Video & Transcript Research : 'cost control'

Page 3 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs May 5th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • the things he raised about electromagnetic pulses, I would mention that we've done a very extensive cost
  • have checked these numbers with utilities, so this is something that is one one-thousandth of the cost
  • but it does so without a comprehensive view of the system, while potentially creating significant costs
  • certain scenarios, and prioritizing those scenarios. ...and directing the commission to estimate the costs
  • I've sat in a lot of hearings and I've done some math listening to costs in the past.
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • It's extremely important and we can certainly see cost savings.
  • Yes or no, do you support privatizing the air traffic control system?
  • Well, regulations have costs, and those costs are passed by the manufacturers down the line to the American
  • Because, again, it adds cost to the car, and it adds cost to the government, because the government has
  • Raises the cost of the automobile. And didn't want to do it, fought it.
Summary: The committee meeting addressed several pressing issues concerning transportation, particularly focusing on the need for improved safety standards and efficient management at the Department of Transportation. Specific discussions revolved around air traffic control, with members highlighting the urgency for a significant upgrade in systems and personnel. Notably, concerns were raised regarding past practices, especially the handling of safety regulations during the Boeing 737 MAX incidents. The committee expressed a clear intent to ensure rigorous safety oversight moving forward, emphasizing that the health and safety of the public must remain the top priority in all legislative and funding decisions.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • is that I was sexualized in a... politically popular way according to a popular agenda of social control
  • while story hours are no more... sexual, but don't support any popular agenda of social control.
  • It is about controlling narrative. erasing identities, and punishing inclusion.
  • So they used a lot of tax dollars to oppose local control, right?
  • continue to have the ability to have representation, support us during end the session at this minimal cost
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Mar 12th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • It costs people money and time, but it's due process.
  • Residents feel unsafe, repair costs have been extensive.
  • And in effect, an effort to reduce costs for property owners, HB 32 will instead increase costs for communities
  • These evictions carry consequences, and they carry costs.
  • , meaning these costs will inevitably fall on taxpayers.
Bills: HB15, HB171, HB204
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Environment Committee Meeting - 2026-04-16

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • control and environmental Pollution control and environmental monitoring<00:03:32.800> are<00
  • <00:13:30.440> for monitor air quality control for monitor air quality control for communities
  • Adding delay and cost to needed drainage work is not a solution.
  • So again, that's the externalized cost So again, that's the externalized cost that<01:09:23.520>
  • So, it continues and then the cost continues.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Environment Committee Meeting - 2026-04-09

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Control Agency. Control Agency.
  • But, I think it's important in a discussion of costs to talk about externalized costs.
  • yes, there's a cost to production. yes, there's a cost to production.
  • and future taxpayer costs helps out. and future taxpayer costs helps out.
  • below their cost of production. below their cost of production.
Bills: HF4740, HF3940
Summary: The committee approved the March 26, 2026 minutes and then heard House File 4740, authored by Rep. Hansen, which would require feedlots with at least 1,000 animal units to provide financial assurance for closure costs. Hansen argued the bill would shift cleanup responsibility from taxpayers to owners, citing abandoned feedlots, changing ownership structures, and the 2024 Pure Prairie Poultry bankruptcy as examples of why public funds should not be used for closures and cleanup. He also said the bill would apply to new or renewed permits and suggested a statutory definition of abandoned feedlot storage units may be needed. Farm and livestock groups testified in opposition. Minnesota Farmers Union, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, Minnesota Pork Producers Association, and Minnesota Farm Bureau Federation said existing MPCA and county permit rules already require closure planning and reporting, and that the bill would add unnecessary costs and barriers for family farms, beginning farmers, and expansion. They warned the financial assurance requirement could function like an animal-unit cap, encourage fragmentation or out-of-state relocation, and impose annual costs that would not improve environmental outcomes. Several testified that true abandonment is rare and that current permitting and closure processes already address it. MPCA staff said the agency has concerns with the bill, noted there is currently no formal fiscal note, and said the agency would need to ensure any appropriations cover ongoing staffing needs. MPCA officials explained that permitted feedlots already must notify the agency before closure, follow a checklist of closure requirements, and undergo follow-up inspection; they said abandonment notifications are uncommon and they are not aware of any currently permitted facilities in abandonment process. Members questioned whether the bill was needed, what form financial assurance would take, how other states handle similar requirements, and whether the proposal would unfairly burden smaller or family operations. No vote on HF 4740 was taken in the portion of the meeting provided.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Health and Human Services May 23rd, 2025

Health & Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senator Campbell: It's really important for us to make sure we keep a good control, a safe control on
  • Some programs now function solely as premium assistance subsidizing commercial insurance costs instead
Bills: HB50
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/5/26

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • squarely within the legislators control. squarely within the legislators control.
  • these mandates come with a cost. these mandates come with a cost.
  • Many aspects of the cost of care and cost of insurance are outside the direct control of this legislature
  • Many aspects of the cost of care and cost of insurance are outside the direct control of this legislature
  • defrail costs, pay for um reinsurance. defrail costs, pay for um reinsurance.
Bills: HF3388, HF400
Summary: The committee approved the minutes from the prior day and then heard House File 400, a bill described as a defrayal measure for health insurance mandates. Representative Perryman said the bill would not block future mandates, but would require the state to pay the added costs of any new mandated benefits so those costs would not be shifted to premium payers. She and supporters framed the bill as a way to protect affordability for Minnesota employers, workers, and families, especially in the fully insured market. Testimony in support came from the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and the Minnesota Council of Health Plans. They argued that Minnesota has a high number of mandated benefits, that each new mandate adds cost to premiums, and that businesses—especially small and midsize employers—are already struggling with rising health insurance costs. The health plans representative said the bill would use the existing Commerce defrayal process to reimburse plans for eligible mandate-related claims, allowing those costs to be removed from premium rates. Several members echoed support, saying the bill would improve transparency by showing the fiscal impact of proposed mandates and help prevent people from being priced out of coverage. Members also explored how mandates apply in the market and how premiums are set. Deputy Commissioner Julia Dryer explained that, unless otherwise specified, mandates generally apply to the individual, small group, and fully insured large group markets, while self-insured ERISA plans and other markets are generally outside that scope. Representative Elkins noted that the affected market is relatively small and said small businesses are increasingly moving to self-insured plans because of cost. He and others raised concerns about affordability, while Representative Smith argued that mandates often ensure needed care and that the bill shifts costs to taxpayers rather than insurers. Representative Bacham added a personal example from tribal self-insurance, saying preventive physicals had saved lives and asking whether other factors besides mandates are driving insurer costs. No amendments were offered, and the bill was laid over for possible future consideration.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

AEN-GVO DEFER, GVO DEFER, GVO-HHS, GVO-PSM, GVO Public Hearings 02-17-2026

Agriculture and Environment

Transcript Highlights:
  • It cost the state between $60,000 and $115,000 a year to house someone.
  • It cost the state between 60 disagree.
  • I'm not sure who would inform the controller that the $5,000— That's my question. Yeah.
  • Who informs the controller to pay? It doesn't say.
  • Um there was a adjustment to control.
Bills: SB2094
Summary: The committee first took up SB 2094, which would require state agencies monitoring environmental toxins and pollutants to establish environmental action levels and limit changes to those levels without meeting procedural requirements. The chair recommended passing the bill with amendments, including inserting estimated costs for a secure portal website and webinars into the committee report and deferring the effective date to July 1, 2050. The motion passed unanimously among those voting, with excused members noted. The committee then considered several other measures and adopted recommendations to pass them with amendments, generally adding technical and clarifying changes and setting a defective date of 2525. SB 2862 was amended to broaden the preamble, make additional appointees confirmable, clarify reporting requirements for gubernatorial appointees, and was held for further discussion. SB 2781 on lei production created a working group to review existing studies and conduct a statewide study of Hawaii’s floriculture industry. SB 3015 adopted California’s definition of PII, applied it to government agencies and political subdivisions, created a private cause of action, and required a compliance report. SB 3230 removed a categorical prohibition on certain third-party project management procurements while preserving state oversight responsibility, in line with procurement office requests. The joint GVO Health and Human Services agenda then focused on two related bills requiring universal changing accommodations in public restrooms. SB 2932 would apply to new state building construction beginning July 1, 2026, and testimony from disability advocates, the Hawaii State Council on Developmental Disabilities, and others supported the measure while asking for language clarifying that the requirement applies only where technically feasible and, in some cases, only to state-managed buildings. SB 2268 was described as broader, extending beyond government buildings into the private sector and including a private right of action; witnesses supported the concept but raised implementation concerns, especially for smaller businesses, and requested the same technically infeasible language and other clarifications. Both bills were advanced with amendments, and the committee noted adoption of the recommendations.