Video & Transcript : 'spousal consent' :

Page 24 of 406
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Mar 25th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • fairness and equal treatment under the law, and for these reasons, I respectfully ask for your favorable consent
  • the Internet, how effective do you believe that this state-level legislation will be in addressing consent
  • It's the act of distributing sexually explicit images or videos of a person without their consent.
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

House in Session Apr 9th, 2025

Florida House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Dear Speaker, consideration of the bills on the consent calendar.
  • The bills on the consent calendar. Representative Garrison, you are recognized on the report.
  • be used in connection with anyone that terminates a pregnancy, and that is obtained with informed consent
  • This amendment is about making sure that the right action may Only be brought by and with the consent
  • A case like this and not have the consent of the mother.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session Apr 9th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • SB 400 by Coca-Cola relates to requiring council consent for a psychological or psychiatric examination
  • Council consent for a psychological or psychiatric examination, testing, or treatment conducted by a
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US House Floor Proceedings (Wednesday, July 22, 2026)

US Federal House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • >> I request unanimous consent to address the House for one minute. >> Without objection, the gentleman
  • ><c> to</c><00:08:01.039><c> address</c> I request unanimous consent to address I request unanimous consent
  • I ask three un consent to recognition?
  • </c><02:29:41.359><c> to</c> back my time, I ask unanimous consent to back my time, I ask unanimous consent
  • :44.720><c> into</c><04:05:44.960><c> the</c> unanimous consent to insert into the unanimous consent
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • up their employer's offer who are either on public coverage or uninsured, so if they do take up a spousal
Keywords: 987, senate, all
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • So if they do take up a spousal offer, fine; they don't pay for their employee... sorry, yeah, yeah,
Summary: The subcommittee heard a lengthy Department of Health Care Services presentation on the governor’s Medi-Cal budget, including a $229.1 billion total-funds proposal, projected Medi-Cal enrollment declines as redeterminations continue, and several major cost drivers such as managed care growth, Medicare-related costs, pharmacy spending, and changes tied to federal policy. Members focused heavily on the elimination of Prop. 56 dental supplemental payments beginning July 1, 2026, questioning the likely impact on provider participation and utilization. DHCS said it is completing the required rate reduction/access analysis for CMS, has been holding stakeholder meetings and issuing provider bulletins, but could not yet quantify the real-world effect. The committee also discussed a $50 million savings proposal tied to new hospice utilization management authority and asked about possible effects on emergency dental care and provider participation. The hearing then moved through the November 2025 family health estimate and several county and program administration issues, including CCS, GHPP, and Every Woman Counts. DHCS said family health costs are rising despite slight caseload declines because of higher utilization and medical costs, and members raised concerns about CCS website accessibility, county administrative funding, and the transition of youth aging out of CCS. The department said most CCS beneficiaries are also on Medi-Cal, that counties have long raised funding concerns, and that it had clarified use of maintenance-and-operations dollars to address some county workload issues. Members also asked about Every Woman Counts potentially seeing higher demand as Medi-Cal changes take effect; DHCS said that is possible and that the program has multiple funding sources including General Fund. A major portion of the hearing focused on provider taxes and federal changes under H.R. 1, especially the Medi-Cal managed care organization tax and the hospital quality assurance fee. DHCS explained that H.R. 1 restricts new or increased health care-related taxes, phases down allowable tax levels over time, and tightens “generally redistributive” rules, which could sharply reduce the state’s ability to use the MCO tax for Medi-Cal financing. Members asked whether the Legislature could amend Prop. 35 or whether voters would need to act; DHCS said a three-fourths legislative amendment may be possible if it aligns with the measure’s purpose, but the department is still evaluating options. The committee also discussed hospital financing, with DHCS describing recent increases in state-directed payments and the effect of H.R. 1 in capping those payments at Medicare levels, and the LAO noting the tradeoff between preserving provider taxes and maintaining Medi-Cal funding. The subcommittee also reviewed a series of DHCS budget change proposals and trailer bill items, including managed care final-rule implementation, managed care operations, a hospital value strategy, a one-year extension of skilled nursing facility financing, long-term care payment transparency, and interoperability/prior authorization requirements. Members repeatedly questioned the use of limited-term versus permanent positions, the overlap among proposals, and the timing of new financing reforms. DHCS said the SNF extension would preserve current workforce standards, sanctions, growth limits, and the SNF quality assurance fee while the department develops a broader 2027-28 redesign. No votes were taken; items were repeatedly held open for later action. Covered California then presented on the expiration of the federal enhanced premium tax credit and the resulting affordability crisis. The agency said Californians will lose about $2.5 billion in premium assistance for 2026, average premiums could nearly double for many enrollees, and as many as 400,000 people could eventually leave marketplace coverage. Open enrollment ended with 1.9 million sign-ups, down 3% from the prior year, with especially steep declines among middle-income consumers and increased movement into bronze plans. Covered California said the state’s $190 million affordability subsidy is helping lower-income enrollees retain coverage, but cannot fully replace the lost federal assistance. Members also asked about the Health Care Affordability Reserve Fund, repayment of loans from that fund, the status of federal review of California’s essential health benefits benchmark, and implementation of the new gender-affirming care benefit under AB 144.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • So if they do take up a spousal offer, fine, they don't pay for that employee—sorry, yeah, yeah—so they
Summary: The subcommittee heard an overview of the Department of Health Care Services’ proposed budget, including a $229.1 billion total-funds budget and projected Medi-Cal enrollment decline as redeterminations continue. Members focused heavily on the fiscal and programmatic effects of prior budget solutions and federal changes, especially the elimination of General Fund-supported Prop. 56 dental supplemental payments beginning July 1, 2026, the hospice utilization-management change, and the impact of reduced caseloads alongside rising health care costs. DHCS said it is still completing required access and rate-reduction analyses for the dental cuts and has been engaging stakeholders, but could not yet quantify the real-world effect on utilization or provider participation. The committee also reviewed the November 2025 Medi-Cal local assistance estimate, which shows higher General Fund spending despite lower enrollment, driven by managed care rate growth, Medicare cost growth, state-only claiming, and federal policy changes. The hearing then turned to provider taxes and federal H.R. 1 constraints, with extensive discussion of the MCO tax, the hospital quality assurance fee, and other health care-related taxes. DHCS explained that H.R. 1 phases down allowable tax levels and tightens “generally redistributive” rules, making the current MCO tax structure and the proposed higher hospital fee levels difficult or impossible to renew as originally designed. Staff and the LAO described the tradeoff between preserving Medi-Cal funding and avoiding higher costs on private providers and consumers. Members asked about options for preserving revenue, including possible amendments to Prop. 35 or returning to voters, and were told the department is still evaluating approaches while federal guidance remains in flux. The committee also reviewed hospital payment increases already implemented through state-directed payments, with DHCS noting that H.R. 1 will force those payments down to Medicare levels over time. Several budget change proposals were discussed and left open, including requests tied to the managed care final rule, managed care operations, hospital value strategy, long-term care payment transparency, and interoperability requirements. The committee also heard about a one-year trailer bill extension for skilled nursing facility financing, including continuation of the SNF workforce standards program, the SNF quality assurance fee, and annual rate growth, while the department develops a longer-term financing redesign for 2027-28. Members expressed skepticism about repeated rate reform efforts and questioned whether a one-year extension of the eliminated workforce quality incentive program should be restored during the transition. Finally, Covered California presented its budget and enrollment update, reporting that the expiration of the federal enhanced premium tax credit is expected to reduce affordability significantly, with average premiums roughly doubling for many enrollees and as many as 400,000 Californians potentially losing marketplace coverage over time. The exchange said California’s $190 million subsidy program is helping lower-income enrollees, but not enough to offset the federal loss, and it is also implementing a new gender-affirming care benefit and awaiting federal action on benchmark plan changes.
CO

Colorado 2026 Regular Session

Colorado Senate 2026 Legislative Day 017 Feb 2nd, 2026

Colorado Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> consent calendar. consent calendar. Senator<00:47:19.440><c> Roberts.
  • </c> consent calendar. consent calendar. &gt;&gt; Further<00:47:36.319><c> motion.
  • Is there any discussion on any of the bill on the consent calendar?
  • Governor's appointments consent calendar. Mr.
  • on the consent calendar.
Keywords: 981, all
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/25/2026 - Senate Government

Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • If your life is on the line, is the parental consent going to come above your health and your life?
  • This simply says it has to be on the actual agenda rather than the consent.
  • It doesn't prohibit cities in any way other than it cannot be on the consent agenda.
  • any way other than it cannot be on the consent agenda.
  • This is the bill that was removed from a consent agenda, I believe so. That one, right?
Committee: Senate Government
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/11/2026 - Senate Regulatory Affairs and Government Efficiency

Regulatory Affairs and Government Efficiency

Transcript Highlights:
  • The owner of the private property must consent of a motor vehicle that is located on private property
  • The owner of the private property must consent to unrestricted parking by the general public in its parking
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Education May 20th, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • I ask for unanimous support of this common-sense bill and ask that it be recommended to local consent
  • In Texas, we require parental consent on sex education.
  • They ignore parental age of consent laws and the mandated Texas instructional standard of abstinence
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session Mar 12th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Motion is adopted. 35 36 Senate of the 89th legislature regular session I ask the advice consent and
  • technology, especially artificial intelligence and machine learning has led 592 593 they did not consent
  • These manipulations, when used to create sexually explicit content without consent, can have devastating
  • If the person depicted has given explicit consent in writing and their consent must be informed.
  • It also includes a producing or distributing deep fake media without consent is classified as a. 607