Transcript Highlights:

• That bill has seven votes. That bill has seven votes.
• Not voting. Dixon, not voting. Brian. Dumao. Aye. Brian. Aye.
• The vote is 7-0. AB 1137 by Assembly Member Krell. The vote is 7-0. Brian, aye. DeMaio? Not voting.
• The vote is 7-2. Dixon? No. DeMaio? No. Irwin? Not voting. Ortega? Aye. Petrie-Norris? Not voting.
• The vote is 8-0. DeMaio? No. DeMaio, no. Irwin? Not voting. Petrie-Norris? Irwin, not voting.

Summary: The committee first heard AB 56, which would require social media platforms to display a warning label about potential mental health harms from prolonged use, with amendments shortening the initial warning and allowing immediate access to the platform. The author and supporters, including a parent who lost a daughter to suicide and a therapist, argued that social media contributes to teen anxiety, self-harm, and other harms and that families need clearer public health information. Opponents from tech and civil liberties groups argued the bill would be ineffective, burdensome, and likely unconstitutional, saying it would create warning fatigue and should be replaced by more targeted tools and digital literacy measures. Several members discussed emergency access concerns, language access, and whether the warning should be more actionable; the bill was moved on a 9-0 vote to the Judiciary Committee. The committee then took up AB 358, which would amend CalECPA to allow law enforcement, with the victim’s consent, to inspect certain abandoned tracking or surveillance devices found in a victim’s home, vehicle, or personal property without first obtaining a warrant. The author and a San Diego prosecutor said the bill is narrowly tailored to devices used solely for spying and is intended to help stalking and domestic violence survivors act quickly before evidence is lost. Opponents from EFF and the ACLU warned the bill would weaken warrant protections, create a loophole around CalECPA, and reduce transparency and accountability. Members debated Fourth Amendment issues, abandonment, and the practical need for rapid access; the bill passed the committee on a 9-0 vote to Appropriations. The committee also heard AB 1137, which builds on last year’s CSAM reporting law by allowing any user to report child sexual abuse material, requiring clearer reporting mechanisms, adding human review in some cases, and mandating third-party audits and public reporting. Supporters, including survivor advocates and a parent of a child victim, said the bill would reduce the burden on survivors and improve removal of abusive content. Tech industry opponents said they support the goal but objected to the human-review mandate, public audit disclosures, and enforcement provisions, arguing they could create security risks and compliance burdens. Members generally supported the bill’s intent but raised questions about audit frequency and human review; the bill was moved on call with seven votes at the time of the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• And I appreciate your green vote on this or your 'I' vote. Thank you.
• I'll be voting green for this. Thank you.
• So please vote green.
• So, members, this is an easy vote.
• Instead, on a party-line vote with Democrats voting yes in committee and Republicans voting no, we showed

Transcript Highlights:

• I ask for a green vote on this amendment.
• Vote no.
• I would encourage you to vote no. I vote no on this amendment. Further discussion on the amendment?
• You should be okay to vote for it. I encourage you to vote green on this bill.
• Please vote no, members.

Transcript Highlights:

• But if you have no intention on voting for the amendment by all means, you know, vote no on both.
• I voted yes on a death to committees voting. Yes. And one committee in another.
• So I'm going to vote in favor of the amendment.
• Yes, by your Vote CS for SB 316.
• So we ask that you vote yes on this bill.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:20:24.919><c> but</c> one vote although probably get voted but one vote although probably get
• any votes or present any no votes any votes or reservations<00:48:42.880><c> hearing</c><00:48:43.119
• Chair votes aye. Vice Chair votes aye. Senator Chang votes aye. Senator Meli votes yes.
• Of the five members present, any no votes, any votes, or reservations?
• </c><01:26:29.520><c> any</c><01:26:29.760><c> votes</c> members present any no votes any votes members

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The committee first took up SB 534, a measure concerning development in Kakaʻako Makai involving the Hawaii Community Development Authority and the Office of Hawaiian Affairs. The chairs explained that the hearing was decision-making only and no testimony would be accepted, though members could ask clarifying questions. The chair outlined amendments to clarify HCDA’s approval process, require an environmental impact statement before residential development proposals are submitted, require Department of Health documentation on hazardous substances, and specify that only OHA-owned parcels would be eligible for certain residential development with a 400-foot height limit and maximum floor area ratio of 10.0. The amendments also addressed affordability, owner-occupancy, association fees, and a special fund, while noting Attorney General concerns that the fee could be construed as a tax and suggesting further review by Judiciary and Ways and Means. Members discussed the affordability threshold, with one senator suggesting 160% AMI instead of 140% due to high housing costs and concern that essential workers could be priced out. Others raised concerns about Native Hawaiian affordability, the long-term effect of perpetuity restrictions, and whether the process would protect OHA’s interests. An HCDA representative said 140% AMI was used in existing reserve housing rules and that lower thresholds could make development economically infeasible. OHA and other supporters said the proposal was still early in planning and emphasized the need for public hearings, community input, and compliance with environmental and remediation standards. The committees voted to pass SB 534 with amendments: Water and Land approved it 4-1, and Hawaiian Affairs also adopted the chair’s recommendation, with one member excused and one voting no. The meeting then moved to SB 3, relating to water resource management. The bill would authorize the Commission on Water Resource Management to retain independent legal counsel, create an executive director position, allow challenges to emergency orders under certain conditions, establish fines for water use offenses, and revise emergency and shortage declaration procedures; Red Hill-related provisions were noted as removed from this version. Testimony was largely supportive, including from DLNR, the Board of Water Supply, OHA, and Sierra Club, with OHA stressing the measure’s importance to Native Hawaiian water rights and past litigation. A Department of Hawaiian Home Lands representative supported the bill with amendments and recommended explicit language directing the commission chair or designee to advocate for water rights and reservations for homelands. The chair indicated the committees would use the prior Senate-passed version as the basis for further action, and the discussion then moved on to SB 130, a search-and-rescue reimbursement bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• I think who voted for what is not a matter for the people of Minnesota.
• I think who voted for what is not a matter for the people of Minnesota.
• I think who voted for what is not a matter for the people of Minnesota.
• You said a strong bipartisan vote on that bill in the Senate chamber.
• You said a strong bipartisan vote on that bill in the Senate chamber.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• All members vote who desire to vote. Thank you. Thank you, members.
• All members vote who desire to vote. Clerk will close the roll and tally the votes.
• We actually have an additional vote, many votes.
• If you can vote no on a coauthor. All members vote who desire to vote.
• All members vote who desire to vote. Clerk will close the roll and tally the vote.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I vote yes. To Texas, I vote yes. Vice Chair Lopez? Aye.
• I vote yes. To Texas, I vote yes. Vice Chair Lopez? Aye. Chair Martinez.
• A voice vote on the motion, please. All right. A voice vote. A voice vote on the motion, please.
• And with that, I vote aye. Thank you. And with that, I vote aye. Thank you.
• vote present today.

Committee: House House Rural Economic Development Committee of Reference

Summary: The committee first took up HB 2950, which would allow a governing body to approve a tourism improvement area to promote tourism and lodging. Supporters from the Arizona Lodging and Tourism Association, Visit Yuma, and Visit Phoenix said the bill would give communities a voluntary, locally controlled tool to market destinations, attract events, and strengthen rural and urban tourism economies without raising taxes on residents. Members discussed tourism’s economic importance in places like Yuma and other rural communities, and the bill was moved forward with a due pass recommendation on a 7-0 vote. The committee then held a presentation on rural economic development in Pinal County, focusing on the Lucid Motors project and its workforce partnership with Central Arizona College. Speakers from the Arizona Commerce Authority, Central Arizona College, and Lucid described the Drive48 training program, the creation of a skilled workforce pipeline, and broader economic impacts such as higher wages, job creation, and related growth in housing and infrastructure. The committee also read proclamations recognizing Lucid Motors and Central Arizona College for their contributions to economic development in rural Arizona. Finally, the committee heard HB 2946, which revises development fee requirements and prohibits development fees on accessory dwelling units. The sponsor argued the bill was intended to address housing affordability and reduce burdens on families and builders, while cities, towns, the League of Arizona Cities and Towns, and municipal attorneys opposed it, saying it would shift costs from growth to existing taxpayers and weaken the principle that growth should pay for growth. An amendment in the chair’s name was adopted to remove county-related provisions and make clarifying changes. The amended bill was then passed with a 4-1 vote and two members voting present.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:13:38.800><c> The</c><00:13:39.440><c> CD1</c> vote on this one. The CD1 vote on this one.
• We have a bill. vote? Yes, please. Chair Chang. Uh, the vote? Yes, please. Chair Chang.
• </c><00:14:25.839><c> Yes,</c> vote on behalf of the house? Yes, vote on behalf of the house?
• </c><00:16:57.120><c> So</c><00:16:57.440><c> chair's</c> the vote? We are. So chair's the vote?
• Chair votes: I. Representative Purick is excused. May I take the vote on behalf of the Senate?

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• To Senator Leak, this is a very good bill that I voted for and will continue to vote for, but taking
• By your vote, SB 8 is reported favorably.
• By your vote, SB 726 is reported favorably.
• I will be voting no today.
• I will be voting no today.

Committee: Senate Rules

Summary: The Rules Committee took up a large agenda of bills, with many measures reported favorably after brief explanations, amendments, and testimony. Early bills included CS/SB 658 on lien waivers and releases, which was amended to preserve enforceability despite form differences and then passed; CS/CS/SB 736 on brownfields redevelopment, which drew support from business and redevelopment interests and passed; and CS/SB 1002 on utility service restrictions, which was amended to bar certain building or fire code provisions affecting fuel-source choices and then passed despite opposition from environmental advocates. The committee also advanced CS/CS/SB 1132 on right-to-repair for certain equipment, where manufacturers, dealer representatives, and industry groups warned the bill could undermine dealer networks and existing repair programs, while supporters argued it would improve consumer access and help farmers and equipment owners. The bill still passed. Other measures reported favorably included CS/SB 1378 on restitution for leaving the scene of property-damage crashes, CS/CS/SB 768 on foreign-country controlling interests in health care licensing, CS/SB 772 on school access to glucagon for diabetes emergencies, CS/SB 1400 on removal of nonconsensual altered sexual depictions, and CS/SB 1696 on transportation network company impersonation and transit funding. A major portion of the meeting focused on affordable housing. CS/SB 1730, a follow-up to the Live Local Act, made several changes to zoning, height, density, parking, moratorium, and enforcement provisions, with members raising concerns about parking reductions, attorney’s fees, local control, and impacts in the Keys and other sensitive areas. Supporters said the bill closes loopholes and improves workforce housing implementation, while some witnesses urged additional exemptions for areas of critical state concern. The bill was reported favorably after amendment. Later, the committee considered several bills from Senator Leak, including CS/SB 576 on service of process, CS/SB 606 on public lodging and food service establishments, and CS/SB 1164 on electronic delivery of landlord-tenant notices. CS/SB 606 drew substantial debate over whether hotels and extended-stay properties should be able to remove nonpaying guests without treating them like residential tenants; the sponsor said the bill clarifies transient occupancy and removes mandatory arrest provisions, and it passed. CS/SB 1164, which allows email notice delivery by agreement, passed despite concerns from tenant advocates that the bill should include clearer consent and safeguards. The committee also approved CS/SB 1374 on school district reporting of educator arrests and misconduct, CS/SB 940 on third-party restaurant reservation sales, and began hearing CS/SB 1690 on surrendered infants, which would authorize infant safety devices or “baby boxes” as a legal surrender option, with supportive testimony from proponents describing crisis situations and the need for anonymous surrender options.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> If not, we will be taking a voice vote. If not, we will be taking a voice vote.
• </c> Members, we will be taking a voice vote. Members, we will be taking a voice vote.
• </c> but as we see here, the um we are voting but as we see here, the um we are voting on<00:41:17.560
• Kong votes no. For HB 1961 HD2 SD1, Rep. Illamada and Kong vote no.
• Kong votes no. HD2 SD2 Rep. Kong votes no.

Bills: SCR96 , SCR164 , SCR172 , SCR166 , SCR182 , SCR7 , SCR59 , SCR58 , SCR60 , SCR89 , SCR184 , SCR11 , HB2296 , HB2315 , HB2343

Keywords: electric reliability, renewable energy, interconnection, Hawaii Electric Reliability Administrator, Public Utilities Commission, capacity shortfalls, energy policies, critical infrastructure, foreign influence, local control, energy dependence, economic resilience, energy analysis, cost reduction, financial risk, Hawaii PUC, energy self-sufficiency, natural gas, energy transition, ratepayer protection

Transcript Highlights:

• Sorry, Senator Smith, I did vote for him.
• I would not have voted for him.
• Why did you vote for Scott Yenner? And do you have an explanation related to that vote, please?
• I voted for Mr. Yenner's track record. I voted for Mr.
• And by your vote, Mr. R.

Summary: The Appropriations Committee on Higher Education heard and approved two bills before moving into confirmation hearings for several university and college board nominees. CS/SB 1458 on apprenticeships and pre-apprenticeships was presented as a measure to improve consistency and transparency in local education agency partnerships, cap LEA administrative funding at 10% when applicable, and require public meetings and work papers for workforce funding model decisions. Support was noted from Associated Builders and Contractors, the Florida Chamber of Commerce, Foundations for Florida Futures, and Independent Electrical Contractors. The bill passed unanimously and was reported favorably. The committee then considered CS/CS/SB 1726 on higher education governance and presidential searches after adopting a delete-all amendment and a late-filed amendment defining the final group of presidential applicants as no fewer than three. The amended bill added provisions on trustee citizenship and residency/alumni eligibility, interim president succession planning, longer presidential contract renewals, limits on candidate polling by universities, syllabus posting, textbook/open-access material lists, and other governance and academic policy changes. Senators raised concerns about the minimum-three finalist requirement, interim president selection, trustee eligibility, and polling restrictions, while supporters said the bill would depoliticize leadership selection and improve transparency. The bill was reported favorably after the amendments were adopted. The committee then heard confirmation testimony from multiple appointees and reappointees, including nominees for FAMU, UNF, Pensacola State College, UWF, and UF. Most nominees emphasized ties to their institutions, student success, workforce development, military connections, and institutional growth. Several UWF nominees were questioned extensively about their votes for former chair Scott Yenner and his controversial comments about women and other groups; some said they were unaware of those remarks at the time of the vote and would not have supported him with that knowledge. Public testimony on UWF expressed concern about the nominees’ lack of higher education experience, their ties to the region, and the impact of Yenner’s views. The committee later voted to recommend a block of non-UWF nominees favorably, and it agreed to vote on the UWF nominees individually, with some remaining nominees deferred to a later hearing due to time.

Transcript Highlights:

• And it is important for each person to know that their vote is counted. and that votes are that the process
• We also want to make sure that that vote is protected.
• ensure that the votes aren't diluted by those who have actually no right to vote.
• You've opposed key voting rights protections over the years, including the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement
• How about a vote for my dad? Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Committee: Senate Senate Judiciary

Keywords: Department of Justice, nominations, Assistant Attorney General, civil rights, enforcement, committee discussion

Summary: The meeting covered important discussions surrounding key nominations in the Department of Justice, specifically for the roles of Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights and the Office of Legal Policy. Various committee members took turns to express their views on the nominees, emphasizing the implications of their potential confirmation on civil rights enforcement in the country. Alongside the committee discussion, the nominees provided insights into their professional backgrounds and how their experiences align with the responsibilities of the positions for which they have been nominated.

Transcript Highlights:

• You need 68 votes to call the question, and they don't have 68 votes.
• You need 68 votes to call the question, and they don't have 68 votes.
• You need 68 votes to call the question, and they don't have 68 votes.
• </c> there any protection you need 68 votes there any protection you need 68 votes to<00:09:30.760><c
• I would expect there'd be 67 votes for Lisa Demuth and that there would be 66 votes for Melissa Hortman

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• vote.
• A vote for this bill is a vote for cruelty.
• And with that, I urge a no vote on the rule and a no vote on the bill.
• vote.
• This vote remains minutes on this vote.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Wednesday, July 2, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I doubt very much we're going to do bill, vote, bill, vote.
• I doubt very much we're going to do bill, vote, bill, vote.
• Senator Bravo: [vote not clearly captured]. Senator Epstein: Explain my vote.
• Okay, explain my vote. I know, not a fan. Okay, explain my vote. Yes.
• I vote aye, and you can continue working on it. Four ayes, two no, one not voting.

Bills: HB2091 , HB2140 , HB2320 , HB2384 , HB2398 , HB2502 , HB2780 , HB2918 , HB2939 , HB2950 , HB2999 , HB4020 , HB4026 , HB4029

Committee: Senate Finance

Keywords: insurance, financial surveillance, regulations, assessments, Arizona Revised Statutes, investment, state treasurer, gold bullion, treasury management, financial regulations, school districts, bonds, financial advisors, elections, municipal advisors, cost of borrowing, lease agreements, school property, tax exemptions, impact aid revenue bonds

Transcript Highlights:

• The current vote is 10 to 2. The chair voting aye, vice chair voting no. DeMaio, no.
• Vote is 9-2. Chair voting aye. Vice Chair voting no. DeMaio, no. McKinner, aye. That vote is 10-3.
• The vote is 10-3 now. The Chair voting aye, Vice Chair voting no. Patterson, thank you.
• Now, the Chair voting aye, Vice Chair voting no. Patterson, not voting. Patterson, not voting.
• The vote is 14-0. Chair and Vice Chair voting aye. Patterson, not voting. Patterson, not voting.

Summary: The Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee met with a new membership roster and adopted its committee rules after quorum was established. The hearing then began with AB 412, the AI Copyright Transparency Act, which would require generative AI developers to provide copyright holders notice when registered copyrighted works are used in training data. The author and supporters, including SAG-AFTRA, the Transparency Coalition, voice actors, writers, labor groups, and other creators, argued the bill would give artists a practical way to learn whether their works were used and to vindicate their rights. Opponents, including EFF, CalChamber, RIAA, CCIA, Chamber of Progress, Bay Area Council, BSA, and TechNet, said the proposal was technically unworkable, could burden startups, conflict with existing law and pending litigation, and raise federal preemption concerns. Members discussed the bill’s amendments, including a fingerprinting approach and narrowing the bill to model developers, and the committee voted 8-2 to pass AB 412 as amended to the Judiciary Committee. The committee then heard AB 446, which would prohibit “surveillance pricing,” or the use of personal data to charge different prices for the same product or service. The author and supporters, including Consumer Watchdog, UFCW, labor organizations, and consumer/privacy groups, described examples of differential pricing tied to device type, location, shopping behavior, and digital price tags, and argued the bill would protect consumers from discriminatory and predatory pricing. Business and industry opponents, including CalChamber, grocers, retailers, travel, broadband, and other associations, said the bill could conflict with the CCPA, interfere with loyalty and rewards programs, and create confusion about personalized discounts and dynamic pricing. The discussion focused on how the bill would treat loyalty programs, whether existing privacy law already covers the issue, and whether the proposal would unintentionally affect legitimate discounts and promotions.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> the legislation they propose to vote on. the legislation they propose to vote on.
• </c> &gt;&gt; The eyes have it by a vote of 14-10. &gt;&gt; The eyes have it by a vote of 14-10.
• </c> ought to pass by a vote of 3 to two. ought to pass by a vote of 3 to two.
• But we're in the voting mode.
• </c> The eyes have it by a vote of 16 to 8. The eyes have it by a vote of 16 to 8.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Clerk, unlock the machine and the members will vote. >> All the members voted.
• Record a vote. >> Clerk will lock the machine. Record a vote. 93. No.
• The members will vote. All the members voted. The clerk will lock the machine.
• The members will vote. All the members voted. The clerk will lock the machine.
• The members will vote. All the members voted. The clerk will lock the machine. Record the vote.

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <01:46:22.920><c> voting</c><01:46:23.119><c> on</c> vote voting on vote voting on hb421<01:46:25.320
• </c> Vice chair for the vote voting on HB 252 Vice chair for the vote voting on HB 252 the<01:51:22.960
• </c><01:54:19.040><c> HD1</c><01:54:20.040><c> the</c> the vote voting on HB 431 HD1 the the vote voting
• <01:59:54.119><c> HD1</c><01:59:55.119><c> the</c> vote voting on HB 346 HD1 the vote voting on HB 346
• ><02:01:29.000><c> HD1</c><02:01:29.679><c> the</c> vote voting on hb2 243 HD1 the vote voting on hb2

Committee: House Housing

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The House Committee on Housing held a public hearing on several bills. HB 576, relating to restrictions on the transfer of real property under chapter 201H, drew support from HHFDC and the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands, which said the bill would waive transfer restrictions that conflict with DHHL’s program implementation. HB 421, relating to contractors, drew opposition from the Contractors License Board and DCCA/RICO, who said the measure would weaken owner-builder restrictions meant to prevent circumvention of contractor licensing laws; Hawaii Roter and the Grassroot Institute supported it. Members questioned whether the bill would still bar resale within a year and whether subcontractors would still need licenses. HB 367, relating to building permits, received support from the Hawaii Farm Bureau and Grassroot Institute, with comments from DLNR; testimony urged the bill to be expanded to include zoning permits as well as building permits to avoid confusion, especially on Kauaʻi. HB 826, relating to housing, received mixed testimony. HHFDC and several local and advocacy groups supported it, while the Sierra Club raised concerns about converting agricultural lands to residential use, possible impacts on food security, property values, taxes, and the need to account for public trust and traditional practices. HB 525 also drew support from HHFDC and three individuals, with no opposition noted. HB 252, relating to managing agents, was supported by the Hawaiʻi Council of Community Associations and opposed by the Community Associations Institute and several individuals, who argued that commercial management experience is not the same as condominium management and preferred language tied to industry certifications and a later effective date. HB 709, relating to trespassing, was opposed by the Honolulu Police Department, which said officers would have difficulty verifying ownership or tenancy in the field, that the bill could require a separate enforcement team, and that the sheriff’s division is better suited to handle evictions. Hawaiʻi Realtors and the Grassroot Institute supported the measure. Finally, HB 431 HD1, relating to housing, received broad support from the Hawaiʻi State Council on Developmental Disabilities, HHFDC, DHS, the Statewide Office on Homelessness and Housing Solutions, OHA, county housing offices, and multiple nonprofit and political groups. Supporters emphasized the bill’s funding for housing and supportive services, with the homelessness office describing the measure as unprecedented and saying it could help the state cut homelessness in half over the next few years.