Video & Transcript Research : 'judicial accountability'

Page 2 of 500
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • we're very close to getting rid of the STAAR test. ...continue to strengthen the A through F accountability
  • system in the state, as well as ensuring that years later we have a public accountability system.
  • We need a test measuring system that's as good as our public accountability system.
  • One is it requires... the agency to notify school districts when there will be changes to the accountability
  • These are items that schools have been asking for with regard to assessments and accountability.
Bills: HB8, HB26, HB192
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 22nd, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's a great bill, and it just puts more accountability on the system. Thank you.
  • In this particular case, those responsible were held to account for what they did.
  • Except for justice takes society into account. This takes the Constitution into account.
  • But there has been a need for judicial clemency or commutation in this area.
  • Judicial is not probative and is just one more way for the state to lean.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill also improves our accountability system by codifying the accountability refresh process so
  • House Bill 8 increases legislative oversight of the accountability system and updates the accountability
  • Which school is accountable for that kid?
  • included in accountability anyway.
  • Machine accounting for roughly 75%.
Bills: HB8, HB12, SB 3, HJR1, SB 11, SB 16, SB 14
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Ways & Means Mar 3rd, 2025

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • Are you're Alison Mansfield, and you represent the Comptroller of Public Accounts, and you're a neutral
  • So, the appraisal role is divided into accounts, but it's not divided by taxpayers.
  • on the roll, um, that's worth more than $250,000 each account, how does the appraisal district ensure
  • that it gets applied to only one of those accounts?
  • Or conversely, if a business has multiple accounts worth less than 25,050,000.
Bills: HB8, HB9, HJR1, HB 22
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part III) Aug 26th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Various matters of judicial administration are always in this bill.
  • I hear that they are through judicial canon.
  • So this applies only to COH accounts. ... What about friends of type accounts?
  • account.
  • We actually mailed postcards to every property tax account, including all your mineral accounts.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025 at 10:04 am

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Passing this bill is a step towards reinforcing the accountability of our judicial system.
  • I'm Jennifer Lundy, Executive Director of Texans for Judicial Accountability.
  • I'm Jennifer Lundy, Executive Director of Texans for Judicial Accountability.
  • I've got you here on behalf of Texans for Judicial Accountability. All right. Ms.
  • I'm Jennifer Lundy, Executive Director for Texans for Judicial Accountability.
Summary: The committee heard House Bill 4961, which would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages after a collision. The author said the bill is intended to create incentives to maintain insurance and to address what he described as an unfair system for insured drivers. Texans for Lawsuit Reform and Texas Eagle Forum testified in support, while the Texas Trial Lawyers Association opposed it, warning the bill could also affect pedestrians, passengers, children, and others who did not choose whether a vehicle was insured. The bill author clarified that passengers would be included in the bill’s coverage. No vote was taken and the bill was left pending. House Bill 5570 would extend a legislative attorney CLE exemption to attorneys appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate to boards or commissions. The author said the measure is meant to ease time burdens and encourage service, and a witness supported it as a modest incentive for public service. A committee member noted a discrepancy in the number of affected attorneys, and the author agreed to verify the correct figure. The bill was left pending. The committee also heard House Bill 2969, which would restrict the State Bar from adopting rules or penalties that unreasonably burden attorneys’ religious exercise or free speech based on sincerely held beliefs. The author and several witnesses from Texas Values, Alliance Defending Freedom, and Cecilia Wood argued the bill protects lawyers of faith from an ABA model rule they described as a speech code. No one testified against the bill, and it was left pending. House Bill 4260, which would prohibit county judges and county commissioners from practicing law in courts over which they have jurisdiction, drew opposition from the County Judges and Commissioners Association, which argued existing ethics rules already address conflicts and that the bill would burden rural officials. The author said the bill was prompted by concerns about judges using their office to pressure others. The bill was left pending. House Bill 5134 would limit Rule 202 pre-suit depositions to people who have suffered or reasonably expect actual damages and would allow attorney’s fees against abusive petitioners. The author said the bill is aimed at preventing harassment and fishing expeditions, especially in family-law disputes. Questions focused on how the standard would work and how it differs from current law; the author said the main change is fee-shifting and a clearer legislative directive. The bill was left pending. House Bill 3095, a committee substitute version of a similar uninsured-motorist bill, would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages and limit economic recovery, with several exceptions. Trial lawyers argued it was unconstitutional because it capped economic damages and could unfairly affect innocent drivers, pedestrians, and older people who no longer drive. The author acknowledged constitutional concerns and said the bill would need further work; the committee withdrew the substitute and left the bill pending. Finally, House Bill 4388 would require all judges, including county judges who perform administrative duties, to remain subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct. Supporters said some elected judges avoid accountability by relinquishing judicial functions, while opponents argued the bill is too rigid and unnecessary because existing remedies already exist. House Bill 3964 would limit public nuisance claims to their historical role and bar such claims against lawful conduct, conduct already covered by other remedies, and products. The author and supporters said the bill is meant to prevent courts from using public nuisance to make policy, while opponents argued it would eliminate useful remedies and could affect local actions against environmental or product-related harms. The author said the bill would not affect statutory nuisance claims, private nuisance claims, or other causes of action, and would be amended to clarify some provisions. The bill was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025 at 10:04 am

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Passing this bill is a step toward reinforcing the accountability of our judicial system.
  • I'm Jennifer Lundy, Executive Director of Texans for Judicial Accountability.
  • I've got you here on behalf of Texans for Judicial Accountability. All right. Ms.
  • I've got you here on behalf of Texans for Judicial Accountability, registered for the bill.
  • I'm Jennifer Lundy, Executive Director for Texans for Judicial Accountability.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on several bills affecting civil practice, judicial conduct, and attorney regulation. HB 4961 and the similar HB 3095 would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages after a collision, with HB 3095 also addressing certain exceptions and limiting economic damages in some cases. Supporters said the measures would encourage insurance coverage and fairness for insured drivers, while opponents argued they would unfairly punish injured people who were not responsible for the lack of insurance, including pedestrians, passengers, children, and others. HB 3095 drew constitutional concerns from witnesses, and the committee later withdrew the committee substitute and left the bill pending; HB 4961 was also left pending after questions about its scope, including passengers. HB 5570 would expand a continuing legal education exemption to attorneys appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate who serve on boards or commissions. The author and witness said the bill would free up time for public service while still requiring ethics training. A committee member raised a discrepancy in the number of attorneys covered, and the bill was left pending. HB 2969 would prohibit the State Bar from adopting rules or penalties that unreasonably burden attorneys’ religious exercise or free speech, especially in relation to sincerely held religious beliefs. Supporters framed it as a protection for lawyers of faith against an ABA-style speech code, while no one testified in opposition; the bill was left pending. HB 4260 would prohibit county judges and county commissioners from practicing law in courts over which they have jurisdiction. The author described it as an ethics measure to avoid conflicts of interest, but county officials and the County Judges and Commissioners Association opposed it, saying existing ethics rules already address conflicts and that the bill would impose hardships, especially in rural counties. The bill was left pending. HB 4388 would require all judges, including those who serve only in administrative roles, to remain subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct; supporters said some judges avoid discipline by relinquishing judicial functions, while opponents said the bill was unnecessary and could burden county judges who serve as administrators. It was also left pending. The committee also heard HB 5134, which would limit Rule 202 pre-suit depositions to people who have suffered or reasonably expect to suffer actual damages and allow attorney’s fees against abusive petitioners. The author said the bill would curb harassment and fishing expeditions, but members questioned how the standard would work in practice; the bill was left pending. Finally, HB 3964 would narrow common-law public nuisance claims by barring suits over lawful conduct, conduct already addressed by other remedies, and products, while preserving other causes of action. Supporters said the bill would prevent regulation through litigation and protect legislative authority; opponents said it would eliminate important remedies and that no Texas abuse had been shown. The author indicated he would revise the bill, and it was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • It came out of, you know, Judicial Council and consultations with a number of these courts.
  • Accountability and transparency are not threats. to professional licensure.
  • They can freeze and seize funds from multiple accounts.
  • So, in closing, we need balance, we need accountability, but we need accountability without causing destitution
  • So what typically happens is, they have $1,000 in the bank account.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Committee Meeting - 2026-04-16

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • The judicial branch.
  • Um I'll just say too that the judicial Um I'll just say too that the judicial branch<00:15:44.720
  • increased staffing of the judicial increased staffing of the judicial security<00:38:36.320>
  • employees for the judicial security unit.
  • crucial protections to for our judicial crucial protections to for our judicial system.<00:43:14.079
Bills: HF3874, HF962
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • This places tremendous strain on the judicial system.
  • independence and judicial accountability rather than taking steps that might undermine it.
  • The answer is not to transform the judicial system.
  • Only if they exercise their judicial power.
  • Donald Trump himself has used his social-media account, the White House account, to post an image of
Summary: During this meeting, the committee focused on the implications of universal injunctions, which have become a significant concern in recent years. The discussion centered around various legislative proposals aimed at addressing the perceived overreach of district judges who issue nationwide injunctions that affect policies across the entire country. Several members expressed the belief that such injunctions undermine judicial authority and disrupt the balance of power between the judiciary and executive branches. Expert witnesses testified about the historical context of universal injunctions and the necessity for reforms that would limit the power of courts to grant remedies benefitting non-parties.