Video & Transcript Research : 'parent concerns'

Page 2 of 500
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • This is my point: you and I share this concern.
  • Senator Miles has a valid concern. Absolutely.
  • My concern is, we're just doing this for the free and reduced lunches.
  • This question keeps me... up at night, and it should concern every parent and grandparent in our state
  • It's a big concern, but it is a concern that we can definitely overcome.
Bills: SB 25, SB25, SB314
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • When my son was little, I saw parents everywhere giving their kids extremely toxic food, thinking ...
  • Most parents, even if they're well educated and can afford the highest quality food, believe that if
  • I'm here today on behalf of the Consumer Brands Association to share our concerns with SB25.
  • We are concerned that the labeling provisions will cause cost and confusion.
  • I'm just concerned.
Bills: SB 25, SB25, SB314
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships Apr 22nd, 2025 at 02:04 pm

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • to state that one parent or the other isn't a parent.
  • ... ...and we're saying, you know, my client's a fit parent, but this parent isn't a fit parent because
  • The other parent of the child can't complain about that parent being in the home unless that parent has
  • between a parent... ...and a non-parent.
  • non-parent.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Ways and Means General Fund Committee Feb 19th, 2025

Ways and Means General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • We do have a lot of concerns and questions about this bill.
  • The non-custodial parent earns, so we want that information out there now.
  • Parents of the amounts paid as a collectible debt up to civil.
  • Any parent of an approved child, including a...
  • Okay, well that's the only concern I have because I do understand.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Senate and Governmental Affairs May 27th, 2026

Senate & Governmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • I am the former foster parent and proud adoptive parent of Kaylee Williams, who is nine years old.
  • But parents have to be able to choose to parent their children.
  • , of what the parents want, what the parents want, what the parents need, and that's not the focus.
  • the parents want, what the parents need, and it's, that's not the focus.
  • child's. parents want or what the parents desire to what the child needs.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence May 21st, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • We have some major concerns with the bill that we think can be worked out. Okay.
  • There were some concerns; Mr. LaHood raised some concerns about confidentiality.
  • I'm with Parent Guidance, and I've been advocating for parents for 20 years.
  • When I first started the Parent Guidance Center in 2004, parents were not automatically assigned attorneys
  • Parents are already substituting attorneys.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships Apr 22nd, 2025

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • parental rights mean.
  • But the biological parents come along and say, "No, I'm the parent."
  • If you did, you're the parent; the other person is the parent.
  • The other parent of the child can't complain about that parent being in the home unless that parent has
  • This will clarify that as far as the D, E, and P grounds are concerned, parental rights are only terminated
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Children and Families Finance and Policy Committee 3/26/25

Children and Families Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm concerned I'm concerned with that. I'm concerned I'm concerned with that.
  • , don't require the rest of the parents, don't require the rest of the parents, biological<00:32:
  • :32:04.080> of biological parents in the state of biological parents in the state of Minnesota
  • uh frustrating for for foster parents. uh frustrating for for foster parents.
  • Chair, but I'm concerned.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Jurisprudence Mar 26th, 2025

Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Current statute does not expressly articulate this presumption in suits involving a parent and a non-parent
  • Under this bill, a non-parent must first provide clear and convincing evidence that the parent is not
  • and a non-parent.
  • When a case comes before the court between a parent and a non-parent arguing about what is in the best
  • , for their parents to make decisions regarding things as long To be raised by their parents, for their
Summary: The Senate Committee on Jurisprudence heard several family-law and probate bills. Senate Bill 2052 would codify a rebuttable presumption that a parent acts in the best interest of a child and require clear and convincing evidence to overcome that presumption in disputes involving non-parents; the author and several witnesses supported the bill as a clarification of existing case law, while one witness suggested refining the modification language. Public testimony was closed and the bill was left pending. The committee also heard Senate Bill 1923, which would allow child support to follow a child placed temporarily with kin or fictive kin under a parental child safety placement or authorization agreement; the bill’s author and a grandparent caregiver testified in support, while one witness suggested the Attorney General could handle the change administratively. That bill was also left pending. Senate Bill 1838 would standardize fee schedules and compensation rules for attorneys ad litem and related court-appointed counsel in DFPS child-protection cases. The author said the bill would clarify unclear current law, and witnesses from the Texas Indigent Defense Commission and family-defense bar supported it, though one asked that expert-witness expenses be expressly included. Senate Bill 387 would raise the bond requirement for county judges handling guardianship proceedings to at least $500,000; the author described it as a refiling of a prior bill that passed unanimously but was vetoed, and a statutory probate judge testified in support. Senate Bill 1839 would require original or paper wills to be delivered to the transferee court when probate proceedings are transferred; the committee substitute broadened the delivery methods, and the district clerk witness supported the change. All three bills were left pending. The committee also took up Senate Bill 1536, which had previously been voted out with the wrong committee substitute; members reconsidered the vote, adopted the corrected substitute, and then voted 3-0 to report the bill favorably to the full Senate, with local and contested calendar certification. Finally, Senate Bill 1940 would create a transfer-on-death mechanism for manufactured homes classified as personal property, similar to existing tools for real property and vehicles; the author and an estate-planning attorney testified that it would streamline transfers and reduce probate costs. A non-substantive committee substitute was still being prepared, and the bill was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Economic Development Apr 7th, 2025

Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • wildlife, ...go in, my neighborhood will endure many costs, including noise, loss of wildlife, safety concerns
  • I’m just concerned about making a blanket piece of legislation here.
  • Can they address some of the concerns, whether it’s the noise or the destruction of vegetation or anything
  • solar come in without an abatement and still cause the challenges that the witnesses expressed their concerns
  • committee that, you know, two of the three bills, probably three of the three bills we just heard, concerned
Summary: The committee heard a series of bills, mostly related to economic development, tax incentives, and workforce programs. Senate Bill 1534 would direct a study by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board and the Texas Workforce Commission on health physics education and workforce needs; resource witnesses from the Workforce Commission and Coordinating Board testified, and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 1553 would authorize Kerr County to impose a hotel occupancy tax for tourism-related uses, and Senate Bills 1086 and 1087 would authorize similar county hotel taxes for Children’s County and Mason County; all three bills received supportive testimony and were left pending. The committee also heard Senate Bill 1754, which would prohibit county and local tax abatements for renewable energy facilities selling power wholesale, with testimony sharply divided between landowners and policy groups opposing renewable subsidies and industry representatives and some senators arguing the bill would harm clean energy investment and local decision-making; the bill was left pending. The committee then heard Senate Bill 2322, which would exempt dispatchable electric generation facilities from the JEDI program’s compelling-factor test so they could qualify for school district tax incentives; testimony was mixed, and the bill was left pending. Later, the committee heard Senate Bill 1718, which would add the NRA annual meeting to the state’s major events reimbursement program. The bill’s sponsor and NRA representatives argued the event brings substantial tourism and economic activity, while opponents said it would use taxpayer funds to subsidize an organization that opposes gun safety measures; the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 2004 would add the Arlington Grand Prix to the major events reimbursement program, with the committee substitute exempting it from the usual competitive site-selection requirement because of timing; testimony from the event organizers and Arlington tourism officials was supportive, and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 2448 would create a rural workforce development grant program at the Texas Workforce Commission to support college-and-career readiness and technical assistance in rural communities; witnesses from Texas 2036, Collegiate Edgination, and a rural school district supported it, and it was left pending. Finally, Senate Bill 913 would repeal a special requirement that Alpine dedicate at least 50% of its hotel occupancy tax to advertising and promotion, and Senate Bill 1143 would require more coordination and reporting for youth workforce programs serving disconnected young Texans; both bills received supportive testimony and were left pending. At the end of the hearing, Senator Johnson moved that the committee stand in recess, subject to the call of the chair.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • and a non-parent. parent, particularly in modification proceedings.
  • Under this bill, a non-parent must first provide clear and convincing evidence that the parent is not
  • rigor of the non-parents. financial capacity.
  • And I'm like, excuse me, parent still has custody, parent determines what's in the best interest, not
  • They do it all. time with parents.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Children and Youth Health Committee Feb 27th, 2025

Children and Youth Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Alabama Bill is far less intrusive, as the parent decides if less intrusive as the parent decides
  • Parents have got to be parents. The state... I've often said the state cannot regulate morality.
  • The app wouldn't download unless the parent approves, putting parents in control.
  • Parents want a one-stop...
  • So there's a concern there; there's a constitutional concern that's not First Amendment, but that is
Bills: SB186, SB187
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Children and Senior Advocacy Committee Feb 26th, 2025

Children and Senior Advocacy

Transcript Highlights:
  • When a parent gets their teen a... ...smartphone or device, the parent can go into their own Apple or
  • parents in control.
  • We do have some concerns that this is over... We do have some concerns that this is overreaching.
  • We do have some concerns with... We do have some concerns with this bill.
  • if that's truly a parent?
Bills: HB285, HB317
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/19/2026 - Senate Government

Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • But the numbers are concerning.
  • He's called me this morning with concerns for this bill. I vote no. Senator Diaz? No.
  • But my one huge concern is about special education.
  • So I'm deeply concerned about the impact of special education here.
  • What we hear from parents is they want smaller class sizes. They want better funded teachers.
Summary: The Senate Committee on Government considered only SCR 1032, along with a strike-everything amendment. The amendment would require school districts, subject to voter approval, to dedicate at least 60% of operational spending to teacher pay, with a phased-in increase starting in FY 2028 for districts below that threshold. It also would penalize noncompliant districts by requiring unexpended Classroom Site Fund monies to revert, making districts ineligible for those funds until back in compliance, and directing JLBC to exclude those districts from per-pupil calculations. The Superintendent of Public Instruction could grant limited waivers of the forfeiture provisions for up to one year, not more than two consecutive years for the same district. Supporters, including representatives of Heritage Action, the Goldwater Institute, and the Center for Arizona Policy, argued that Arizona has increased school funding substantially while teacher pay has remained flat in real terms, and said the measure would improve accountability and ensure more money reaches teachers rather than district administration. They cited Auditor General findings and prior voter-approved efforts such as the Classroom Site Fund and teacher pay initiatives as evidence that districts have not prioritized classroom spending as intended. A rural school coalition testified in opposition, saying the proposal would be difficult for small districts to meet because it could force cuts to other essential costs such as fuel, insurance, facilities, and other operating needs, and that the Auditor General’s classroom-spending categories may not accurately reflect actual teacher pay. One committee member also raised concerns that the measure could harm special education and other legally required student services. During discussion, the sponsor said charter schools were excluded because they are private businesses under the state’s framework, despite receiving public funds. The committee adopted the strike-everything amendment and then voted 4-3 to give SCR 1032, as amended, a do pass recommendation.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Transportation, Highways & Military Affairs Committee, February 12, 2026

Transportation, Highways & Military Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • They just legislative concerns they had.
  • It's or concerns in administering it.
  • I have no concerns reviewed this bill.
  • <00:42:44.240> with little bit more of our concerns with little bit more of our concerns with
  • So that's where our concerns were 365.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 2/25/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:17:42.280> to the ability of an estranged parent to the ability of an estranged parent
  • So maybe it's, you know, spouse one or parent one and parent two, and you have parent one who knows very
  • > you<00:36:17.839> have<00:36:18.079> parent one and parent two and you have parent
  • knows very well that parent two one knows very well that parent two never<00:36:20.960> showed
  • I think the court has to balance all the concerns you have. We have the same similar concerns.
Bills: HF747, HF360
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Child Committee Meeting - 2026-04-14

Children and Families Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • I I'm really concerned, and I understand I I'm really concerned, and I understand like<00:34:48.159><
  • > others delay, what you call a concern, others delay, what you call a concern, others call<01
  • 01:12:50.000> people<01:12:50.200> call concern is what other people call concern is what
  • concern about, we call a deal breaker. concern about, we call a deal breaker. Right?
  • Uh the firearms, we share the concern Uh the firearms, we share the concern about<01:36:41.600><
Bills: HF4407, HF4382
Summary: The Children and Families Committee adopted the April 8 minutes and then took up House File 4407, as amended by the A1 amendment. The amendment, explained by nonpartisan staff, incorporated much of the Senate version of related legislation and made a series of changes: it revised the definition of “disproportionately represented child,” shifted that determination to the Commissioner of Children, Youth, and Families, made technical cross-reference and terminology updates, adjusted training requirements, set the working group to expire December 31, 2027, and added an appropriation for statewide implementation. The committee adopted the A1 amendment and then referred the bill to Ways and Means. Representative Gilman said the bill is intended to preserve the goals of the Minnesota African American Family Preservation Act while addressing operational, legal, and fiscal problems before statewide implementation. He argued for delaying the effective date by one year, shifting case review responsibilities to the state, and providing funding so counties are not left with an unfunded mandate. He also said the bill adds safety measures related to synthetic opioids and other imminent-harm concerns, and that the delay would allow the working group to finish its recommendations and give counties time to prepare. County officials Steve Schmidt of Meeker County/Minnesota Rural Counties and Jenny Mojo of Clay County testified in support of the bill as amended, emphasizing that counties need clearer responsibilities, staffing, training, technology, and dependable funding to implement the law successfully. Rebecca St. George of DCYF said “active efforts” is not absolutely defined and is determined case by case, often with court involvement. Members raised questions about the meaning of active efforts, the bill’s synthetic opioid language, and whether the proposal should apply more broadly rather than within this specific act. A citizen also cautioned that the opioid language should not unintentionally affect families in treatment programs. Representative Hicks warned that the fentanyl provisions could lead to broad removals and create placement problems for teens with substance use disorder, while Representative Gilman responded that the bill includes a rebuttable presumption and is meant to protect children from imminent harm.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Health and Human Services May 20th, 2025

Health & Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, but I certainly wouldn't downplay anyone's concern, especially not a parent of a child.
  • But I certainly wouldn't downplay anyone's concern, especially not a parent of a child. Okay.
  • birth parents alike.
  • Concerns have been raised that chemical dependency treatment facilities do not inform parents of their
  • Concerns have been raised that chemical dependency treatment facilities do not inform parents of their
Summary: The committee met without a quorum at first, then established a quorum with five members present. Members heard and left pending several House bills, including HB 4743 on allowing hospitals to license mobile stroke units under a hospital license, HB 4129 on earlier DFPS enforcement tools for single-source continuum contractors in community-based foster care, HB 4903 creating a Quad Agency Child Care Initiative to coordinate child care regulations across state agencies, HB 3812 revising the gold card/prior authorization process for physicians, HB 4535 requiring written informed consent before COVID-19 vaccination and a standardized state information sheet, and HB 4666 reducing the frequency of some HHSC reports to the legislature. The chair also noted HB 35 would be voted on later after a subcommittee back was received, and that a large number of bills would be heard the next day. Most of the testimony focused on HB 4535 and HB 4730. On HB 4535, supporters argued the bill would strengthen informed consent for COVID vaccination by requiring written consent and clearer state-level information about risks, manufacturer liability protections, and adverse-event reporting; opponents, including a pediatrician and medical groups, said existing federal and state informed-consent materials already cover these topics and warned the bill could create duplicative paperwork and penalties. On HB 3812, the Texas Medical Association supported changes that would extend the gold-card evaluation period to one year, raise transparency, and make prior authorization exemptions easier to administer, while health plans said they were neutral and viewed the bill as a balance between reducing burden and preventing fraud or unsafe care. HB 4730 drew extensive testimony from adoption professionals, birth mothers, adoptive parents, and child welfare advocates. The bill would require DFPS to create a relinquishment form, train child-placing agency staff, and extend the minimum waiting period for voluntary relinquishment from 48 hours to seven days. Supporters of the current law argued the 48-hour period aligns with hospital discharge, allows informed decisions, and helps birth parents and adoptive families begin healing and bonding without pushing children into foster care or creating legal and Medicaid complications. The author said the bill would be revised and that the seven-day provision was a work in progress. No votes were taken on the bills during the meeting; each bill was left pending after public testimony closed.