Video & Transcript Research : 'utility fees'

Page 23 of 500
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • A facility that is connected outside of this state unless the Public Utility Commission determines that
  • Sections 4 and 5 of the bill are identical to the preemption language that was utilized in the TRCA.
  • There have been examples brought up about ETJ issues, annexation, impact fees, and what have you; we
  • They're one of the three legs of our stool, along with property taxes and utility revenues.
  • And I don't know if it's because of the revenue cap, but we've got impact fees.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government (Part II) May 26th, 2025

Local Government

Summary: The Senate Local Government Committee briefly convened and then immediately moved to recess. Senator Paxton made a motion to recess subject to the call of the chair, which was accepted. No bills, testimony, or substantive policy issues were discussed during the meeting. With no other business before the committee, it stood in recess subject to the call of the chair.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government (Part I) May 26th, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • The committee will be utilizing an electronic registration system.
  • The process is generally designed, however, for municipal utility districts in mind.
  • Okay, so you've got a special utility district.
  • And this has a taxing component, but there's also fees, right?
  • And this has a taxing component, but there's also fees, right? You could be, yes.
Summary: The committee heard and discussed several local-government-related bills, mostly with committee substitutes. House Bill 2731 would let certain border counties regulate roadside vendors selling live animals in unincorporated areas and along public rights-of-way; the substitute narrowed the bill to live animal sales only and excluded livestock and other roadside commerce. House Bill 3483 would streamline TCEQ review of special utility district revenue bonds by removing tax-bond requirements that do not apply to SUDs. House Bill 4308 would create a county industrial development district framework, limited in the substitute to certain counties including Fort Bend County, to help finance industrial sites and related infrastructure. House Bill 5663 would create a Wood County Hospital District memory-care-focused district with no taxing power, intended to help pursue grants and other funding for a new facility. House Bill 4582 addressed attainable housing in Dallas and Tarrant counties, allowing local reimbursement tools for developers under a uniform, optional framework. House Bill 5509 would let municipalities suspend or revoke a hotel’s certificate of occupancy if law enforcement and a criminal court both find probable cause of human trafficking, with the substitute adding due-process protections. House Bill 1532 created a Lake Houston dredging and maintenance district funded by revenue from dredged material sales and revenue bonds, with no taxing authority or eminent domain. House Bill 23, heard as pending business, would revise the process for local governments to rescind development documents and adjust third-party reviewer liability and eligibility rules. House Bill 4580, concerning property tax exemptions for charitable organizations such as the Houston Rodeo, was amended to remove language about exempting revenue from property use and instead focus on land used for agricultural, youth, and educational support. Public testimony was generally supportive on the bills heard, with witnesses including county officials, utility and water association representatives, hotel industry representatives, and housing developers. Several speakers emphasized the need for faster financing or permitting tools, flood mitigation, housing affordability, anti-trafficking enforcement, or local economic development. Some members raised concerns about scope, precedent, consultation with affected senators, and due process, particularly on House Bill 4582 and House Bill 5509, but the committee largely accepted the committee substitutes as improvements. No public testimony was offered on several bills, and most measures were left pending before later being voted out. The committee took recorded votes on multiple pending bills and reported them favorably, often with committee substitutes adopted in lieu of the filed versions. House Bills 1532, 2731, 3483, 5509, 5663, and 4580 were reported out, with 1532 and 5663 passing unanimously and 3483, 2731, and 5509 also receiving favorable votes despite one present-not-voting on 3483. House Bill 23 and House Bill 4582 were left pending subject to call of the chair. The committee then recessed until adjournment or later.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Committee on Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs Apr 7th, 2025

Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • How do they even know that the utility has...?
  • The bill is considered if I have a utility taking over a defunct or inept utility, and then you get an
  • It could be that getting service from a neighboring utility, retail public utility, whether it's another
  • So it's not for new utilities.
  • Expanded to include a larger subset of the water utilities.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs Apr 7th, 2025

Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • The communication consisted of the application and required fee.
  • or inept utility and then you get an expedited CCN that impacts that new utility provider that just took
  • Getting service from a neighboring utility, retail public utility, whether it's another CCN holder or
  • Some utilities straddled the edge of the EAA.
  • So it's not for new utilities.
Summary: The Senate Committee on Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs heard several water-related bills, with testimony focused on drinking water quality, groundwater contamination notice, flood infrastructure funding, water rights conservation, and utility service areas. SB 1662 would limit TCEQ’s advance notice to public water systems to no more than 24 hours before testing after a consumer complaint, to reduce the chance of temporary treatment affecting results. SB 1663 would allow TCEQ to notify private well owners, groundwater conservation districts, and nearby residents by direct means about known groundwater contamination, rather than relying mainly on first-class mail and annual reporting. SB 2124 would move the deadline for publishing the Texas Groundwater Protection Committee’s annual report from April 1 to June 1. Witnesses on the first two bills described long-running water quality problems and delayed notice in their communities and supported the measures. No opposition was recorded, and each bill was left pending for a later vote. The committee also heard SB 1967, which would expand eligibility for Flood Infrastructure Fund financing to multipurpose projects that both reduce flooding and create water supply. Senator Hinojosa and Hidalgo County representatives described the Delta Reclamation Project as a shovel-ready example that would capture flood and drainage water, treat it, and produce new potable supply while also providing detention and flood mitigation. A Sierra Club witness also supported the bill, saying such projects could help manage floodwaters and reduce polluted discharges to bays and estuaries. The bill was left pending. A lengthy and divided discussion followed on SB 1413, which would expand the streamlined expedited release process for landowners seeking removal from a water or sewer CCN in additional counties. Senator Nichols said the bill was a property-rights measure aimed at legacy monopolies and bad actors who use CCNs to hold landowners hostage, while supporters described cases where developers could not get timely service, including fire flow, or were asked to fund infrastructure without reasonable recoupment. Opponents from rural water corporations and utility associations argued the bill would undermine investment in water infrastructure, strand debt, and weaken the return on planned expansion. PUC and TCEQ resource witnesses explained that compensation is handled case by case through appraisal and can include stranded costs, planning, design, construction, and some legal fees, but members noted the statute is unclear and discussed possible committee substitute language. Public testimony was closed with the bill left pending. Later, SB 1624 would allow the Texas Water Trust within the Texas Water Bank to hold donated water rights for conservation purposes and protect them from use-it-or-lose-it cancellation, and SB 863 would address Edwards Aquifer utilities that straddle the aquifer boundary by allowing them to continue using Edwards water within their certificated areas under specified conditions. Both bills were laid out, received no public opposition in the hearing, and were left pending.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Housing Committee Meeting - 2025-04-01

Housing Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • The infrastructure, including roads, and public utilities is halfway there, and we will complete those
  • roads and utilities by the end of this summer or early fall.
  • The community owner's responsibility includes things like tree care and utility maintenance.
  • Most of these increases are uncontrolled; they're coming from property tax increases, utility rate increases
  • There are a couple points, a few points we do support, perhaps with some tweaking: limiting the late fee
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Housing Finance and Policy Committee 4/1/25

Housing Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • The infrastructure, including roads and public utilities, is halfway there, and we will complete those
  • roads and utilities by the end of this summer or early fall.
  • <00:24:40.840> is including roads and Public Utilities is including roads and Public Utilities
  • yet by the end of roads and utilities yet by the end of this<00:24:44.799> summer<00:24:45.080
  • are a couple points, or a few points, we do support, perhaps with some tweaking: limiting the late fee
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee 3/17/26

Public Safety Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • The section further repeals the prohibition on law enforcement charging a respondent for processing fees
  • The section further repeals the prohibition on law enforcement charging a respondent for processing fees
  • The section further repeals the prohibition on law enforcement charging a respondent for processing fees
  • The section further repeals the prohibition on law enforcement charging a respondent for processing fees
  • On law enforcement charging a respondent for processing fees for storage of firearms, those that are
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Apr 1st, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • To be clear, this bill does not limit or cap any of these utility rates or fees.
  • House Bill 91 does not apply to private utility companies; it only applies to municipally owned utility
  • imposed by their local utilities.
  • As part of our commitment to these principles, most municipally owned utilities already post full fee
  • They can utilize the nonprofit attorneys as well to do this.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee 3/10/25

Agriculture Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • requests for that program, so the demand really is clear that people want to take opportunities to utilize
  • to use utilize this and just<00:41:36.440> to<00:41:36.839> give<00:41:37.040> further
  • 00:43:35.119> to assistance funding so really want to assistance funding so really want to utilize
  • this time during session to utilize this time during session to remain<00:43:38.400> Nimble<00
  • <00:48:55.599> and opposed by cities Gas Utilities and opposed by cities Gas Utilities and
Bills: HF1704
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/25/2026 - Senate Regulatory Affairs and Government Efficiency

Regulatory Affairs and Government Efficiency

Transcript Highlights:
  • would, that fee would be. have a license with a fee that would be self-sustaining.
  • Fees from time to time really make a lot of sense.
  • Those come out of nurses' fees. There is funding for that.
  • Um, so the impact fees, I just first want to be clear that the impact fees are not the big bad city charging
  • Just to give you an example of some of these fees.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Transportation Apr 22nd, 2025

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • DPS, commercial division needed a building, so they've been utilizing the old TxDOT facility.
  • The bill does not increase any fines or any fees.
  • What it does essentially, it utilizes the VIN numbers, the license plates, the color of the vehicle,
  • you that exact same car, but it helps you narrow down different aspects of the car so that you can utilize
  • The committee substitute increases the permit fee from $1,200 to $2,000 and requires that it be split
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Appropriations Apr 22nd, 2026

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Fees in there. Pretty sneaky. All right. I see no hidden fees.
  • It authorizes a supplemental fee to fund pursuit intervention technology.
  • It's a $2 fee for each renewal, which is about 50 cents a year.
  • And this small fee does that. And I agree with what you said.
  • I've got to pay $60 for my hybrid fee this month.
Summary: The House Appropriations Committee met on April 22 and first considered Chairman Beaulieu’s House Bill 646, a constitutional amendment limiting the amount of State General Fund money that may be appropriated in a fiscal year. After adopting a set of amendments creating the Louisiana Income Tax Elimination Fund and making conforming changes, the committee reported the bill favorably as amended. The companion bill, House Bill 824, which establishes the growth limit formula based on CPI, medical CPI, and population change, was also amended and reported favorably as amended. Supporters framed both measures as a way to keep spending within recurring revenues and create a path toward reducing or eliminating the state income tax. The committee then reported favorably as amended House Bill 1157, creating the Louisiana State Infrastructure Fund to help finance infrastructure-related projects, with testimony that it would leverage private and federal dollars and initially focus on rail, port, road, and bridge projects. House Bill 316, which provides a framework for student literacy reforms for grades four through eight, was presented as having no new cost because the Department of Education said the work was already covered by existing resources; it was reported favorably. House Bill 549, creating the Bayou Growth Opportunity Workforce Program to provide employer-based training grants, also received support from business groups and was reported favorably as amended. House Bill 1129, dealing with the sale of state-owned surplus movable property, drew support from Louisiana auctioneers who argued local firms should be allowed to bid on the state’s auction contract instead of relying on an out-of-state vendor; it was reported favorably. House Bill 873, which would fund pursuit intervention technology through a $2 driver’s license fee, generated significant concern about adding fees and whether the money should instead come from existing budgets. After discussion of the proposed technologies and training, the committee deferred the bill voluntarily to work on alternatives, including a possible sunset and other funding options. Finally, House Bill 752, which would change the timing and duration of regular legislative sessions by joint rule, was reported without action after members noted the revised fiscal note showed a decrease in state general fund expenditures. The meeting then adjourned.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Higher Education Finance and Policy Committee 4/16/26

Higher Education Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • So this revises that cap and sets it at either the lesser of the average tuition and fees charged by
  • Um, above tuition, above fees, above room and board, above all of those things.
  • ,<01:08:47.120> your or less, your tuition, your fees, your or less, your tuition, your fees
  • They will only be covered by the North Star Promise, which only covers the tuition and fees.
  • <01:29:34.320> at<01:29:34.560> a tuition and fees at a tuition and fees at a public
Bills: HF4252
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/3/26

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • The assets in there are shut off from the bank, except maybe, I guess, fees help with cash flow.
  • he's questioning what what kind of fees he's questioning what what kind of fees or<00:37:52.880>
  • card benefits they have uh or utilize card benefits they have uh or utilize them<01:08:19.520>
  • Consumers are inundated with fees all the time on the internet as they are buying things.
  • Consumers are inundated with fees all the time on the internet as they are buying things.
Summary: The committee first approved the minutes from February 26, after correcting the header date to Thursday, February 26. It then took up House File 36004, as amended by the author’s technical A1 amendment. Representative Van Binsbergen described the bill as a change to statute governing bulk delivery of nonoxygenated fuel, especially for boats and other watercraft, to allow direct delivery to vehicles rather than requiring transport of fuel in containers or removal of boats from the water. Members generally supported the concept, citing convenience for lake users, reduced travel and potential invasive species spread, and fewer spill risks, but the chair said the bill would be laid over pending additional clarification from the State Fire Marshal’s Office and other agencies. House File 2236 was then introduced as a vehicle bill for possible future omnibus use and laid over without testimony or opposition. The committee also heard House File 3709, which would allow Minnesota banks and credit unions to offer custodial accounts for digital assets such as cryptocurrency. The authors framed the bill as a consumer-protection and competitiveness measure that would let local institutions keep pace with customer demand and prevent Minnesotans from relying on out-of-state or offshore providers. Testimony from the Department of Commerce and credit union representatives supported the bill, saying it would level the playing field, keep digital assets under Minnesota oversight, and help local institutions remain relevant; one witness said significant liquidity had been leaving local communities for outside exchanges. Questions from members focused on whether the accounts would be NCUA-insured, how the bill related to unclaimed property, and whether the policy goal was consumer protection or simply preserving bank relevance. Several members expressed support but also cautioned about crypto volatility, scams, and the need to avoid turning credit unions into exchanges. The discussion ended without a final vote in the excerpt, with the bill still under committee consideration.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 2/24/26

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • violation of those rights because of the chilling effect it has on people's ability to exercise and utilize
  • Representative Long added that he also worries about the attorney’s fee piece and apologized for not
  • The ways that public and private entities collect, utilize, and share our personal data have real implications