Transcript Highlights:

• more depth about the interpretation, with a focus on changes to program eligibility and ways to preserve
• We will now move to our second panel, possible efforts to preserve access to health care and food.
• We will now move to our second panel, possible efforts to preserve access to health care and food.
• access, but if you could keep it regarding preserving access, but if you could keep it rhetorically
• This includes, as the director mentioned, automating systems in ways that preserve people's coverage

Summary: The Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee held an oversight hearing on the impacts of H.R. 1 on California’s safety net, focusing on Medi-Cal and CalFresh. The chair and vice chair framed the issue as a major federal disruption that would reduce benefits and shift costs to the state, counties, hospitals, and other local systems. The first panel included the Legislative Analyst’s Office, the Department of Finance, the UC Berkeley Labor Center, and the Food Research and Action Center, each describing projected enrollment losses, higher state and county costs, and implementation challenges. The LAO outlined H.R. 1’s main changes: new and expanded work requirements, more frequent eligibility redeterminations, restrictions on certain non-citizen eligibility, and financing changes affecting provider taxes and federal matching rates. The LAO estimated that 1 to 2 million people could be disenrolled from Medi-Cal and more than 600,000 could lose CalFresh, with additional costs from reduced federal support and possible state and county administrative burdens. The Department of Finance said the Governor’s budget includes about $1.4 billion General Fund in 2026-27 to respond to H.R. 1, with larger out-year reductions in federal funds and projected Medi-Cal caseload losses of up to 2 million by 2029-30. The UC Berkeley Labor Center projected up to 3 million Californians could lose full-scope Medi-Cal by 2028 when H.R. 1 is combined with state budget changes, while noting the state could choose policies that would reduce some of those losses. The Food Research and Action Center warned that CalFresh cuts and time limits would increase hunger, worsen health outcomes, and strain local economies and emergency systems. Members questioned the witnesses about procedural disenrollments, regional variation, the overall growth in Medi-Cal spending, the future of the MCO tax, the CalFresh error rate, and the downstream effects on hospitals and county indigent care. Several senators argued that the federal law was driven by tax cuts for high-income earners and would disproportionately harm low-income Californians, immigrants, and communities of color. Administration witnesses said some impacts are still being analyzed, that counties and departments are working on implementation, and that the Legislature may need to use statute, reporting, and oversight tools as federal guidance develops. No votes or formal actions were taken during this portion of the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• more depth about the interpretation, with a focus on changes to program eligibility and ways to preserve
• We will now move to our second panel, possible efforts to preserve access to health care and food.
• more presentations, and we certainly want to hear everything that you have to tell us regarding preserving
• We'll do. regarding preserving access, but if you could keep it rhetorically economic, would be most
• This includes, as the director mentioned, automating systems in ways that preserve people's coverage

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• If we're going to have a legal cannabis marketplace, why is it important to preserve a medical marketplace
• If we're going to have a legal cannabis marketplace, why is it important to preserve a medical marketplace
• If we're going to have a legal cannabis marketplace, why is it important to preserve a medical marketplace
• If we're going to have a legal cannabis marketplace, why is it important to preserve a medical marketplace
• If we're going to have a legal cannabis marketplace, why is it important to preserve a medical marketplace

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• c> animal habitat and Energy Efficiency animal habitat and Energy Efficiency asset asset asset preservations
• <00:42:08.280><c> um</c><00:42:08.800><c> asset</c><00:42:09.160><c> preservation</c><00:42:09.760><c
• > that</c> preservations um asset preservation that preservations um asset preservation that we<00:42

Bills: HF1013, HF1598, HF1656, HF2162

Keywords: energy, economic development, funding, renewable resources, Clean Energy Economy Minnesota, air ventilation, geothermal, school financing, Minnesota Climate Innovative Finance Authority, geothermal energy, renewable energy, construction funding, Como Zoo, energy efficiency, HF2162, Minnesota, planning grants, renewable development account, clean energy, Department of Commerce

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:23:49.440><c> of</c> 270 uh requiring the preservation of 270 uh requiring the preservation of
• She said these devices are very important in the election process and should be preserved and treated
• just like we preserve all ballots absentee<00:24:44.240><c> ballot</c><00:24:44.720><c> applications
• </c><00:25:07.919><c> and</c> process and should be preserved and process and should be preserved and
• At Gettysburg, Lincoln memorialized our national sacrifice to preserve a government of the people, by

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It confirms that lien priority is preserved.
• 04.160><c> priority</c> bill preserves the existing priority bill preserves the existing priority framework
• .<01:34:28.600><c> Represent</c><01:34:29.080><c> Representative</c> preserved.
• Represent Representative preserved. Represent Representative Esinoza. Representative Espinoza.
• It confirms that the lien priority is preserved regardless of whether the modification is recorded.

Keywords: 981, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The DFL really prioritized preserving the E-12 investments from the 2023 DFL education budget, and as
• And we did maybe not at the level we would have wished, but we were able to preserve those in the best
• And we did maybe not at the level we would have wished, but we were able to preserve those in the best
• And we were able to preserve those in the best way that we can.
• I'm really pleased to share that there is language to preserve funding for compensatory revenue, which

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• with additional clarity from the February forecast, a key challenge was laid before us: How do we preserve
• The proposals laid out in the governor's education bill address this, preserving our shared priorities
• our shared priorities for preserving our shared priorities for students<01:09:50.799><c> and</c><01:
• While charter schools have many direct facility preservation and maintenance expenses, this funding goes
• While charter schools have many direct facility preservation and maintenance expenses, this funding goes

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• um something along those lines, and I I think there are there may be situations where we want to preserve
• um something along those lines, and I I think there are there may be situations where we want to preserve
• um something along those lines, and I I think there are there may be situations where we want to preserve
• about stalking or something along those lines, and I think there may be situations where we want to preserve
• I think there may be situations where we want to preserve the option of people not disclosing their address

Bills: HF484, HF483, HF1447, HF1496, HF554

Keywords: natural gas, gas hookups, residential construction, energy policy, local control, state preemption, municipal regulation, county ordinance, electrification, climate policy, housing development, building codes, energy source, utility infrastructure, Minnesota Statutes chapter 326B, propane, utility service, building permits, local government, energy choice

Transcript Highlights:

• It preserves transparency and accountability by maintaining oversight mechanisms appropriate for the
• </c> Financial burdens it preserves Financial burdens it preserves transparency<01:54:01.760><c> and<
• This affordable housing is occurring without the help of government subsidy to preserve this unique housing
• Financial accountability is important, and this bill preserves alternative examination methods.
• </c><02:05:41.159><c> alternative</c> and this bill preserves alternative and this bill preserves alternative

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So we're interested in maintaining the current law and preserving this opportunity for our members.
• So we're interested in maintaining the current law and preserving this opportunity for our members.
• So we're interested in maintaining the current law and preserving this opportunity for our members.
• So we're interested in maintaining the current law and preserving this opportunity for our members.
• So we're interested in maintaining the current law and preserving this opportunity for our members.

Bills: HF845

Keywords: net metering, distributed generation, solar energy, rooftop solar, renewable energy, utility rates, electric cooperatives, municipal utilities, public utilities, Public Utilities Commission, net billing, bill credits, cost of service study, standby charge, qualifying facility, energy policy, clean energy, customer generation, interconnection, Minnesota Statutes 216B.164

Transcript Highlights:

• risk of a future catastrophic wildfire by creating a speedy process for fair compensation while preserving
• Finally, it preserves accountability for wildfire risk mitigation.
• Finally, it preserves accountability for wildfire risk mitigation.
• individuals rights to while preserving individuals rights to pursue<01:34:18.360><c> litigation</c><
• </c> society finally it preserves society finally it preserves accountability<01:34:57.800><c> for</c

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on House Bill 1077, a governor’s administration bill to increase transient accommodations tax revenue and split it between two new special funds: a climate mitigation and resiliency special fund and an economic development and revitalization special fund for tourism/resort areas. Supporters, including the Governor’s Office, recovery and resilience staff, climate and conservation groups, and several state agencies, said the bill would create a dedicated, more reliable funding stream for wildfire mitigation, coastal resilience, land clearing, infrastructure, and community-led projects. Some supporters also urged changes to the bill, including moving the fund to DLNR, adding DHHL and OHA representation, clarifying community grants, and ensuring the fund can support both state-led and community-led resilience work. The Attorney General’s office flagged a drafting issue, noting that the bill references fees deposited into the new fund even though the new chapter does not authorize fee collection, and recommended deleting that language or adding fee authority. The Climate Advisory Team representative also suggested adding DHHL to the decision-making body and requiring at-large members to have climate, resilience, conservation, or infrastructure expertise. The Tax Foundation of Hawaii and the Kohala Coast Resort Association opposed the measure, arguing that the special fund structure does not meet statutory criteria, that the bill functions as a tax increase, and that the transient accommodations tax is not being collected equitably across all lodging types before any increase is imposed. Other opponents, including tourism and lodging interests, warned that hotels and timeshares already bear most of the tax burden and that raising the TAT could hurt an already struggling visitor industry and drive tourists away. Supporters countered that current funding is far short of what is needed and that a dedicated revenue stream is necessary to address climate impacts now. Committee members questioned why the Legislature should cede spending decisions to a separate executive-branch process, and the administration responded that the bill is intended to create a transparent, recurring mechanism for funding priorities that can be adjusted over time. No vote or final action was taken in the portion of the hearing provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• passes though, I think we have from stakeholders and interested parties a way to move forward that preserves
• passes though, I think we have from stakeholders and interested parties a way to move forward that preserves
• passes though, I think we have from stakeholders and interested parties a way to move forward that preserves
• ><c> right</c><06:27:19.680><c> to</c><06:27:19.920><c> have</c><06:27:20.160><c> these</c> that preserves
• the right to have these that preserves the right to have these in<06:27:20.878><c> residential</c><06

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It's about the preservation of our republic.
• ><c> of</c><07:51:27.680><c> our</c> It's about the preservation of our It's about the preservation of
• Today we are talking about<07:52:22.240><c> how</c><07:52:22.558><c> we</c><07:52:22.798><c> preserve
• </c><07:52:23.360><c> democracy</c><07:52:24.240><c> under</c> about how we preserve democracy under
• about how we preserve democracy under the<07:52:24.718><c> circumstances</c><07:52:25.360><c> that</c

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Wednesday, June 25, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We want to preserve that.
• We want to preserve that.
• We want to preserve that.
• We want to preserve that.
• We want to preserve that.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So, narrow the bill to prohibit the demonstrable misuse of surveillance data while preserving lawful
• </c> while preserving lawful market activity. while preserving lawful market activity.
• </c><02:42:21.680><c> lawful</c><02:42:22.160><c> market</c> data while preserving lawful market data
• He said this would limit it by preserving lawful market activity and reducing ambiguity.
• </c> exploitative practices to preserve exploitative practices to preserve dynamic<02:50:31.920><c> pricing

Keywords: 981, all

Transcript Highlights:

• who for the last 18 years have stood firm in protecting Kakaʻako Makai, because they believe in preserving
• our shoreline and preserving the last open space in East Honolulu.
• </c><00:10:09.440><c> our</c><00:10:09.640><c> Shoreline</c><00:10:10.200><c> and</c> um in preserving
• our Shoreline and um in preserving our Shoreline and preserving<00:10:10.880><c> the</c><00:10:11.200
• the last open space in East preserving the last open space in East Honolulu<00:10:14.720><c> uh</c><

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The joint hearing of the Water and Land, Hawaiian Affairs, and Housing committees on January 29, 2025 focused on SB 534, with the chairs outlining hearing procedures, public testimony limits, and plans to allow extended presentations from the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) and the Hawaii Community Development Authority (HCDA) before moving to other testifiers. The hearing was presented as a public, transparent discussion of OHA’s plans for Kakaʻako Makai, with committee members noting that decision-making would follow if time permitted. OHA testified in strong support of SB 534. The chair of OHA’s Board of Trustees said the bill was a novel proposal for the legislature and emphasized that OHA was bringing together a broad coalition of partners and stakeholders, including representatives from construction, hospitality, education, law enforcement, civil service, and schools, as well as longtime community advocates who have opposed development in Kakaʻako Makai. OHA’s presentation reviewed the history of the area, the creation and role of HCDA, prior master plans, the 2012 land conveyance to OHA, and the argument that OHA has not been able to realize the full economic value of the lands because desired entitlements were not secured. OHA linked the bill to its constitutional mission to improve conditions for Native Hawaiians and argued that the state’s housing crisis makes additional development, including residential use, especially important. A major theme of the testimony was housing. OHA argued that Hawaiʻi faces severe affordability pressures, out-migration, and workforce shortages, and said that residential development in Kakaʻako Makai would help address those needs while also supporting the value of the trust lands. The presentation described HCDA’s authority over zoning and development in Kakaʻako, the existing reserved housing requirements, and the need for a master plan that could move forward if SB 534 becomes law. No votes or final committee action were taken in the portion of the hearing provided; the discussion remained in the presentation and testimony phase.

Transcript Highlights:

• So how does the affordable housing trust fund increase and preserve housing supply?
• It funds single-family home construction, emergency repairs to preserve existing homes, and then rental
• </c> housing trust fund increase and preserve housing trust fund increase and preserve housing<00:36:
• </c><00:36:43.839><c> existing</c> emergency repairs to preserve existing emergency repairs to preserve
• Over this time, I think it's important to note that nearly 13,000 homes have been built or preserved.

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00:03 Roll Call 00:00:08 Discussion of Indiana Residential Infrastructure Fund 00:01:27 Discussion of Affordable Housing Trust Fund 00:33:30 Discussion of Urban Infill 01:12:37 Approval of Minutes from July Meeting 01:39:00 Adjournment 01:39:42, 958, all

Summary: The Housing Task Force heard a presentation from Anita Sanford of the Homebuilders Association of Kentucky and Sheri Cybert of Indiana’s Residential Infrastructure Fund about Indiana’s low-interest loan program for local housing infrastructure. They described the program as a voluntary, locally driven model that helps communities finance roads, sewers, sidewalks, traffic lights, turning lanes, and other infrastructure needed for new housing development. Sanford emphasized that infrastructure and regulation are major drivers of housing costs, citing estimates that infrastructure can account for up to 30% of a home’s cost and regulations another 25%, and said the association is studying Kentucky-specific regulatory costs. She also noted that every $1,000 added to new home construction can price out about 2,000 Kentucky households. Cybert explained that Indiana’s program, administered through the Indiana Finance Authority, began in 2023 with $75 million appropriated over two years and has since closed 17 loans totaling $60.7 million, with more than 2,700 projected housing units. The program reserves 70% of funds for rural communities and 30% for urban communities, requires applications from local governments rather than developers, and asks communities to show need through a market study, describe the infrastructure and housing to be built, and provide preliminary engineering plans and a repayment source. She said the loans currently carry an interest rate around 3.5%, reset quarterly, and that the program has generated about $25 million in savings to communities compared with private borrowing. She also described recent Indiana legislative changes that encourage higher density and other zoning reforms, and said a majority of those local ordinance changes must be adopted for an application to be fundable. Members asked about the ordinance requirements, the funding split between rural and urban areas, repayment mechanisms, and whether there were caps on project size. Cybert said repayment is worked out case by case, often through existing or project-specific TIFs, temporary tax agreements, or letters of credit, and that the program has no cap on request size or income/affordability restrictions. She said the largest request funded was $19 million for a 700-unit project. Co-chair Mills and others discussed whether Kentucky could adopt a similar model and what it would cost, while Sanford and Cybert said they were still refining budget estimates. Later, Scott Welch, president of the Homebuilders Association of Kentucky, testified that upfront infrastructure costs are a major barrier in his projects, citing a $1 million pump station and road-widening and utility relocation costs as examples, and said an infrastructure fund would help get projects off the ground.

Transcript Highlights:

• Then the purpose clause of pooled risk management programs is preserved verbatim from the existing statute
• Then the purpose clause of pooled risk management programs is preserved verbatim from the existing statute
• and in addition provisions preserved and in addition provisions added<00:31:45.039><c> given</c><00:
• This also again goes to my question about preserving local control. Okay.
• And this also again goes to my question about preserving local control. Okay.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Summary: The subcommittee took up the pooled risk management program bill and reviewed a new amendment drafted with input from the Insurance Department and Legislative Services. Department witnesses explained that the proposal would move oversight of pooled risk management programs from the Secretary of State’s office to the Insurance Department, add a licensure requirement, preserve the programs’ non-insurer status, and exempt them from third-party administrator licensure. They also described a series of solvency tools in the draft, including financial reporting, risk-based capital standards, minimum capitalization, investment limits, commissioner examination and enforcement authority, rulemaking authority, merger and affiliate-transaction review, confidentiality protections, and a separability clause. A major theme of the discussion was that pooled risk management programs differ from commercial insurers because the risk remains with the member local governments rather than being backed by a state guarantee fund. Witnesses said the bill is designed to emphasize solvency over return of premium and to give the Insurance Department a regulatory “toolbox” to prevent insolvency, including a proposed $5 million excess or stop-loss coverage benchmark, optional accessible policies, and a requirement that boards vote on dividends or premium returns when capital exceeds 600% of risk-based capital. Members questioned how this approach differed from the original Secretary of State bill and whether assessments on towns would still be possible; the department responded that the new framework would allow more flexible oversight and alternatives to immediate court action. The committee also discussed why the statute should continue to say the programs are not insurers, with the department explaining that this preserves their autonomy and avoids applying unrelated insurance laws and premium taxes. Members asked about the department’s workload and were told the department believed it could absorb the new duties without additional funding. No vote or final committee action was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• That phrasing preserves the bill's intent to re- recognize differences.
• I urge you to support this amendment to preserve the integrity of our statutes and shield Texans from
• The amendment it seems to me seeks to preserve somewhat of the author's intent, saying that you could
• Statutory definition, so the amendment preserves flexibility with those programs as well.
• HB 146 by Garen, relating to the required approval by the State Preservation Board of certain traffic

Bills: HB46, HJR35, HJR47, HJR182, HB 113, HB983, HB4847, HB1449, HB3833, HB5151, HB265, HB1845, HB782, HB 108, HB1960, HB158, HB1954, HB1955, HB2512, HB605, HB2581, HB2803, HB627, HB2667, HB1738, HB636, HB3679, HB2638, HB2655, HB871, HB2438, HB 1107, HB1765, HB1822, HB2153, HB4099, HB3732, HB3171, HB3178, HB3182, HB3749, HB2814, HB3977, HB4204, HB4207, HB4449, HB1820, HB1876, HB1939, HB1347, HB2593, HB2136, HB2132, HB2658, HB2413, HB2757, HB2080, HB3154, HB3063, HB3009, HB3448, HB3006, HB2844, HB3241, HB3680, HB3169, HB2078, HB2507, HB4559, HB3946, HB3460, HB3405, HB475, HB3463, HB3441, HB3520, HB2060, HB4731, HB4991, HB1991, HB5596, HB2014, HB2142, HB2673, HB2731, HB2417, HB2399, HB2301, HB3335, HB3234, HB3320, HB5573, HB4848, HB4748, HB4769, HB4795, HB2086, HB2234, HB2203, HB4916, HB5624, HB4505, HB139, HB5093, HB5302, HB5402, HB5606, HB2333, HB4630, HB4701, HB2583, HB2983, HB4924, HB3339, HB3793, HB3631, HB4882, HB5509, HB5499, HB5430, HB5561, HB5611, HB5043, HB5064, HB3733, HB3781, HB3219, HB32, HB4515, HB5348, HR559, HB4506, HB1646, HB3185, HB3388, HB2761, HB3233, HB1534, HB5129, HB5394, HB3619, HB2867, HB3672, HB2434, HB4903, HB3687, HB3675, HB4609, HB4582, HB3866, HB4534, HB2446, HB3984, HB700, HB4088, HB229, SB2419, SB842, SB1257, SB2550, SB996, HB 1186, HB4327, HB3221, HB2588, SB552, HB4870, HB2494, HB3940, HB4838, HB3177, HB1441, SB1841, HB3962, HB2225, HJR112, HB897, HB2695, HB4670, HB3602, HB3317, HB3717, HB3138, HB3704, HB1403, HJR218, HB4921, SJR37, HJR138, HJR144, HB3892, HB4, HB46, HJR35, HJR47, HJR182, HB4234, HB722, HB4136, HB4105, HB4413, HB170, HB551, HB2858, HB3053, HB3142, HB3180, HB3722, HB2200, HB1794, HB1784, HB1581, HB2530, HB4308, HB1896, HB2974, HB3359, HB4580, HB2458, HB2215, HB3332, HB2278, HB3015, HB3151, HB1368, HB40, HB 101, HB 112, HB146, HB168, HB214, HB413, HB1523, HB493, HB521, HB594, HB557, HB305, HB549, HB854, HB 1057, HB 1052, HB842, HB3174, HB3311, HB2486, HB3196, HB824, HB 1039, HB2529, HB2713, HB4936, HB4995, HB4830, HB4864, HB5219, HB5263, HB5154, HB2674, HB5525, HB5623, HB2545, HB2587, HB2625, HB5520, HB5436, HB4926, HB1573, HB5165, HB4811, HB5081, HB4755, HB3179, HB4310, HB4611, HB2159, HB4626, HB3637, HB3153, HB3066, HB2786, HB2966, HB638, HB640, HB876, HB497, HB5539, HB4809, HB5308, HB4687, HB4070, HB4421, HB4412, HB3284, HB3369, HB3420, HB3449, HB4098, HB4281, HB4120, HB4504, HB4370, HB 1106, HB2370, HB2404, HB3863, HB2407, HB2253, HB2273, HB2040, HB1586, HB3788, HB3993, HB4690, HB4309, HB4696, HB2308, HB 1142, HB1533, HB1621, HB2242, HB2012, HB2193, HB2442, HB2464, HB2348, HB2313, HB2289, HB1942, HB2011, HB1629, HB2993, HB3592, HB3824, HB4076, HB4535, HB4623, HB4773, HB 1091, HB5115, HB5515, HB3372, HB5659, HB 127, HB386, HB 115, HB2868, HB 1249, HB4766, HB3720, HB4656, HB4879, HB 105, HB5383, HB4621, HB5431, HB5678, HB5534, HB4174, HB4212, HB3954, HB3966, HB3636, HB3918, HB1422, HB4765, HB4732, HB4742, HB5122, HB4518, HB5084, HB3986, HB4045, HB4144, HB3911, HB3976, HB4473, HB3425, HB3641, HB3642, HB3475, HB3509, HB3424, HB3383, HB4744, HB4531, HB4539, HB3159, HB5228, HB5370, HB4359, HB4398, HB4443, HB4466, HB3861, HB3849, HB4240, HB4706, HB4685, HB5354, HB5141, HB5686, HB3629, HB3554, HB3567, HB2015, HB3575, HB5381, HB1431, HB3514, HB4614, HB4546, HB4683, HB5681, HB5673, HB5663, HB4271, HB4350, HB4035, HB3807, HB3812, HB3552, HB3540, HB3715, HB3710, HB3664, HB4196, HB4233, HB4173, HB1998, HB3333, HB3510, HB4222, HB2070, HB2854, HB2347, HB 113, HB983, HB4847, HB1449, HB3833, HB5151, HB265, HB1845, HB782, HB 108, HB1960, HB158, HB1954, HB1955, HB2512, HB605, HB2581, HB2803, HB627, HB2667, HB1738, HB636, HB3679, HB2638, HB2655, HB871, HB2438, HB 1107, HB1765, HB1822, HB2153, HB4099, HB3732, HB3171, HB3178, HB3182, HB3749, HB2814, HB3977, HB4204, HB4207, HB4449, HB1820, HB1876, HB1939, HB1347, HB2593, HB2136, HB2132, HB2658, HB2413, HB2757, HB2080, HB3154, HB3063, HB3009, HB3448, HB3006, HB2844, HB3241, HB3680, HB3169, HB2078, HB2507, HB4559, HB3946, HB3460, HB3405, HB475, HB3463, HB3441, HB3520, HB2060, HB4731, HB4991, HB1991, HB5596, HB2014, HB2142, HB2673, HB2731, HB2417, HB2399, HB2301, HB3335, HB3234, HB3320, HB5573, HB4848, HB4748, HB4769, HB4795, HB2086, HB2234, HB2203, HB4916, HB5624, HB4505, HB139, HB5093, HB5302, HB5402, HB5606, HB2333, HB4630, HB4701, HB2583, HB2983, HB4924, HB3339, HB3793, HB3631, HB4882, HB5509, HB5499, HB5430, HB5561, HB5611, HB5043, HB5064, HB3733, HB3781, HB3219, HB32, HB4515, HB5348, HCR76, HCR127, HCR9, HCR40, HCR118, HR559

Keywords: low-THC cannabis, dispensing organization, Texas Compassionate-Use Program, medical use, patient access, registration, healthcare, legislation, Grow Texas fund, economic stabilization, infrastructure, oil and gas, constitutional amendment, severance tax, Texas STRONG defense fund, funding, public health, workforce development, revenue transfer, Veterans' Land Board