Video & Transcript Research : 'statutory compilation'

Page 212 of 341
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Appropriations and Budget Human Services Subcommittee Feb 16th, 2026 at 10:30 am

A&B Human Services Subcommittee

Transcript Highlights:
  • Currently, DHS, who does a great job, responds on a case-by-case basis, but there is no statutory enhanced
Keywords: 914, all
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Rules Feb 16th, 2026 at 08:48 am

Senate Rules

Transcript Highlights:
  • the EIBA is currently about to engage in active rulemaking, and the memorial language departs from statutory
Keywords: 996, all
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Appropriations and Finance Jan 28th, 2026 at 05:50 pm

House Appropriations & Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • I know there are statutory guidelines on that.
Keywords: 996, all
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Public Health May 19th, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • Sure, the clear direction from the statutory language.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Economic Development May 19th, 2025

Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • However, due to a lack of statutory authority for DPS to administer the grants, the substitute Transfers
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

S/C on Defense & Veterans' Affairs May 5th, 2025

S/C on Defense & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh, this bill also clarifies and updates statutory language, uh, to ensure consistency throughout the
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Rules and Administration - Subcommittee on Ethical Conduct - Part 2 - 05/05/25

Rules and Administration - Subcommittee on Ethical Conduct

Transcript Highlights:
  • last hearing and we had that large discussion about 56.4 and statute 10A.07 about what the current statutory
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Elections Committee Mar 26th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • Historically, the statutory process of certification has been unconstitutional.
Keywords: 988, house, all
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Through budget trailer bills, we now have statutory authorization for criminal and civil remote proceedings
Summary: The California Legislature met in joint convention for the annual State of the Judiciary address, with judges and justices from across the state in attendance along with Governor Newsom and other statewide officials. The opening included prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, followed by the formal introduction of Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero and the California Supreme Court justices. Speakers emphasized the importance of judicial independence, the courts’ role in protecting rights and democracy, and the value of collaboration between the legislative and judicial branches. Chief Justice Guerrero focused on the state of the judicial branch, beginning with budget pressures from prior cuts and noting partial restoration in the governor’s proposed budget, while urging continued stable funding for courts, court-appointed counsel, and judgeships in high-need counties. She highlighted the expansion and benefits of remote proceedings, ongoing judicial vacancies, workload growth, and efforts to improve data collection and case-weighting. She also discussed implementation of the CARE Act, the court interpreter workforce pilot, CASA and kin-first child welfare efforts, courthouse security and facilities projects, and the judiciary’s work on generative AI guardrails. A major portion of the address addressed the recent problems with the California bar exam and broader State Bar oversight. Guerrero said the court would pursue remedies for examinees harmed by the failures and would strengthen admissions oversight, including the role of the Committee of Bar Examiners. She also reiterated support for pro bono legal services and discussed immigration-related courthouse access, citing state laws limiting cooperation with federal immigration enforcement in courthouses. The convention concluded after remarks thanking the judiciary and Legislature, and the joint session adjourned without any recorded votes or formal legislative action.
TX
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

March 4, 2025 - 04:00 PM

Transcript Highlights:
  • And since there is no statutory requirement for school districts to report expenditure data for the revenue
Summary: The Pre-K through 12 Budget Subcommittee met for its first meeting of the 2025 session and received an overview of add-on weights in the Florida Education Finance Program (FEFP), followed by a Department of Education presentation on a legislatively required study of add-on weight funding and expenditures. The chair explained that add-on weights apply to acceleration and career programs such as AP, IB, ACE, CAPE, dual enrollment, early graduation, and certain small-district needs, and noted that add-on funding has grown substantially as the base student allocation increased. The chair also raised concerns that the department’s report did not clearly show whether districts’ reported costs included the full costs required by the proviso, and asked for more specificity on any recommended adjustment to the weights. Deputy Commissioner Suzanne Pridgen said the department surveyed districts on how they spent add-on revenue for fiscal years 2021-22 through 2023-24, with categories including teacher compensation, materials, equipment, professional development, exam fees, counseling, apprenticeship costs, and other expenditures. She said most add-on funds were spent on teacher bonuses and compensation, with AP, ACE, CAPE, and dual enrollment showing the largest increases in spending in 2023-24 due to higher FEFP funding; IB and early graduation were relatively flat. The department reported that add-on revenue covered between 41.8% and 79.2% of total program expenditures in 2023-24 and recommended adjusting add-on weights to better align with pre-2023-24 funding relationships, though no specific percentage was given during the meeting. Members asked about how “other” expenditures were categorized, whether teacher compensation included only statutory bonuses, how dual enrollment tuition and fees were counted, the small district factor, and whether the weights incentivize districts to offer advanced programs. The department clarified that teacher compensation in the study referred only to bonuses, that some “other” costs included charter school payments and dual enrollment tuition/fees, and that the small district factor is 1.0277, increasing base funding by 2.77% for fiscally constrained counties. No votes were taken, and the meeting adjourned after the presentation and questions.