Video & Transcript : 'petitioner notice' :

Page 22 of 500
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Local Government (Part II) Mar 24th, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • We like the transparency, the idea of the publication of the plan before the public notice.
  • They don't provide us notice. We have to be on the lookout and watch for these things to come out.
  • So once They don't provide us notice.
  • They are required to provide notice, yes. How that may be publicized is questionable to me.
  • That's what I noticed too, Senator West.
Summary: The Senate Local Government Committee heard several bills by Senator Bettencourt focused on property tax and local government accountability. SB 32 would provide about $700 million in business tax relief by raising the business personal property exemption from $2,500 to $25,000 and continuing a 20% franchise tax credit for inventory taxes paid. Witnesses from NFIB, the Texas Retailers Association, and Texas Realtors supported the bill, saying business personal property and inventory taxes are burdensome and especially hard on small businesses. After no opposition testimony, SB 32 was left pending. The committee also heard SB 1453, which would change how interest and sinking tax rates are calculated by using only the minimum debt service required under bond schedules, while still allowing a higher rate with a 60% governing body vote and a public explanation. A witness from the Texas Taxpayers and Research Association supported the bill as a way to keep debt rates from rising as property values increase and to preserve tax relief. The bill was left pending after testimony. SB 1883 would tighten rules on local impact fees by requiring 60 days of public availability for capital improvement plans and land use assumptions, raising the approval threshold for adopting impact fees from a simple majority to two-thirds, limiting how often fees can be increased, and expanding notice requirements. Builders and developers testified in support, arguing that impact fees are often poorly reviewed, lack accountability, and are passed on to homebuyers, worsening housing affordability. Committee members discussed adding audit provisions and questioned the lack of city testimony. The bill was left pending with subcommittee action. SB 1452 would require a voter election to decide whether a municipal management district continues to exist, with dissolution if voters reject it; supporters said it would add accountability, while others noted some districts provide essential services and infrastructure. The committee heard testimony from district representatives and builders, then left SB 1452 pending before recessing.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government (Part I) Mar 24th, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Cities must publish notice and hold hearings before imposing a moratorium.
  • However, the temporary moratorium takes effect 5 days after the city post notice.
  • a simple majority vote of the city's governing body to pass Senate Bill 2 will align transparency notice
  • up the cost of housing in Texas. 1882 corrects the current practice of giving only 4 days public notice
  • if there is a shortage of infrastructure, as the statute allows, but it does say there needs to be notice
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Judiciary Committee Jun 30th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • I want to be clear: advance notice.
  • So first and foremost, this bill is about noticing.
  • And again, this is a noticing bill.
  • And you said it's a notice bill. I mean, I love notice.
  • petitioner is not permitted to attend any hearings.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on several bills, beginning with SB 16, which would require county behavioral health directors to create clear pathways for clinicians to be authorized to initiate 5150 involuntary holds. The author and supporters argued the bill would reduce reliance on law enforcement and create more consistent crisis response standards statewide, while county behavioral health directors opposed it as an unfunded mandate that could increase law enforcement involvement and create implementation burdens. Members raised questions about county costs and funding, but the author emphasized the bill’s role in building a more clinical response system. SB 561 would require public guardians to acknowledge conservatorship referrals, make determinations within a reasonable time, and provide status updates on request. Supporters said the bill would reduce delays that leave vulnerable adults in limbo, while the opposition from public guardian representatives was removed after amendments. SB 381 drew extensive public testimony in support; it would allow California-born adoptees, and descendants of deceased adoptees, access to original birth certificates, with a nonbinding contact preference form for birth parents. Supporters framed the bill as a matter of dignity, identity, and health, and there was no formal opposition on the record. The committee also discussed SB 880, which would give tenants and prospective owner-occupants notice and a first opportunity to make an offer when institutional investors sell certain homes. Supporters said it would expand homeownership opportunities and preserve neighborhood stability, while opponents warned about conflicts with federal law, bundled-sale restrictions, and impacts on build-to-rent and affordable housing projects. Members and the author discussed possible amendments to address those concerns. SB 1238 would impose a duty of care and additional transparency requirements on HOA managers and boards; supporters said it would protect homeowners from mismanagement, while the main opposition argued the duty should remain contractual and could increase litigation. Finally, SB 423 would require disclosure of emergency-service records related to private detention facilities, and SB 28 would make changes to the CARE Court process, including a statewide ombudsperson and expanded oversight; both drew support and opposition, with concerns focused on transparency, privacy, implementation, and the balance between treatment and coercion. SB 574, discussed at the end, would require disclosure and human oversight for AI use in courts and legal practice and create a complaint process for ADR providers, with the State Bar noting requested amendments related to complaint handling and confidentiality.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Children and Families Finance and Policy Committee 3/11/26

Children and Families Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Currently, we believe, um, a drafting oversight, the statute requires us to give notice to the Department
  • to counties when there are divorces with or without children, but the only real reason to give the notice
  • As a result, the only time you need to give that notice is when there are children as part of the divorce
  • in statute that um um um what<00:13:32.560><c> are</c><00:13:32.640><c> the</c><00:13:32.760><c> notice
  • </c><00:13:33.120><c> requirements</c><00:13:33.920><c> in</c> what are the notice requirements in what
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Civil Rights & Judiciary Jan 30th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Civil Rights & Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • And lastly, it provides a narrow post-filing remedy: a sworn affidavit process, notice to the original
  • They're misusing the form to kind of place a public notice of a lien, or I guess, security interest against
  • They're misusing the form to kind of place a public notice of a lien, or I guess, security interest against
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Law & Justice Jan 13th, 2026 at 08:00 am

Law & Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • I immediately noticed a troubling trend.
  • I also noticed that I was not the first person to notice this problem.
  • notice to the adult who's nearest in kin.
  • So notice of a hearing may be in used alternative means including mail by U.S.
  • The court doing due diligence to make sure that both parents are actually received notice.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Energy Resources May 12th, 2025

Energy Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Public notice of this hearing was given on May 9, 2025, according to Rule 4, Section 11A of the Texas
  • Public notice posting is intended to inform the chair to end witness registration on today's agenda at
  • We look forward to hearing from you regarding excavation notices.
  • And then as they began to notice that our...
  • It adds that the entity that sends the notice must make sure the notice was delivered.
Bills: SB290, SB2949