Video & Transcript Research : 'civil commitment facility'

Page 27 of 500
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Technology and Telecommunications 2ND REVISED Apr 16th, 2026 at 08:45 am

Technology and Telecommunications

Transcript Highlights:
  • I was really looking at section five on the civil penalties, and it does set out some civil liability
  • Between the civil penalties, I guess my question is really if a minor accesses this technology and the
  • minors, and I think until we do, what we'll probably see is that our punitive measures are limited to civil
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice Feb 18th, 2026

Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice will now come to order.
  • Members, tab one is the committee's proposed criminal and civil justice budget, and given our full and
  • Broadly, the criminal and civil justice budget totaled $7.9 billion and reflects a strong commitment
  • Broadly, the criminal and civil justice budget totaled $7.9 billion and reflects a strong commitment
  • Right now, we're asking people to work in facilities that are literally falling apart.
Summary: The Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice met to consider several criminal justice and court-related bills, along with the committee’s proposed $7.9 billion budget. The committee first heard and approved CS/SB 600 on bail bonds, as amended to adjust solicitation, cash bond return, forfeiture remission timing, and clerk procedures; CS/SB 436 on felony battery, which expands qualifying prior offenses and was amended to correct a drafting issue; CS/SB 928, “Missy’s Law,” requiring immediate remand to custody after conviction for dangerous crimes; SB 1332 on career offender registration, adding in-person reporting, more detailed registration requirements, and stronger penalties for noncompliance; and CS/SB 682 on violent criminal offenses, a domestic violence measure adopted via a substitute amendment that adds stricter penalties, electronic monitoring, injunction protections, and related procedures. All of those bills were reported favorably. The committee also approved SB 1072 creating an anti-Semitism task force in the Attorney General’s Office. The bill drew extensive public testimony both for and against, with supporters emphasizing rising anti-Semitic incidents and the need for statewide review, and opponents raising concerns about free speech, the definition of anti-Semitism, and possible conflation of criticism of Israel with hate speech. Senators also discussed the bill’s scope and the IHRA definition before it was reported favorably. In addition, CS/SB 532 on clerks of court was amended to clarify foreclosure sale procedures and funding predictability for clerks, then reported favorably. CS/SB 644 on attorney’s fees, suit money, and costs was also approved after amendments that aligned family-law fee provisions and codified standards for fee awards in dissolution and paternity cases; the sponsor said the bill was intended to curb vexatious litigation and improve consistency across districts. After the bill actions, the chair summarized the criminal and civil justice budget, describing it as a disciplined proposal that addresses corrections deficits and future inmate growth while funding core public safety needs. The committee then heard substantial public testimony on prison conditions, staffing, pay, heat, infrastructure, and the possibility of reducing prison populations or adding air conditioning in facilities. The chair announced that SB 1632 and its conforming bill SB 1634 would be temporarily postponed to the following week, and the record was supplemented with the names of many people who had registered to speak for or against those bills. The meeting concluded after members were invited to record votes and the committee adjourned.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Judiciary Feb 9th, 2026 at 01:36 pm

Senate Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • So delete the second “A,” so the court may also assess a civil penalty for A.
  • It protects water lines, oil and gas facilities, communication networks.
  • It's not a health care facility.
  • We don't define what the health care facility is for purposes of this.
  • technician while acting as an employee or agent of the facility.
Bills: SB40, SB104, SB136, SB164
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Judiciary Committee Feb 19th, 2025

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • part of this, if I were to... the civil part of this, if I were to file a civil complaint to sue someone
  • Barnes, can I just say real quick on the civil?
  • Ang, on the civil side.
  • Sure, so can I give you kind of an overview of where the civil side is... overview of where the civil
  • Because now I also have to meet a civil standard... now I also have to meet a civil standard in my criminal
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Judiciary Feb 7th, 2026 at 09:12 am

House Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • That would go through the usual civil process.
  • The Civil Rights Act would be implicated or not implicated for a second claim.
  • Rule 74 is a rule of civil procedure, which applies to appeals of administrative agencies.
  • Sexual violence impacts more than half of New Mexicans—over 1.1 million people—yet our current civil
  • I believe you're saying a civil procedure. So I think you need to synchronize... maybe. Yeah.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • As in any other civil case, jurisdiction and standing, as we know, are components of jurisdiction, and
  • We had a productive conversation, and I've committed to try to do a next draft that recognizes those
  • I don't think the rules of civil procedure speak to that. I'm pretty sure they don't.
  • The bill allows the business court to handle civil multi-district litigation for prompt jurisdictional
  • I mean, for example, there are lots of little changes to the civil practice and remedies code in the
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Environment Committee Meeting - 2026-04-16

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • However, the issue is this facility is located immediately next to neighborhoods.
  • facility facility uh<00:09:48.640> from<00:09:48.920> from<00:09:49.120> Gopher
  • their commitment to Minnesota's natural<00:28:41.440> resources.
  • I'm a licensed civil engineer with Moore Engineering.
  • be very civil about it and respectful. be very civil about it and respectful.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Energy Finance and Policy Committee 3/10/26

Energy Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • This is a civil tribal law matters.
  • Together, we have developed a 3-megawatt solar generation facility.
  • Together, we have developed a 3-megawatt solar generation facility.
  • > tribal remain committed to strong tribal remain committed to strong tribal partnerships<00:20
  • , shared commitment among regulators, shared commitment among regulators, utilities,<00:36:02.000
Summary: The committee approved the March 5, 2026 minutes and then took up House File 3458, as amended, which would exempt tribes from utility exclusive rights and assigned service areas. The bill’s author and the Upper Sioux community chairman said the measure was prompted by a dispute over a solar project at the tribal casino and argued the issue is really about tribal sovereignty, not solar, citing tribal civil regulatory authority and prior court cases. The amendment A1 was adopted before testimony. Testimony was split. Chairman Kevin Jensel of the Upper Sioux community strongly supported the bill, saying the tribe should not be forced to follow utility service territories and that the state should correct a long-standing omission in law. Derek Mo of the Minnesota Rural Electric Association opposed the bill, warning it would undermine the regulatory compact, reliability, long-term planning, and financing for electric service, especially in tribal areas. Justin Johns of East Central Energy also opposed the bill, but emphasized that many cooperatives have productive tribal partnerships and said his co-op has worked successfully with the Mille Lacs Band on solar, resilience, and workforce efforts; he cautioned that removing service obligations could leave difficult-to-serve areas underinvested. Members discussed whether the Public Utilities Commission process already underway should be allowed to resolve the dispute and whether the bill’s scope could extend beyond the current solar issue. The chair responded that the bill was a legislative approach to a problem that had not been resolved and said the amendment addressed concerns about removing the obligation to serve. A roll call was requested, and the committee voted to re-refer House File 3458, as amended, to the General Register.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

EEP Public Hearing - Thu Feb 19, 2026 @ 9:45 AM HST

Energy & Environmental Protection

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, they are trying to build a construction demolition waste gasification or pyrolysis type of facility
  • I want to state right now, this bill states it's for renewable production facilities within and outside
  • Thank you. ...I want to state right now, this bill states it's for renewable production facilities within
  • I want to state right now, this bill states it's for renewable production facilities within and outside
Summary: The committee on Energy and Environmental Protection heard testimony on three measures related to cleaner fuels. On HB 1986, which would require the Department of Transportation to adopt rules for a clean fuel standard by January 1, 2028 and include reporting and public informational sessions, testimony was largely supportive from state commissions, fuel companies, airlines, and other industry and advocacy groups. Supporters said the bill would create a long-term framework for reducing emissions and developing cleaner fuels in Hawaii. Opposition came from Energy Justice Network, which argued that so-called clean fuels are not carbon-free, would be costly, and could delay a needed transition to electrification. The department later said it was monitoring the bill and was concerned about costs. No vote or final action was taken in the hearing. The committee then heard HB 1694, a sustainable aviation fuel tax credit bill that would provide a per-gallon credit for SAF, cap annual credits at $20 million, require reporting, and sunset in 2035. The Department of Taxation testified on administration, while the Department of Transportation said it supported the measure as a short-term strategy to jump-start SAF until the clean fuel standard ramps up. Airlines, fuel companies, the Hawaii Food Industry Association, the Hawaii Renewable Fuels Coalition, and others supported the bill, saying it would send a market signal, help close the cost gap with conventional jet fuel, and encourage local production and investment. Opponents, including Energy Justice Network, Life of the Land, and Ted Metros, argued the bill would be expensive, could lock in a transitional fuel system, and would not produce enough fuel to meet demand. Committee members asked about the likely impact and the share of total fuel demand the credit could support; DOT said the supported gallons would be only a very small percentage of annual demand and that the credit was intended to work alongside the future clean fuel standard. Finally, the committee took up HB 1695 HD1 on renewable fuel, which expands the renewable fuels production tax credit. Testimony was again mixed but generally supportive from the Department of Transportation, Department of Taxation, Island Energy Services, airlines, the Tax Foundation, Pana Pacific, and the Hawaii Farm Bureau. Supporters said the measure would encourage local feedstock production, create agricultural opportunities, and help attract investment in renewable fuels. Pana Pacific requested an amendment to explicitly include camelina in the definition of renewable feedstocks. Opponents, including Energy Justice Network and Life of the Land, repeated concerns about cost, imported feedstocks, and the risk of undermining full electrification goals. The hearing transcript does not show any vote or final committee action on HB 1694 or HB 1695 HD1.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health May 12th, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • They don't apply to other types of healthcare facilities.
  • all healthcare facilities with over $7 million in sales.
  • So, it expands the current price transparency requirements to other healthcare facilities.
  • So you're saying if they come to your facility... Yes, ma'am.
  • So the surgeon provides, you know, we provide the service as far as the facility fee.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health May 12th, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • operate ethically and transparently, establishing criminal and civil principles. compliance, ensuring
  • It’s a practice in Western civilization to do that.
  • However, we rely on accredited tissue banks to provide cadaveric specimens for our training facilities
  • They could leave the state to attend other training facilities, which is not only costly but requires
  • This certification reflects a commitment to maintaining expertise and ensuring patient safety.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • We are committed to working towards that goal. Thank you.
  • keep the individuals in these facilities safe.
  • Examples of these senior living facilities include adult foster care facilities, assisted living, retirement
  • The facility may not waive copay, deductible, or coinsurance.
  • There was notification, price transparency, there was a facility fee, and there was a ban on the facility