Video & Transcript Research : 'justification'
Page 37 of 72
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
Senate Children and Family Law (03/19/2026)
Children and Family Law
Transcript Highlights:
- This leads to inconsistent rulings, prolonged litigation, and children losing a parent without justification
- :44:22.640>
a <00:44:22.800>parent <00:44:23.119>without <00:44:23.440>justification - losing a parent without justification. losing a parent without justification.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- that are available to try and reshuffle, bring help, fill those gaps, and down the road, with justification
- <00:28:20.880>
with those gaps and down the road with those gaps and down the road with justification - 22.640>
there's <00:28:22.960>no <00:28:23.200>other <00:28:23.440>way justification - , if there's no other way justification, if there's no other way to<00:28:23.840>
address <00:28
Bills:
HB1531
Keywords:
emergency announcements, American Sign Language, accessibility, public safety, broadcast media, 910, house, all
Summary:
The committee heard testimony on House Bill 1913, which would create a mental health coordinator position within the Office of Veteran Services for the Daniel K. Akaka State Veterans Home and appropriate funds for it. Supporters said veterans, especially on the neighbor islands, need more mental health access and coordination. Several witnesses, including Sean Sonatada and Tom Driscoll, supported the intent but urged amendments to broaden the position beyond one facility and make it a statewide resource. Committee members questioned whether the bill would duplicate existing services at the veterans home and whether the position would be reimbursable through federal VA funding; testimony indicated the state would appropriate the money, while existing home services are already covered through current staff and federal reimbursement structures. The committee also heard testimony on House Bill 9, which would designate Hawaii as a Purple Heart state. Testifiers generally supported the measure as a way to honor wounded veterans and their families, though one member asked what benefits the designation would confer. Witnesses clarified that the bill was mainly symbolic and did not appear to create new benefits, and one testifier noted Honolulu County had already adopted a similar Purple Heart designation.
The committee then took up House Bill 1628, which would establish a compassionate release protocol for certain seriously ill or debilitated incarcerated persons. The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and the Hawaii Paroling Authority opposed the bill, arguing that an existing administrative process already works, that the bill could improperly extend eligibility to people serving life without parole or mandatory minimum sentences, and that it lacked victim and family input and sufficient resources. In contrast, the Hawaii Correctional System Oversight Commission strongly supported the bill, saying it would reduce the high cost of incarcerating people with complex medical needs, ease burdens on staff and the prison population, and better reflect human dignity. The commission described having seen severe suffering and deaths in custody and said compassionate release is warranted in some cases. No votes or final actions were taken in the portion of the meeting provided.
AL
Transcript Highlights:
- So there will need to be some justification or some reasoning behind that expense.
- So there will need to<02:06:50.320>
be <02:06:50.400>some <02:06:50.719>justification - <02:06:51.440>
or <02:06:52.079>some to be some justification or some to be some justification
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
Administrative Regulation Review Subcommittee (12-8-25)
Transcript Highlights:
- A big part of his justification is that the regulatory amendment now before this subcommittee is not
- c><02:00:39.440>
part <02:00:39.599>of <02:00:39.760>his <02:00:39.920>justification - A big part of his justification is Ba.
- A big part of his justification is that<02:00:41.119>
the <02:00:41.280>regulatory <02:00
Summary:
The committee first approved the minutes and then recognized a staff member’s birthday and a guest shadowing Senator Adams. It then moved into informational review of Education and Labor Cabinet, Department of Education regulation 702 KAR 3:30, which sets insurance coverage requirements for school district buildings and structures. Department of Education officials explained that districts are expected to carry coverage at replacement cost and said they understand some districts participate in self-insurance pools with backup policies, but they deferred detailed insurance questions to the Department of Insurance. Senators raised concerns that pooled coverage could leave districts exposed if claims exceed pool limits, and the chair asked KDE to follow up with DOI to confirm districts are adequately covered, especially for bondholders. No vote was taken on the informational review.
The committee then reviewed emergency ABC regulations 804 KAR 130:01 through 130:04 implementing Senate Bill 100’s new licensing requirements for tobacco, nicotine, and vapor product businesses. ABC and Public Protection Cabinet representatives outlined the emergency rules governing enforcement, license applications, denial criteria, and transitional licenses. Retail industry witnesses Shannon Stiglet and Brian Clark said they support licensure in principle but argued the rules add duplicative requirements borrowed from alcohol licensing, create confusion about transitional licenses, and may be too burdensome for the roughly 7,000 affected businesses to meet by the January 1 deadline. They also said guidance has been inconsistent and requested the agency revise the regulations, remove requirements not grounded in law, and provide clearer, separate processes for new and existing businesses.
Committee members asked whether the industry had worked directly with ABC and noted the public comment period was still open. Witnesses said they had communicated with ABC and the Public Protection Cabinet, but responses had been uneven and they wanted written guidance. Members expressed concern about the short timeline and the need to avoid disruption so businesses can operate legally on January 1. Representative Marzian asked for clarification that the discussion concerned emergency regulations already in effect while ordinary regulations remain in process. No formal action was taken beyond receiving the informational testimony and discussion.
TX
Texas 89th Regular
Congressional Redistricting, Select Aug 1st, 2025
Congressional Redistricting, Select
Transcript Highlights:
- What we've gotten here today so far has been the racial justification for what's happening here.
- The only public justification of this map is a Department of Justice directive to the Governor, saying
- Other colleagues, it's wrong to come in and begin to dismantle that, and I don't find any justification
- misquote King: judged by the content of your character, not the color of your skin, to use it as justification
Bills:
HB4
Keywords:
district composition, congressional election, Texas, legislature, voting districts, 997, house, all
NH
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- off campus, and if the offense did not involve school property students or staff, there is no justification
- There's no justification for a school to ever impose. any sort of disciplinary consequence.
- off campus are you asking us whether there should be whether that should be whether there is is justification
- So, in that context, the statement that there is no justification for the school to impose those additional
Bills:
HB6, HB27, HB 123, HB210, HB213, HB222, HB610, HB 1085, HB1481, HB6, HB27, HB123, HB210, HB213, HB222
Keywords:
mental health, telehealth, public schools, discipline management, behavioral interventions, financial literacy, high school education, curriculum requirements, economics, personal finance, HB 123, kindergarten readiness, early literacy, early numeracy, reading screening, math screening, foundational literacy, foundational numeracy, dyslexia screening, reading intervention
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
JHA Public Hearing - Thu Feb 19, 2026 @ 2:00 PM HST
Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- without a warrant for petty misdemeanors and violations and requires officers to document the justification
- officers to violations and requires officers to document<00:51:57.760>
the <00:51:58.000>justification - <00:51:58.640>
for <00:51:58.800>the document the justification for the document the - justification for the arrest.<00:52:00.319>
Measure <00:52:00.640>amends <00:52:01.040> - not the case, and it’s not true because the officer would have to make sure that, as part of the justification
Summary:
The House Committee on Judiciary and Hawaiian Affairs recessed briefly for a joint hearing, then reconvened and took up House Bill 2494, which would limit warrantless arrests for petty misdemeanors and violations, require officers to document arrest justification, expand citation-in-lieu-of-arrest use, and direct the Judiciary to create a standardized citation form. The chair also outlined hearing procedures and testimony time limits. Committee members later received an overview from the Policing Project about national trends in expanding citation use.
Testimony was divided. Supporters, including the Office of Hawaiian Affairs, the Hawaii Correctional System Oversight Commission, the Office of the Public Defender, the ACLU of Hawaii, the Drug Policy Forum of Hawaii, and the Policing Project, argued the bill would reduce unnecessary arrests and pretrial detention, lessen jail overcrowding, save law enforcement time, and reduce harms such as job loss, housing instability, family disruption, and recidivism. They also said the bill preserves officer discretion through public-safety and flight-risk exceptions, and several supporters urged the committee to adopt a standardized citation form despite the Judiciary’s request for a delayed implementation date.
Opposition came from the Department of the Attorney General, the Judiciary, county prosecutors, Honolulu Police Department, and other individuals. They argued the bill would unduly restrict law enforcement discretion, create administrative and data-processing problems, and make it harder to identify repeat or habitual offenders because of changes to citation information and fingerprinting. The Judiciary requested implementation no earlier than January 1, 2028 and said the citation form would need major changes. Opponents also warned the bill could increase litigation, suppress evidence, and not meaningfully reduce overcrowding because most jail populations are held on felony matters. The chair reported 14 testimonies in support, 21 in opposition, and one with comments; no vote or final action was taken in the portion provided.
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
US House Floor Proceedings (Wednesday, December 3, 2025)
US Federal House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- returned, claiming that they were in hot pursuit, even though there was no chase, no threat, no legal justification
- returned, claiming that they were in hot pursuit, even though there was no chase, no threat, no legal justification
- there was no chase, no threat, no though there was no chase, no threat, no legal<08:11:56.478>
justification - <08:11:57.200>
that <08:11:57.440>would <08:11:57.600>allow legal justification - that would allow legal justification that would allow entering<08:11:58.478>
a <08:11:58.798><
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
US House Floor Proceedings (Thursday, June 5, 2025)
US Federal House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- local SBA offices out of so-called sanctuary cities despite there being no legal definition and no justification
- <02:24:00.080>
no being no legal definition and no being no legal definition and no justification - <02:24:03.040>
This justification for such a move. This justification for such a move. - Congress receives reporting from the SBA on the proposed relocation of covered offices, including a justification
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- One, that there may be justification, at least in certain circumstances, or all circumstances, of somebody
- One, that there may be justification, at least in certain circumstances, or all circumstances, of somebody
- that<01:42:51.360>
there <01:42:51.560>may <01:42:51.840>be <01:42:52.639>justification - <01:42:53.320>
ation that there may be justification ation that there may be justification
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Education Policy and Administration (01/12/2026)
Education Policy and Administration
Transcript Highlights:
- He said this is for the benefit of taxpayers and children, and questioned what the justification would
- He said that this is for the benefit of taxpayers and children, and asked what the justification would
- are going to have public funding for private schools, and we are going to say that part of the justification
- c> of<04:30:29.760>
the going to say that part of the going to say that part of the justification - for this public funds is justification for this public funds is that<04:30:32.159>
to <04:30:32.399
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety - 02/20/26
Judiciary and Public Safety
Transcript Highlights:
- Now, the fact is, this is a late justification that happened after Metro Surge began.
- <03:11:34.080>
is <03:11:34.319>a <03:11:34.640>late <03:11:35.200>justification - <03:11:36.000>
that um this is a late justification that um this is a late justification that - /c><03:13:06.319>
be <03:13:06.399>a <03:13:06.560>legal <03:13:06.800>justification - there has to be a legal justification there has to be a legal justification for<03:13:07.760>
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Criminal Justice and Public Safety (01/15/2026)
Criminal Justice and Public Safety
Transcript Highlights:
- for taking a life the justification for taking a life would<01:55:42.800>
profoundly <01:55:43.520 - taking another human's life brings someone some type of gratification or relief or some type of justification
- 27.199>
of gratification or relief or some type of gratification or relief or some type of justification - :29.119>
it <02:10:29.360>feels <02:10:29.920>if <02:10:30.159>and justification - , then if it feels if and justification, then if it feels if and it<02:10:30.560>
feels <02:10:
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Science, Technology and Energy (01/14/2026)
Science, Technology and Energy
Transcript Highlights:
- government intentionally alters atmospheric conditions without notice, disclosure or emergency justification
- government intentionally alters atmospheric conditions without notice, disclosure or emergency justification
- government intentionally alters atmospheric conditions without notice, disclosure or emergency justification
- government intentionally alters atmospheric conditions without notice, disclosure or emergency justification
- government intentionally alters atmospheric conditions without notice, disclosure or emergency justification
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Judiciary (02/19/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- The justification provided for this classification is protecting rights and physical safety, privacy
- would be broadly amended statute would be broadly permitted<01:54:36.520>
the <01:54:36.679>justif - <01:54:37.280>
justification permitted the justif justification permitted the justif justification - I'm concerned this bill creates a precedent for policing bathrooms that results in justification of violence
Summary:
The House Judiciary Committee opened a hearing on House Bill 148, which Rep. Jim Kofalt said is the same language as last year’s HB 396, vetoed by the governor. He described the bill as allowing, but not requiring, separation by biological sex in three areas: bathrooms and locker rooms, houses of correction, and certain athletic competitions. Kofalt argued the bill would give local school boards and other policymakers discretion to set practical rules, citing concerns about safety, privacy, and a Milford incident involving a biological male in girls’ locker rooms. Committee members pressed him on the lack of a definition of “biological sex,” and he said he did not think one was necessary because males and females are commonly understood. He also said the bill was meant to address situations where outside groups threaten lawsuits and leave local boards with no latitude.
Testimony then split sharply. Supporters, including Executive Counselor Karen Hill and several others, said HB 148 would roll back anti-discrimination protections, contradict New Hampshire’s “Live Free or Die” values, and harm transgender and non-binary people. Opponents described the bill as discriminatory and unnecessary, arguing that existing bathroom and sports policies already work and that the bill would invite harassment, invasive enforcement, and legal conflict. Several speakers, including trans residents and parents of trans children, said they had used public restrooms without incident and warned that enforcement would be impractical or abusive. One supporter argued the bill was needed to protect girls’ privacy and safety and cited school sports disputes and a concern about a sex offender at a game as examples of why sex-segregated rules should be restored.
Committee members asked questions about how biological sex would be defined, whether the bill was responding to real incidents in New Hampshire, and how any restrictions would be enforced. Kofalt said he was aware of issues in several school districts and at the State House, but did not have detailed documentation for every case. No vote or final action was taken in the portion of the hearing provided; the chair instead moved through public testimony under a strict two-minute limit and noted that follow-up questions would be limited so the committee could hear multiple bills that day.
CO
Colorado 2026 Regular Session
Colorado House 2026 Legislative Day 119 May 13th, 2026
Colorado House Floor Meeting
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Transportation (03/04/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- I could not disagree with you more on the reasoning, the justification, or the value that this bill brings
- Representative Miller: I could not disagree with you more on the reasoning, the justification, or the
Summary:
The Transportation Committee met in executive session on several House bills. HB 212, allowing a 180-day operation waiver when a vehicle fails an emissions test, was retained at the sponsor’s request for possible modifications. HB 249, which would have let bicyclists treat stop signs as yields and stop lights as stop signs, was recommended inexpedient to legislate (ITL) by a 9-7 vote, with a minority report expected.
The committee then retained HB 298, creating an exception for removing VIN tags from pre-1981 vehicles when needed for repair or restoration, by a 15-1 vote. HB 411-FN, making handheld device use while driving a secondary offense, was recommended ITL by consent after members argued the current primary-offense law is more effective for enforcement and safety.
On HB 414, which would have barred DMV license suspensions based on debts owed to private towing or storage companies, the committee rejected ITL and instead retained the bill 16-0 after members split over whether the current law unfairly ties driving privileges to private debt collection. HB 441, addressing visible diesel emissions and “rolling coal,” was recommended ITL 16-0 because members said the conduct is already illegal under existing state and federal law. The committee then took up HB 461, concerning Department of Safety and DMV training and testing materials, where members debated whether driver testing should be limited to English and whether multilingual materials are a safety necessity or discriminatory; the transcript cuts off before a final vote is shown.
HI
Hawaii 2025 Regular Session
CPC Public Hearing- Thu Jan 30, 2025 @ 2:00 PM HST
Consumer Protection & Commerce
Transcript Highlights:
- So are you saying that there's no threshold of justification that they must show in order to increase
- There's no threshold of justification that they must show in order to increase the rates?
Summary:
The committee on Consumer Protection and Commerce met on January 30, 2025, and heard testimony on several condominium-related bills, beginning with HB 70. HB 70 would require a budget summary disclosure for condominiums. Supporters, including Community Associations Institute, a real estate broker, and several condominium owners, said the bill would improve consumer protection by giving owners and buyers a clearer, more understandable snapshot of an association’s financial health and reserve compliance. One supporter noted the bill should help reduce confusion caused by lengthy reserve studies and emphasized the importance of accurate disclosure. A testifier also urged the committee to hear other condominium bills quickly, including measures related to an ombudsman, managing agents, parliamentarians, and attorney’s fees.
The committee then heard HB 106, which would change the process for condominium fines and disputes. Phil Nery of CAI and other supporters said the bill would strengthen due process by requiring clearer notice, allowing an internal board appeal, and then permitting small claims court review without attorney’s fees unless the fine is upheld. They argued this would prevent fines from escalating into costly legal disputes and provide a more linear, fair process. Some supporters suggested amendments, including clarifying that the statute controls over association documents and refining refund language. During questioning, members raised concerns about small claims limits and whether associations would be represented by volunteers or attorneys. One testifier initially in support later said he would not support the bill as written after hearing HPD’s concerns.
HB 224, relating to property rights, drew opposition from the Department of the Attorney General and the Honolulu Police Department. Both agencies said the bill would improperly push law enforcement into a quasi-judicial role and could short-circuit existing due process procedures for occupants of residences. A realtor who had initially been listed in support changed his position after hearing the opposition testimony. The committee also heard emotional testimony from a resident describing a long-running squatter and utility theft problem at a neighboring property, which he said took years of court action and police involvement to resolve. No votes or final committee actions were taken during the portion of the meeting reflected in the transcript.
NJ