Video & Transcript Research : 'involuntary termination'

Page 3 of 230
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • In cases where termination occurs, the bill further places the department that dismissed the employee
  • It's up to you, including termination, based on the grievance or the complaint.
  • The bill's mandatory termination provision is troublingly severe.
  • By placing a terminated employee's department under conservatorship, this bill would chill the academic
  • Instead, it threatens teachers with terminations on the basis of an undefined term.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Public Education Apr 29th, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • The, the due diligence, um, the, the action was terminated and local control was, uh, like I said, the
  • The board of trustees is the one that made the decision to terminate the concept from going forward.
Bills: HB4, HB54, SB 10, SB 24
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Currently, an SSCC that decides to prematurely terminate a contract with DFPS may do so with only 60
  • Similarly, DFPS may opt to terminate a contract with an SSCC with a third... a 30-day notice.
  • The premature termination of an SSCC contract impacts children with active cases. placements and may
  • This increases the required notice period for contract termination between DFPS and SSCCs to 180 days
  • For example, a pharmacist was terminated from her position at H-E-B after she refused to administer the
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Apr 8th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • independent contractors beyond 12 weeks of compensation and prohibits any severance if the individual is terminated
  • House Bill 4317 allows for up to 20 weeks of severance pay for executive employees who are not terminated
  • Those who are terminated but not because of something of their own device and still permit successive
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on the Judiciary Jun 21st, 2026 at 01:00 pm

Joint Committee on the Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • We spent years waiting for my son to get better in involuntary hospital treatment.
  • All right, so I am speaking in opposition to the involuntary outpatient commitment bill.
  • And certainly, the involuntary outpatient commitment communicates that.
  • And I just want to clarify that Massachusetts already has involuntary treatment.
  • They're talking about any kind of involuntary treatment.
Keywords: 995, all
Summary: The Joint Committee on the Judiciary held a lengthy hearing on several juvenile justice and parole-related bills, with much of the testimony focused on H. 2051/S. 1087 to end lifetime parole for juveniles and emerging adults, and H. 1923 to raise the age of juvenile court jurisdiction to include 18-, 19-, and 20-year-olds. Chairs Brandy Fluker-Reid and Lydia Edwards opened the hearing by noting the large number of bills and witnesses, the need to keep testimony moving, and special procedures for incarcerated witnesses and sensitive testimony. They also acknowledged the historic nature of the hearing being chaired by two Black women attorneys. No votes were taken during the hearing itself. Many incarcerated speakers and advocates supported ending lifetime parole, arguing that young people can change, that lifetime supervision creates constant fear of technical violations, and that it undermines rehabilitation, family stability, employment, and reintegration. Several testified about their own trauma, youth, and growth in prison programs, while others emphasized the costs of decades of supervision and the racial disparities in the system. Support also came from elected officials, UTEC, the Transformational Prison Project, United Way, CPCS’s Youth Advocacy Division, the Massachusetts Coalition to Prevent Gun Violence, and others, who said juvenile systems are better suited to developmentally appropriate treatment and that the bills would improve public safety and reduce recidivism. There was also opposition, including testimony from family members of a murder victim who argued that lifetime parole should remain for serious violent crimes and that some offenders are not sufficiently rehabilitated. One virtual witness described a family tragedy involving the kidnapping and murder of her infant nephew and warned that ending lifetime parole could remove needed long-term supervision for dangerous offenders. In addition to the juvenile justice bills, the committee heard testimony on H. 1867, a bill related to continuing care for severe mental illness, and H. 2063, which would increase penalties for assaults on correction officers and other prison staff; the correction officers’ union supported H. 2063 and related safety bills. The hearing continued with many more witnesses and bill topics, but no final committee action was announced in the portion provided.