Video & Transcript Research : 'fiscal transparency'

Page 31 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs Apr 2nd, 2025

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • embedded with party cells, militia cells, they're controlled by the party state, they don't allow transparent
  • Reporting and enforcement mechanisms ensure transparency and accountability.
  • Third, it promotes transparency in foreign gifts, contracts. and academic partnerships.
  • McCain National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2019. or any foreign company considered by
  • Testifying on behalf of Texans for fiscal responsibility and yourself and you're for the bill.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Mar 17th, 2026 at 09:00 am

Oklahoma Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • I want to clarify that there Is no fiscal impact on this bill.
  • there's no fiscal impact to the state. I think if that's the question.
  • Senate Bill 1433 is the Guidance Transparency Act.
  • President, is there a fiscal impact if we do not pass this bill?
  • I think transparency with government bodies is incredibly important.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

CPC Public Hearing - Tue Feb 24, 2026 @ 2:00 PM HST

Consumer Protection & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • Just as a high-level overview, sections one and five are meant to increase consumer transparency.
  • sections one and five um are meant to increase<00:48:14.560> consumer<00:48:14.960> transparency
  • <00:48:16.079> Sections increase consumer transparency.
  • Sections increase consumer transparency.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on HB 1697, which would exempt natural hair braiders from licensing requirements under certain conditions. The DCCA Board of Barbering and Cosmetology said it recognizes braiding as within the scope of cosmetology practice but warned that a broad exemption could create consumer protection gaps, especially around sanitation training, tool use, and enforcement. Supporters from the Institute for Justice and the Grassroots Institute of Hawaii argued the current licensing regime is overly burdensome and unrelated to braiding, citing the 1,250-hour training requirement, high tuition costs, barriers for low-income entrepreneurs, and the fact that many other states already exempt braiders. Committee members asked whether a standalone sanitation course or similar training could address the board’s concerns, and the board said it would bring that idea back for discussion. The committee also noted 16 written testimonies in support and 2 in opposition. The committee then took up HB 1678, relating to condominium and planned community association elections using cumulative voting. Supporters, including the Hawaii State Association of Parliamentarians, said the bill would clarify that cumulative voting applies to all candidates, including write-ins, and would help resolve confusion in association elections. One testifier urged the committee to remove proxy voting, calling it an abuse of power in some associations, while another asked whether cumulative voting and proxies could be manipulated to stack votes. In response, the parliamentarian explained that cumulative voting and proxy voting are different, that proxies simply allow someone to vote on another’s behalf, and that existing deadlines and counting procedures reduce opportunities for abuse. Testimony also emphasized that electronic or mail voting can be secure and efficient, and that the bill would make the process clearer and more democratic. Finally, the committee heard testimony on HB 1679, which would clarify an association board’s authority over electronic meetings, electronic voting, voting without a meeting, and mail voting without a meeting. Supporters said the measure would clean up statutory language, make electronic voting optional, and fix problems created by a 2024 change that made written-consent timing rules difficult to use for association actions. They also said the bill would clarify that proxies are only used at meetings, not for actions taken without a meeting. One opponent argued the bill needs further amendment because electronic voting is not well defined and could be abused, and questioned the neutrality of parliamentarians testifying on condominium bills. No votes were taken on any of the measures during the portion of the meeting provided.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/04/2026 - Senate Judiciary and Elections

Judiciary and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • I've done real estate over 20 years, so I do believe in transparency and I practice what I preach.
  • Transparency.
  • And just providing the transparency, people sign off and we know what's what. Open any questions.
  • I will point out, I have fiscal year 2025's numbers in front of me.
  • We concluded 8,440 cases in fiscal year 2025. Of those, we issued decisions in 1,606.
Summary: The committee approved the minutes and then took up several election, family court, and criminal justice bills. SB 1425, the “big bill,” would move Arizona’s 2026 primary election date earlier and adjust related election administration timelines; the chair’s amendment moved the primary to July 21 and removed the shortened curing/ID deadlines. County officials testified in support, explaining the timing changes and the need to align dates, and the committee adopted the amendment and gave the bill a do-pass recommendation. SB 1289, dealing with certifications for entities providing money or resources for election administration and foreign funding disclosures, also received a do-pass recommendation after testimony from supporters arguing it would block foreign influence in election administration and ballot issue spending. The committee later heard SCR 1013, a related resolution that would more directly prohibit foreign-source money for election administration and ballot measures; the sponsor and supporters said it was similar to SB 1289 but broader, and testimony focused on foreign money flowing through nonprofit networks. The committee then considered SB 1326, which would allow courts to award attorney fees and costs to victims when a party violates or worsens a victim’s rights. A victim’s attorney testified that the bill would provide needed accountability and guidance, while opponents argued the term “exacerbates” was vague and that existing remedies already exist. The committee approved SB 1326 on a 4-3 vote. SB 1402, requiring courts to impose a fee on certain probationers to cover electronic monitoring costs, drew support from the sponsor and advocates who said offenders should pay for monitoring, and opposition from defense attorneys who warned it could burden indigent probationers and divert money from treatment; it also received a 4-3 do-pass recommendation. The most extensive debate was on SB 1330, which would allow a parent in certain custody cases to request a jury trial on parenting time or legal decision-making. Supporters, including several parents, described costly and traumatic family court experiences and argued a jury would provide a neutral check on judges and court-appointed professionals. County and court representatives opposed the bill, saying family cases require specialized judicial expertise, jury trials would delay urgent matters, increase costs, and risk confidentiality. Despite those concerns, the committee adopted the bill on a 4-3 vote. The committee also approved SB 1328, which declares state policy favoring parental rights and a child’s equal access to both co-parents, after adopting an amendment adding legislative intent language. Finally, SB 1329, which would let parents sue court-appointed professionals who deviate from professional ethics or standards in custody matters, passed 4-3 after testimony from parents and advocates who said court appointees lack accountability, while opponents said existing malpractice and licensing remedies already address misconduct.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs May 6th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • 2027 to evaluate the impact of the bill. these changes, if this committee so desires, ensuring transparency
  • Do y'all have any idea of what kind of fiscal impact this would have on the City of Houston if something
  • We do not have an idea of what the fiscal impact is, but I can provide the committee with some information
  • By the legislature and uniformly applies similar transparency and advocacy requirements to the 4% program
  • And we believe in accountability, transparency, notification, and all of those things.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Energy Resources Apr 14th, 2025

Energy Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Quickly, I see that the fiscal note is at $95 million for 2026-2027.
  • I saw the fiscal note showing $95 million.
  • Gates's concerns on the fiscal note of this thing.
  • The fiscal note probably doesn't contemplate any of that, actually. Right?
  • I can't speak in detail to the fiscal note questions.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Energy Resources Apr 14th, 2025

Energy Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's about transparency.
  • So I think they're pretty transparent as it is.
  • You could do that, but I don't see how that's increasing the transparency.
  • So as Representative Rosenthal said, this is a transparency bill.
  • This creates a significant barrier to transparency for the royalty owners.
TX
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate County and Municipal Government Committee Apr 2nd, 2025

County and Municipal Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Those are numbers determined by our legislative fiscal office in order to be...
  • Legislative fiscal office, in order to be as fair as possible, we went back and looked at the calculation
  • Yeah, I mean the numbers are the numbers prepared by the Legislative fiscal office, and so I would encourage