Judges, eligibility to be elected or appointed further provided for, constitutional amendment
Summary
HB450 is a proposed constitutional amendment that would change the judicial age limit in the Alabama Constitution. Under current law, an individual is not eligible to be elected or appointed to a judicial office after reaching age 70; this bill would raise that cutoff to age 75. The measure also preserves an exception allowing a judge over 75 to be appointed as a supernumerary judge if the judge is not eligible for state judicial retirement benefits.
If ratified by voters, the amendment would revise Section 155 of the Constitution of Alabama of 2022 and require the Code Commissioner to make conforming, nonsubstantive edits to place the amendment properly in the constitution. The bill also sets out the ballot language that would appear before voters and provides that the amendment becomes effective only if approved by a majority of qualified electors voting on it.
Impact
HB450 would directly alter the constitutional eligibility rules for judges in Alabama by extending the maximum age for election or appointment from 70 to 75. This would affect judicial candidates, sitting judges seeking reappointment or election, and the administration of judicial retirement and supernumerary appointments. Because it is a constitutional amendment, the change would not take effect through ordinary statute and would instead require statewide voter approval under the procedures for constitutional amendments.
Sentiment
The available record shows limited public or committee debate, with no transcripts or recorded votes included. The bill’s introduction and referral to the Judiciary Committee suggest it was treated as a formal constitutional proposal rather than a highly contested measure in the available materials. Its current status as indefinitely postponed indicates it did not advance, but the provided context does not show the reasons for that outcome.
Contention
The main policy issue is whether Alabama should permit judges to serve or be appointed at older ages, balancing experience and continuity against concerns about age limits in judicial office. Supporters would likely view the bill as expanding the pool of eligible judges and retaining experienced jurists longer, while opponents may argue that the existing age cap should remain to encourage turnover and ensure regular generational change. The only explicit exception in the text—allowing certain older judges to serve as supernumerary judges if they are not eligible for state judicial retirement benefits—could also be a point of technical or policy discussion.
Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.
Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.
(Constitutional Amendment) Provides for the election of constitutional convention delegates and vote requirements necessary for the adoption of a new constitution (RR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)
(Constitutional Amendment) Modifies disposition of certain state revenues through repeal of the Revenue Stabilization Trust Fund and deposits of certain revenue streams into the Budget Stabilization Fund (RRF INCREASE GF RV See Note)
(Constitutional Amendment) Provides relative to the application of state monies to the unfunded accrued liability of the Teachers' Retirement System of La. (EN DECREASE SD RV See Note)
Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.