Video & Transcript : 'disclosure statement' :

Page 323 of 500
AR

Arkansas 2026 1st Special Session

LEGISLATIVE JOINT AUDITING Jan 9th, 2026

LEGISLATIVE JOINT AUDITING

Transcript Highlights:
  • In other business, a request for a study of fiscal impact statements was withdrawn.
  • So, going back to your statement, I remember... Senator Petty: Yes, thank you, Madam Chair.
  • So, going back to your statement regarding the federal court, was there periodic accounting to the federal
  • If any of you would like to give an opening statement, this is a lot of information and help us understand
  • But with that general statement about how we do things, we'll be happy to answer any specific questions
Summary: The committee first adopted prior minutes and then heard several standing committee audit reports. The executive committee report noted audit and special reports scheduled for the month, one outstanding committee-requested report, and a request to gather information on a possible special report for February. The city/county/local report covered delinquent private water and sewer audits, including reinstatement of turn-back funds for 17 entities, 59 of 64 delinquent 2023 entities filing reports, and action on the town of Daisy requiring repayment of misused street funds. The education report filed three higher education audit reports and deferred one Northwest Arkansas Community College report. The state agencies report filed four reports and deferred audits of the Department of Human Services and the Department of Parks, Heritage, and Tourism for more information on corrective actions. The committee then received a special audit review of the Charles W. Donaldson Scholars Academy at UA Little Rock. Auditors said the program received $10 million in desegregation funding and a $50,000 grant, awarded $1.87 million in scholarships to 379 students, and saw 116 students graduate. The review found many scholarship eligibility exceptions, including awards above the maximum and to students who did not meet GPA, enrollment-hour, or full-time requirements, and numerous disbursement documentation and authorization problems. Committee members sharply questioned the program’s oversight, the role of former staff, the use of funds for travel and cultural activities, and whether any improper spending should be referred for criminal review. UALR representatives said the program was overseen as a sponsored program, that some controls were later strengthened, and that Philander Smith only verified enrollment rather than eligibility. The committee voted to table the report until the next meeting and asked staff to gather the federal court order and additional information. Finally, the committee reviewed the annual report on matters referred to prosecutors and the Attorney General for 2024. Staff said 164 matters were referred, with 28 criminal charges filed, 39 still under review, 3 dismissed, 5 pending in court, and 96 not charged; convictions in 20 cases led to fines, restitution, audit costs, and some bond trust fund payments. Prosecutor representatives explained that many referrals do not become criminal cases because of intent, timing, or other legal limits, and said they generally seek restitution even when charges are not filed. Members asked for more standardized reporting, including whether restitution was recovered and why cases were not prosecuted, and discussed possible training and a checklist for future reports. The committee then voted to file the report and adjourned, with the next meeting set for February 12-13.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Appropriations Committee Aug 20th, 2025

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Assemblymember Gallagher is unable to be here so I'd like to read his statement to the record if I'm
  • And I just want to quote from her statement last May. when the governor announced a cut to Planned Parenthood
  • in the state budget, and her statement at the time was with this May budget revision, Governor Newsom
  • I will make this as a statement.
  • Believe me, I've made my own statement on hair for a long time. sorry Mr. talking about voting aye and
Keywords: 988, house, all
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Higher Education Apr 8th, 2025

Higher Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • Sir, you have a statement? I'm certainly here to answer any questions. You're just resourceless.
  • Okay, and a statement was made when the bill was being laid out about issue with freshmen dropping out
  • I believe that would be a that would be an accurate statement largely across the board there certainly
  • Is that a fair statement?
  • I have no prepared statements, but I'm here. there is a resource witness.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, seeing none, if the nominee would like to come up and make a statement after she gets a lay, another
  • come up<00:02:33.680><c> and</c><00:02:34.000><c> make</c><00:02:34.160><c> a</c><00:02:34.400><c> statement
  • after</c><00:02:35.440><c> she</c><00:02:35.680><c> gets</c><00:02:36.080><c> a</c> up and make a statement
  • after she gets a up and make a statement after she gets a lay,<00:02:36.959><c> another</c><00:02:37.519
  • So, you're welcome to make an opening statement.
Keywords: 912, senate, all
Summary: The Judiciary Committee heard testimony on Governor’s Message 666, the nomination of Rose Kea to the Commission on the Status of Women for a term ending June 30, 2029. Testimony was overwhelmingly in support from business and community members, and Kea described her background as a real estate broker, small business owner, and nonprofit volunteer leader, saying her experience with workplace equity and women-owned businesses would help the commission. Senators questioned her about the connection between her background and the commission’s work, and about how she would respond to current threats to women’s rights; she said the commission should serve as a unifying and leading force for gender equity. The committee later voted to advise and consent, with the chair’s recommendation adopted. The committee also considered SCR 128 and SR 107, which sought information on state lands leased to the federal government. The Department of the Attorney General opposed the resolutions as drafted, saying the AG does not maintain the lease inventory and that the request should instead go to the agencies that manage the land, such as DLNR, DOE, and DOT. The committee amended the measures to ask the AG to determine whether there are constitutional or other legal impediments to continued leasing or new leases, including whether nominal lease amounts violate law, and then passed both with amendments. Next, the committee took up STR 153 and SR 123, which request the County of Maui to complete the transfer of the Hoie roads, including Hoie Road F, to resolve jurisdictional ambiguities. The judiciary administrator testified in support, and the measures were passed, with the committee adopting the chair’s recommendation. Finally, the committee heard STR 179 and SR 149 on reviewing the Hawaii Revised Statutes for gender-neutral language. The LGBTQ+ Commission and the Commission on the Status of Women supported the effort, though the women’s commission asked for more time and a set date to dissolve the work group. The committee amended the resolutions to assign the review to the Legislative Reference Bureau, with consultation from the LGBTQ+ Commission, the Commission on the Status of Women, civil rights experts, and law-related organizations, and set interim and final reporting deadlines before passing the measures with amendments.
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

Community Affairs Mar 17th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • I WILL MAKE A STATEMENT THEN. >> Chair McClain: WE WILL EITHER PASS THIS AMENDMENT WERE NOT.
  • THE LAST PART OF MY STATEMENT IS. >> Chair McClain: ARE YOU GOING TO ASK A QUESTION?
  • Sharief: ANSWER QUESTION IN A STATEMENT SO I WILL STOP. ASK IT?
  • FOR PRE-K-12 EDUCATION TO DIVISION THAT MANDATED SCHOOL START TIMES THE COMMITTEE UNDERSTOOD THE STATEMENT
  • IT IS JUST THE STATEMENT.
Keywords: 999, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development - Subcommittee on Veterans - 03/17/25

Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development - Subcommittee on Veterans

Transcript Highlights:
  • I thought I definitely want to be in this room and to make my quick statement and to thank you for this
  • my</c><00:09:16.040><c> quick</c> this room and to make my quick this room and to make my quick statement
  • 18.360><c> thank</c><00:09:18.519><c> you</c><00:09:18.680><c> for</c><00:09:19.240><c> this</c> statement
  • and to thank you for this statement and to thank you for this consideration<00:09:21.200><c> it's</c
  • Senator Kunesh, do you have a closing statement you'd like to make?
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • With that, I recognize Senator Sanders for his opening statement.
  • Bhattacharya, you are you'd like to give an opening statement, please.
  • line of my opening statement, I think there's some real problems in how the scientific establishment
  • to making sure... to making sure, in fact it's one of the five points I emphasized in my opening statement
  • Just a follow-up and then a closing statement. Again, thank you for being here.
Summary: The meeting of the committee focused on various healthcare and scientific issues, with significant discussions surrounding the impact of recent administrative actions on the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and its research agenda. Senators expressed concerns over funding cuts and personnel reductions, particularly the reported termination of over 1,200 NIH staff members, which could jeopardize ongoing and future research projects. The session included testimonies on the importance of supporting early-stage researchers and restoring public trust in scientific institutions following pandemic-related controversies. Additionally, the potential for future healthcare management based on diverse scientific ideas was emphasized as crucial to tackle chronic diseases effectively.
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

Senate - Education Mar 5th, 2025

Senate Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • He'll identify himself and make a brief statement.
  • He'll identify himself and make a brief statement. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Yes, sir, please.
  • Senate Education Committee, if I can again defer to an expert witness, he'll identify himself, make a statement
  • The point of that statement is to assure that they have the qualifications required of a superintendent
  • I think there are some statements we can get to assist as this moves down the line to exhibit that, which
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • Any last closing statements?
  • Any last closing statements? Representative Zesar: Thank you, Chair, and thank you, members.
  • 00:21:17.039><c> any</c><00:21:17.559><c> last</c><00:21:17.799><c> closing</c><00:21:18.240><c> statements
  • </c> good okay um any last closing statements good okay um any last closing statements representative
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The committee took up House File 337, a bill addressing long-term funding for rural and Greater Minnesota EMS and ambulance services. The author offered the A2 amendment, moved to divide it, and the committee adopted lines 1.2 to 1.19 of the amendment. The bill, as amended, was described as creating a policy framework for identifying ambulance services with operating deficits, requiring financial audits, and setting up a future grant program, with the author emphasizing that the proposal was still being developed and was intended to be a long-term solution rather than a short-term fix. Testimony was largely supportive. Eric Simonson of the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities said the bill builds on last session’s one-time aid and would target grant dollars using state data, clarify eligible uses, allow audits, address uncompensated care and readiness costs, and require reporting back to the legislature. Mike Warner of the Red Wing Fire Department said his city’s ambulance service operates with a heavy government-funded payer mix and a persistent operating shortfall. Tim Meyer of Sanford Ambulance said low-volume rural services face widening revenue gaps, staffing pressures, and the loss of the volunteer model. Nathan Zacharias of the Association of Minnesota Counties and Kevin Lee of North Memorial Health also supported the bill, citing rising costs, staffing shortages, stagnant reimbursement, and the need for a sustainable statewide funding model. Members raised concerns about how the bill would work in practice, especially around communities that straddle metro and non-metro boundaries and around local control over grant dollars. Representative Pel asked how the eligibility language would apply to places like Northfield and New Prague; the author and a testifier said eligibility would depend on whether a service area is mostly outside the metro area, but acknowledged more review was needed. Representative Huitt argued the bill should give more local control and should address EMS as a statewide issue, not only a Greater Minnesota issue. Representative Ryer asked whether the bill would eventually include revenue recapture or another funding source, and the author said the proposal was still at an early stage and all options were being considered. The committee laid HF 337, as amended, over for possible inclusion in the omnibus bill.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • insurance fraud by expanding the definition of an insurance act, excuse me, to expand it to say that any statement
  • insurance fraud by expanding the definition of an insurance act, excuse me, to expand it to say that any statement
  • to<00:04:48.479><c> say</c><00:04:48.720><c> that</c><00:04:48.919><c> any</c><00:04:49.440><c> statement
  • </c><00:04:49.919><c> that</c><00:04:50.080><c> misre</c> to say that any statement that misre to say
  • that any statement that misre represents<00:04:51.120><c> the</c><00:04:51.280><c> scope</c><00:04:51.639
Summary: The committee met with a quorum and first took up Senate Bill 24, a measure aimed at combating property and casualty insurance fraud. Senator Girdler and witnesses from the Insurance Institute of Kentucky and the National Insurance Crime Bureau said the bill would expand the definition of a fraudulent insurance act to cover statements that misrepresent the scope of property damage or repair costs, with the goal of addressing inflated storm-damage claims and out-of-state bad actors. Members discussed whether existing prosecutors were already handling these cases, the role of Commonwealth’s attorneys versus the Attorney General, and the need to keep the bill narrowly tailored to criminal intent rather than negligence or ordinary disputes over value. The committee substitute was adopted, the bill received favorable expression, and a title amendment was also adopted. The committee then heard Senate Bill 18, which would address a shortage of insurance options for automobile dealers by allowing nonadmitted carriers to provide garage liability coverage in Kentucky. Testimony from an insurance agent and a legislative agent for Big I Kentucky described a shrinking market in which some small dealers cannot find coverage at all, risking closure. Members asked about the meaning of garage liability, consumer protections, solvency concerns, and whether more competition could lower prices; witnesses said surplus lines carriers already operate in Kentucky, agents play an important vetting role, and errors-and-omissions coverage would apply to the agent. The bill was supported as a way to preserve dealer businesses and expand coverage options, and it passed the committee with favorable expression after roll call.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
  • And also, I know that you had put in a statement of registration. ...a statement of registration acknowledging
  • </c><00:12:50.000><c> that</c><00:12:50.399><c> statement</c><00:12:50.800><c> that</c> really is negated
  • . that statement that really is negated. that statement that is<00:12:51.120><c> that</c><00:12:51.600
  • I think, as a legislature, we need to make a statement and say that this is something that really needs
  • </c> legislature we need to make a statement legislature we need to make a statement and<00:31:48.960
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The Environment and Agriculture Committee held a work session and then executive session on HB 396, which would allow processing of beef cows, swine, sheep, and goats at facilities not certified by USDA. Representative Comtois presented a revised amendment after prior drafting issues were corrected. The changes narrowed the bill to cuts of meat rather than meat food products, clarified labeling for amenable and non-amenable species, removed an exemption from federal law, struck a seasonal date range at Representative Bixby’s request, and reinstated a previously removed section. Supporters said the amendment now had clearer language and better safeguards, while some members still expressed reservations about the underlying policy. Testimony from DHHS food safety officials emphasized that the department does not inspect custom-exempt facilities and would have little oversight unless there were a complaint or foodborne outbreak. They noted concerns about removing the September 1 to April 30 date range, explaining it had been included in the original bill because of temperature and storage concerns for large animals, and they also said the amendment appeared to focus documentation requirements on bison, elk, and red deer. Committee members and witnesses debated whether the proposal would create food safety risks, whether farmers should instead be educated and helped to aggregate processing capacity, and whether the bill would expose farmers, retailers, and restaurants to federal enforcement risk. Rob Johnson of the New Hampshire Farm Bureau said the organization had recently voted down a policy opposing state regulations that would allow uninspected meat sales at retail, and he said he needed to consult further with Farm Bureau leadership before taking a position on HB 396. He suggested the bill should use the broader term “dairy and beef cattle” rather than “beef cows” for consistency. Supporters argued the bill would help small farmers, expand local food access, and reflect an intrastate policy choice despite conflict with federal law. The committee then moved into executive session and voted to approve amendment 2025-3090H, with members stating they would likely have different views on the bill itself.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session 05-08-2026 11:30am

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

HI
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Policy Committee 5/5/25

Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • For us to prosecute a case, we have to have a very firm statement that can hold up in court and that
  • For us to prosecute a case, we have to have a very firm statement that can hold up in court and that
  • It's easy to make broad conclusory statements.
  • It's easy to make broad conclusory statements.
  • We want to make sure that statements.
Bills: HF3043 , HF2891
ID

Idaho 2026 Regular Session

Agenda Mar 3rd, 2026

Revenue and Taxation

Transcript Highlights:
  • If you look at that statement of purpose, you'll see six changes.
  • If you look at that statement of purpose, you'll see six changes.
Keywords: 989, all
ID

Idaho 2026 Regular Session

Agenda Feb 16th, 2026

Health and Welfare

Transcript Highlights:
  • So if you see fit to give us an introduction, then we'll bring back a statement of purpose and fiscal
  • has him as a co-sponsor on that. ...see fit to give us an introduction, then we'll bring back a statement
Keywords: 989, all
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • Are there any members that would like to make a statement?
  • Without any further statements the executive session is now adjourned.
Summary: The meeting centered around the confirmation of four significant individuals nominated for leadership positions within various financial institutions. Members engaged in heated discussions regarding the nominees' qualifications and past track records. Concerns were raised over the potential implications of these appointments on economic stability and consumer protections. Each nominee was scrutinized, with particular emphasis on their political alignments and prior influence in their respective agencies. Despite the contentious atmosphere, there was a clear focus on the need for strong leadership to guide economic policies during challenging times.
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Cannabis Policy Jun 21st, 2026 at 10:30 am

Joint Committee on Cannabis Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • I coordinated the statement of concern, which was put out in 2019.
  • So I guess I would quibble or draw a distinction between your declared statement that this whole industry
  • So I guess I would quibble or draw a distinction between your declared statement that this whole industry
  • That's a precatory statement, as I read it.
  • These bills support the CCC's own statement of ensuring public health and safety, and they will help
Keywords: 995, all
Summary: The Joint Committee on Cannabis Policy held a hearing on a broad set of cannabis and hemp bills, with the chairs opening by emphasizing unfinished work on equity, public health, safety, and market stability. The committee heard testimony on House Bill 146, which would create more efficient cannabis testing standards by increasing batch sizes, reducing or eliminating some environmental testing, standardizing lab reporting, and requiring annual scientific review and public data reporting. Industry witnesses, including a representative of the Massachusetts Cannabis Coalition, cultivators, and a testing lab owner, said current testing rules are overly burdensome, costly, and inconsistent, and argued the bill would lower compliance costs while preserving consumer safety. A testing lab witness also said some operators switch labs to obtain higher THC results or pass contaminated batches, and urged greater transparency and better sampling protocols. A major portion of the hearing focused on intoxicating hemp and related bills that would bring hemp-derived intoxicating products under a stronger regulatory framework. Legislators and industry witnesses described products sold in gas stations, smoke shops, and convenience stores as often untested, not age-gated, and sometimes mislabeled or far above the federal hemp THC threshold. Testimony from attorneys and cannabis business leaders said states can regulate these products more strictly under the Farm Bill’s non-preemption language, and pointed to New Jersey and other states as possible models. Some witnesses and committee members stressed that any new rules should avoid harming non-intoxicating CBD businesses or lawful hemp farmers, while others argued that the products are effectively cannabis and should be regulated like cannabis for licensing, testing, age limits, and taxation. The committee also heard extensive public-health testimony in support of bills S. 95, S. 96, S. 97 and their House counterparts H. 191, H. 192, and H. 193. Parents, advocates, and public health professionals urged stronger warning labels, THC potency caps, and improved data collection on cannabis-related harms, citing cannabis-induced psychosis, addiction, anxiety, and youth exposure to high-potency products. Several witnesses said Massachusetts has not done enough to track health outcomes or warn consumers, and referenced other jurisdictions such as Connecticut, Vermont, Colorado, Canada, and Quebec as examples of stronger limits or warnings. No votes or formal actions were taken during the hearing; the committee primarily received testimony and questions.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • And, again, the reason why I brought this forward is because of the statements made by, you know, the
  • terms of amendment is a process that would expedite the process because I don't disagree with your statement
  • But I also want to make a clarifying statement as well.
  • It's a statement of our values. This bill is more than symbolic. It's a statement of our values.
  • because we have no control over the federal government, then I think this is a really important... ...statement
Summary: The committee heard several bills focused largely on regulatory oversight, food insecurity, state symbols, immigration-related funding, and ethnic media outreach. SB 885 and SB 986 would require major regulations with estimated economic impacts over $50 million to come back to the Legislature for review; supporters said this would restore accountability and help address affordability, while opponents warned it would delay health, safety, and worker protections. SB 1025 would create an Office of Food Security and Affordability to coordinate food programs across state departments, expand outreach, run a hunger hotline, and analyze service gaps; members generally supported the goal but urged stronger reporting and oversight language. SB 1214 would designate the Western monarch as California’s state butterfly, and SB 1178 would designate the California yellow jacket as the state wasp, with testimony emphasizing conservation, ecology, and agricultural benefits. SB 1286 would recognize the California sea lion as the state pinniped, with supporters citing its role as a sentinel species and conservation success story. SB 1171 would make private entities that contract with ICE ineligible for state-funded grants or loans; supporters framed it as a response to ICE conduct, while opponents raised concerns about unintended impacts on contractors providing essential services and possible federal retaliation. SB 1358 would create the Ethnic and Community Media Equity Act to improve state advertising and outreach to ethnic and community media through a database and contracting requirements, with supporters arguing it would improve effectiveness and reach underserved communities. Several bills were advanced on committee votes, many with roll calls held open for absent members. SB 885, SB 986, SB 1025, SB 1214, SB 1178, SB 1286, and SB 1171 all received motions to do pass, with some members noting support but also urging amendments or guardrails, especially on timing, reporting, and oversight. The committee also took up a consent calendar of multiple items after quorum was established.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • You look at our mission statement. We’ve made it really short now. But we’re open to everyone.
  • However, committee staff will be reading their statement for Committee staff will be reading their statement
  • And so I'll ask Latifah Alexander to read their statement.
  • of the Select Committee on Racism, Hate, and Xenophobia for allowing CARE, California to submit a statement
  • Islamic Relations is the nation's largest Muslim civil rights organization in the country. to submit a statement
Summary: The Select Committee on Racism, Hate, and Xenophobia met to hear from Los Angeles County officials and community advocates about rising hate, discrimination, and xenophobia, with opening remarks emphasizing the need for stronger anti-hate infrastructure, community-based reporting, and state support. Assemblymember Lowenthal noted the broader economic and social impacts of discrimination, and the committee framed the hearing around understanding local conditions and identifying legislative responses. Los Angeles County Human Relations Commission Executive Director Robin Toma presented county hate-crime data showing record-high levels in 2024, with racial/ethnic hate crimes remaining the largest category and anti-Black hate crimes the most common. He also highlighted high levels of anti-Latino, anti-Jewish, anti-Muslim, anti-LGBTQ, and anti-transgender hate, the role of underreporting, and the county’s L.A. vs. Hate system for reporting and victim support. The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department said it uses hate-crime and hate-incident data to guide proactive patrols, community outreach, and training, and discussed the need to build trust amid immigration enforcement fears that discourage reporting. Community organizations described how current political rhetoric and federal immigration enforcement are intensifying fear and underreporting. LULAC called for multilingual, culturally competent reporting systems, prevention education, and stronger support for grassroots organizations. The Jewish Federation of Los Angeles described severe anti-Semitism, increased security costs, and the need for safe worship protections, security grants, and Holocaust education. The NAACP emphasized the continuing impact of anti-Black racism and the need for cross-community solidarity, while the Los Angeles LGBT Center highlighted rising anti-trans violence and urged funding for gender-affirming care, LGBTQ centers, and reauthorization of California vs. Hate. CHIRLA and CAIR California both described heightened fear among immigrants and Muslims, workplace discrimination, and the need for stronger civil-rights protections, data collection, and community-based reporting. No formal votes were taken. The discussion focused on policy ideas and funding priorities, including improved law-enforcement training, alternative sentencing or diversion for hate offenders, protections for houses of worship, and continued or expanded funding for California vs. Hate, Stop Hate, and related programs. Committee members and witnesses repeatedly stressed that hate is underreported, that words and leadership rhetoric matter, and that California should continue investing in prevention, response, and healing.