Transcript Highlights:

• I believe before you get started, you have a DE1 amendment.
• Any discussion to the DE1 amendment?
• The amendment is adopted to House File 2140 as amended.
• The amendment is adopted to House File 2140 as amended. Representative Craft, thank you, Mr. Chair.
• The amendment is adopted to House File 2140 as amended. Representative Craft, thank you, Mr. Chair.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Because the bill was heard for the very first time after the amendment deadline, there was no ability
• with ACLU California Action and Opposition, happy to answer any technical questions about First Amendment
• they were bargaining that language, they probably didn't consult with free speech expertise, constitutional
• that the analysis that you have before you today really highlights and points out some of the constitutional
• In section three of the bill, the amendments, which are in 262.32, there is a reference to the complaint

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Chairman, by... coming up with another committee substitute if we have time, or just doing a floor amendment
• Either way, with a floor amendment or with another committee sub at the committee's direction.
• minor, and then we add including by engaging in conduct that involves physical mistreatment or constitutes
• Chair lays out SJR 59 by Senator Birdwell as pending business This bill proposes a constitutional amendment
• related to a sexual offense regarded regardless of whether they believe the conduct reasonably constitutes

Bills: SB604, SB843, SB1636, SB2395, SB571, SB1224, SB1832, SB2392, SB747, SB2623, SB2624, SB2185

Keywords: bonds, education funding, Texas Permanent School Fund, financial transparency, speculative rating, school funding, deferred maintenance, tax revenue, education budget, school districts, education, finance, Texas Education Code, misconduct, child abuse, educators, investigation, criminal offense, education law, suspension

Transcript Highlights:

• Signed, Senator Case, chairman. do pass amended. Eyes, Senators Boner, do pass amended.
• balancing the budget amendments. balancing the budget amendments.
• Any discussion on the amendment? Any discussion on the amendment?
• amendment in second reading amendment amendment in second reading amendment number<00:52:51.120>
• Senate File 10, do pass amended. pass. Senate File 10, do pass amended.

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• that we we have identified an area that we believe<00:26:24.200> requires<00:26:24.760> amendment
• /c><00:26:25.280> to<00:26:25.400> allow<00:26:25.680> the believe requires amendment
• to allow the believe requires amendment to allow the AGO<00:26:26.720> to<00:26:26.920> equitably
• While the serious constitutional flaws with the pharmaceutical ad ban would certainly be litigated, it
• Due to the profound constitutional concerns with this provision, we would respectfully request that it

Keywords: 918, senate, all

Summary: The committee heard public testimony on a health insurance/home care nursing provision and on other consumer protection items. Nick Keis and Emily Walters, both parents of medically complex children, testified that commercial health plans had recently begun capping home care nursing as if it were intermittent home health visits, which they said was contrary to Minnesota law and legislative intent dating to 2010. They described severe impacts on their families, including hospitalizations, loss of nursing coverage, strain on waiver budgets, and the risk of children being forced out of the home and into institutions. Representative Bierman echoed that the bill was a straightforward clarification of existing law, not a new mandate or added cost, and a staff member later cited the statutory definition of home care nursing as ongoing, continuous nursing services that cannot be met through intermittent or visit-based care. The committee also discussed the practical difference between home health visits and private duty/home care nursing, with testimony emphasizing that the latter is medically necessary, assessed, and not unlimited in practice. Laura Sales of the Minnesota Attorney General’s Office testified on changes to the Consumer Protection Restitution Fund (CIPRA). She said the fund has begun distributing restitution, starting with consumers harmed by the closure of Woodbury Dental Arts, but that current statutory language limits the office’s flexibility to prorate payments. She asked for an amendment allowing the AGO to distribute available funds more equitably so more eligible consumers can receive some payment, rather than requiring full payment to the oldest claims first. Annette Meeks, representing Citizens Against Gambling Expansion, testified in support of banning sweepstakes gambling in the Commerce Committee omnibus report. She argued that online sweepstakes casinos are an illegal gray-market form of gambling, cited rapid growth and billions in revenue, and said other states have acted through enforcement and legislation to stop them. She urged the committee to include language from Senate File 4474 to clarify state law and prohibit sweepstakes gambling. No votes were taken in the portion of the meeting shown; members mainly asked questions and received testimony.

Transcript Highlights:

• The Supreme Court of Texas, by the way, in the Brackeen case, did hold that ICWA was constitutional and
• know we did have some conversations just a bit before you convened, and we would consider a floor amendment
• I would put that out as an amendment on the floor. And thank you for that.
• It was an unusual time in America—the first time in American history where constitutional rights were
• The bill amends the Texas Family Code to require parents whose rights have been terminated...

Bills: HB18, HB37, HB116, HB18, HB37, HB116, HB388, HB879, HB913, HB1151, HB2216, HB2358, HB2809, SB577, SB1590, SB1782, SB1887, SB2744

Keywords: HB 18, Texas Legislature, quorum break, quorum-busting, legislative walkout, absent legislators, political contributions, campaign finance, political expenditures, legislative caucus, specific-purpose committee, Texas Ethics Commission, civil penalty, show cause order, district court, Fifteenth Court of Appeals, session fundraising, travel lodging food expenses, legislative session, compelled attendance

Transcript Highlights:

• doctor choice and employee notices, while others simply have a handful of urgent care clinics that constitute
• HB 4415 would amend Labor Code Section 451.0025 to include all public employees, not just first responders
• HB 4415 would amend Labor Code Section 451.0025 to include all public employees, not just first responders
• John Shergold: Under Article I, Section 27 of the Texas Constitution, which Senator Wilson taught me
• Actually, in 2017, the legislature passed House Bill 1983 that amended Chapter 504 of the Labor Code

Summary: The subcommittee heard testimony on a broad agenda of workforce, labor, and workers’ compensation bills. HB 4676 would require political subdivision workers’ compensation networks to follow the same notice, access, and complaint rules as certified TDI networks; supporters said public employees and first responders deserve equal access to care, while municipal risk pool representatives opposed added regulation and said existing 504 networks already perform well. HB 4479 would create a rural workforce development grant program at TWC to support college-and-career readiness and local workforce alignment, and HB 3844 would define “opportunity youth” in state law to improve data, coordination, and access to services for disconnected young Texans; both drew strong support from rural, education, and chamber witnesses. HB 5545 would clarify federal tax treatment for wage-replacement benefits in non-subscriber injury benefit plans, with proponents calling it a win for employers and injured workers. HB 5118 would direct TWC and DIR to study AI and automated employment decision tools in hiring, including bias and oversight concerns. HB 1667 would move existing PTSD workers’ compensation language into a broader Labor Code chapter so more first responders, including state and campus officers, could qualify for benefits; supporters called it a technical fix to extend coverage more evenly across agencies. The committee also heard several first-responder and workers’ compensation bills. HB 2369 would speed up claims handling for injured first responders by allowing a single medical evaluation, giving carriers 60 days to accept or deny a claim, and letting workers seek treatment while disputes proceed; law enforcement supporters said it would help injured officers return to work faster, while opponents warned it would revive extent-of-injury waiver problems and increase litigation. HB 4483 would reclassify certain workers’ compensation maintenance taxes as surcharges to reduce retaliatory taxes imposed by other states on Texas-domiciled carriers, and HB 875, as revised by committee substitute, would create a small-project exception to municipal workers’ compensation and bonding requirements for certain low-value construction contracts in small cities; both were presented as cost-saving measures for Texas employers and local governments. HB 4415 would extend anti-retaliation protections for workers’ compensation claimants from first responders to all public employees and expressly waive sovereign immunity for those claims, with supporters describing it as closing a loophole that leaves public workers without the same remedy available in the private sector. The committee also took testimony on HB 5400, which would expand remedies for sexual harassment victims by removing the requirement to first file an administrative charge, extending the filing deadline from 300 days to two years, clarifying retaliation, and eliminating current damages caps. Supporters, including employment lawyers and a parent of a victim, said the current deadlines and caps prevent many survivors from obtaining counsel or full relief, especially younger workers and those in small workplaces or franchises. Across the agenda, witnesses repeatedly emphasized access to care, fair treatment for injured workers, rural workforce development, and stronger protections for vulnerable employees. After each bill was laid out and testimony heard, the chair generally closed the public hearing and left the bill pending; no final votes were taken, and the subcommittee adjourned after completing the agenda.

Transcript Highlights:

• Many folks don't realize, but the Massachusetts Constitution requires the House and the Senate to meet
• Senator Rodrigues's office, an amendment.
• Senator Rodrigues offers an amendment, which the clerk will read. Mr.
• . on Tuesday, February 11, 2025, and all such amendments shall be second-reading amendments to the proposed
• Further amendments in the third degree to such amendment shall be in order.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Senate met in informal session, beginning with recognition of the Masconomet Regional High School girls varsity soccer team, the 2004 MIAA Division 2 state champions, along with coaches, staff, and visiting House members. Senators offered praise for the team’s accomplishments and presented citations, noting the chamber was in informal session to satisfy the constitutional requirement to meet every 72 hours and to handle limited procedural business before a later budget debate. The Senate then adopted a motion to adjourn in memory of Christian Jose Fildago Barros, a young child who had battled a rare neuroblastoma and died on January 13. A moment of silence was observed in his memory. The main legislative action concerned House Bill 58, a fiscal year 2025 supplemental appropriations bill. Senator Rodrigues offered an amendment to replace the bill’s text with Senate Document 16, and the Senate suspended the rules to take up an order setting the bill for a second reading on Wednesday, February 12, 2025, with amendments due electronically by 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 11. The order was adopted, placing H.58 on the Orders of the Day for Wednesday. The Senate also adopted an order to meet again on Wednesday at 11:00 a.m. in formal session, then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• We've addressed an amendment 0459H. And we have struggled with the amendment.
• And you will be amendment with amendment. Passes amendment. Yes, okay. You got the number.
• Amendment 0573H.
• :27.520> section The amendment amends replacing section The amendment amends replacing section
• <04:31:49.359> I amendment? We got one amendment. I amendment? We got one amendment.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Representative Maggard offered the following amendment to amendment with title amendment barcode 458307
• Read the next amendment. Yes. Opposed, no. Show the amendment adopted. Read the next amendment.
• Representative Rizzo offered the following amendment to amendment with title amendment, barcode 34646467
• House Amendment 1-117705 to Senate Amendment 1-413632, with Senate Amendment 1-159-170, concurred in
• Representative Busada offered the following amendment to amendment. First amendment.

Summary: The House took up a series of Senate messages and concurred in several amendments before passing multiple bills. Early actions included unanimous passage of CS/CS/HB 1299 on Department of Health matters, CS/HB 1549 on financial institutions after removing a Senate-added trust-account provision, and CS/CS/SB 768 on foreign ties in business ownership after trimming registration requirements. The chamber also insisted on its housing amendment to CS/CS/CS/SB 184 after the Senate refused to concur. A major portion of the meeting focused on CS/CS/HB 875 on educator preparation. The House adopted an amendment restoring two teacher-prep courses, preserving the Florida Center for Teaching Excellence at Miami-Dade College in partnership with USF, and modifying the teacher candidate testing framework and mentor qualifications. Supporters said it reduced barriers while keeping standards; opponents raised concerns about the remaining “identity politics” language and other provisions. The bill then passed 91-22. The House also passed HB 1101 on out-of-network providers after adopting a House amendment that kept the original bill’s notice and referral provisions with a good-cause exemption, despite objections that it placed too much responsibility on doctors. Later, the chamber approved CS/CS/SB 180 on emergency preparedness and response, with members highlighting debris management, emergency planning, crane safety, and hurricane recovery provisions; it passed unanimously. The House then rejected concurrence in a Senate amendment to HB 1609 on waste incineration, and later spent substantial time debating CS/CS/HB 1115 on education, especially Schools of Hope, expanded co-location authority, funding, transportation, and school-district agreement terms. Critics argued the language was added late and could disadvantage traditional public schools, while supporters said it would expand options for students; the debate continued with the bill still under consideration at the end of the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• Representative Maggard offered the following amendment to amendment with title amendment barcode 458307
• Read the next amendment. Yes. Opposed, no. Show the amendment adopted. Read the next amendment.
• Are there questions on the Senate amendment as amended?
• Representative Rizzo offered the following amendment to amendment with title amendment, barcode 34646467
• Representative Busatta offered the following amendment to an amendment. First amendment.

Summary: The House convened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, quorum established, and several recognitions, including a legislative intern, a guest in the gallery, and Representative Bruce Antone’s upcoming induction into the Tuskegee Athletic Hall of Fame. The Speaker also gave brief remarks about the end of session and the freshman class. The chamber then took up a series of Senate-returned messages and concurred or insisted on several amendments while moving bills toward final passage. The House unanimously approved CS/CS/HB 1299 on Department of Health matters, CS/HB 1549 on financial institutions after adopting a House amendment to remove the IOTA-related provision, and CS/CS/SB 768 on foreign ties and business interests after a House concurrence motion. It also insisted on its amendment to CS/CS/CS/SB 184 on housing. CS/CS/HB 875 on educator preparation was amended to restore House provisions on teacher-prep courses, the Florida Center for Teaching Excellence at Miami-Dade College, and related testing and mentor-qualification changes; it passed 91-22 after debate over teacher certification, testing, and “identity politics” language. HB 1101 on out-of-network providers was amended to keep the House’s original notice and referral framework with a good-cause exemption; it passed 87-27 despite objections that it placed too much responsibility on doctors. After recess, the House took up CS/CS/SB 180 on emergency preparedness and response. Members described changes including removal of some homestead-assessment and debris-removal provisions, a study requirement for a post-hurricane county restriction concept, and a Florida Keys evacuation-time change paired with a 10-year cap of 900 permit allocations; the bill passed 116-0. The House also refused to concur in a Senate amendment to HB 1609 on waste incineration and requested the Senate recede. Later, the House returned to HB 1101 and insisted on its amendment after the Senate refused to concur. The longest debate came on CS/CS/HB 1115 on education, where the House amendment replaced the Senate version with the substance of HB 1267, including Schools of Hope, higher education governance, and course transparency. Members questioned provisions expanding Schools of Hope co-location and sponsorship authority beyond traditional opportunity zones, the role of the Department of Education versus school districts, transportation and facility-cost issues, and performance-based agreements. Supporters said the changes would expand options for students and use vacant or underutilized facilities; opponents argued the language was added late, lacked transportation funding, and could allow charter operators to enter high-performing schools. The bill remained under debate at the end of the transcript, with no final vote shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• that since this is 6E this is amending that since this is 6E this is amending 6E<00:34:57.880>
• adopt all of hda's proposed amendments adopt all of hda's proposed amendments in<01:46:35.760>
• <01:47:18.000> to<01:47:18.159> amend adopt hda's proposed amendment to amend adopt
• hda's proposed amendment to amend the<01:47:18.520> definition<01:47:18.920> of<01:47:
• <01:47:44.840> as with and Tech amendments as with and Tech amendments as necessary<01:47:

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The Housing Committee heard testimony on several housing-related bills. On SB 26, SD 2, relating to affordable housing, the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development explained a prior transit-oriented development study that identified roughly 59,000 possible units and about 25,000 affordable units from known projects, and said the bill would help fill gaps by evaluating additional public lands for housing suitability and possible co-use with existing facilities. Members asked about the need for resources and staffing to do that work, and OPSD said it would need time and consultant support to carry it out. Testimony on the bill included support from state and county housing agencies and comments from planning and land use entities. On SB 66, SD 2, relating to housing and historic preservation review, SHPD and OHA both testified. SHPD said the bill would not override existing burial-site protections and that county staff with proper qualifications could make historic-property determinations locally, while OHA asked for clearer language requiring consultation when Native Hawaiian historic sites are involved and clearer procedures if an adverse effect is found. Committee members and SHPD discussed whether the bill should explicitly preserve existing Chapter 6E processes, whether counties have qualified staff, and how quickly a county would have to decide if it cannot complete the review itself and must use a third-party reviewer. Supporters said the measure could speed permitting and keep decisions local; one opponent argued it could rush approvals and strain infrastructure. The committee also heard support from housing, construction, business, and food-industry groups, and opposition from some preservation and community advocates. The committee then heard SB 332, SD 1, on foreclosure-related protections, with testimony focused on Lānaʻi and concerns about speculative real estate after the foreclosure moratorium ended. SB 414, SD 2, on restoring access to disaster-affected areas, drew support from HHFDC, DHS, and the Maui Chamber; HHFDC noted DOH plans for a temporary paved access road to the Kayola temporary housing site and said agencies were discussing which parcels would be needed. On SB 102, SD 2, relating to affordable housing and third-party historic review, SHPD said it would need to do more upfront screening and that the bill’s timelines and third-party provisions should be clearer; OHA said the measure should include a sunset and better staffing, and asked that the department fill positions to meet review demand. No votes or final committee actions were reported in the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• 20 of the Wyoming Constitution. 20 of the Wyoming Constitution.
• Um and let me just generally amendments.
• Would you going to be a few amendments.
• Amendment is adopted. Is there any further... Adopted. Is there any further amendments?
• 102 as amended. 102 as amended. Representative<00:46:52.319> Braden.

Bills: HB0076, HB0102, HB0115

Keywords: annexation, landowner rights, municipal law, city planning, property, local government, artificial intelligence, synthetic sexual material, child protection, self-harm, criminal liability, cardiac emergency, defibrillator, school safety, training, public health, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Are there any amendments for this bill? I do not see amendments.
• <01:09:43.040> because um put out the two amendments because um put out the two amendments
• But I offer two amendments here.
• <01:20:59.040> yes you like to address your amendments yes you like to address your amendments
• <01:26:48.000> because move either of the Amendments because move either of the Amendments

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• and moving down onto page one amending and moving down onto page one amending title<00:07:53.840
• constituted to engage in a hand recount. constituted to engage in a hand recount.
• Are there any amendments?
• amendment, please signify by saying I. amendment, please signify by saying I. >> I.
• for House Bill 16 as amended. for House Bill 16 as amended.

Bills: SF0028, SF0030, SF0031, SF0032

Keywords: voting, elections, electronic voting systems, transparency, public testing, voter registration, qualified elector, residency requirements, voting rights, mortgage modification, priority, electronic signatures, real property, financial covenants, 911 services, emergency response, grant funding, next generation technology, government accountability, public safety

Transcript Highlights:

• However, I don't know if you remember the first scene; we have term we tried to pass a conclusion amendment
• That's why I'm sponsoring that constitutional amendment, helping them to remove that limit of five acres
• ...when we pass the constitutional amendment, if it passed, they can just put solar partners if they

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on H. 3256, a bill stemming from the Massachusetts Cranberry Revitalization Task Force that would remove Chapter 61A barriers for certain renewable energy projects on non-producing agricultural land. Supporters said the bill would let farmers separate adjacent land from Chapter 61A without a municipal right of first refusal, avoid rollback and advance tax penalties, and use small solar or other renewable projects to generate supplemental income while keeping the farm in operation. Testimony emphasized that the proposal is intended to be “farm-first,” limited to marginal or accessory land, and could also produce local tax revenue for municipalities. Some members raised concerns about whether the bill should be limited to solar, the appropriate project size, impacts on other agricultural sectors, and whether future sales or conversion back to other uses should trigger local rights of first refusal. Witnesses said the bill had been reported favorably in a prior session and noted that similar projects typically involve 20-year leases with extensions. The committee also took testimony on S. 2009, which would authorize regional transportation ballot initiatives. MAPC and Transportation for Mass argued that the bill would give municipalities and groups of municipalities a flexible tool to raise local revenue for transportation projects such as transit, roads, bridges, bikeways, and pedestrian infrastructure, with sunset provisions so the revenue ends when the project ends. They said the measure would not raise taxes on its own, but would allow local voters to decide whether to adopt a revenue source, and pointed to examples from other states where similar initiatives funded major transit and infrastructure projects. No votes were taken during the hearing. Testimony was also heard on S. 1922, which would create a Massachusetts fund allowing voluntary taxpayer donations to the UN Least Developed Countries Fund or related 501(c)(3) nonprofits supporting climate-vulnerable communities. Climate Reality Project representatives said the bill would let Massachusetts residents support climate resilience projects in the world’s poorest countries at no cost to the Commonwealth, and could serve as a model for other states. Senators questioned how recipient countries and nonprofits would be selected, what safeguards would exist regarding countries such as Yemen, and how taxpayers would know where donations would go; witnesses said the fund would be administered through the UN system and that they would provide more clarification. Rep. Michelle Ciccolo also testified on H. 3051, seeking a one-year deferral of the higher interest rate that applies when deferred property taxes become due after the death of a senior or veteran, saying the current jump to 16% can burden heirs and discourage use of the deferral program. The hearing concluded without any votes or committee actions.

Transcript Highlights:

• Starting constitutes having a contract or breaking ground? Starting constitutes having a contract.
• Senate Bill 2133 will amend Section 351.152 of the tax code to the list of cities entitled to receive
• Senate Bill 1483 amends Chapter 351 of the tax code to extend the convention...
• So I would appreciate your expeditious help because if I can work this as a floor amendment and reach

Bills: SB1071, SB1444, SB1483, SB1556, SB1703, SB1756, SB1854, SB2036, SB2133, SB2297, SB2622, SB2779, SB2955, SB2979

Keywords: municipality, tax revenue, hotel project, convention center, economic development, hotel tax, municipal authority, local governments, local authority, convention centers, hotel occupancy tax, municipal finance, local tax revenue, tourism, hotel and convention center project, Tax Code Chapter 351, city revenue, special district, Texas municipalities, venue financing

Transcript Highlights:

• forward with some technical amendments forward with some technical amendments or<01:48:43.400>
• <01:48:51.599> for make some technical amendments for make some technical amendments for clarity
• and four make some technical amendments and four make some technical amendments for<01:56:02.599
• <01:57:43.000> for we'll make some technical amendments for we'll make some technical amendments
• please voting on SB 694 with amendments please voting on SB 694 with amendments representative<02

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The House Committee on Judiciary and Hawaiian Affairs heard SB 104, which would restrict the use of restrictive housing or solitary confinement in state-operated and state-contracted correctional facilities, with specified exceptions. The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation strongly opposed the bill, saying its existing policy already meets or exceeds ACA and National Institute of Corrections standards, and objecting to language they said would give the oversight commission operational decision-making authority. The Hawaii Correctional System Oversight Commission supported the bill, but also said it was not intended to run operations and described concerns about restrictive housing practices, including CoreCivic’s SHIP program at Saguaro. Supporters included the Office of Hawaiian Affairs, the Office of the Public Defender, the Disability Rights Center, ACLU Hawaii, Easter Seals Hawaii, and individual testifiers. They argued that Native Hawaiians are disproportionately impacted by incarceration, that solitary confinement is harmful and linked to depression, anxiety, suicidality, and poor reentry outcomes, and that confinement beyond 15 days is widely condemned under international standards. Several testifiers cited suicides and deaths in custody as reasons to codify limits in statute rather than rely on policy alone. The department responded that it already has 24/7 medical care, though not 24/7 mental health coverage at one facility, and explained that it uses four custody categories: disciplinary segregation, administrative segregation, protective custody, and placements for inmates seeking separation for safety reasons. Members questioned the department and commission about the SHIP program, whether the bill was based on other states’ laws, and how current policies compare with national standards. The director said the bill was too ambiguous in places and that the department was willing to work with the commission on policy changes, but still opposed the measure as written. The committee took testimony and questions; no vote or final action was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• THAT IS THE AMENDMENT. >> Chair: QUESTIONS ON THE AMENDMENT?
• TO THE AMENDMENT, ANY APPEARANCE FORMS ON THE AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDMENT, ANY DEBATE ON THE AMENDMENT
• SUBSTITUTE AMENDMENT IS ADOPTED SO ANOTHER AMENDMENT LATE FILED AMENDMENT BARCODE 377612.
• THE AMENDMENT IS ADOPTED, BACK ON THE MAIN AMENDMENT BARCODE 642556 AS AMENDED BY THAT AND WRITTEN AMENDMENT
• AMENDMENT 853150 WHICH HAS NOW BEEN AMENDED, ANY QUESTIONS ON THAT AMENDMENT?

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• constitutional constitutional officers<00:14:37.519> as<00:14:37.800> Chief<00:14:38.079
• <00:48:18.200> so Practices Act that might be amended so Practices Act that might be amended
• <00:50:42.599> um<00:50:43.160> but Court interprets our constitution um but Court
• interprets our constitution um but if<00:50:43.680> there<00:50:43.839> is<00:50:44.040
• no protection would be this amendment no protection would be afforded<00:55:59.799> uh<00:55:

Keywords: 1183, house