Video & Transcript Research : 'binding determination'

Page 3 of 500
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Rules REVISED Apr 20th, 2026 at 09:00 am

Rules

Transcript Highlights:
  • simply making sure that every child had an opportunity to attend the school best suited for them as determined
  • And that determines at what level they can participate In the tax credit. Follow up. Thank you, Mr.
  • They get to determine who they will admit into their program based on any kind of category or criteria
  • Senator Daniels, this is making a slight adjustment to the timelines for evaluating and determining the
  • don't know if we have an accurate fiscal impact of how many people that would maybe not even be Determined
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Delivery of Government Efficiency Apr 9th, 2025

Delivery of Government Efficiency

AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/18/2026 - Senate Regulatory Affairs and Government Efficiency

Regulatory Affairs and Government Efficiency

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill requires the director of the Arizona Department of Water Resources to annually determine the
  • The bill requires the municipality or county to pay for the individualized determination and allows an
  • All that kind of information and study is done beforehand to determine your proportional share of your
  • Some counties did read this as shifting the cost for professional services necessary to determine the
  • The board will still be able to determine whether something is disciplinary or non-disciplinary action
Summary: The committee approved the minutes and then heard Senate Bill 1668, which would extend the deadline for funeral establishments or responsible persons to submit required documentation from seven calendar days to 14 business days and make related changes involving disposition of unborn or stillborn children, minors, and abortion clinic forms. Funeral industry testimony said the current timelines are difficult to meet and create stress for grieving families, while a mother described problems caused by requiring an ex-spouse’s signature after her child’s death. The bill passed on a 4-3 vote, with some members supporting the timing and family-law fixes and others objecting to the abortion-clinic provisions. The committee then took up Senate Bill 1286, on veterinary telemedicine prescriptions. An amendment shortened the telemedicine prescription period for non-antimicrobial drugs from 60 days to 30 days, allowed antimicrobial prescriptions for up to 14 days based on an electronic exam, and barred further antimicrobial prescriptions without an in-person exam. Veterinarians and the Arizona Veterinary Medical Association moved to neutral on the amended bill but warned about safety, overprescribing, and the limits of telemedicine; supporters argued it would improve access for rural, elderly, and low-income pet owners. The committee adopted the amendment and then passed the bill as amended on a 4-3 vote. Senate Bill 1235, creating the emergency services personnel licensure interstate compact, passed unanimously after sponsor testimony that it would improve reciprocity for EMTs and paramedics and help military personnel. Senate Bill 1446, which would change dialysis-center social worker documentation from monthly to quarterly, also passed unanimously, with DeVita Dialysis Services saying the change would reduce paperwork and align Arizona with federal and most-state practice. Senate Bill 1515, a cleanup bill for the Industrial Commission of Arizona that renames positions, removes outdated duties, and changes publication of fee schedules, passed after an amendment and supportive agency testimony. The committee also heard Senate Bill 1678, which would require direct-care staff in certain facilities to complete patient information forms and reestablish the Vulnerable Adult Systems Study Committee. An amendment removed the form requirement and instead required DHS to investigate complaints from EMS personnel about missing DNR orders; first responders and provider groups supported the revised approach, though some members wanted minority-party appointments added to the study committee. The bill passed as amended on a 6-0-1 vote. Finally, the committee began hearing Senate Bill 1747 on social media protections for minors, with the sponsor framing it as a child-safety measure and opponents from NetChoice, TechNet, and Meta warning about privacy risks, age-verification problems, constitutional concerns, and the possibility that teens would evade restrictions; supporters argued parents need stronger controls and pointed to app-store-based alternatives, but no vote was taken in the portion provided.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Child Committee Meeting - 2025-04-01

Children and Families Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • The proposal also makes redetermination dates consistent for 12 months from the date of the last determination
  • And so, who determines what's in the child's best interest in the case that we're talking about today
  • The determination of the child's best interest comes from looking at the circumstances of the family's
  • However, in Minnesota, if a maltreatment determination is upheld, this offender would be prohibited from
  • Having a maltreatment determination on an offender who commits those acts outside of our jurisdiction
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Children and Families Finance and Policy Committee 4/1/25

Children and Families Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • so when a child is born to determination so when a child is born to a<00:04:29.039> family<00
  • <00:10:04.560> scholarship<00:10:05.079> amounts<00:10:05.680> expands determining
  • scholarship amounts expands determining scholarship amounts expands eligibility<00:10:06.600> to<
  • Representative Nadeau asked who determines what is in the child's best interest in this case.
  • Miss Scullpammer explained that the determination of the child's best interest comes from looking at
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WAL Public Hearing - Thu Feb 5, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST

Water & Land

Transcript Highlights:
  • Whether we have to pay everyone that has yet to be determined again by the OHA board, but we certainly
  • Whether we have to pay everyone that has yet to be determined again by the OHA board, but we certainly
  • Whether we have to pay everyone that has yet to be determined again by the OHA board, but we certainly
  • Uh<01:31:23.679> trying<01:31:23.920> to<01:31:24.159> determine<01:31:24.560>
  • a Uh trying to determine comparables or a process<01:31:26.239> to<01:31:26.800> establish
Summary: The committee first heard HB 1527 relating to gambling. The chair outlined hearing rules, including a two-minute limit and a warning that bills not heard would die. Testimony was overwhelmingly in support from a prosecutor, Honolulu Police Department, and Stop Predatory Gambling, all arguing that casinos and sports betting increase crime, sex trafficking, harassment of athletes, and broader social harm. No opposition testimony was presented, and the committee moved on without questions or action taken on the bill. The committee then heard HB 1823 relating to coastal zone management and HB 2490 relating to coastal resilience. For HB 1823, DLNR, the Office of Planning, and Maui County testified, with Maui County supporting the measure and its proposed amendments. For HB 2490, DLNR expressed concern about exempting a proposed Mokuji Bay pilot project from permits and regulation before a long-term plan is finalized, while the County of Maui, the Mokuji Soto Zen Mission, and the Office of Planning supported the bill as a coastal resilience pilot. The mission described severe erosion, sea-level rise impacts, and years of unsuccessful efforts to stabilize the shoreline; its consultant said the study is leaning toward nature-based and hybrid solutions. In questioning, members and DLNR discussed whether the bill should say the project “shall” or “may” be exempt, and the chair indicated the language would be adjusted to preserve DLNR discretion and to change the lead agency reference to OPSD. No vote was taken in the transcript. Finally, the committee took up HB 2223 relating to historic preservation reviews. SHPD said it stood on its written comments, while OPSD and DHHL supported the bill. DHHL argued the measure would streamline reviews, improve transparency, and help address long wait times for its projects, saying it could alleviate burden on SHPD and better serve beneficiaries. Representative Shimizu questioned whether the bill would create redundancy and expand government rather than strengthen SHPD, noting a separate staffing bill already exists. SHPD responded that DHHL is uniquely subject to 6E review and that the bill would not waive federal or state historic review requirements; the discussion also touched on possible federal-style grant support and the existing memorandum of agreement between SHPD and DHHL. The transcript ends during questioning, with no final committee action shown.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate Healthcare Committee Feb 11th, 2026

Healthcare

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senator Ors, this bill has to do with AI and the AI determination from insurance companies whether they
  • therapeutic plan or treatment, it has to be reviewed by an individual and not let the computer make the determination
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Apr 8th, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Oklahoma Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • clerk will read, whereas competing at a championship level requires extreme dedication, skill, and determination
  • whereas Dominic is an exceptional athlete whose success continues to be shaped by both personal determination
  • And whereas the Calumet boys baseball team outscored Fort Cobb 5 to 3 with tireless dedication, determination
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • would determine that there's no<00:02:28.920> immediate<00:02:29.239> danger<00:02:29.519
  • This requires that the Hawaiian version of the law be held binding if the law in question was originally
  • This requires that the Hawaiian version of the law be held binding if the law in question was originally
  • This requires that the Hawaiian version of the law be held binding if the law in question was originally
  • The ʻŌlelo Hawaiʻi version would be the binding one. Questions or concerns?
Keywords: 912, senate, all
Summary: The Judiciary Committee held a decision-making-only agenda and voted on a series of bills, mostly following the chair’s recommendations. Measures passed unamended included SB 1202 on allowing campaign funds for child care and dependent care costs, SB 30 requiring all moped drivers to wear helmets, SB 55 requiring state administrative rules to be posted in a digitally accessible and searchable format, SB 106 on pedestrian conduct more than 200 feet from a crosswalk, SB 344 requiring helmets for skateboard users under 16, SB 849 increasing penalties for harming native species, SB 1337 clarifying Stadium Authority quorum rules, and SB 268 reducing the size of island burial councils and removing certain membership requirements. SB 1511, which prohibits vessels longer than 75 feet from entering Honay Bay, was also adopted, though the transcript includes some inconsistent wording about whether it was amended. Several bills were approved with amendments. SB 1048 on solicitation of funds from the public was amended to remove a ministerial exception and to require certain charitable organizations and fundraising platforms to file written contracts with the Department before commencing solicitations. SB 109 was amended so that, in specified circumstances, the ʻŌlelo Hawaiʻi version of a law would be binding when the law was originally drafted in English, translated into Hawaiian, and later amended. SB 66 on county building permits was amended to add a bad date, April 23, 2057. SB 1312, deferred to the 10 o’clock agenda, clarified that “profits from prostitution” includes money or property received from prostitution proceeds even if characterized as reimbursement or debt repayment; it was also passed with amendments. The committee also adopted a recommendation to pass SB 55 and other measures with the noted excused absences of Senator Gabbard and, at times, other members. Throughout the meeting, no major opposition was recorded beyond one member voting no or with reservations on some bills, and the chair repeatedly announced that the recommendations had been adopted. The meeting concluded after the 10 o’clock agenda, with notice that the committee would meet upstairs for later agendas with WHAM.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Taxes - 02/05/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • . will determine how many days are will determine how many days are required<01:26:45.800> for
  • for that binding that binding ruling for that binding that binding ruling for that<01:27:53.280
  • <01:42:06.280> Minnesota determining Minnesota determining Minnesota taxes<01:42:09.040> if
  • It's binding on the commissioner.
  • on the uh and are not not binding on the uh and are not binding<01:50:15.360> on<01:50:15.719
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

Senate Election Law and Municipal Affairs (04/14/2026)

Election Law and Municipal Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, would that be a binding vote?
  • So, would that be a binding vote?
  • Even if the the vote be binding?
  • . binding. binding.
  • legally binding. legally binding. Additional<01:01:07.599> questions?
Keywords: 1191, senate, all
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:01:18.799> arbitration<00:01:19.280> as agreements that um binds arbitration as
  • Uh a binding assisted living facility.
  • there's a prohibition on pre binding there's a prohibition on pre binding pre-arbitration<00:15:
  • being required to sign binding being required to sign binding arbitration<00:15:35.279> agreements
  • determinations that are taking<00:35:34.480> place.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

December 10, 2025 - 09:00 AM

Transcript Highlights:
  • And to determine that, we perform what's called a functional analysis.
  • And we determine what is the political dynamic within that district.
  • Primarily visual, we look at the map and we simply make a determination.
  • So in terms of binding effect, it has binding effect on Louisiana in the sense of being, you know, what
  • So in an indirect way, that is binding on us as well.
Summary: The Select Committee on Congressional Redistricting met for an informational presentation from outside counsel Andy Bartos on the legal standards governing congressional redistricting. He reviewed federal Equal Protection principles, Florida’s non-diminishment provision, and Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, explaining how race can be considered in redistricting but generally cannot be the predominant factor. He also discussed the Florida Constitution’s tiered standards, including the prohibition on intentional political favoritism, compactness, and the requirement to use existing political and geographical boundaries where feasible. Bartos focused on two recent or pending cases: the Florida Supreme Court’s Black Voters Matter decision, which upheld the legislature’s 2022 congressional map and held that the non-diminishment clause does not justify making race predominant absent specific identifiable discrimination, and Louisiana v. Callais, pending before the U.S. Supreme Court, which may further clarify whether race may be used predominantly to comply with the Voting Rights Act or whether Section 2 remains constitutional as applied. He also explained how courts assess compactness and intent, and how data such as the 2020 census, voter registration, turnout, and election results are used for voting-rights analysis. Members asked about what triggers redistricting, whether the legislature must redraw maps now, what data is available in the mapping tool, how intent is measured, and whether public input opportunities will be provided. Bartos said redistricting timing is largely a legislative judgment unless a court requires changes, that the committee can consider whether BVM or the eventual Callais decision warrants revisions, and that the Callais ruling will bind Louisiana directly but serve as precedent for other courts. No votes or legislative actions were taken, and the meeting adjourned after the presentation and questions.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
  • Quite a determination to make from John Q. Public, right?
  • Quite a determination to make from John Q. Public, right?
  • Quite a determination to make from John Q. Public, right?
  • <00:26:33.399> the and then in order to um determine the and then in order to um determine
  • back on the municipality to determine back on the municipality to determine the<01:51:36.560>
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The committee worked through a draft bill amending animal cruelty and protective custody provisions, focusing on how animals may be seized, cared for, and returned, and on what rights owners have when animals are taken. Members discussed adding language requiring officers to inform a charged person in writing of the right to petition for a veterinarian of their choice, clarifying that any documents presented for signature must be fully and honestly explained, and revising language so confiscated animals cannot be altered without notarized owner authorization. They also considered a new prohibition on using confiscated animals for fundraising or donations, ultimately preferring the term “financial gain” over “profiteering.” The discussion also covered protective custody procedures, including adding “municipal animal control officer” to the list of officers involved, allowing return of animals to the owner or caretaker if no charges have been filed or no warrant establishing probable cause has been sought or issued, and clarifying the distinction between criminal seizure and temporary protective custody. The commissioner’s comments led to several proposed deletions or revisions, including removing language viewed as redundant or inconsistent with protective custody, and striking references to live racing provisions that are no longer relevant. Members further addressed lactating animals, agreeing to add language that confiscated lactating animals should not be separated from their nonweaned offspring. They also discussed a proposed confidentiality provision requiring people assisting in investigations or taking possession of seized animals to sign a binding nondisclosure agreement, though members noted similar protections may need to be duplicated in the temporary custody section as well. The conversation was largely about drafting and legal clarity, with no final vote or formal action recorded in the excerpt.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House Constitution, Campaigns and Elections Committee Mar 4th, 2026

Constitution, Campaigns and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • Then once they get to the convention, that convention will determine their own rules.
  • <00:34:43.119> I<00:34:43.200> can bind the delegates in Alabama.
  • <00:34:48.000> the in Alabama would pass would bind the in Alabama would pass would bind the
  • That would be determined by Congress.
  • <00:46:19.200> that >> and who determines that >> and who determines that >
Bills: HB433, HB443