like, it's a private business.
Committee:
House Delivery of Government Efficiency
Keywords:
cybersecurity, state command, information resources, data protection, incident response, information technology, classification officer, job descriptions, state positions, competency-based, information sharing, government efficiency, public sector, private sector, distributed ledger, title registry, real estate, property liens, pilot program, healthcare
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Utilities and Energy Committee Apr 8th, 2026
Utilities and Energy
Transcript Highlights:
- We do think that this bill lacks some very serious safeguards.
- And I believe that for a number of reasons.
- It seems like a reasonable...
- It seems like a reasonable ask that even if you were designing these safeguards, make those safeguards
- CalCCA, it seems like a reasonable ask that even if you were designing these safeguards, make those safeguards
Committee:
House Utilities and Energy
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee 3/24/26 - Part 2
Public Safety Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- Um, there's a reason firefighters don't ride around on the tailboards of trucks anymore and they're in
- Um, there's a reason firefighters don't ride around on the tailboards of trucks anymore and they're in
- It includes safeguards in the bill that first requires cease and desist notice.
- It includes safeguards in the bill that first requires cease and desist notice.
- </c><00:34:47.440><c> in</c> you're 18 or some of the safeguards in you're 18 or some of the safeguards
Bills:
HF2354 , HF3407 , HF4359 , HF4192 , HF3356 , HF3695 , HF1597 , HF3155 , HF3871 , HF4437 , HF4446 , HF3990
Committee:
House Public Safety Finance and Policy
Keywords:
medical assistance, fraud prevention, subpoena authority, criminal penalties, consumer protection, ghost guns, unserialized firearms, 3D-printed guns, 3D printer firearms, CNC milling, home-built firearms, firearm serialization, serial numbers, unfinished frame, unfinished receiver, ghost gun ban, gun control, firearm design files, CAD files, digital gun blueprints
ID
Transcript Highlights:
- For this reason, we do not support a full ban.
- For this reason, increase in demand for illicit opioids and overdoses.
- For this reason, we do not support a full ban.
- Chairwoman and Senator Wintrow, so the reason why I'm here is because of the When, so the reason why
- I am a chronic pain patient, and plain leaf kratom is the reason I'm alive today.
Committee:
Senate Health and Welfare
PA
Transcript Highlights:
- So it's very important that we put this safeguard in place with this legislation.
- Existing law already requires non-compete agreements to be Reasonable.
- So for those reasons, I have to be a no on this bill. And I would ask you to do the same.
- Madam Speaker, I rise in opposition to House Bill 2412 for multiple reasons.
- Madam Speaker, I rise in opposition to House Bill 2412 for multiple reasons.
Summary:
The House began with ceremonial recognitions, including guests of Representatives Benham and Warren and a farewell acknowledgment for longtime floor staffer Michelle Martin, who is leaving House service for a role in the Senate. The chamber then took up caucus and committee announcements, recessed several times, and later returned to consider a series of committee reports and bills. House and Senate bills were reported from Rules, Appropriations, and Judiciary, including referrals of several measures to committees.
The House adopted House Resolution 515 unanimously, urging Congress to review Major Richard D. Winner’s actions for possible Medal of Honor recognition. It also adopted House Resolution 208, directing a performance audit of services, wait times, and processes in the Bureau of Blindness and Visual Services; supporters said it would help improve services for Pennsylvanians with vision impairment, while the vote was 201-1. The chamber then passed several bills with amendments, including measures on foster care youth benefits, AI companion safeguards, prison industry enhancement program administration, memorial bridge designations, firefighter and EMS donation options through PennDOT renewals, horse-racing background checks, and fertility preservation coverage.
Several bills reached final passage. House Bill 1239, limiting homeowners associations from restricting rooftop solar installations, passed 109-93. House Bill 2146, amending the Sunshine Act to tighten the 24-hour agenda notice rule while preserving limited exceptions, passed 193-9 after debate over transparency and local-government flexibility. House Bill 2558, banning non-compete agreements for broadcast workers, passed narrowly 103-99 amid objections from Republicans and concerns about impacts on local broadcasters and contract rights. Senate Bills 971 and 972 also passed finally, dealing with township audit deadlines and municipal memorials for first responders.
The House also approved House Bill 2412, funding state-related universities for fiscal year 2026-27, by 155-47 after debate over Penn State’s campus closures, accountability, and per-student funding differences; House Bill 2413, appropriating funds to the University of Pennsylvania, passed 195-7. The chamber then moved several bills back to Appropriations, signed Senate Bills 971 and 972, and adjourned until the next scheduled session.
VT
Transcript Highlights:
- Those are all acceptable reasons to, uh, Zoom in and vote.
- You can miss if you're for no reason.
- Those are all acceptable<00:18:55.760><c> reasons</c><00:18:56.320><c> to</c><00:18:56.960><c> uh</c>
- <00:18:57.120><c> zoom</c><00:18:57.360><c> in</c><00:18:57.600><c> and</c> acceptable reasons to uh
- zoom in and acceptable reasons to uh zoom in and vote.<00:18:58.640><c> So</c><00:18:59.039><c> both<
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- This bill is important for multiple reasons, but the most important of these is that it enables prosecutors
- Reasonable efforts to try to mitigate the situation in the best interest of the child.
- in the constitutional safeguards are meant to protect the child.
- And I'll just close by noting that one of the reasons why we haven't needed legislation on this before
- Those are often targeted, but I see there's no rhyme or reason. All right. Thank you.
Committee:
House Criminal Jurisprudence
Keywords:
human organs, criminal penalties, physician license, medical ethics, illegal trade, SB 826, Texas, DWI, driving while intoxicated, intoxicated driving, school crossing zone, school zone, reduced speed limit, traffic safety, child safety, pedestrian safety, felony DWI, state jail felony, Penal Code Section 49.04, Transportation Code Section 541.302
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- So, what is the reason or reasons for filing this bill to create a new... government regulatory office
- Section 1, Subsection A, Subsection 1. on the grounds that his caption fails to give the public reasonable
- This is not a radical idea without judicial deference as a safeguard a true independent panel is our
- The Inspectors Protecting Workers at the EPA, the public servants safeguarding our food, our air, and
- Yet without judicial deference as a safeguard, a truly independent panel is our next best defense.
Keywords:
regulatory reform, government efficiency, administrative law, rulemaking, agency deference, judicial review, de novo review, Texas Government Code, Administrative Procedure Act, state agencies, plain language, regulatory burden, regulatory reduction, cost-benefit analysis, fiscal note, public benefits and costs, contested case, rule challenge, Texas Regulatory Efficiency Office, advisory panel
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee Mar 17th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- One of the reasons why life is so expensive in California is that sometimes this Legislature, instead
- For these reasons, we respectfully urge a no vote on SB 886. Thank you very much. Thank you.
- So there's a lot of good reasons why this bill should move forward. Again, I want to thank you, Mr.
- Without safeguards, these stranded infrastructure costs could ultimately fall back on ratepayers.
- We can be a problem solver on this issue, and for those reasons I ask for your aye vote. Great.
Summary:
The committee first heard SB 868, the Plug and Play Solar Act, which would streamline approval for portable plug-in solar devices for homes and apartments. The author and supporters argued the bill would help renters and other Californians lower electric bills, expand access to solar, and create statewide safety standards through UL certification and the National Electrical Code. Opponents, including electrical workers, firefighters, utilities, and PG&E, raised concerns about shock, fire, backfeeding, older electrical systems, and the bill bypassing the California Electrical Code and Building Standards Commission process. After extended discussion and testimony from UL, the author agreed to add California Electrical Code language, and several opponents indicated they would move to neutral; the committee then passed the bill out as amended to the Senate Judiciary Committee on a roll call vote.
The committee then took up SB 886, which would establish rules for large data centers to prevent electricity cost shifts to other ratepayers. The author and supporters said rapid data center growth could drive major grid costs and that the bill would require data centers to pay for their own infrastructure, participate in demand response, and secure new zero-carbon resources. Supporters included environmental and consumer groups, while opponents such as the Data Center Coalition, Silicon Valley Leadership Group, utilities, and business groups argued the bill was unnecessary, could duplicate CPUC proceedings, and might impose operationally risky mandates, especially around demand response and backup power. Committee staff described amendments narrowing the bill to large data centers, clarifying tariff and cost-allocation provisions, replacing behind-the-meter storage with a pre-funded long-term clean energy contract, and exempting certain public and critical facilities; the discussion continued with questions about cost responsibility, clean energy targets, and peak-load management.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee Mar 17th, 2026
Energy, Utilities and Communications
Transcript Highlights:
- For these reasons, we respectfully urge a no vote on SB 886. Thank you very much. Thank you.
- Without safeguards, these Or experiences project delays.
- Without safeguards, these stranded infrastructure costs could ultimately fall back on ratepayers.
- We can be a problem solver on this issue, and for those reasons I ask for your aye vote.
- And for those reasons, I ask for your aye vote. Great. All right.
Committee:
Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications
MO
Transcript Highlights:
- We want to safeguard our taxpayer money.
- But I think the safeguard is that the, the which. Safeguards in there for taxpayer money.
- So really for these reasons, I respectfully urge you to oppose these bills and not let them move from
- So really for these reasons, I respectfully urge you to oppose these bills and not let them move from
- So really for these reasons, I respectfully urge you to oppose these bills and not let them move from
Committee:
House General Laws
WA
Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Floor Session Feb 4th, 2026
Washington House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- There are quite a number of reasons why.
- So for that reason, I urge adoption of this amendment. Thank you.
- Also urging you to vote yes on this amendment for two reasons.
- Speaker, I think the biggest reason, or the most important or compelling reason, to support this amendment
- We've got the prisoners, but we also need to safeguard our staff.
Summary:
The House convened, established a quorum, led the Pledge of Allegiance, and heard a prayer from a Scouting America leader. After caucuses and routine introduction and committee-report actions, the chamber took up House Bill 1604, dealing with standards for strip searches in local jails and related correctional procedures. Supporters said the bill would align local jails with existing federal law and provide clearer standards for staff and administrators; opponents argued it would create liability, staffing, and operational problems, and force female officers into unwanted searches of male inmates.
A series of amendments were debated and mostly rejected. Failed amendments sought to add liability protections, require same-sex searches, create religious accommodations for staff, broaden exigent circumstances, limit how often an inmate could change gender identity, and allow staff to decline searches or delay them when no appropriate staff were available. One amendment changing the implementation date from 2025 to 2026 was adopted. The final striking amendment was also defeated.
The bill was then advanced to third reading and final passage as Engrossed House Bill 1604. In closing debate, supporters emphasized public safety, dignity, and compliance with federal standards, while opponents repeated concerns about consent, staffing, and jail administration. The House passed the bill 56-39, with three excused, and the floor session ended afterward.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Banking and Financial Institutions Committee Jan 7th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- In closing, SB 505 provides a simple, proactive safeguard.
- In closing, SB 505 provides a simple, proactive safeguard that strengthens consumer trust, protects personal
- And I think the committee analysis raises reasonable considerations for the author.
Summary:
The Senate Committee on Banking and Financial Institutions met to consider three bills, including two on consent. The consent calendar items, SB 546 and SB 700, were adopted by roll call. The committee then heard SB 505 by Senator Richardson, which would require digital wallet providers and money transmitters operating in California to use two-factor or multi-factor authentication at login, with a delayed operative date of January 1, 2028. The author said the bill was narrowly tailored to address consumer protection and account takeover risks, and noted ongoing discussions about self-hosted crypto wallets and possible clarifying amendments.
Support testimony came from Rise Economy, while representatives from the California Blockchain Advocacy Coalition, Andreessen Horowitz, and TechNet described themselves as “tweeners” or re-evaluating their positions, citing the author’s and staff’s work on definitions and amendments. No formal opposition was registered. Vice Chair Nilo said he supported the bill but raised concerns about technology changing over time and the need to avoid locking the state into one security approach; the author responded that the bill was intentionally narrow and that he would return with updated policy if needed.
The committee moved SB 505 on a due pass and re-refer to Appropriations motion, and the bill received enough votes to pass out of committee. The chair also noted the broader concern about fraud and scams affecting consumers. The committee then completed the consent calendar and adjourned.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Banking and Financial Institutions Committee Jan 7th, 2026
Banking and Financial Institutions
Transcript Highlights:
- In closing, SB 505 provides a simple, proactive safeguard.
- In closing, SB 505 provides a simple, proactive safeguard that strengthens consumer trust, protects personal
- And I think the committee analysis raises reasonable considerations for the author.
Committee:
Senate Banking and Financial Institutions
Summary:
The Senate Committee on Banking and Financial Institutions met to hear two-year bills that had not advanced the prior spring. The committee first adopted the consent calendar, which included SB 546 and SB 700, on a roll call vote. The committee then heard SB 505 from Senator Richardson, a consumer protection bill aimed at digital wallets and money transmitters.
SB 505 would require digital wallet providers and money transmitters operating in California to use two-factor or multi-factor authentication at login, with a delayed operative date of January 1, 2028. The author said the bill was narrowly focused on authentication, not transactions, fees, or data collection, and noted ongoing discussions with stakeholders about self-hosted crypto wallets and possible definitional amendments. Support came from Rise Economy, while representatives from the California Blockchain Advocacy Coalition, Andreessen Horowitz, and TechNet described themselves as neutral or “tweener,” citing appreciation for the author’s work and the revised language.
Committee members generally supported the bill while raising concerns about fraud, phishing, and the possibility that technology could change over time. Vice Chair Niello said he had some trepidation about mandating a specific technology but supported the bill as a practical anti-fraud measure. The chair also noted the bill’s narrow scope and the need for continued conversation. SB 505 was given a do pass and re-refer recommendation to Appropriations and passed the committee on a 5-0 vote; the consent calendar also passed with five votes. The committee then adjourned.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Banking and Financial Institutions Committee Jan 7th, 2026
Banking and Financial Institutions
Transcript Highlights:
- In closing, SB 505 provides a simple, proactive safeguard.
- In closing, SB 505 provides a simple, proactive safeguard that strengthens consumer trust, protects personal
- And I think the committee analysis raises reasonable considerations for the author.
Committee:
Senate Banking and Financial Institutions
WA
Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Environment, Energy & Technology Jan 23rd, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- Is there anything in the bill that, for obvious reasons, we've got companies that have already come in
- For that reason, we think that we want to make sure data centers aren't making our grid less reliable
- It also poses new challenges to make sure we can safeguard the reliability of our grid, prevent rate
- We agree with the policy goals of the bill and think this bill is a reasonable response.
- And it's crucial to acknowledge the reality that passing reasonable regulations on data center growth
Summary:
The committee first met in executive session on Senate Bill 5941, which would exempt certain school districts from a Washington State Energy Code requirement for onsite renewable energy systems on large new commercial buildings or additions. The committee adopted Senator Short’s amendment narrowing the eligible school district definition from 1,000 or fewer students to 500 or fewer students, then approved the bill as amended and sent it to the Rules Committee with a do pass recommendation.
The committee then held a public hearing on Senate Bill 6171, a proposed substitute addressing emerging large energy use facilities, primarily data centers. Staff explained that the bill would require utilities serving such facilities to adopt tariffs or policies to protect other ratepayers, require long-term contracts and full cost recovery, allow curtailment during emergencies, add reporting and sustainability requirements, create a fee to fund energy assistance, weatherization, and higher education programs, and impose new clean energy and labor-related requirements. The prime sponsor said the bill is intended to protect affordability, reliability, transparency, and the public interest as data center demand grows.
Testimony was mixed. Supporters, including community action groups, environmental organizations, some utilities, Ecology, and student representatives, argued the bill would prevent cost shifting, improve transparency, support low-income energy assistance, and help manage grid and climate impacts. Opponents, including data center representatives, public utility district and business groups, and some local government and port officials, said the bill was too prescriptive, could raise costs, threaten competitiveness, duplicate existing utility practices, and interfere with existing CCA/CETA provisions and local flexibility. No vote was taken on SB 6171 during the hearing, and the meeting adjourned after public testimony.
TX
Texas 89th Regular
Energy Resources S/C Underground Facility Safety Oct 22nd, 2025
AZ
Arizona 2026 Regular Session
03/04/2026 - House Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections
House Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections Committee of Reference
Transcript Highlights:
- Essentially, for the disposal of campaign funds upon termination of the committee, the only reason that
- eligible uses essentially for the disposal of campaign funds upon termination of the committee the only reason
- I trust that the senator that wrote this bill had a reason to write this bill, and we know that the CVRs
- I think it needs to build in some additional safeguards to make sure that it's only knowable by the voter
- I think it needs to build in some additional safeguards to make sure that it's only knowable by the voter
Summary:
The Committee on Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections heard and voted on several election- and campaign-related bills. SB 1006 would raise the threshold for itemizing in-state individual contributions on committee campaign finance reports from $100 to $200 and require aggregate reporting of smaller contributions; it passed 4-3. SB 1029 would treat a candidate committee as intending to terminate upon the candidate’s death and allow designated individuals to serve as treasurer and close out the account; a Town of Queen Creek representative testified in support, describing difficulties after the deaths of two council members, and the bill passed unanimously 7-0.
SB 1038 would require county election officials to transmit the cast vote record to the Secretary of State and prohibit alteration of that record except as otherwise allowed by law. Testimony and debate focused on whether the CVR is already a public record and whether the bill was needed to prevent counties from changing release practices; it passed 4-3. SB 1237 would add county recorders and the chair and ranking members of the House and Senate election committees to the list of officials the Secretary of State must consult when prescribing the Elections Procedures Manual. The Arizona Association of Counties and Pinal County Recorder Dana Lewis supported the bill as a way to ensure recorder input and reduce litigation; it passed 4-3.
SB 1057 would require vendors providing ballot paper fraud countermeasures to meet specified ISO certifications and include at least three listed security features. Members discussed the standards and whether the bill needed further safeguards, with one member noting possible floor amendments and another objecting that ISO is an international standard; it passed 4-3. Several other bills were held, including measures at the sponsor’s request and the remaining items on the agenda, and the committee adjourned without further action.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Arts, Entertainment, Sports, and Tourism Committee Mar 18th, 2025
Arts, Entertainment, Sports, and Tourism
Transcript Highlights:
- However, we, at the same time, need to be able to provide programs that are reasonably affordable for
- Despite these findings and widespread use in high school football, college, and the NFL, for whatever reason
- play a role in this for parents who may not have the funds to purchase these additional types of safeguards
- . purchase these additional types of safeguards, but that's another step.
- I appreciate your reasonableness on this issue, and I look forward to supporting it. Thank you.
OK
Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session
Health and Human Services REVISED Mar 2nd, 2026 at 02:00 pm
Health and Human Services
Transcript Highlights:
- The main reason is because in the area where I live, there's a lawsuit going on with one of the centers
- Senate Bill 2179 makes changes to the not guilty by reason of mental illness statute.
- Is there a reason that this language is needed currently? Thank you for the question.
- of Mental Illness or the old term reason of insanity.
- It also puts safeguards in place for things that should not be discussed.
Bills:
SB1328 , SB1380 , SB1436 , SB1558 , SB1572 , SB1651 , SB1805 , SB1831 , SB1836 , SB2014 , SB2023 , SB2044 , SB2179 , SB933
Committee:
Senate Health and Human Services
Keywords:
parents' rights, healthcare consent, minors, medical records, protection, legal guardianship, Medicaid, Oklahoma Health Care Authority, eligibility verification, death records, Death Master File, vital statistics, disenrollment, recoupment, improper payments, benefits integrity, public assistance, income verification, residency verification, incarceration status