Transcript Highlights:

• and the lack of stability federally, what will happen to her and people like that?
• law, but we because of state and federal law, but we hope<00:11:54.160><c> that</c><00:11:54.399><c>
• We have an authoritarian occupying the executive branch federally, and we have a legislative branch federally
• and we have a executive branch federally and we have a legislative<00:31:51.120><c> branch</c><00:31
• :51.600><c> federally</c><00:31:52.159><c> that</c><00:31:52.399><c> is</c> legislative branch federally

Transcript Highlights:

• But our position is it is technically covered in federal law.
• There is a federal case going on right now and I could argue it either way as a lawyer.
• Mandating coverage that cannot be obtained is not protection but a shutdown order.
• Hart Lowman: Federal law allows states to opt out of or modify this restriction, and Congress created
• It does not expand federal eligibility or alter SNAP work requirements for income. Rep.

Transcript Highlights:

• And we're going through a pretty rapid disruption right now given federal tax credits and what's happened
• </c><00:19:36.799><c> tax</c> disruption right now given federal tax disruption right now given federal
• happened right before COVID, and therefore when the order came out, which was in the summer of 2020 and shutdown
• happened right before COVID, and therefore when the order came out, which was in the summer of 2020 and shutdown
• Uh, before COVID, and therefore when the order came out, which was in the summer of 2020 and shutdown

Bills: SB2033 , SB2487 , SB2497 , SB2471 , SB2829

Committee: Senate Commerce and Consumer Protection

Summary: The committee first reconvened on SB 2471 and SB 2829, both relating to the powers of artificial persons. After discussion with the Attorney General’s office and a prior Q&A period, the chair said the committee would defer decision-making again, with the intent to return with amended versions of both bills that could gain support from the administration and its lawyers. The measures were deferred to Tuesday, February 10, 2026, in Conference Room 229 at 9:30 a.m. The committee then took up SB 2180, relating to deposits of public funds. Members noted late testimony from the prior day’s joint hearing with the Housing Committee and moved to pass the bill out with amendments, including a defective effective date. The motion carried unanimously among those voting: the chair, vice chair, Senator Lamosao, and Senator Awa voted aye; Senator McKelvey was excused. The measure was adopted. A joint hearing followed on SB 2033, relating to renewable energy and a streamlined grid-ready homes interconnection process. The PUC supported the bill’s intent but raised concerns about the time, resources, and stakeholder input needed to establish the proposed process, and asked for clarification of terms such as “grid-ready homes” and the role of HERA. Hawaiian Electric said it supported the intent but opposed the proposed process and HERA funding use. The Hawaii Solar Energy Association strongly supported the bill, arguing that faster interconnection is needed to meet rooftop solar goals and lower costs over time. Testimony totaled 27 in support, two in opposition, and four with comments. Members questioned costs, consumer protections, and whether the bill would burden low- and moderate-income households; the bill’s supporters said amendments could clarify the definition of grid-ready homes and add guardrails, while acknowledging that upfront costs and interconnection costs would still need to be addressed.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:19:17.200><c> dollars</c> state match it with some federal dollars state match it with some federal
• We've gotten outside funding through Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines.
• </c> gotten outside funding through Federal gotten outside funding through Federal Home<00:25:13.799>
• </c><00:52:29.200><c> government</c> relationship with the federal government relationship with the federal
• the federal program.

Committee: Senate Housing and Homelessness Prevention

Transcript Highlights:

• ><c> in</c> funding and federal fund expenditures in funding and federal fund expenditures in here?
• </c> rather than the federal government. rather than the federal government.
• /c><01:10:37.760><c> to</c><01:10:38.080><c> decrease</c> federal bill uh federal HR1 to decrease federal
• That means if federal government.
• Uh the federal to a federal change.

Committee: House Finance

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> that language intact, keep the federal that language intact, keep the federal request<00:23:44.240
• </c> that DHS will make to the federal that DHS will make to the federal government<00:33:53.760><c>
• Uh HR1 is a federal law that passed Uh HR1 is a federal law that passed three<00:42:52.640><c> days</
• </c><00:49:34.319><c> government</c> where the federal government where the federal government cuts?
• </c> would be a federal crime, a felony. would be a federal crime, a felony.

Committee: House Finance

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:18:59.159><c> that</c> epidemic, such as a COVID shutdown that epidemic, such as a COVID shutdown
• Thank you. peacetime emergency and those federal peacetime emergency and those federal waivers.<00:30
• </c><01:03:04.160><c> level</c> that was required at the federal level that was required at the federal
• </c> the federal government. the federal government.
• So, there is a match federal government.

Bills: HF2136 , HF4195 , HF4548 , HF4432 , HF4174 , HF3024 , HF4389 , HF3773

Committee: House Children and Families Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:

• So, as we look at a 12/31/30 shutdown on Sherco 3, we're kind of on the clock right now.
• So, as we look at a 12/31/30 shutdown on Sherco 3, we're kind of on the clock right now.
• So, as we look at a 12/31/30 shutdown on Sherco 3, we're kind of on the clock right now.
• </c> new federal requirements. new federal requirements.
• ><c> putting</c> With the federal government putting With the federal government putting roadblocks<00

Committee: Senate Energy, Utilities, Environment, and Climate

Transcript Highlights:

• commend the Liftoff Louisiana team for their role in developing a highly successful response to the Federal
• unmanned aircraft systems and for their partners in developing a highly successful response to the Federal
• Senate Bill 116 by Senator Foil, Department of Transportation, relative to the federal government, to
• Senate Bill 116, relative to the federal government, to provide forgiving authority of the department
• , take over duties of the Department of the federal government.

Bills: HR91 , HR92 , HR93 , HCR44 , HR84 , HR85 , HR86 , HR87 , HR88 , HR89 , HR90 , HCR42 , HCR43 , SCR21 , HB483 , HB484 , HB893 , HB1087 , HB1088 , HB1089 , HB1090 , HB1091 , HB1092 , HB1093 , HB1094 , HB1095 , HB1096 , HB1097 , HB1098 , HB1099 , HB1100 , HB1101 , HB1102 , HB1103 , HB1104 , HB1105 , HB1106 , HB1107 , HB1108 , HB1109 , HB1110 , HB1111 , HB1112 , HB1113 , HB1114 , HB1116 , HB1117 , HB1118 , HB1119 , HB1120 , HB1121 , HB1122 , HB1123 , HB1124 , HB1125 , HB1126 , HB1127 , HB1128 , HB1129 , HB1130 , HB1131 , HB1132 , HB1133 , HB1134 , HB1135 , HB1136 , HB1137 , HB1138 , HB1139 , HB1140 , HB1141 , HB1142 , HB1143 , HB1144 , HB1145 , HB1146 , HB1147 , HB1148 , HB1149 , HB1150 , HB1151 , HB1152 , HB1153 , HB1154 , HB1155 , HB1156 , HB1157 , HB1158 , HB1159 , HB1160 , HB1161 , HB1162 , HB1163 , HB1164 , HB1165 , HB1166 , HB1167 , HB1168 , HB1169 , HB1170 , HB1171 , HB1172 , HB1173 , HB1174 , HB1175 , HB1176 , HB1177 , HB1178 , HB1179 , HB1180 , HB1181 , HB1182 , HB1183 , HB1184 , HB1185 , HB1186 , HB1187 , HB1188 , HB1189 , HB1190 , HB1191 , HB1192 , HB1193 , HB1194 , HB1195 , HB1196 , HB1197 , HB1198 , HB1199 , HB1200 , HB1201 , HB1202 , HB1203 , HB1204 , HB1205 , HB1206 , HB1207 , HB1208 , HB1209 , HB1210 , HB1211 , HB1212 , HB1213 , HB1214 , HB1215 , HB1216 , HB1217 , HB1218 , HB1219 , HB1220 , HB1221 , HB1222 , HB1223 , HB1224 , HB1225 , HB1226 , HB1227 , HB1228 , HB1229 , HB1230 , HB1231 , SB1 , SB54 , SB82 , SB87 , SB92 , SB93 , SB99 , SB104 , SB113 , SB114 , SB115 , SB123 , SB129 , SB133 , SB161 , SB162 , SB224 , SB236 , SB275 , SB280 , SB289 , SB305 , SB310 , SB325 , SB330 , SB339 , SB350 , SB359 , SB382 , SB410 , SB412 , HCR10 , HB54 , HB55 , HB67 , HB73 , HB125 , HB133 , HB158 , HB168 , HB169 , HB191 , HB195 , HB205 , HB225 , HB245 , HB280 , HB283 , HB296 , HB319 , HB325 , HB339 , HB399 , HB407 , HB448 , HB482 , HB550 , HB591 , HB821 , HB826 , HB992 , HB995 , HB1085 , HB1086 , HR15 , HR20 , HCR14 , HCR6 , HCR19 , HB861 , HB889 , HB904 , HB907 , HB908 , HB929 , HB1009 , HB13 , HB23 , HB25 , HB32 , HB41 , HB90 , HB120 , HB121 , HB122 , HB127 , HB138 , HB139 , HB141 , HB179 , HB187 , HB213 , HB247 , HB286 , HB332 , HB344 , HB357 , HB367 , HB370 , HB462 , HB505 , HB527 , HB537 , HB605 , HB680 , HB681 , HB725 , HB780 , HB782 , HB847 , HB892 , HB911 , HB916 , HB1012 , HB81 , HB134 , HB154 , HB163 , HB170 , HB194 , HB217 , HB220 , HB254 , HB259 , HB290 , HB308 , HB311 , HB360 , HB382 , HB401 , HB410 , HB417 , HB463 , HB575 , HB592 , HB718 , HB723 , HB750 , HB755 , HB776 , HB812 , HB844 , HB882 , HB888 , HB961 , HB966 , HB980 , HB228 , HB289 , HB735 , HB796 , HB284 , HB301 , HB722 , HB468 , HB546 , HB746 , HB842 , HB923 , HB46 , HB166 , HB349 , HB352 , HB436 , HB588 , HB140 , HB429 , HB827 , HB953 , HB901 , HB9 , HB52 , HB58 , HB193 , HB400 , HB570 , HB577 , HB582 , HB733 , HB747 , HB868 , HB952

Keywords: Tulane University, education, research, economic impact, healthcare, Louisiana, condolences, memorial, community service, faith, legacy, centenarian, tribute, honor, longevity, philanthropy, youth leadership, fundraising, nonprofits, physical therapy

Transcript Highlights:

• federal single audit.
• And right now, of those federal dollars, there are federal programs in there that get audited.
• the federal dollars and the testing of the federal dollars.
• federal government shutdown would not allow us to get a revenue estimating number.
• The federal single audit is based on a federal compliance supplement and the Federal Single Audit Act

Bills: HB2 , SB145 , SB143

Committee: Senate House Appropriations & Finance

Summary: The committee first heard Senate Bill 143, which would raise caps on certain agriculture fees so they can keep pace with inflation. Senator Woods explained that the bill only adjusts fee ceilings, not automatic increases, and an amendment was adopted to tie the caps to the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the U.S. Department of Labor. There was no public support or opposition testimony, and the bill was then passed on an 8-0 do-pass vote, with several members excused. The committee then took up Senate Bill 145, which would change the state audit system by raising thresholds for smaller local public bodies and creating a statewide federal single audit for state agencies. The State Auditor and DFA said the bill was intended to streamline audits, reduce delays, and align New Mexico with federal rules and other states, but multiple CPA and audit witnesses opposed the statewide single-audit concept, warning it could reduce transparency, weaken accountability, and increase the risk of fraud, waste, and abuse. Committee members pressed for clarification on how the audit structure would work, which agencies would be covered, and whether DFA or independent auditors would conduct the work; the sponsors said amendments were needed to clarify the bill and remove problematic language, including the appropriation and references to gifts and donations. The committee adopted an amendment striking the appropriation language and then continued questioning without taking final action in the excerpt. The final portion of the meeting shifted to the House Bill 2 budget presentation. Committee members reviewed the Senate Finance version of the budget, which included about a 2.7% increase in recurring spending, 30% reserves, and major investments in health care affordability, early childhood, public education, housing, clean energy, water, and agriculture-related priorities. Members asked about water testing needs, water settlement funding, career technical education funding, and the contingency fund/disaster reserve structure. The presenters said some items still needed technical work and that additional adjustments would be made before final passage.

Transcript Highlights:

• federal single audit.
• the federal dollars and the testing of the federal dollars.
• The federal single audit is based on a federal compliance supplement and the Federal Single Audit Act
• However, for the purposes of the Federal Single Audit Act, the federal government's...
• federal single audit.

Bills: SB145 , SB143

Committee: Senate Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:

• IS KIND OF HANGING OVER ALL OF US WHO WORK ON THESE ISSUES AT THE STATE LEVEL LIST THE QUESTION OF FEDERAL
• THERE HAS BEEN A EXECUTIVE ORDER, BUT THE DETAILS OF ANY FEDERAL PREEMPTION THERE HAS BEEN A EXECUTIVE
• ORDER, BUT THE DETAILS OF ANY FEDERAL PREEMPTION HAVE YET TO BE DETERMINED.
• OF FEDERAL PREEMPTION STOP YOU DOING THE RIGHT THING FOR YOUR CONSTITUENTS.
• AND SO THERE ARE SOME POSITIVE EXAMPLES AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL IN TERMS OF GETTING THE SYSTEMS TO WORK

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:15:55.120><c> funds</c> anticipate other than the federal funds anticipate other than the federal
• <00:36:27.359><c> government</c> federal government federal government and<00:36:29.040><c> we</c><00
• There is a lot going on, especially with the forthcoming federal cutbacks.
• There is a lot going on, especially with the forthcoming federal cutbacks.
• There is a lot going on, especially with the forthcoming federal cutbacks.

Committee: Senate Economic Development and Tourism

Summary: The committee heard several bills, beginning with HB 934 on broadband and digital equity. Testifiers from the Lieutenant Governor’s office, the Office of Enterprise and Technology Services, DCCA, the University system, the Hawaii State Council on Developmental Disabilities, and others generally supported the measure and emphasized the need to coordinate broadband efforts, fund operations, and expand access to high-speed internet, devices, and digital navigation services. The Chamber of Commerce and West Coast Comprehensive Health Center supported the bill but objected to HD1 language excluding broadband infrastructure for retail service, warning it could create unintended consequences and limit community-led or rural projects. The Lieutenant Governor explained the state expects roughly $400 million to $500 million in federal broadband funding, described the bill as consolidating efforts under a broadband office attached to the CIO, and said the office would focus on infrastructure, devices, and training. No vote was taken on HB 934 in the portion provided. The committee then took up HB 97 on travel insurance. The Insurance Division said it had no major problem with the product but requested technical changes to align with licensing requirements and noted the bill largely codifies practices already used in the industry. Industry witnesses from Allianz and the U.S. Travel Insurance Association said the measure would create a consistent framework, add consumer protections, and align Hawaii with the NAIC model adopted in many other states. Members questioned whether there was a specific problem the bill was solving, and the division responded that it was mainly a framework and form-review measure rather than a response to a known enforcement issue. The bill was discussed but no final action was reported in the excerpt. HB 448 on technology enablement drew broad support from the Hawaii Technology Development Corporation, the Chamber of Commerce, the Food Industry Association, and other business representatives. Supporters said the measure would help businesses use technology such as digital platforms, e-commerce, robotics, and AR/VR to improve competitiveness, especially in tourism and other sectors. Committee members pressed for clearer scope, cost estimates, and assurances that local companies would be used; the agency said it would prioritize local-first contracting, use federal NIST-related support where possible, and estimated an initial request of about $200,000, though it could not give a firm total. Members expressed concern that the plan was still too undefined. The committee then began HB 455 on small business loans, where the Attorney General suggested explaining why a special fund is needed, and a witness from H Collaborative said the bill would help startup businesses that struggle most to access capital.

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm curious about the federal match. It's almost a 20-80 match.
• Or how does that federal money work?
• We've relied on federal dollars.
• So I will say, STAR was able to secure, right before the shutdown, we had been applying nonstop for federal
• we don't have any federal funding anymore.

Committee: House Appropriations

Summary: The committee heard public testimony on several budget requests tied to health and human services. Louisiana Children’s Advocacy Centers asked for continued support and a supplemental appropriation of $1.173 million for infrastructure and standardization, explaining that the money would expand use of the Guardify digital evidence system, improve chain of custody, and reduce reliance on DVDs. Baton Rouge and statewide CAC leaders said prior funding helped eliminate a therapy wait list and speed services for abused children. Members asked detailed questions about the digital system, MDT coordination, and how the request related to SB 237, which would strengthen multidisciplinary review of child abuse cases. The Alzheimer’s Association sought $824,000 to sustain the dementia care specialist program, saying it helps families navigate services, keep loved ones at home longer, and reduce Medicaid costs. AARP and the Live at Home Coalition also testified for 750 additional Community Choice waiver slots at a state cost of $3.3 million, arguing that home- and community-based care is cheaper than nursing homes and that the current wait list is more than 11,000 people. Legislators discussed the size of the need, the state’s long-term care spending mix, and whether more support should go to family caregivers and community-based options. Testimony also focused on disability support services, substance use treatment, and developmental disability provider rates. A parent and direct support worker described the Children’s Choice waiver’s 20-hour cap and low pay, saying it makes it hard to retain caregivers and meet the needs of medically fragile children. Odyssey House and O’Brien House asked for higher Medicaid reimbursement rates under ASAM 4, warned that removal of room-and-board payments and weak Medicaid eligibility pathways are reducing access, and called for more oversight of sober living homes; members questioned outcomes data, length of stay, and links to homelessness. Finally, the Arc of Louisiana said the LDH rate study confirmed underfunding and supported a $53.6 million increase in state general funds, with local ARC leaders describing the services they provide and the need for higher direct support professional wages.

Transcript Highlights:

• Who have been impacted by the federal prohibition.
• That would have otherwise received any kind of federal funding.
• The federal government does not pay for abortion services. Correct? Correct.
• Federal government does not cover abortion care.
• We have a huge debt to the federal. our employers.

Committee: Senate Budget and Fiscal Review

Summary: The Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee heard AB 106, an early-action budget bill providing $90 million one-time General Fund to support reproductive health providers affected by the federal H.R. 1 prohibition on Medicaid funding. Department of Finance staff explained that the money would be administered as grants through the Department of Health Care Access and Information because affected providers can no longer bill Medi-Cal during the federal restriction, which lasts through July 4, 2026. Members also discussed why the amount increased from an earlier $60 million estimate, with Finance saying the figure was updated based on additional claims data and provider information. The committee debate focused heavily on the policy implications of the funding. Supporters argued the bill is an emergency response to a targeted federal attack on Planned Parenthood and related family planning services, emphasizing that the funding would backfill non-abortion services such as cancer screenings, contraception, STI testing, mammograms, and prenatal care. Opponents questioned the use of General Fund dollars, the grant structure versus loans for other distressed providers, the Public Records Act exemption, and the bill’s priority compared with rural hospitals, developmental services, public safety, and other budget needs. Finance clarified that the federal funds at issue do not pay for abortion services and that the grant program would be open to eligible providers meeting criteria set by the department. Public testimony was overwhelmingly in support from Planned Parenthood affiliates, Essential Access Health, Western Center on Law and Poverty, the California Medical Association, family physicians, OBGYN groups, and others, while some commenters used the opportunity to raise unrelated budget concerns such as Medi-Cal dental cuts, IHSS, and CalHome funding. After discussion, the committee approved AB 106 on a 12-4 vote and reported it out. The chair also noted that a later hearing would examine broader H.R. 1 impacts in more detail.

Transcript Highlights:

• In the face of federal reductions.
• These are Medi-Cal health providers who have been impacted by the federal prohibition.
• That would have otherwise received any kind of federal funding.
• The federal government does not pay for abortion services. Correct? Correct.
• Federal government does not cover abortion care.

Summary: The Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee heard AB 106, an early-action budget bill providing $90 million one-time General Fund to support reproductive health providers affected by the federal H.R. 1 Medicaid funding prohibition. Department of Finance staff explained that the money would be administered as grants by the Department of Health Care Access and Information because affected providers can no longer bill Medi-Cal during the federal restriction, which runs through July 4, 2026. The Legislative Analyst’s Office had no additional comments. Members also discussed related budget context, including the broader estimated loss to California providers, the use of grant funding rather than loans, and provisions exempting some contract and records information from public disclosure. Committee debate focused on whether the funding was an appropriate priority amid other budget pressures. Supporters argued the bill is an emergency response to a targeted federal attack on Planned Parenthood and other family planning providers, emphasizing that the clinics provide broader primary care services such as cancer screenings, STI testing, contraception, and prenatal care, and that the funding is not for abortion services because federal Medicaid dollars cannot be used for abortion. Opponents questioned the size of the appropriation, the use of General Fund dollars, the transparency exemptions, and why similar aid was not being directed to rural hospitals, disability services, Proposition 36, or other budget needs. Public testimony was overwhelmingly in support from reproductive health, medical, and health equity organizations, with some unrelated comments urging funding for dental care, disability services, housing, and county health systems. After public comment, the committee voted on AB 106 and passed it on a 12-4 vote. The bill was reported out of committee.

Transcript Highlights:

• Thank goodness the federal government... We'll move on until the next weekend.
• Thank goodness the federal government got back to whatever status quo they have.
• And there's still a lot of details to sort out, given the government shutdown.

Summary: The Special Commission on the 250th Anniversary of the American Revolution met without a quorum, so no votes were taken and any items requiring action were deferred to a future meeting. Representative Sean Garballey welcomed new commission member Mona Roy and thanked outgoing members Susie Berry and Abigail Chandler, noting that the governor’s office would be contacted about open appointments to help restore quorum. The commission then heard a presentation from the Massachusetts Civic Learning Coalition, which outlined civics and history education programs tied to Mass 250 and America 250, including Civic Learning Week, teacher professional development, student civic projects, online courses, and curriculum resources from partners such as iCivics, Harvard’s Democratic Knowledge Project, GBH, Facing History and Ourselves, EDC, Revolutionary Spaces, and others. The Massachusetts Office of Travel and Tourism reported on the state’s 250th anniversary campaign, including a November event at the Old South Meeting House with the governor, lieutenant governor, and Boston Symphony Orchestra, strong media coverage, over $6 million in sponsorships, new TV spots tied to Ken Burns’ American Revolution documentary, and a new Massachusetts First webpage and merchandise. Revolutionary 250 gave an update on upcoming Henry Knox Trail commemorations, including events beginning in January at the state line and continuing in Great Barrington, Springfield, Worcester, Framingham, Cambridge, Roxbury, and Dorchester Heights, with related planning for the St. Patrick’s/Evacuation Day parade and other Revolutionary-era observances. The commission also discussed possible future initiatives for member working groups: contributing to an America 250 time capsule, organizing community-level “America’s potluck dinner” events on July 5, and coordinating readings of the Declaration of Independence on July 8. Members asked clarifying questions about how the potluck and time capsule efforts would work, and staff said an email would be sent after the meeting to gather interest and form small planning groups. The meeting ended with a motion to adjourn, a second, and unanimous approval.

Transcript Highlights:

• We have over 20 federal employees paid by the federal government to assist with family readiness mental
• I think we're fairly right-sized on the federal side.
• We actually do not receive any federal funding.
• So, the federal funding shutdown and changes in federal funding have not impacted us at all.
• Federal spending doubled overnight, going from around $7 billion in federal expenditures every year to

Committee: House A&B General Government Subcommittee

Transcript Highlights:

• The work must be completed in consultation with federally recognized tribes and with participation from
• The work must be completed in consultation with federally recognized tribes and with participation from
• government shutdown was for the purpose of issuing food, as opposed to issuing food benefits.
• This is being driven by the federal government, in fact. And in fact, I think that's a problem.
• federal government changes in the last year.

Bills: SB5998

Committee: Senate Ways & Means

Keywords: fiscal appropriations, budget, state funding, financial management, operating expenses

Transcript Highlights:

• With the current federal matching rate, that would be the standard.
• That would ensure that an additional $170 to $300 million would come in federally.
• To the next slide, 14, we need to address the impact of the recent federal cuts.
• Well, this is federal CMS language.
• The 2025 federal medical assistance percentage for New Mexico is 71.68%.

Committee: House Legislative Health & Human Services Committee