Video & Transcript Research : 'transportation code'

Page 38 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections May 8th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • The bill provides common-sense safeguards into the election code.
  • For older voters who might be homebound, have limited resources, lack adequate transportation, or are
  • The bill completely ignores Election Code 84.007, which requires a hard copy of the application to be
  • The section of the code that y'all are amending to put the dates forward was set up for a bill.
  • Members, Chapter 32 of the Election Code provides for the ...judge and alternate presiding judge for
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Delivery of Government Efficiency May 7th, 2025

Delivery of Government Efficiency

Transcript Highlights:
  • The bill amends the federal government code to include both current and former administrative law judges
  • The current fee-for-service model within the code has led to. to fragmented billing and unpredictable
  • It will also have two non-voting members from the Texas Department of Transportation. and the Texas Commission
  • I'd like to highlight three key parts of the First, it will establish an AI code of ethics to be adopted
  • It establishes a comprehensive code of ethics, as was mentioned previously, and the bill also calls for
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections Apr 24th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's clear in Texas election code 11.002. Why are we wasting time on this?
  • Have it in code, in our code. When did we do it?
  • Voter ID, we allow in the election code 63.001.
  • I mean, it's something that's across other parts of the election code.
  • Transportation is more likely an issue in rural areas.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The other authorized user on the account, as directed by the Code of Federal Regulations, requires retail
  • little to no procedural guidelines on the impeachment process. impeachment contained in Government Code
  • , also commonly known as the Forgiveness Doctrine, which is found in Chapter 665 of the Government Code
  • To just what, to push me into a box that I'll just get like V-coded to death or like what?
  • I was able to bring this issue directly to his In response, we implemented a strict dress code requiring
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The other authorized user on the account, as directed by the Code of Federal Regulations, requires retail
  • little to no procedural guidelines on the impeachment process. impeachment contained in Government Code
  • , also commonly known as the Forgiveness Doctrine, which is found in Chapter 665 of the Government Code
  • To just what, to push me into a box that I'll just get like V-coded to death or like what?
  • In response, we implemented a strict dress code requiring employees to dress in accordance with their
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part II) Apr 3rd, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Statutory impeachment, contained in Government Code Chapter 665, applies to a state officer, a head of
  • what, to push me into a box that... to just, what, to push me into a box that I'll just get, like, V-coded
  • In response, we implemented a strict dress code requiring employees to dress in accordance with their
Summary: The committee first heard Senate Bill 1183, by Senator Creighton, which would require Lone Star Cards used for SNAP and TANF benefits to display the recipient’s name and photo, add fraud-reporting information, and require HHSC to track replacement-card requests. Creighton argued the bill would reduce fraud and protect taxpayer dollars, citing Texas SNAP theft and overpayment data. HHSC testified that photo IDs on the card are technically possible and explained how authorized secondary users are added. Dr. Amber O’Connor of Every Texan testified against the bill, saying SNAP fraud is a small share of expenditures, that the proposal would be costly and ineffective, and that federal rules limit mandatory photo requirements. Public testimony closed and SB 1183 was left pending. The committee then heard Senate Bill 1184, also by Senator Creighton, which would lower from 20 years to 10 years the minimum age of collectible wine that Texas collectors may sell to permitted restaurants. Supporters said the change would help Texas restaurants access desirable vintages, keep collectible wine in-state, and align with market demand; invited witnesses from the wine industry testified in favor. No opposition was heard, public testimony closed, and SB 1184 was left pending. Next, Senator Birdwell laid out Senate Bill 2051 and Senate Joint Resolution 68, both aimed at revising Texas impeachment procedures in response to issues identified during the 2023 impeachment process. The measures would clarify constitutional and statutory impeachment authority, require sworn testimony, extend review periods for House members, address conflicts of interest and presiding officers, require cost reporting, and modify rules for impeaching the governor or lieutenant governor. A committee substitute added protections for the accused, longer review periods, and a fallback presiding-officer option. Witnesses generally supported stronger accountability but raised questions about whether the language should also cover retired or visiting judges. Both measures were left pending after testimony. The committee also heard Senate Bill 1577, which would expand Texas Motor Speedway’s alcohol sales authority to include distilled spirits and remove certain event and concession limits; the Speedway’s representative supported the bill and it was left pending. Later, the committee heard Senate Concurrent Resolution 42 and Senate Bill 240, which would recognize only two sexes and restrict access to sex-designated private spaces in public facilities based on biological sex. Supporters argued the measures were needed to protect women’s privacy and safety, including in schools and shelters, while opponents warned about enforcement problems, privacy concerns, and impacts on transgender Texans and others who do not fit stereotypical sex traits. After extensive testimony, both measures were left pending. The committee then took up multiple pending bills and reported several favorably, including SB 511, SB 33, SB 510, SB 871, SB 2024, SB 2166, SJR 27, SJR 40, SB 1313, SB 1314, SB 1316, SB 1541, SB 2420, SB 1999, SB 2309, SB 1860, and SB 2429, with some also certified for the local and uncontested calendar.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Committee on Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs Apr 28th, 2025

Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Yes, those guys do transportation back and forth and are generational workers. But no, it's good.
  • SB 1891 would clarify the definition in Texas Water Code Chapter 13 to include these options and adjust
  • Senate Bill 1442 are reported to the full Senate, relating to the issuance of TCEQ on environmental codes
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Apr 2nd, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • buildings, and the ability to implement the latest energy codes for the International Code Council.EECO
  • Residential Code.
  • or excuse me, published the 2024 codes.
  • So if there's something crazy in those codes that doesn't work for Texas, they can amend that code.
  • I don't think examples should be put into campus hate speech codes.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs Apr 2nd, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Hotel occupancy taxes under the Texas Tax Code Section 351.004 remain unaffected.
  • Restaurants comply with health codes. Home-based businesses get...
  • I serve as the managing partner of Code Concepts Group, where my partner and I...
  • The Department of Licensing and Regulation has adopted the 2023 National Electric Code.
  • Following that code, these systems should be safe.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Aug 15th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Y'all ever heard of V-coding?
  • V-coding is a common practice in prisons, where trans women are given cells with the most violent cisgender
Bills: SB6, SB7, SB8, SB11, SB12, SB13, SB15, SB17
Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 8, the Texas Women's Privacy Act, and heard extensive public testimony both for and against the measure. Supporters, including representatives of Texas Values and Texas Values Action, argued the bill was needed to protect women’s privacy and safety in restrooms, locker rooms, showers, prisons, domestic violence shelters, and other government-controlled spaces, and said it would provide clear, sex-based rules. Opponents, including many transgender Texans, civil rights advocates, clergy, business and public safety voices, and others, argued the bill would invite harassment, gender policing, lawsuits, and invasive inspections, while harming trans, intersex, and gender-nonconforming people as well as cisgender women who do not fit stereotypes. Several witnesses said the bill would conflict with federal law or prison standards, worsen safety in shelters and prisons, and hurt Texas’s reputation and economy. The chair repeatedly noted the compressed special-session schedule and said flood relief remained the session’s top priority. Public testimony on SB 8 was eventually closed, and the bill was left pending. The committee then moved to Senate Bill 6, dealing with consumable hemp product restrictions. Testimony on SB 6 focused on whether the bill went too far in restricting hemp-derived THC products. Opponents argued hemp and THC have medical and economic value, that the bill would criminalize conduct and burden courts, and that regulation—not prohibition—was the better approach. Some witnesses supported tighter rules such as testing, child-resistant packaging, and limits on marketing to children, but still opposed the bill’s broad THC ban, higher fees, and age restrictions. Several speakers emphasized benefits for veterans, chronic pain patients, and small businesses, and warned that prohibition would push consumers toward the illicit market. The committee heard the testimony and then continued with additional witnesses, with no final vote or disposition reported in the excerpt.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • It's not following our code, and they're not following the law. That's correct.
  • The problem is that there's nothing in the code that allows for the enforcement of the code against a
  • Then, there’s an express waiver of immunity for enforcement of the code by an action through mandamus
  • governance structure with the established framework under Section 285.081 of the Health and Safety Code
  • The Texas Education Code currently places limits on severance pay for ISD superintendents, but those