Video & Transcript Research : 'CAP'

Page 2 of 267
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services May 12th, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • We have been very strategic in how we manage our debt, and so that 5% cap actually penalizes us.
  • But the 5% cap really does penalize cities, and it really hurts us in the long run. Thank you.
  • The 3.5% cap by SB2 has really put pressure on cities because 3.5% is not easy to live on.
  • But overall, the 5% cap is what really hurts.
  • So my recommendation would be no cap, and to remove that off of there.
Bills: SB512, SB1024
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Energy Finance and Policy Committee 3/24/26

Energy Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • increasing demand, volatile fuel costs, and lost revenue, lost federal subsidies due to HR1, placing a cap
  • It will cap interim rate increases at no more than 5% while a utility's rate case is under review.
  • This significantly minimizes any risk to investment from capping interim rates.
  • This significantly minimizes any risk to investment from capping interim rates.
  • <00:21:28.720> may capping interim rates, utilities may capping interim rates, utilities may
Bills: HF4236, HF4122, HF4377
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 4158 raises the salary caps for students who receive the OTEG grant so that their families
  • determine is the fund is on a first-come, first-served basis, but $60,000 is not very much to cut off the cap
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Apr 10th, 2025

Alabama House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • of concerned the committee, I was kind of concerned the committee, I was kind of concerned about the cap
  • and really if any changes about the cap and really if any changes about the cap and really if any changes
  • that we can see glad that there is a cap that we can see glad that there is a cap that we can see and
  • States insurance provider, over United States insurance provider, over $500 billion net worth in 20 cap
  • in $500 billion net worth in 20 cap in $500 billion net worth in 20 cap in 2024, is going to be the
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Apr 8th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • public funds, including federal or state. which can be used in the effort to circumvent the 12-week cap
  • It's only construction that's capped at $100,000, and as someone who's in the construction business,
  • The one thing is ESDs are unique in that their tax cap, their limit...
  • Constitutionally, ESDs have a $0.10 per hundred tax cap, one of the lowest taxing entities we have in
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • And the most common is appraisal caps. Colleagues, let's do appraisal caps.
  • Appraisal caps only shift burden. They do not...
  • this $500-page document, which outlines all the articles on appraisal caps being bad.
  • This is a little bit because you'll hear about appraisal caps are good.
  • Increased rates or by the appraisal caps going up.
Bills: SB4, SJR2, SB 4, SJR 2
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Mar 18th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Now, when we're talking about 4% and 9% tax credits, 60% AMI is the cap.
  • That property is worth probably 12 million dollars because the rents are all capped at Section 8 rates
  • There's no rent growth; it's capped.
  • overlaps with the restrictions and help from the federal government and the state government. that put caps
DE

Delaware 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Administration Committee Meeting Jun 17th, 2026

Administration

Transcript Highlights:
  • Most hospital services would be capped at no more than 250% of the Medicare reimbursement rates, while
  • The bill also includes critical hospital cost containment measures, including a phased-in cap on hospital
  • Vo-Tech districts actually have a tax cap that is set, so this bill would not actually apply to them
  • They would still be obligated to stay within the cap that is set through that process. Thank you.
  • longer relevant to the present day and are no longer exercised by the commissioners, and it changes the cap
Bills: SB268, SB306, SB264, SB312
Summary: The House Administration Committee met to consider a series of resolutions and bills covering arts districts, child care background checks, federal worker relief, health care reform, court transparency, school tax reassessment, municipal charter changes, constitutional amendment procedures, data center nondisclosure agreements, state employee benefits governance, and lieutenant governor vacancies. Members also noted that House Concurrent Resolution 12 had been removed from the agenda and that public comment would be limited to one minute per speaker. The committee released SCR 167 to study arts, culture, and creative districts in Delaware; HB 438 to close a loophole in the child care service letter requirement; SB 268 to provide interest-free loans, free transit, and tax deferrals for federal workers during shutdowns; SS2 for SB 1 to expand and permanently strengthen primary care investment while also addressing hospital cost growth; HCR 147 to request a Court of Chancery report on audio recordings and automated case assignment; SB 322 to replace the current post-reassessment 10% school revenue increase authority with a 2% annual increase option under safeguards; SB 306 to amend the Rehoboth Beach charter; HB 440 to require voter approval for constitutional amendments after legislative approval; SB 312 to bar nondisclosure agreements for large data center projects; SS1 for SB 289 to change State Employee Benefits Committee governance; and SB 264 to require a special election to fill a lieutenant governor vacancy. Testimony was mixed on several measures. Arts, child care, federal worker relief, primary care, court transparency, data center transparency, and the lieutenant governor vacancy bill drew mostly supportive testimony, while SB 322 and SB 306 drew both support and opposition, especially over tax impacts and the proposed spouse/partner restriction in Rehoboth Beach. HB 440 prompted debate over whether 55% voter approval was the right threshold for constitutional amendments, and SB 312 was supported as a transparency measure by residents affected by prior data center NDAs. All of the listed measures were released from committee by roll call vote, with some members voting no on HB 440, SB 306, SB 312, SS1 for SB 289, and SB 264.