Video & Transcript Research : 'judicial council'

Page 2 of 500
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Leg Committee Meeting - 2026-03-18

Legacy Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Sam's Outdoor Heritage Council Sam's Outdoor Heritage Council established.<00:47:56.880> I
  • the full council. the full council.
  • it makes sense that the full council it makes sense that the full council would<01:04:53.920>
  • Um, and I think when when the council Um, and I think when when the council asked<01:07:12.400><
  • <01:10:52.239> have important work that the council have important work that the council have
Bills: HF4148
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/26/2026 - House Land, Agriculture & Rural Affairs

Land, Agriculture & Rural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'd like to highlight a few points about the council.
  • The Arizona Beef Council was authorized to become a qualified state beef council to collect the federal
  • Another program area is that the council places a high importance on education in the classroom.
  • I find it interesting that we need a council to promote beef.
  • I do have some concerns requiring a council for something that Arizona is very well known for.
Summary: The House Committee on Land, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs met for its first session, with members and staff introducing themselves before taking up committee-of-reference business and several bills. The committee first heard a presentation from the Arizona Beef Council, which described its checkoff-funded promotion, education, and research work for Arizona beef producers, including classroom materials, nutrition outreach, and ranch tours. After questions about how the program is funded and whether the state would lose its Arizona-retained share if the council were not continued, the committee voted to recommend continuing the council for eight years, until July 1, 2034. The committee then considered HB 2155, which also continued the Arizona Beef Council for eight years, and advanced it on a 7-1 vote. HB 2156, which appropriates money to the livestock compensation fund for wolf depredation losses, was amended to set the appropriation at $250,000 from the general fund in fiscal year 2027 and then passed 5-2, with supporters emphasizing rancher compensation and opponents questioning use of general funds and noting unused prior funding. HB 2162, which would require at least one Arizona Game and Fish Commission member to be a cattleman or rancher, drew testimony for and against but was ultimately held by the chair after discussion about representation, existing appointment structures, and rural interests. The committee also advanced two cell-cultured protein bills. HB 2762 would require a disclaimer on packaging for food derived from cultivated cells; supporters argued for consumer transparency and opponents said federal labeling rules already apply and state-specific requirements could create confusion. It passed 5-3. HB 2791 would prohibit the sale of cell-cultured protein for human consumption and make violations a felony; supporters raised safety, innovation, and agricultural concerns, while opponents argued it would criminalize federally approved products and restrict consumer choice. That bill also passed 5-3. The committee adjourned after completing its agenda.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 16th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • In 1995, the committee, working with representatives of the Texas Secretary of State and the Council,
  • The committee substitute is an alleged council draft of the original non-legislative council draft and
  • This bill addresses the lack of actionable prosecution data by requiring the Texas Judicial Council to
  • It asks for a collaborative process for the Texas Judicial Council to work.
  • A mandate in the bill, it is rather the bill sets up a process by which the Texas Judicial Council will
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House Public Safety and Homeland Security Committee Apr 1st, 2026

Public Safety and Homeland Security

Transcript Highlights:
  • for the city council, great for the<00:27:11.520> mayor.
  • what I described from a city council what I described from a city council public<00:30:45.279>
  • <00:44:34.079> and As I used to go before the council and As I used to go before the council
  • I agree with you, and our city council agrees with you.
  • c><01:00:35.520> the<01:00:35.680> mayor city council approved and the mayor city council
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 2nd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Did you just say that the Texas Judicial Council recommends that the implicit bias...
  • Well, we want our judicial system to be fair and impartial.
  • We have Legislative Council here as a witness.
  • On behalf of the Legislative Council. On behalf of the Council, yes.
  • Last one out, members, so Legislative Council can get back to work.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 2nd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • It represents real threats and dangers that are judicially... system and the public face daily.
  • Court security has been the main concern of the Justice of Peace Court and councils around the state
  • Furlow, here for yourself and the 106th Judicial District, and you are against the bill.
  • Jennifer Lundy I show you as with Texans for judicial accountability and you are against the bill.
  • It's going to change judicial rules or judicial financial interest or special interest in many . . .
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Appropriations Committee, February 17, 2026

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:03:46.239> be business council needs to be business council needs to be restructured,<
  • <00:07:10.720> board with the uh the business council board with the uh the business council
  • council doing? What should it be doing? council doing? What should it be doing?
  • of funding uh for the business council of funding uh for the business council with<00:10:25.279>
  • Council and utilization of its programs. Council and utilization of its programs.
Bills: HB0150
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025 at 10:04 am

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Judicial Conduct.
  • In this role, I also serve as the executive director for the Texas Judicial Council, here as a resource
  • These were recommendations from the Texas Judicial Council, and I'm here as a resource if there's any
  • These were recommendations from the Texas Judicial Council, and I'm here as a resource if there's any
  • These were recommendations from the Texas Judicial Council, and I'm here as a resource if there's any
Summary: The committee heard House Bill 4961, which would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages after a collision. The author said the bill is intended to create incentives to maintain insurance and to address what he described as an unfair system for insured drivers. Texans for Lawsuit Reform and Texas Eagle Forum testified in support, while the Texas Trial Lawyers Association opposed it, warning the bill could also affect pedestrians, passengers, children, and others who did not choose whether a vehicle was insured. The bill author clarified that passengers would be included in the bill’s coverage. No vote was taken and the bill was left pending. House Bill 5570 would extend a legislative attorney CLE exemption to attorneys appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate to boards or commissions. The author said the measure is meant to ease time burdens and encourage service, and a witness supported it as a modest incentive for public service. A committee member noted a discrepancy in the number of affected attorneys, and the author agreed to verify the correct figure. The bill was left pending. The committee also heard House Bill 2969, which would restrict the State Bar from adopting rules or penalties that unreasonably burden attorneys’ religious exercise or free speech based on sincerely held beliefs. The author and several witnesses from Texas Values, Alliance Defending Freedom, and Cecilia Wood argued the bill protects lawyers of faith from an ABA model rule they described as a speech code. No one testified against the bill, and it was left pending. House Bill 4260, which would prohibit county judges and county commissioners from practicing law in courts over which they have jurisdiction, drew opposition from the County Judges and Commissioners Association, which argued existing ethics rules already address conflicts and that the bill would burden rural officials. The author said the bill was prompted by concerns about judges using their office to pressure others. The bill was left pending. House Bill 5134 would limit Rule 202 pre-suit depositions to people who have suffered or reasonably expect actual damages and would allow attorney’s fees against abusive petitioners. The author said the bill is aimed at preventing harassment and fishing expeditions, especially in family-law disputes. Questions focused on how the standard would work and how it differs from current law; the author said the main change is fee-shifting and a clearer legislative directive. The bill was left pending. House Bill 3095, a committee substitute version of a similar uninsured-motorist bill, would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages and limit economic recovery, with several exceptions. Trial lawyers argued it was unconstitutional because it capped economic damages and could unfairly affect innocent drivers, pedestrians, and older people who no longer drive. The author acknowledged constitutional concerns and said the bill would need further work; the committee withdrew the substitute and left the bill pending. Finally, House Bill 4388 would require all judges, including county judges who perform administrative duties, to remain subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct. Supporters said some elected judges avoid accountability by relinquishing judicial functions, while opponents argued the bill is too rigid and unnecessary because existing remedies already exist. House Bill 3964 would limit public nuisance claims to their historical role and bar such claims against lawful conduct, conduct already covered by other remedies, and products. The author and supporters said the bill is meant to prevent courts from using public nuisance to make policy, while opponents argued it would eliminate useful remedies and could affect local actions against environmental or product-related harms. The author said the bill would not affect statutory nuisance claims, private nuisance claims, or other causes of action, and would be amended to clarify some provisions. The bill was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025 at 10:04 am

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Judicial Conduct.
  • In this role, I also serve as the executive director for the Texas Judicial Council, here as a resource
  • These were recommendations from the Texas Judicial Council, and I'm here as a resource if there's any
  • These were recommendations from the Texas Judicial Council, and I'm here as a resource if there's any
  • So the threshold for needing a new court is judicial time.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on several bills affecting civil practice, judicial conduct, and attorney regulation. HB 4961 and the similar HB 3095 would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages after a collision, with HB 3095 also addressing certain exceptions and limiting economic damages in some cases. Supporters said the measures would encourage insurance coverage and fairness for insured drivers, while opponents argued they would unfairly punish injured people who were not responsible for the lack of insurance, including pedestrians, passengers, children, and others. HB 3095 drew constitutional concerns from witnesses, and the committee later withdrew the committee substitute and left the bill pending; HB 4961 was also left pending after questions about its scope, including passengers. HB 5570 would expand a continuing legal education exemption to attorneys appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate who serve on boards or commissions. The author and witness said the bill would free up time for public service while still requiring ethics training. A committee member raised a discrepancy in the number of attorneys covered, and the bill was left pending. HB 2969 would prohibit the State Bar from adopting rules or penalties that unreasonably burden attorneys’ religious exercise or free speech, especially in relation to sincerely held religious beliefs. Supporters framed it as a protection for lawyers of faith against an ABA-style speech code, while no one testified in opposition; the bill was left pending. HB 4260 would prohibit county judges and county commissioners from practicing law in courts over which they have jurisdiction. The author described it as an ethics measure to avoid conflicts of interest, but county officials and the County Judges and Commissioners Association opposed it, saying existing ethics rules already address conflicts and that the bill would impose hardships, especially in rural counties. The bill was left pending. HB 4388 would require all judges, including those who serve only in administrative roles, to remain subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct; supporters said some judges avoid discipline by relinquishing judicial functions, while opponents said the bill was unnecessary and could burden county judges who serve as administrators. It was also left pending. The committee also heard HB 5134, which would limit Rule 202 pre-suit depositions to people who have suffered or reasonably expect to suffer actual damages and allow attorney’s fees against abusive petitioners. The author said the bill would curb harassment and fishing expeditions, but members questioned how the standard would work in practice; the bill was left pending. Finally, HB 3964 would narrow common-law public nuisance claims by barring suits over lawful conduct, conduct already addressed by other remedies, and products, while preserving other causes of action. Supporters said the bill would prevent regulation through litigation and protect legislative authority; opponents said it would eliminate important remedies and that no Texas abuse had been shown. The author indicated he would revise the bill, and it was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chairman, you're aware of this. that the Judicial Council has looked at this and made some recommendations
  • It came out of, you know, Judicial Council and consultations with a number of these courts.
  • In this role, I also serve as the Executive Director of the Texas Judicial Council, which is the policymaking
  • This bill addresses the inefficiencies. ...by authorizing district judges in four judicial districts
  • And aligning with the importance of that protection, in 2020, the Texas Judicial Council adopted a resolution
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Judicial salaries have also been an issue that the...
  • Council for the State Commission on Judicial Conduct.
  • This year, I am also the chair of the Judicial Section of the State Bar of Texas.
  • Because the judicial section is an organization encompassed within the.
  • So judicial pay plays into the democratic process and the true cure for our weakness in the judicial
Bills: SB260, SB263, SB293, SJR18
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The committee substitute for Senate Bill 2933 simply makes a legislative council draft.
  • Judicial education on elder abuse is essential to ensure informed, compassionate, and effective legal
  • determine the proper allocation of funds and specify that statutory probate court judges are paid out of judicial
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Government, Elections And Indian Affairs Jan 28th, 2026 at 08:36 am

House Government, Elections & Indian Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • This is Christina Vasquez, as she works for Legislative Council, and this is Clinton Turner.
  • Council Services.
  • I am a judge at the Second Judicial District Court in the family division.
  • Madam Chair, House Bill 95 is to create a 31st district judge position in the Second Judicial District
  • “And I think we should have the fifth judicial—excuse me, the fifth judge added for family court.
Bills: HB70, HB93, HB95, HB139, HB140, HJR4
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Administrative Rules REVISED: Link added Mar 3rd, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Administrative Rules

Transcript Highlights:
  • Judicial and public safety are approving the rules submitted by February 1st due date for the agencies
Bills: HJR1086, SB392