Video & Transcript Research : 'defined contribution plan'

Page 22 of 500
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Commerce May 5th, 2026

Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • So part of our strategic plan recommended that we create a framework for that, and this is just another
  • So part of our strategic plan recommended that we create a framework for that, and this is just another
  • When he reviews plans, he reviews not only the architect's law...
  • We already defined 'delivered,' so 'sent' was the proper word there. That's good. That's good.
  • How do we define, in some cases, what app is social media and what is not?
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WAL Public Hearing - Thu Mar 19, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST

Water & Land

Transcript Highlights:
  • how we define them. how we define them.
  • depends on how we define it. Yeah. depends on how we define it. Yeah.
  • Next up, Office of Planning. Next up, Office of Planning.
  • agency, they're a planning agency. agency, they're a planning agency.
  • duplication or conflicting plans. duplication or conflicting plans.
Summary: The Committee on Water and Land heard testimony on SB 5253 SD2 relating to conservation and SB 2401 relating to regional shoreline mitigation district, with the chair emphasizing short testimony limits and the need to finish before session. On SB 5253, DLNR said it stood on its written testimony and answered questions about the bill’s proposed nonprofit endangered species sanctuary. Members asked whether existing entities or agreements, such as land trusts, private landowners, and DLNR safe harbor agreements, could accomplish similar conservation goals without creating a new entity. DLNR said similar work already exists, but it was not aware of a comparable sanctuary model in the state. A member also questioned language suggesting for-profit businesses in the sanctuary, and DLNR said the intent appeared to be sales of outreach or similar materials, though it agreed that such activities could be handled by a nonprofit. The bulk of the hearing focused on SB 2401, which would create a regional shoreline adaptation/mitigation framework. The Department of the Attorney General said it had concerns about inconsistent use of the terms “mitigation” and “adaptation,” warning of possible title-subject issues. DLNR said it was neutral on the terminology and more concerned with the substance, and noted that the bill would not waive permits; any plan would still require environmental review and applicable state and county permits. DLNR also supported OHA’s recommendation to consider impacts on Native Hawaiian traditional and customary practices during regional planning, and said the bill’s language on temporary shoreline protection measures could help address the gap between emergency permits and longer-term planning while avoiding a hardening-only approach. The Office of Planning supported the regional planning concept but noted it is not a regulatory agency and would need to work with DLNR and the Land Board. OHA supported the bill’s planning-based approach but recommended amendments to require assessment of impacts on Native Hawaiian traditional and customary practices during plan development and to clarify that environmental review would still apply at the project level. Testifiers from the Ka‘anapali Steering Committee strongly supported the bill, saying it would provide a regional framework for ongoing erosion problems while preserving full regulatory authority and normal permitting, and they proposed amendments to standardize terminology, create a limited pathway for temporary shoreline protection, and address ownership and maintenance responsibilities. Members discussed the meaning of “mitigation” versus “adaptation,” the scope of shoreline hardening, and whether the bill would help the legislature take a broader, more holistic view of shoreline decisions. No votes or final actions were taken in the portion of the hearing provided.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House Ways and Means Education Committee Mar 18th, 2026

Ways and Means Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • a population of less than 60,000, they're considered jumpstart counties, which is the definition defined
  • a population of less than 60,000, they're considered jumpstart counties, which is the definition defined
  • continue our outreach, to potentially develop partnerships, and to possibly implement our project area plans
  • have, if y'all have a couple minutes, we would be grateful to answer any questions that you may have. plans
  • We are going to continue our plans.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WAL Public Hearing - Thu Feb 12, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST

Water & Land

Transcript Highlights:
  • is office of planning here? is office of planning here? >> Yes. >> Yes.
  • a planning overlay um, from the state. a planning overlay um, from the state.
  • is responsible for planning and should be able, like they do with Waikīkī, to approve shoreline plans
  • is responsible for planning and should be able, like they do with Waikīkī, to approve shoreline plans
  • Uh, I don't think a plan like that would be approved. Nobody favors a plan like that.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on HB 1846, relating to shoreline mitigation districts. DLNR and the Office of Planning opposed the bill, arguing it would improperly shift regulatory roles between the agencies and prioritize private land interests over public trust and natural and historic resources. Supporters, including the Shoreline Preservation Coalition, Kahana Bay residents, and Hawaii Realtors, said regional planning is needed to address severe erosion, especially in Kahana, and that better coordination between state and county agencies could help move stalled projects forward. Testifiers emphasized that shoreline conditions vary by area and that science-based, region-specific solutions are needed. Members asked questions about whether existing law already allows regional planning and emergency shoreline responses. DLNR said it already has authority to process regional projects and cited an existing draft EIS for Kahana Bay that would proceed through normal permitting and public hearing channels. Supporters responded that the bill would provide a clearer regional planning framework and help communities facing urgent erosion impacts. No vote was taken on HB 1846 in the portion provided. The committee then took up HB 2205, relating to emergency erosion mitigation. DLNR opposed the bill, saying it already has authority to issue emergency permits and had recently done so quickly for a collapsed sidewalk at Queen Surf Beach, and warning that the bill’s language could weaken Act 16 by changing a prohibition on shoreline hardening to a requirement to merely minimize it. Kahana Bay representatives and other supporters argued the bill would create a limited, regulated short-term pathway for emergency shoreline solutions while long-term plans are developed, and said current permits have expired or stalled, leaving dangerous sandbags and no practical relief. Additional testimony from a private homeowner stressed that erosion is threatening homes and that private owners are often bearing the cost of protecting public shoreline access. The discussion remained focused on balancing emergency protection, public access, and long-term shoreline management, and no final action was taken in the excerpt provided.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/28/2026 - Senate Health and Human Services

Health and Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • plan requirements, directly addressing compliance concerns identified by Commit.
  • In addition, behavior treatment plan concerns were a common challenge.
  • If this passes, what would be the plan to bring back...
  • So what would—well, how do you see this plan rolling out?
  • Are providers that work a lot with the American Indian plan or program?
Summary: The Health and Human Services Committee approved the January 21 minutes and then heard a series of bills focused on developmental disabilities oversight, behavioral health fraud, AHCCCS operations, child safety, and state hospital capacity. SB 1179 would make the Developmental Disabilities Group Home Monitoring Program permanent and remove the appropriations contingency; Disability Rights Arizona and program managers testified that Commit had identified systemic care problems, while the sponsor said the work should continue. The bill received a 6-1 do-pass recommendation. SB 1114 would appropriate $1 million to the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office for behavioral health patient brokering investigations; Native advocates described widespread recruitment and exploitation of vulnerable people, especially Native Americans, and the bill passed 8-0. SB 1115 would prohibit AHCCCS from allowing remote work for Access employees; the sponsor argued in-person oversight was needed, while AHCCCS warned of space and staffing problems. It passed 4-3. SB 1051 would require hospitals to collect and report patients’ citizenship or immigration status for cost accounting; supporters called it a data-collection measure, while nurses and physicians said it would create fear and deter care. It passed 4-3. SB 1122, as amended, would replace prior authorization with 100% prepayment review for certain behavioral health services under the American Indian Health Plan, and passed 7-0 after AHCCCS said it had worked on the amendment. SB 1132, to appropriate unspecified funds for a new Arizona State Hospital wing, drew testimony from families and advocates describing severe shortages of state hospital beds and the need for more long-term treatment capacity; it passed 7-0. SB 1169, to fund graduate medical education and a new residency program, passed 6-0. SB 1171, requiring AHCCCS to check for dual enrollment in exchange plans and AHCCCS, passed 4-2-1 after AHCCCS said implementation would require system changes and costs. SB 1172, requiring more experienced DCS investigators for repeated abuse/neglect reports and court notification of hotline calls in dependency cases, passed 7-0. SB 1173, requiring behavioral health facility applicants, owners, and licensees to be U.S. citizens or lawfully present permanent residents with fingerprint clearance cards, passed 4-3 after an amendment clarifying the lawful-presence requirement.
TX
Bills: SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, SB1, HB4
Summary: The Senate briefly convened and received a message from the House stating that the House was taking a vote. No bills, motions, or substantive policy matters were discussed in the exchange. Pursuant to a previously adopted motion, the Senate then adjourned until 7 p.m. on Thursday, August 21.
NV
Transcript Highlights:
  • That would be a max of five years if you get the maximum contribution.
  • A lot of states offer payment plans... ...that do this.
  • A lot of states offer payment plans when you get fines and penalties.
  • So what do you anticipate that fee would be to be able to go on to a payment plan?
  • That it's been performing and people have been taking advantage of the payment plans.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • With those plans, HB 1942 extends the same flexibility to state-regulated health plans to further increase
  • physician also accepts this plan. plans, Texas Medical Association, Texas Nurse Practitioners, and others
  • all regulated health plans in the state.
  • Every plan handles it slightly differently, and so that just really...
  • But the committee, as it's defined, does not invest into...
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • It would define the direct patient care agreement as a written agreement under which a physician or healthcare
  • It's not an alternate health plan; it's an alternate medical model.
  • Into the bloodstream is a medical act as defined by the Medical Practice Act.
  • Quite simply, strong, healthy families contribute to a strong, healthy Texas.
  • Trapped in that cycle actually does contribute to families deciding, well, we can't get married because
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The plan today is to attend to pending business and then hear testimony on the bills listed for today's
  • Moreover, the scope of the regulations that can be waived within the sandbox program are further defined
  • Critical infrastructure is defined, you know, primarily on page... ...but it includes pretty much every
  • You know, they're basically praying to get through it without any real plan or any expertise or anything
  • I don't mean to jump in, but we'll tell you exactly where we are with the—my understanding is the plan
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Ways & Means May 19th, 2025

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • This extension will allow the city to develop and plan multi-year infrastructure projects for. ...streets
  • projects can take three to ten years from the initial planning to completion.
  • It states that the plan, referring to a reappraisal plan, may not include a standard where the timeline
  • The problem with this bill is that it really restricts local fiscal planning.
  • I feel like this is almost a restriction on their financial planning. a solution in search of a problem
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health May 19th, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • Therapeutic is defined by FDA approved indications.
  • So if you requested that, that would be a part of my treatment plan.
  • That becomes a part of the comprehensive treatment plan, yes.
  • Seeking that treatment as a part of the treatment plan that we're creating.
  • This is something that should be a part of our dental care plan.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health May 19th, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • If you are planning to testify today in our public testimony portion of the hearing, please be sure you
  • The criteria as defined here, the criteria used to determine whether...is the criteria something that
  • It's not defined; it just says vehicular traffic.
  • Senator Hughes found that there was no documentation of a plan in case this was to happen.
  • the county's contribution, you'll see that the city's far outweighs what the county is paying for.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • According to the state's own 2022 water plan, water availability is projected to decline by 18 percent
  • Water Planning Group, which I sit on, also covers Wise County.
  • Specifically, when an aquifer is no longer relevant for planning, or when a desired future condition
  • is challenged in court or deemed unreasonable, a long-term groundwater management plan is needed.
  • State plans must be updated within two years of new DFCs being adopted to ensure management strategies
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The legislature, in its wisdom, has had on the books for 30 years 28 drought contingency plans that all
  • They already have... to adopt a drought contingency plan.
  • So if we don't have an agency approving a plan, simply accepting and logging said plan, how can we properly
  • Senate Bill 1055 by Nichols, relating to the management plans adopted by groundwater.
  • Hearing none, the motion is adopted, relating to the management plans adopted by groundwater.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs (Part II) Apr 14th, 2025

Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Since 1997, the state law required the public water suppliers to prepare drought contingency plans to
  • They already have to adopt a drought contingency plan.
  • So if we don't have an agency approving a plan, simply accepting and logging said plan.
  • Relating to the management plans adopted by Groundwater Senator Nichols, Senate Bill 1055.
  • Uh, relating to the management plans adopted by Groundwater Conservation District by 1583 by Senator
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Education Policy Committee Apr 9th, 2025

Education Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • And then it adds some evaluation plan, so they have to have... ...a metrics for what their goal is, what
  • And here we are, married, faithful to our wives, faithful to our kids, contributing to our state, and
  • contributing to our communities.
  • We've been fighting to keep Planned Parenthood been fighting to keep Planned Parenthood out of our state
  • That's not defined anywhere. That is problematic.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Transportation Apr 2nd, 2025

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • National plan.
  • The threshold is defined, but the number one that has to be in the economically disadvantaged county.
  • Current statute also says that for a federally funded project, the state may pay, contribute up to half
  • mission is to accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energy, and in pursuit of that, we plan
  • So we plan to develop those metrics and clarify that as we launch the service.
Summary: The committee meeting focused on two primary bills, SB1598 and SB1493. SB1598, introduced by Senator Hagen Booth, addresses the clarity of collision report information access for law enforcement, aiming to enhance the tools available to police agencies across Texas for solving crimes. The meeting featured strong support from police representatives, including Sheriff Brian Hawthorne of Chambers County, who emphasized the significance of the CARFAX program for police in facilitating access to vital vehicle information, free of charge. Public testimony reflected a consensus on the necessity of the bill for improved investigatory processes.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • They're not part of the Federal Aviation Administration National Plan.
  • They're not part of the Federal Aviation Administration National Plan.
  • Statute also, current statute also says that for a federally funded project, the state may contribute
  • , bringing these stakeholders together and putting together a plan of action like this is an example
  • So we plan to develop those metrics and clarify that, you know, as we launch the service.
Summary: The Senate Transportation Committee heard and advanced a wide range of transportation-related bills. Early in the meeting, SB 1598 by Senator Hagenbuch was heard on allowing collision report information to be used and shared more clearly for law enforcement investigations, including through records-management partners and nonconfidential VIN data; the bill drew support from the Sheriff’s Association and Carfax for Police and was left pending before later being reported favorably. SB 1493 by Senator Parker, which would codify DPS’s position on flashing/pulsing stop lamps as compliant with federal standards, also received supportive testimony and was reported favorably. SB 1895 by Senator Perry would designate Loop 88 in Lubbock as a First Responders Memorial Loop and was reported favorably, and SB 1919 and SB 2243 by Senator West, dealing with TxDOT liability claim settlements and TxDMV authority to require VIN inspections for certain trailers, were likewise heard without opposition and later reported favorably. SB 2039, concerning right-of-way and traffic rules for sidewalk users such as bicycles, e-bikes, skateboards, and scooters, was heard and left pending before being reported favorably later in the meeting. SB 2226 by Senator Nichols, reducing the local match requirement for aviation grants in economically disadvantaged counties from 10% to 5%, was discussed with TxDOT testimony explaining how federal and state airport funding interact; it was reported favorably. SB 2499 by Senator Flores, involving memorial markers and an account for donations, and SB 1394 by Senator Hall, concerning concrete truck axle rules, were also reported favorably. The committee recessed after handling the pending items and leaving some additional matters for a later hearing. A major portion of the meeting focused on SB 2425 by Senator Nichols, a comprehensive bill on commercial autonomous vehicles. The author said the bill was developed through extensive stakeholder meetings with industry, agencies, insurers, and lawyers, and it would require AV companies to provide information to TxDMV, submit first-responder interaction plans to DPS, and allow DPS and DMV to suspend or revoke operations in certain circumstances. The committee substitute also updated definitions, addressed Level 3 systems, clarified commercial use and fleet penalties, and created an expedited process for reinstating operating authority after disputes. Supporters included the Texas Public Policy Foundation, Tesla, GM Cruise, Bot Auto, and the Autonomous Vehicle Industry Association, who said the bill balances innovation and safety and helps Texas remain a leader in AV deployment. One witness opposed the bill, arguing that it would improperly shield manufacturers from liability, but committee members and the industry witnesses said liability would continue to be governed by state law and that the bill was intended to clarify, not eliminate, responsibility. After debate, the committee adopted the substitute and reported SB 2425 favorably on a 6-0 vote. Throughout the hearing, members asked questions about practical effects and funding. On SB 2226, TxDOT’s aviation director explained that some airports already receive federal and state support and that the bill would mainly help state-only airports in disadvantaged counties that struggle to meet local match requirements. On SB 2425, members asked about reliability metrics, commercialization, and liability; industry witnesses said the technology is still being refined but that Texas’s framework has attracted investment and could improve road safety over time. Several bills were recommended to the local and uncontested calendar after favorable votes, and the committee also agreed to keep motions in writing open briefly for members who were absent, so long as doing so would not change any bill outcomes.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Capital Investment Committee 3/27/25

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • The second phase was part of the original plan.
  • It will there currently in more planned.
  • <01:27:26.800> uh been incorporated into the the plan uh been incorporated into the the plan
  • In terms of how we planned it, we planned it so that it could be built on into the future, and we're
  • So the city developed a street and utility replacement plan.