Video & Transcript Research : 'special needs'

Page 23 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Ways & Means Apr 14th, 2025

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • These groups include elderly groups, special needs groups, and religious groups.
  • We don't need the fairgrounds; quite honestly, we don't need the promotion.
  • We don't need our guest tax dollars going into this because it's simply not needed.
  • We need tools like this, so cities in my district need tools like this. So thank you, members.
  • They need more hotels; they need a convention center.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Those are the kids that need a little bit of extra.
  • We need context and perspective. A pregnancy resource center is a.
  • I read through it to double check if need be.
  • That we just need to clean the bad things out of the library.
  • We need to allow Representative Norwood to come over here for a special phone call from the governor.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Chamber Meeting Feb 14th, 2026 at 01:49 pm

New Mexico House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • I have two very special guests with me.
  • I see the need for that too, and it does matter.
  • My arms need to get longer. It didn't help. My arms need to get longer. Mr.
  • I do think we need proper procedures when we are looking at incidents...
  • The clerk needs an agenda. Any announcements? Gentlelady from Santa Fe. Mr.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WAL Public Hearing - Tue Feb 10, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST

Water & Land

Transcript Highlights:
  • We do need to get read your testimony.
  • That's why we Northshore so special.
  • We need to >> Okay. Thank you very much. We need to move<00:45:34.160> on.
  • One process, one EA to satisfy either their needs or 343 needs.
  • were needed to implement this.
Summary: The committee on Water and Land met on February 10, 2026, with Chair Mark Hashem outlining strict testimony rules and noting a time constraint because of later hearings and floor session obligations. The committee then took up several bills, hearing mostly supportive testimony on HB 1881 relating to land use, HB 2218 relating to DLNR/community management, and HB 1956 relating to freshwater waves, while HB 1845 relating to the Land Use Commission drew legal concerns and opposition. HB 2151 relating to building materials had no substantive testimony presented in the excerpt, and the committee moved through it quickly. On HB 1881, testimony focused on protecting North Shore lands from overdevelopment. A supporter described the area as valuable precisely because it remains largely undeveloped, and a member asked whether the bill’s restrictions on “finculars” would affect existing or future private residential installations; the response suggested the bill was aimed at future commercial uses and that grandfathering or personal-use exceptions might be possible, but the exact wording would need legal refinement. HB 2218 received broad support from OHA, DLNR, Kua, Sierra Club, Hui Maka Aana, the Honlay Initiative, and others, who said the measure would expand community-based co-management across DLNR divisions, build on existing park partnerships, and produce real benefits such as better stewardship, safer access, local jobs, and stronger community trust. Members asked about the bill’s five-year review structure, how multiple community groups would be handled, and whether the model could apply to ocean or nearshore areas; DLNR said the board would retain authority, agreements would be non-exclusive and subject to review, and the department was still working through how the approach would function across different divisions and marine settings. For HB 1956, the Attorney General offered technical comments, urging clearer definitions of “residing” and “freshwater way,” clearer timing for citations and arrests, and more explicit procedural safeguards and agency roles. On HB 1845, the Attorney General and Land Use Commission raised concerns that the bill could conflict with constitutional protections for important agricultural lands and could not be reconciled with existing voting requirements; the LUC also said commissioners cannot vote by proxy under sunshine law and warned that the bill could allow too few commissioners to approve major boundary changes. Members questioned how the bill would work in counties without designated important agricultural lands, and the LUC explained that Kauai is the only county to have completed the IAL process, while the broader statutory process remains county-driven and has been the subject of litigation. No votes or final committee actions were taken in the excerpt.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/28/2026 - House Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • We should be supplying to our soldiers what they need. However, when it comes to... They need.
  • We have FUDs areas all over the state that need clean.
  • I need new glasses. Mr.
  • In rural Arizona, people need driver licenses to work. They need to vote. They need health care.
  • Chair, is they need VSOs.
Summary: The committee first heard House Bill 2348, which would appropriate state general fund money in FY 2027 for Arizona Department of Emergency and Military Affairs projects including wireless networking at training centers, a reimbursement program for service members without government computers, lodging and kind for service members, and HVAC upgrades and maintenance. Two amendments were considered: the Marquez Amendment, which filled in dollar amounts for the appropriations, failed; and the Gillette Amendment, which restricted certain networking equipment for national security reasons, removed the reimbursement program, revised the lodging language, and tied some funding intentions to compliance, passed. After extensive testimony from the sponsor and several Army Reserve and National Guard witnesses about lack of Wi-Fi, inadequate lodging, safety concerns from long drives, and poor HVAC at joint facilities, the committee approved HB 2348 as amended on a 4-3 vote. The committee then considered HCR 2016, a ballot referral that would cap precinct size at 2,500 voters and eliminate county authority to use vote centers, emergency voting centers, and certain on-site early voting options. The sponsor said the measure was intended to restore precinct-based voting and let voters decide. County officials and election advocates opposed it, arguing that vote centers and early voting provide flexibility, are more cost-effective in many counties, and are necessary where geography, staffing, and facility availability make precinct voting difficult. After debate over local control, voter choice, and the practicality of precincting, the committee gave HCR 2016 a 4-3 do-pass recommendation. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 2165, which exempts veterans from Arizona State Parks admission fees, and adopted the Marquez Amendment to extend the exemption to active military members, National Guard members, and reserve-unit members, with alternative ID options. Arizona State Parks testified in neutral, saying it supports veterans but is concerned about revenue losses; it estimated that even a modest share of veteran visits could reduce revenue by about $1.8 million annually. The sponsor said the bill was prompted by constituent requests and was meant to help veterans enjoy outdoor recreation and therapeutic opportunities. The committee then approved HB 2165 as amended on a vote of 4-0, with some members absent or not voting.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Natural Resources May 21st, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Bell of Montgomery relating to requirements for the addition of contiguous territory to a certain special
  • , to certain special districts.
  • The issue when somebody maybe had inherited some land or, or needed for financial reasons to sell off
  • The district experienced delays due to drought and the permitting process that prompted the need to seek
  • Diverting water from a reservoir is needed for the purposes of repairing, maintaining, or rehabilitating
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs May 6th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • They need to register with the city so the city knows where they are.
  • Okay, so do... ...we need to do.
  • This may not be the solution, but we need one. Thank you.
  • We need the points.
  • We need to look out for our constituents on this.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 24th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • couple of weeks ago, the little barista at Starbucks, the city secretary, those kinds of folks who need
  • House Bill 3892 is exactly the fix we need. The bill doesn't change the law.
  • Fairness to land development in Texas and unlocking the housing supply Texans need.
  • Our regulations are exactly what you need.
  • It's also creating areas where the water utility would need to stop over-sizing because of that Swiss
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 24th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, this bill demonstrates Texas' commitment to addressing affordable housing needs without making any
  • carrying costs and accruing interest and other items while we wait on these approvals for these really needed
  • Members, this bill clarifies that a district created by the conversion of a special district.
  • But currently, if the law is such that in the codes, individuals need to submit a statement of the tree
  • Have come together to protect this special bird, and passing this bill would completely undermine all
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • God knows we need it.
  • House Bill 2109 is needed. It's needed to help fix a flaw in the state water planning process.
  • House Bill 2109 is needed. It's needed to help fix a flaw in the state water planning process.
  • the future, and we may not need it in the future.
  • So you do need additional water supplies.
Summary: The Committee on Natural Resources heard House Bill 2109, which would remove certain long-proposed reservoir projects from the state water plan after 50 years without progress. Chairman Van Deaver and many landowners, local officials, timber interests, and conservation advocates testified in support, arguing that the Marvin Nichols Reservoir has burdened Northeast Texas landowners for decades with the threat of eminent domain, depressed property values, and uncertainty over homes, farms, ranches, schools, churches, and cemeteries. Supporters also said the project would flood tens of thousands of acres, require extensive mitigation, harm timber and agriculture, and that Texas now has better alternatives such as conservation, reuse, aquifer storage and recovery, and desalination. Several members expressed sympathy for the affected families and questioned whether a project could remain in the plan indefinitely without progress. Opposition came from North Texas water interests, including the North Texas Commission, Tarrant Regional Water District, and the Texas Water Association, who argued that the bill would interfere with the state’s long-term water planning process and remove needed future supply options for a fast-growing region. They said Region C faces major projected shortages by 2070, that conservation and reuse have already delayed the need for new supplies, and that reservoirs remain one tool in the state’s water-planning toolbox. TWDB staff explained the existing inter-regional conflict process and noted that the substitute would affect several unique reservoir sites, not just Marvin Nichols. After testimony, Chairman Van Deaver closed by urging passage of the bill, but the committee withdrew the substitute and left HB 2109 pending. The committee then took up House Bill 5188, a brackish groundwater bill. The author said the bill would reduce permitting burdens for wells in designated brackish groundwater production zones, and the committee substitute added requirements on monitoring, groundwater-rights ownership, and allocation of pumpage limits while removing some exclusions and export-fee provisions. Texas Wildlife Association testified against the bill, warning that the exemptions could weaken groundwater conservation districts’ ability to protect freshwater resources and surface-owner rights. San Antonio Water System testified in favor, saying brackish groundwater is a key future supply and that the substitute would help speed development of desalination and brackish projects. The Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts testified neutrally but raised concerns about reduced district oversight, especially around injection-well exclusions and the loss of export fees, and said discussions on the bill were ongoing.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Our infrastructure, God knows we need it.
  • And you do not need to come take my 172.
  • future, and we may not need it in the future.
  • So you do need additional water supplies.
  • It's needed; we cannot lose Red River County.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm gonna need you to say that in your Trump... Thank you. Look, we really appreciate it.
  • But we need water. We need water. water and the Rio Grande River ain't cutting it.
  • Prior legislation requires planning groups to consider ASR for areas with significant water needs and
  • We need this bill. Thank you. Representative Bell. I was just listening to your...
  • This time recognizes representatives. we need to close. I close. Thank you.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Education Apr 15th, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • So this needs to be something that.
  • Do we need a law?
  • Sometimes they need us to say, this is OK. And then they do it.
  • needs, which can affect their behavior and learning outcomes.
  • Special education law is incredibly complicated and advocates need specific knowledge to ensure good
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Education Apr 15th, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • Everyone agrees that needs to be taught appropriately.
  • The student I mentioned earlier did not need to be referred to an I.T. process; the student didn't have
  • a learning disability; the student simply needed glasses.
  • improve our vision screening process as part of our individualized student interventions, but the need
  • They need support without a systemic structure.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Transportation Funding Apr 14th, 2025

S/C on Transportation Funding

Transcript Highlights:
  • Trains there can't run over 10 miles an hour because tracks and bridges need to be upgraded.
  • But we need one more partner: you.
  • I just need you to stick to your script. That's fine, Mr. Chairman. I'll do that.
  • No, this is, what we've been doing is wrong; it needs to stop.
  • There are no witnesses and one resource witness, if needed. Members?
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Judiciary Committee Apr 9th, 2025

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Police need some help, and there needs to be some consequences. This is what we came up with.
  • The person said it needed replacing.
  • They also found some things that needed to be corrected.
  • They need dual nationality to do that.
  • He saw a need. He met the need. He transported a... need. He met the need.