Video & Transcript Research : 'Consumer Protection'

Page 28 of 500
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • Our forests and watersheds protect our water supplies, support agriculture, drive outdoor recreation,
  • forward to hearing from our excellent witnesses and working with my colleagues at both parties to protect
  • Public lands belong to all Americans and should be managed under federal protection.
  • They are dedicated public servants who protect and conserve these lands without them doing their work
  • against wind and wildfire prepared home standards to protect against conflagrations.
Bills: HB471
Summary: The meeting primarily focused on H.R. 471, the Fix Our Forests Act, which aims to address the ongoing crisis of wildfires exacerbated by climate change and the need for updated forest management practices. Various committee members voiced concerns about past federal management failures and emphasized the necessity for collaborative approaches involving local communities and stakeholders in forest management. As discussions unfolded, there were varying perspectives on the implications of certain provisions in the bill, particularly around regulatory changes and their likely impacts on public participation and environmental reviews.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WAL Public Hearing - Thu Mar 19, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST

Water & Land

Transcript Highlights:
  • where the protection is. where the protection is.
  • But compassion does not require bypassing Hawaii coastal protections.
  • <02:05:48.680> our environmental people who protect our environmental people who protect our
  • environmental protect environmental protect those<02:07:07.280> who<02:07:07.560> are<
  • to protect to protect like<02:11:11.720> ooh<02:11:11.800> or<02:11:12.000> the
Summary: The Committee on Water and Land heard testimony on SB 5253 SD2 relating to conservation and SB 2401 relating to regional shoreline mitigation district, with the chair emphasizing short testimony limits and the need to finish before session. On SB 5253, DLNR said it stood on its written testimony and answered questions about the bill’s proposed nonprofit endangered species sanctuary. Members asked whether existing entities or agreements, such as land trusts, private landowners, and DLNR safe harbor agreements, could accomplish similar conservation goals without creating a new entity. DLNR said similar work already exists, but it was not aware of a comparable sanctuary model in the state. A member also questioned language suggesting for-profit businesses in the sanctuary, and DLNR said the intent appeared to be sales of outreach or similar materials, though it agreed that such activities could be handled by a nonprofit. The bulk of the hearing focused on SB 2401, which would create a regional shoreline adaptation/mitigation framework. The Department of the Attorney General said it had concerns about inconsistent use of the terms “mitigation” and “adaptation,” warning of possible title-subject issues. DLNR said it was neutral on the terminology and more concerned with the substance, and noted that the bill would not waive permits; any plan would still require environmental review and applicable state and county permits. DLNR also supported OHA’s recommendation to consider impacts on Native Hawaiian traditional and customary practices during regional planning, and said the bill’s language on temporary shoreline protection measures could help address the gap between emergency permits and longer-term planning while avoiding a hardening-only approach. The Office of Planning supported the regional planning concept but noted it is not a regulatory agency and would need to work with DLNR and the Land Board. OHA supported the bill’s planning-based approach but recommended amendments to require assessment of impacts on Native Hawaiian traditional and customary practices during plan development and to clarify that environmental review would still apply at the project level. Testifiers from the Ka‘anapali Steering Committee strongly supported the bill, saying it would provide a regional framework for ongoing erosion problems while preserving full regulatory authority and normal permitting, and they proposed amendments to standardize terminology, create a limited pathway for temporary shoreline protection, and address ownership and maintenance responsibilities. Members discussed the meaning of “mitigation” versus “adaptation,” the scope of shoreline hardening, and whether the bill would help the legislature take a broader, more holistic view of shoreline decisions. No votes or final actions were taken in the portion of the hearing provided.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Please help us change this now and protect our children in Texas.
  • I think we agree schools, above all, need protection.
  • Please pass this bill and help us to protect these sacred spaces.
  • With 33 other states already providing this protection, it's time for Texas to follow suit.
  • Texas' current legal protections... ...do not prevent unjust prosecutions.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Those adults don't step up to protect the children and leave them to fend for themselves in the dark.
  • Please stand with us and protect the vulnerable, and ensure that justice is truly served.
  • The current process lacks a due process standard protection for peace officers.
  • You know, and for seven years I wondered if I would ever have protection in my life.
  • It focuses on those who intentionally use digital tools to exploit and endanger their consumers.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Justice (Part II) Apr 29th, 2025

Criminal Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • Please help us change, change this now and protect our children in Texas.
  • Panicked calls and emails flooded our police, myself and others seeking protection.
  • Please pass 1602 and help us to protect these sacred spaces. Mayor Hinojosa. Thank you, Mr.
  • With 33 other states already providing this protection, it's time for Texas to follow suit.
  • Texas's current legal protections do not prevent their unjust prosecutions.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Criminal Judiciary Apr 7th, 2026 at 03:00 pm

Criminal Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • It still ensures the protection of victims are made whole, just Simply provides consistency across county
  • Members, Senate Bill 1980 protects Oklahomans from gift card fraud.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Government Oversight Mar 3rd, 2026 at 10:30 am

Government Oversight

Transcript Highlights:
  • And so this provides a layer of protection for Oklahomans.
  • So if someone is a consumer and because of their own personal beliefs, wants to do business with a bank
  • Does this prevent that consumer from making that choice? Thank you for the question.
  • There are a lot of protections. They have. The taxpayers have bailed them out more than once.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WAL Public Hearing - Thu Feb 19, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST

Water & Land

Transcript Highlights:
  • I mean, this is all consumer protection, isn't it? Aren't we just protecting our consumers?
  • <01:19:21.360> protection, mean, this is all consumer protection, mean, this is all consumer
  • Aren't we just protecting our isn't it? Aren't we just protecting our consumers?
  • um a statement of something to protect um a statement of something to protect consumers<01:20:33.760
  • discussion and consumer uh protection. discussion and consumer uh protection.
Summary: The committee on Water and Land met on February 19, 2026, and the chair opened by emphasizing strict time limits and that all bills would be deferred if the agenda was not completed before the noon session. The first major measure discussed was HB 1739 HD1, which would preempt county land-use authority in transit-oriented development areas. The Department of Planning supported the bill, saying it could promote state-funded TOD and infrastructure, while the city and county’s position was raised in questioning. Unite Here Local 5 opposed the bill, arguing it would strip counties of self-determination, disrupt state-county policy collaboration, and remove a check on unrestrained development. Committee members pressed the supporters on whether the bill was really about higher density and whether it would override local zoning and sustainability concerns. The committee then heard testimony on HB 1741 HD1, a housing bill described by supporters as reducing inclusionary housing mandates and increasing supply. Grassroots Institute of Hawaii argued affordability mandates reduce overall housing production and raise market-rate prices, while a Zoom testifier said the bill would improve housing stability, health, and community outcomes for working families, kupuna, and young residents. Members asked about the bill’s needs assessment and who would conduct it, with a witness saying the counties would likely contract it out but that the bill did not clearly specify the reviewer. HB 2668 HD1, dealing with water heating systems, drew testimony from the Hawaii State Energy Office and industry representatives. Supporters generally backed adding heat pumps to the law, but one solar-water-heater industry witness asked for amendments to remove or extend the current 15-year statutory life limit for solar water heaters and to update outdated standards and variance rules. A Kauaʻi Climate Action Coalition witness opposed the existing solar-only structure, arguing heat pump water heaters are cheaper, align with climate goals, and should be allowed without a variance. The Energy Office said the current law already allows variances in some cases, suggested adding high-efficiency heat pump water heaters to the exemption, and said the 15-year figure may be too short, with 18 years mentioned as a possible alternative. The committee also briefly moved through several other bills, including HB 2606 HD1 on off-site construction and HB 2362 HD1 on housing, with no notable testimony or action recorded in the excerpt.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House State Government Committee Feb 4th, 2026

State Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • sure we put language in there to protect sure we put language in there to protect what<00:13:46.720
  • So just keep in mind this is related to or similar to some provisions that protect the consumer at traditional
  • New consumer.
  • So just keep in mind this is related to or similar to some provisions that protect the consumer at traditional
  • New consumer.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health Apr 28th, 2025 at 08:04 am

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • Committee substitute adds liability protection for the commissioner. of the Department of State Health
  • If that was there, then they would not come out with it. vaccines to protect the population.
  • I do a lot of work in the interim with Child Protective Services.
  • We also included liability protections for paramedics and medical directors who act in good faith and
  • without malice. and expanded the protections to medical directors and paramedics in communities that
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Natural Resources Apr 9th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Consumers are not protected from potentially abusive practices.
  • We also need to balance, uh, that with protecting.
  • So this is a protection, a common sense protection of our existing resources.
  • Quite honestly, if you want to protect an endangered species, please protect a small Texas rancher cause
  • It pains me to ask for more regulation, but if we cannot protect a location that is this worthy of protection
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 9th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Without a regulated cap on these fees, consumers are not protected from potentially abusive practices
  • So this is a protection, a common sense protection. in, um, of our existing resources, but you mentioned
  • Quite honestly, if you want to protect an endangered species, please protect them.
  • Now we need your help to protect.
  • But if we cannot protect a location that is this worthy of protection, then the laws need to change.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 9th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • These powers allow the district to provide flood protection within its boundaries. and develop those
  • resource to water supply companies. that could then sell it to end-user, commercial, and residential consumers
  • hill country that we have the tools to make sure that those communities are built in a way that protects
  • in the best interest of the community. interests of the residents, in the best interests of the protection
  • hearing from so many county commissioners residents, that this is something that really needs to protect
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

AEN Public Hearing 01-28-2026

Agriculture and Environment

Transcript Highlights:
  • Again, we don't like unnecessary regulations, but we do want to protect our bees.
  • Again, we don't like unnecessary regulations, but we do want to protect our bees.
  • Thank you for want to protect our bees.
  • I believe this measure will help protect and strengthen Hawaii's beekeeping industry.
  • to help and protect. Thank you. to help and protect. Thank you.
Summary: The committee heard several agriculture-related bills. SB 874 on veterinary medicine would require veterinarians, upon a client’s request, to provide a written prescription for an animal patient in an existing veterinary client-patient relationship, allow Hawaii-licensed pharmacies to dispense those prescriptions, and authorize the Veterinary Medicine Board to set penalties. Testimony was overwhelmingly supportive, with supporters citing lower costs and consumer choice; the Hawaii Veterinary Medical Association said veterinarians already should be doing this and supported the bill if amended. One testifier in opposition argued the bill needed a conspicuous notice requirement so pet owners know they can request prescriptions. Committee members and the Department of Agriculture said they were not aware of widespread problems, and discussion focused on whether the measure was already consistent with current practice and whether amendments would address remaining concerns. The committee also heard SB 2097, which would create a climate-resilient food systems grant program in the Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity and appropriate funds. The department, Hawaii Farm Bureau, Hawaii Farmers Union, Hawaii Cattlemen’s Council, and others supported the bill, saying it could help farmers and ranchers invest in resilience, infrastructure, and technology. Several testifiers asked for clearer definitions, especially for terms like “food hubs” and “resilience hubs,” and suggested adding technical assistance and clearer eligibility criteria. The department explained the program was intended for shovel-ready projects in the middle of the supply chain, with a focus on farmers in a certain revenue range, and said it was modeled on a USDA program. SB 2098 would establish a clean plant program to produce and distribute disease-free plant material to growers, nurseries, and other producers. Testimony was supportive, emphasizing biosecurity, nursery industry needs, and preventing invasive species and crop disease. The department described the program as using tested clean stock, tissue culture facilities, and data collection to support future planting decisions, and estimated a two-year ramp-up. Members questioned whether the program duplicated existing work at CTR/other partners and whether data collection should be centralized, but the department said the effort would build on existing varieties and partnerships rather than overlap them. Finally, SB 2126 would create a conventional farming grant program for small and midsize conventional farmers. Supporters from the department, Hawaii Farm Bureau, and Hawaii Cattlemen’s Council said conventional agriculture deserves support and that the bill would help increase food production. Opposition and comments focused on the bill’s exclusion of organic farmers; one farmer said the measure was unfair unless amended to include organic producers, while a Farmers Union witness said the bill was too vague about the grant’s purpose and should be clearer about its goals. In response to questions, the department said the exclusion of organic farming was not intentional and that the bill was meant to support all agriculture, though no vote or final action was taken in the excerpt provided.