Video & Transcript Research : 'modeled available groundwater'
Page 2 of 500
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Finance Division III (02/21/23)
Keywords:
NH House of Representatives Committee Streaming, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkFfnu9Y-AU, 2026-07-02T03:39:40+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Committee materials, to the extent available, may be found here: https://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/lba/budget/HF_2024_2025_Division_iii.aspx, 928, house, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Finance Division III (02/17/23)
Keywords:
NH House of Representatives Committee Streaming, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIfa-4a4s64, 2026-07-02T03:39:40+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Committee materials, to the extent available, may be found here: https://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/lba/budget/HF_2024_2025_Division_iii.aspx, 928, house, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Finance Division III (02/01/23)
Keywords:
NH House of Representatives Committee Streaming, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4q-Tw9g8UY, 2026-07-02T03:39:38+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Committee materials, to the extent available, may be found here: https://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/lba/budget/HF_2024_2025_Division_iii.aspx, 928, house, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47
TX
Texas 89th Regular
Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs (Part I) Apr 14th, 2025
Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs
Bills:
SB 1169, SB 1285, SB 1583, SB 1611, SB 1898, SB 1976, SB 2160, SB 2161, SB 2658, SB 2661, SB 2662, SB 2692, SB 1055, SB 1359, SB 2660
Keywords:
water service, sewer service, public utility, joint operation, infrastructure, municipality, compliance, groundwater management, water conservation, district planning, environmental regulation, sustainability, groundwater, conservation, fees, agricultural uses, water regulation, wastewater treatment, environmental testing, pollutants
TX
Texas 89th Regular
Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs May 5th, 2025
Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- Or amending groundwater permits.
- and in the management of groundwater by those groundwater districts.
- I'm available for any questions.
- districts or groundwater wells in the district.
- Relating to certain groundwater export fees collected by groundwater districts, HB 1689 by Representative
Keywords:
agricultural conservation, land preservation, environmental protection, wildlife habitat, Texas Farm and Ranch, groundwater conservation district, Texas Water Code, water permit, permit amendment, groundwater permit, water rights, aquifer, well registration, exempt wells, beneficial use, water conservation, groundwater quality, well plugging, Hill Country Priority Groundwater Management Area, surface water resources
Summary:
The Senate Water, Agriculture, Rural Affairs Committee heard several bills focused on groundwater management, water infrastructure, and agricultural land conservation. SB 612 would limit certain water districts in Hidalgo, Cameron, and Willacy counties from charging developers pipeline construction fees above actual, documented costs; the committee substitute removed a developer challenge mechanism to preserve district discretion over construction standards. HB 1633 would require groundwater conservation districts to consider registered exempt wells when reviewing or amending permits, and testimony from landowners, district representatives, and advocacy groups largely supported the bill as a way to protect domestic and livestock wells from drawdown caused by large export projects. HB 1689 would clarify that export fee revenues may be used for well operability, alternative water supplies, and aquifer monitoring, including through interlocal cooperation, and HB 3058 would give the Post Oak Savannah Groundwater Conservation District authority to use export fees for county road improvements and environmental programs tied to well inspection and groundwater management. HB 2018 would clarify that the Texas Farm and Ranchland Conservation Program is intended to purchase conservation easements only on working agricultural lands, with support from cattle raisers and Farm Bureau representatives. The committee also considered HB 29, which would require large water systems to validate water loss audits and submit mitigation plans; a committee substitute removed the water-loss threshold and adjusted the timeline for more detailed validation. Public testimony on the bills was generally supportive, with several witnesses describing declining well levels, road damage from export projects, and the need to preserve agricultural land and local water supplies. The committee adopted committee substitutes and voted favorably on HB 29, HB 1689, HB 2018, SB 612, and SB 3058, recommending several of them for the local and uncontested calendar; HB 1633 was left pending awaiting a committee substitute.
TX
Texas 89th Regular
Senate Committee on Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs May 5th, 2025
Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- in Texas before issuing or amending groundwater permits.
- When considering an application for a groundwater permit, groundwater conservation districts (GCDs) must
- and the management of groundwater. or by those groundwater districts.
- It's essential for the inspection and monitoring of groundwater districts and our groundwater wells in
- Post-Oak Savannah Groundwater District.
Keywords:
agricultural conservation, land preservation, environmental protection, wildlife habitat, Texas Farm and Ranch, groundwater conservation district, Texas Water Code, water permit, permit amendment, groundwater permit, water rights, aquifer, well registration, exempt wells, beneficial use, water conservation, groundwater quality, well plugging, Hill Country Priority Groundwater Management Area, surface water resources
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
Capital Projects and Bond Oversight Committee (6-22-23)
Keywords:
KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s97HMIXXwks, 2026-06-21T07:17:04+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Due to technical issues, the full video of this meeting cannot be uploaded. However, minutes for this meeting will be available at some point. You will be able to find them on the Capital Projects committee page at the Kentucky Legislature's website., 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- “Yes, essentially that exercise will be done with one of our groundwater availability models, and we
- available groundwater.
- available groundwater.
- So, well over the modeled available groundwater, exporting out.
- So, well over the modeled available groundwater, exporting out.
Summary:
The committee met to hear House Bills 27 and 24 on groundwater issues in East Texas, with members and witnesses focusing on a proposed large-volume groundwater export project and the need for more science before major permitting decisions are made. HB 27, which was within the special session call, would direct the Texas Water Development Board to conduct a hydrogeologic study of the aquifers in the affected area and temporarily pause new export permits while the study is underway. HB 24, a separate bill that would limit certain production and export permits to 5% of modeled available groundwater, was laid out but the chair said it would not be moved out of committee.
Testimony on HB 27 was largely supportive, though some witnesses were neutral. Supporters, including representatives from a water supply corporation, the Trinity River Authority, Environmental Defense Fund, and the Texas and Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association, said the region lacks enough hydrologic data, that the proposed pumping could affect private wells, surface water, and local economies, and that the state needs better information on sustainable yield and groundwater-surface water interaction. Several witnesses emphasized that groundwater conservation districts need clearer tools and better data, while also noting concerns about property rights and the rule of capture. Committee members discussed the scale of the proposed project, the absence of a groundwater conservation district in Houston County, and the possibility that the study should examine desired future conditions and maximum sustainable pumping rather than only modeled available groundwater.
The committee adopted the committee substitute for HB 27 and voted it out favorably to the full House with a recommendation that it do pass, be printed, and be sent to the Committee on Calendars. The roll call was unanimous, 11 ayes and 0 nays. After the vote, members briefly reflected on the complexity of the issue and the need to continue working on broader groundwater policy in the interim and next session. HB 24 was discussed later in the meeting, but no final action on that bill was taken in the portion provided.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- What I want to emphasize is how I think that this bill will protect rural groundwater supplies and in
- I work a lot with the groundwater conservation districts on tools that they need, but growth is also
- And so what we're seeing is a lot of these muds developments occurring where groundwater is the sole
- availability study from any, um, developer that uses groundwater for a subdivision, and I think it was
- They must require that if the builder developer is going to use groundwater as a supply of water.
Bills:
HB24
TX
Bills:
HB24
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- And we have a model on such as this, and these frightening models are in California.
- The region, during when the draft plans are available, which they recently have been made available,
- When the draft plans are available, which they recently have been made available, one region can pursue
- by exempting from groundwater conservation district, or GCD, permitting requirements groundwater wells
- We support brackish groundwater project initiatives and protecting our fresh groundwater supplies for
Bills:
HB1523, HB2109, HB2694, HB3525, HB3898, HB4646, HB5188, HB5219, HB5320, HB5651, HB5655, HB5659, HB5662, HB5672
Keywords:
aquifer conservation, Class V injection well, environmental regulation, groundwater protection, municipal water supply, temporary prohibition, water management, reservoir construction, state water plan, Texas Water Code, environmental impact, Brazoria Drainage District, commissioners, elections, vacancies, resignation, HB 3525, North Texas Groundwater Conservation District, groundwater permit, permit amendment
Summary:
The Committee on Natural Resources heard House Bill 2109, which would remove certain long-proposed reservoir projects from the state water plan after 50 years without progress. Chairman Van Deaver and many landowners, local officials, timber interests, and conservation advocates testified in support, arguing that the Marvin Nichols Reservoir has burdened Northeast Texas landowners for decades with the threat of eminent domain, depressed property values, and uncertainty over homes, farms, ranches, schools, churches, and cemeteries. Supporters also said the project would flood tens of thousands of acres, require extensive mitigation, harm timber and agriculture, and that Texas now has better alternatives such as conservation, reuse, aquifer storage and recovery, and desalination. Several members expressed sympathy for the affected families and questioned whether a project could remain in the plan indefinitely without progress.
Opposition came from North Texas water interests, including the North Texas Commission, Tarrant Regional Water District, and the Texas Water Association, who argued that the bill would interfere with the state’s long-term water planning process and remove needed future supply options for a fast-growing region. They said Region C faces major projected shortages by 2070, that conservation and reuse have already delayed the need for new supplies, and that reservoirs remain one tool in the state’s water-planning toolbox. TWDB staff explained the existing inter-regional conflict process and noted that the substitute would affect several unique reservoir sites, not just Marvin Nichols. After testimony, Chairman Van Deaver closed by urging passage of the bill, but the committee withdrew the substitute and left HB 2109 pending.
The committee then took up House Bill 5188, a brackish groundwater bill. The author said the bill would reduce permitting burdens for wells in designated brackish groundwater production zones, and the committee substitute added requirements on monitoring, groundwater-rights ownership, and allocation of pumpage limits while removing some exclusions and export-fee provisions. Texas Wildlife Association testified against the bill, warning that the exemptions could weaken groundwater conservation districts’ ability to protect freshwater resources and surface-owner rights. San Antonio Water System testified in favor, saying brackish groundwater is a key future supply and that the substitute would help speed development of desalination and brackish projects. The Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts testified neutrally but raised concerns about reduced district oversight, especially around injection-well exclusions and the loss of export fees, and said discussions on the bill were ongoing.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- The reservoir model is broken.
- We have a model on such as this, and these frightening models are in California.
- The region, during when the draft plans are available, in which they have recently been made available
- for groundwater wells that are located within a brackish groundwater production area designated by the
- We support brackish groundwater project initiatives and protecting our fresh groundwater supplies for
Bills:
HB1523, HB2109, HB2694, HB3525, HB3898, HB4646, HB5188, HB5219, HB5320, HB5651, HB5655, HB5659, HB5662, HB5672
Keywords:
aquifer conservation, Class V injection well, environmental regulation, groundwater protection, municipal water supply, temporary prohibition, water management, reservoir construction, state water plan, Texas Water Code, environmental impact, Brazoria Drainage District, commissioners, elections, vacancies, resignation, HB 3525, North Texas Groundwater Conservation District, groundwater permit, permit amendment
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Adjacent counties have upwards of 40,000 acre feet of modeled available groundwater.
- while balancing conservation and development of groundwater using the best available science.
- Secondly, the groundwater moves, groundwater movement, pumping from inside and outside the district pulls
- ASR will make modeling more...
- In closing, it is of utmost importance to our groundwater this that groundwater resources be protected
Bills:
HB1523, HB2109, HB2694, HB3525, HB3898, HB4646, HB5188, HB5219, HB5320, HB5651, HB5655, HB5659, HB5662, HB5672
Keywords:
aquifer conservation, Class V injection well, environmental regulation, groundwater protection, municipal water supply, temporary prohibition, water management, reservoir construction, state water plan, Texas Water Code, environmental impact, Brazoria Drainage District, commissioners, elections, vacancies, resignation, HB 3525, North Texas Groundwater Conservation District, groundwater permit, permit amendment
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
Legislative Oversight & Investigations Committee (7-10-25) - Reupload
Transcript Highlights:
- Commonwealth and makes it available to all. And I really ran through that.
- </c><01:14:09.920><c> for</c> and going and to keep it available for and going and to keep it available
- I'm in 100% control of that 99.999% availability.
- So, they're looking at a new model, a lot of dead spots as you pointed out.
- So, they're looking at a new model, a lot of dead spots as you pointed out.
Keywords:
Call to Order and Roll Call- 00:00:03
Summary of Staff Report on the Firefighter Commission Minimum Training Standards and Administrative Spending- 00:01:00
Staff Update on Child Fatality and Near Fatality External Review Panel 00:16:00
Child Fatality and Near Fatality Review Panel Representatives Available for Questions-00:39:34
Kentucky State Police & Finance Cabinet Status Update on Kentucky Statewide Emergency Responder Voice System-00:52:35
Adjournment-01:46:24, 958, all
Summary:
The committee first approved the minutes from December 19 and June 12, then received a staff report on the Kentucky Fire Commission’s minimum training standards and administrative spending. Staff explained that the commission’s current minimum training hours are 115 for volunteer firefighters and 300 for paid firefighters, down from 150 and 400 before January 1, 2023, after the commission removed elective classes not directly tied to NFPA standards. The report found the commission’s certification testing aligns fully with NFPA standards, but recommended that the commission formally promulgate regulations establishing the reduced training hours. On finances, staff said the commission complied with the first statutory cap on administrative reimbursements to KCTCS, but could not verify compliance with a second, more specific cap because the finance system does not break out program-level costs and the statute is vague. Staff recommended the commission work with KCTCS to fix that issue and suggested the General Assembly may wish to clarify the statute. After questions about reimbursement levels and investment income, the committee voted to accept the report.
The committee then heard an update on the Kentucky Child Fatality and Near Fatality External Review Panel. Staff reported that the panel has implemented two of three prior recommendations: it revised its agency notification letter to clearly state the 90-day response deadline and added response prompts and checkboxes to improve completeness. The third recommendation, to adopt formal written procedures, remains in progress; staff said the panel plans to develop those procedures alongside its new case management system. The panel is meeting its statutory membership and meeting requirements, but agency responses to its recommendations have been inconsistent: 48% were timely and appropriate in 2022, 36% in 2023, and 82% in 2024, though only three of nine timely 2024 responses were fully complete. Staff also described the new case management system project, funded with $200,000 in one-time money, and recommended the panel consult budget staff about use of those funds beyond fiscal year 2025. They reissued the recommendation that the panel develop written procedures for case review, findings, recommendations, and annual reports. Committee members raised concerns about the lack of penalties for noncompliance, the volume and length of panel meetings, and technology barriers to reviewing cases, and one member said the panel’s findings should inform future legislation.
OK
Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session
Conference Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Oversight Apr 30th, 2026
Conference Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Oversight
Bills:
SB133
Summary:
No legislative transcript or meeting content was provided beyond two brief expressions of thanks, so there is no committee or floor discussion to summarize. If you share the transcript or recording text, I can produce a factual overview of the bills, testimony, and any actions taken.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- I'm available for questions that you may have with respect to this bill.
- I do believe there are resource witnesses available to answer questions as well.
- Groundwater Conservation District. you, Mr.
- Groundwater Conservation District.
- It's estimated to be the 11th largest groundwater district in the state.
Keywords:
Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District, groundwater, water wells, domestic well, livestock well, exempt well, metering device, well meter, groundwater conservation district, Special District Local Laws Code, Water Code, Section 36.117, groundwater regulation, water rights, aquifer management, municipal utility, retail public utility, groundwater export, water supply contract, election
Summary:
The Committee on Natural Resources heard testimony on a series of water, utility, and groundwater-related bills. Early items included HB 5693, which would let Drainage District 7 hold board elections in November of odd-numbered years when a countywide election is occurring, and HB 5671, which would update the Johnson County Special Utility District by clarifying board eligibility, allowing bond issuance, and removing redundant TCEQ approval language to reduce costs and delays. Both bills were left pending after brief testimony from bill sponsors and local witnesses.
The committee also heard SB 1504, which would update the Gulf Coast Authority to allow video-conference participation in meetings, and SB 1302, aimed at closing a TCEQ permitting loophole that allowed dischargers with prior denials or suspensions to reapply through an automated process without meaningful review. SB 2692 drew substantial discussion: it would change the signature threshold for outside-city-limits customers appealing municipal utility rates to the PUC by customer class. Valero supported the bill as a way to avoid requiring large-volume users to gather signatures from unrelated residential customers, while the City of Corpus Christi opposed it, arguing that lowering the threshold to one customer could trigger expensive appeals costing $500,000 to $1 million. A PUC witness said such cases are increasing and that the agency would need additional staff under the fiscal note. SB 790, creating a simplified PUC complaint process for small water and wastewater billing disputes, and SB 1663, expanding TCEQ notice requirements for nearby residents when groundwater contamination is discovered, were also heard and left pending.
Additional bills included HB 3115, clarifying that the Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District cannot require meters on exempt domestic or livestock wells; SB 1055, raising the Southeast Texas Groundwater Conservation District’s production fee cap from 1 cent to 7 cents per 1,000 gallons; and SB 1625, requiring private water and wastewater utilities to report cybersecurity incidents to TCEQ and DIR. The committee then took up pending business and adopted a substitute for SB 7, which made several changes to water fund use, eminent domain coordination, and EDAP-related provisions, and voted 10-0 to report it favorably. The committee also adopted a substitute for HB 2347, a county water conservation program bill, and reported it favorably 9-1. HB 5675 and SB 2476 were each reported favorably 10-0. The meeting concluded with adjournment.
TX
Keywords:
Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District, groundwater, water wells, domestic well, livestock well, exempt well, metering device, well meter, groundwater conservation district, Special District Local Laws Code, Water Code, Section 36.117, groundwater regulation, water rights, aquifer management, municipal utility, retail public utility, groundwater export, water supply contract, election
AZ
Arizona 2026 Regular Session
01/20/2026 - House Natural Resources, Energy & Water
Natural Resources, Energy & Water
Transcript Highlights:
- And how much of the percentage of the whole money available was that?
- Yes, and how much of the percentage of the whole amount of money available was that?
- With that, I'm available for any questions. With that, I'm available for any questions. Thank you.
- this particular... ...try to address the groundwater potential contamination.
- And that system is much more affordable if there's land available.
Keywords:
water conservation, grants, infrastructure, environmental protection, sustainability, grant fund, Arizona water law, A.R.S. 49-1332, water efficiency, water reuse, education programs, public outreach, rainwater harvesting, gray water, graywater, drought-resistant landscaping, xeriscaping, turf removal, groundwater recharge, aquifer health
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- And then I'll just remind everyone that the model available groundwater numbers that are derived from
- Essentially, that exercise would be done with one of our groundwater availability models, and we have
- available groundwater.
- The modeled available groundwater, according to the Texas Water Development Board for the two counties
- Over the modeled available groundwater, exporting out.
Keywords:
groundwater, conservation, water permits, sustainability, resource management, 997, house, all
OK
Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session
Conference Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Oversight Apr 30th, 2026 at 03:30 pm
Energy and Natural Resources Oversight
Keywords:
groundwater, permits, medical marijuana, license, Oklahoma Water Resources Board, 914, all