Transcript Highlights:

• We can carve off part of the coding so we have a non-coded and coated—the machine picks it up the same
• We can carve off part of the coding so we have a non-coded and coated—the machine picks it up the same
• We can carve off part of the coding so we have a non-coded and coated—the machine picks it up the same
• We can carve off part of the coding so we have a non-coded and coated—the machine picks it up the same
• We can carve off part of the coding so we have a non-coded and coated—the machine picks it up the same

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee took up House File 737, which would amend Minnesota’s lead- and cadmium-related product restrictions and was re-referred to the Committee on Environment, Finance and Policy. Representative Bjorn Olson said the bill was prompted by a constituent who could no longer make cadmium-based art supplies in Minnesota, and he argued the law unintentionally swept in professional art materials that are used safely and are important to Western art culture. The committee first adopted the author’s A2 amendment, which broadened the bill to include additional exemptions beyond paint and pastels, including certain pens, mechanical pencils, and vehicle keys/key fobs. Testimony in support came from Darren Reenie of Wet Paint Artist Materials and Framing, who said artist paint and related supplies account for a significant share of sales and that the ban threatens independent art supply businesses and artists’ access to essential pigments. Josh Fiser of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation supported the key and key fob exemption, saying the current law is overly broad, exposure risk is minimal, and Minnesota should align with California and European Union standards. Bill Morgan of the Arts and Creative Materials Institute and Writing Instrument Manufacturers Association also supported the amendment, arguing there was little scientific basis for including pens, mechanical pencils, and professional artist materials, and citing prior reviews in the Consumer Product Safety Commission and the European Union. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, through Assistant Commissioner Kirk Kadelka, opposed broad exemptions and emphasized that no amount of lead is safe for children. He said the law was based on evidence from consumer products associated with elevated blood lead levels and argued that safer alternatives exist for many of the items in the amendment, including pens, mechanical pencils, and some key components. He also raised concerns about exposure during production and disposal. Committee members questioned the scope of the exemptions and whether the industry had workable alternatives. The A2 amendment was adopted, and the bill was then advanced for further consideration and re-referred as noted by the chair.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:41:55.079> of Education um did this visitor code of Education um did this visitor code
• Once again, the issue is not the absence of policies or codes of conduct.
• Once again, the issue is not the absence of policies or codes of conduct.
• A code of conduct addresses behavior upfront, and that's for reasonable adults.
• A code of conduct addresses behavior upfront, and that's for reasonable adults.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The Committee on Education met on January 30 and heard testimony on several bills, beginning with an announcement asking testifiers and members to keep remarks brief because of weather. The vice chair also explained that HB 440, relating to immigration issues in schools and state hospitals, was removed from the agenda because the proposal would not create meaningful legal protections and immigration policy is governed by federal law. The committee then moved through a series of education-related measures, with testimony largely from the Department of Education, the School Facilities Authority, the Attorney General’s office, unions, advocacy groups, and individual testifiers. On HB 330, concerning school impact fees, the School Facilities Authority supported the bill as aligning policy with implementation, while the Tax Foundation of Hawaii said the fee accounts have accumulated large balances, including more than $20 million in impact fee funds and nearly $9 million from predecessor fair-share contributions, and urged that collected money be used rather than left idle. DOE said it would follow up on the balance and why it was not being used. On HB 1188, dealing with workforce housing, DOE and the Charter School Commission offered comments or support, the Attorney General suggested clarifying the phrase “within commuting distance” by using a mileage standard and adding repayment language, and HSTA, HGEA, and others supported the bill, with HSTA saying teachers need housing to be able to live and work in Hawaii. On HB 624 and HB 625, both related to school psychologists, DOE said it would participate in a work group on the pathway bill and supported the incentive program bill; school psychologists and related groups supported the measures, while one testifier said DOE should not lead the work group alone because school psychologists may work in many education settings beyond DOE schools. The committee also heard HB 1314 on youth mental health in schools. DOE described its student support process, universal screening tools, and behavioral health services, saying schools already identify and respond to concerns and that staff are trained to report issues, while the Attorney General warned the bill could expose schools to liability and recommended a broad liability waiver. Testimony was mixed, with several supporters and one opponent. On HB 616, concerning school safety and harassment protections for educational workers, the Attorney General sought clarifying amendments on harassment definitions, temporary restraining order costs, and paid leave, while HSTA, HGEA, and individual teachers strongly supported the bill, describing harassment incidents and arguing for a standardized statewide response. DOE said it already has reporting pathways, visitor codes of conduct, trespass notices, and an ethics hotline, but acknowledged implementation varies by school and that staff can escalate concerns if needed. The committee also began hearing HB 88 on a three-year pilot program for athletic travel, but the transcript cuts off before that bill’s testimony is completed or any votes are taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• prior to changing their land use code prior to changing their land use code which<02:06:18.000><
• utility, or storm water codes.
• storm water code.
• , enforcing a local life safety code, enforcing a local life safety code, including<02:26:32.479>
• <02:26:48.160> Thank utility, or storm water codes. Thank utility, or storm water codes.

Keywords: 981, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The 1963 Legislative Assembly did enact North Dakota Century Code 52-12, which authorized state agencies
• or Administrative Code sections that provide authorization for those plans.
• North Dakota Century Code 54-03-03.28 is linked in your agenda.
• Last legislative session, there were some changes made to North Dakota Century Code 54-03-08.08.
• And Beth, just I want to make sure, as I’m reading the code part of it, it still has the requirement

Summary: The Employee Benefits Committee met to hear presentations on state employee health insurance, compensation, leave policies, labor market conditions, and prevailing wage issues, then later took up committee rules and bill-draft jurisdiction. PERS reviewed the history and structure of the state health plan, noting the state has paid the full family premium since 1979, described cost-control and benefit-enhancement changes over time, and explained current plan options, wellness incentives, employer wellness discounts, and the upcoming bid process for the 2027-29 contract. HRMS then presented compensation comparisons showing state classified pay generally trails private and regional markets, with larger gaps at higher-level jobs, and reviewed benefits and leave policies, including the new enhanced annual leave and new-hire leave, the state’s unpaid family leave structure, and varying tuition reimbursement practices. Job Service reported on labor force trends, low unemployment, high labor force participation, job openings, and wage growth, and OMB said there are no state prevailing-wage requirements beyond federal Davis-Bacon rules for federally funded projects. The committee then considered a proposed amendment to Joint Rule 211 to better align the health insurance mandate review process with recent statutory changes. Members discussed how the rule should reference both the committee’s required actuarial reports and the Legislative Council cost-benefit analysis, and the amendment was adopted on a roll call vote. The committee also discussed how its jurisdiction decisions affect whether a bill draft receives actuarial analysis, with staff explaining that a decision not to take jurisdiction means the bill is not treated as impacting the relevant retirement or health plans for purposes of that analysis. After that, the committee began reviewing bill drafts for jurisdiction. The first draft, bill draft 33, would automatically renew pre-tax elections for dental and vision coverage during open enrollment instead of requiring annual re-election. Members debated whether it had any actuarial impact, noting the state does not pay those premiums directly, and the discussion was still underway when the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• Pink Central Coast, Code Pink East Bay, Collective for Inclusion Education, Communities United. for
• It comes directly from education code.
• Under existing law in the Education Code.
• The factually accurate standard is already in the Ed Code. So that is not something that's new.
• I'm part of Code Pink.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• What this language does is allows specific providers to build Medicaid using collaborative care codes
• What this language does is allows specific providers to build Medicaid using collaborative care codes
• What this language does is allows specific providers to build Medicaid using collaborative care codes
• Medicaid using collaborative care codes Medicaid using collaborative care codes establish<00:08:
• number of licensed providers by ZIP code number of licensed providers by ZIP code and<00:15:12.480

Bills: HF958, HF688, HF702

Keywords: mental health, behavioral health, psychiatric care, collaborative care model, healthcare funding, service dog, service animal, service dog in training, assistance dog, guide dog, disability rights, housing accommodations, fair housing, landlord, rental housing, homeowners association, HOA, Minnesota human services, accessible housing, reasonable accommodation

Transcript Highlights:

• Our first bill this year is House Bill 2153, Internal Revenue Code Conformity Deductions.
• summarize the bill very shortly, the bill creates tax credits and deductions in the Arizona revenue code
• Internal Revenue Code Conformity Deductions.
• summarize the bill very shortly, the bill creates tax credits and deductions in the Arizona revenue code

Keywords: 1182, all

Summary: The meeting opened with discussion of House Bill 2153, Internal Revenue Code Conformity Deductions. Nicole explained that the bill would create tax credits and deductions in the Arizona revenue code to mirror most of the items in H.R. 1 passed in July. She noted that the bill had already been heard in a joint hearing between House Ways and Means and Senate Finance, where it received heavy opposition. No additional testimony or substantive debate was offered. Ranking Member Blackman had no further comments. The chair thanked attendees and adjourned the meeting. No votes or actions were taken during this portion of the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• Kentucky utilize barcodes or QR codes Kentucky utilize barcodes or QR codes for<00:59:35.280>
• code to the public for public scrutiny. code to the public for public scrutiny.
• that source code. that source code.
• actors, bad guys to have access to code actors, bad guys to have access to code that<01:43:04.719
• somebody who might compromise your code somebody who might compromise your code in<01:43:45.520>

Keywords: Discussion of BR 25 (2026 RS) 04:15 Presentation on voting systems by ES&S 48:14 Presentation on voting systems by Hart InterCivic and Harp Enterprises 01:13:07, 958, all

Summary: The committee met to approve the October 21 minutes and then took up BR 25 for the 2026 regular session, a proposal relating to prohibited uses of tax dollars and public resources. The sponsors said the bill is intended to strengthen existing law by adding civil and criminal penalties for taxpayer-funded advocacy on ballot questions, especially in light of controversies during the 2024 election over school officials and districts using public resources to oppose a constitutional amendment. They also described related concerns about school districts hiring third-party lobbyists and public relations firms, particularly in Fayette County, and said the proposal was meant to keep tax dollars focused on public services rather than political persuasion. Committee members raised several concerns about scope and drafting. Some asked whether the bill should specifically mention schools, school boards, and school employees, and the sponsors said they would add that language. Others questioned whether the measure would also affect local government lobbying through groups like KLC and KCO, and the sponsors said they intended to focus narrowly on schools while exempting certain advocacy organizations and internal government lobbyists. Members also asked whether public employees could still speak as private individuals, and the sponsors said yes. Several members suggested splitting the lobbying and ballot-advocacy issues into separate bills, and the sponsors said they would consider that. Members also pressed for clarification on how the bill would apply in practice, including whether it would cover legal challenges to petition drives or only advocacy after a question is on the ballot. Counsel for the sponsors said the bill would not cover some petition-related litigation as drafted, though they believed it should. The sponsors and supporters argued the proposal was needed to give the existing prohibition real enforcement, while some members warned that the language could unintentionally limit legitimate public representation or be too broad if not carefully drafted. No final vote was taken during the discussion.

Transcript Highlights:

• An example would be the Building Code Council, which we do not serve on.
• example would be the building code example would be the building code council<00:25:13.840> uh
• When this was first brought about, you know, these establishing language from the code sections back
• When this was first brought about, you know, these establishing language from the code sections back
• When this was first brought about, you know, these establishing language from the code sections back

Keywords: Government Structure - Room 409, 12 January, 2026; 2:00 P.M., 925, all

Summary: The committee held its first meeting under its new Government Structure Committee name and began by electing Senator Chris Johnson as secretary. The chair explained the committee’s purpose as improving efficiency, effectiveness, and stewardship of taxpayer dollars, and said members had asked statewide officials and agencies for ideas on streamlining government and reducing costs. Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce Andy Gibson testified at length about ways his agency has found efficiencies, especially after the COVID-era consolidation of three agencies into one. He said state procurement and construction rules can add major time and cost to projects, citing a proposed $300,000 building that grew to about $1 million through the state process. He recommended raising repair and quote thresholds, streamlining construction procedures, reconsidering restrictions on payments between state agencies, and allowing more flexibility for agencies to help one another when authorized. Members questioned Gibson about the repair caps, the construction cost increase, Ticketmaster and other technology/vendor arrangements, and whether agencies should have more decentralized control over contracts. The chair and several senators agreed the committee should examine red tape, vendor relationships, and procurement rules, and Gibson said he would provide more information and work with the committee. No formal legislation was acted on in the portion provided. The transcript then shifted to testimony from the Insurance Commissioner, who said his department is heavily affected by IT and board structure issues and oversees 17 boards. He urged consolidation of some boards, criticized the effects of SB 2362 on special-fund agencies, and said the State Fire Academy and other operations have been constrained by general-fund treatment and limited authority. He also discussed insurance-rate pressures, including projected premium increases, wind pool rate concerns on the Gulf Coast, and the need for mitigation to stabilize costs.

Transcript Highlights:

• Members, the Minnesota Board of Electricity adopts the electrical code, including any amendments.
• 12:50.200> adopts<00:12:50.760> the<00:12:50.839> electrical<00:12:51.360> code
• , Electricity adopts the electrical code, Electricity adopts the electrical code, including<00:12
• The board includes 12 electrical code.
• Members, the Board of High Pressure Piping Systems adopts and amends the high-pressure piping code and

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The question I have is in the medical coding, how is this going to be coded and how is this going to
• There's got to be some sort of medical coding. How much is it going to cost?
• All of it has a billing code.
• All these screenings cost: there's going to be a billing code associated with it.
• And it doesn't add to the quality of care; it simply adds to the billable codes on your bill.

Bills: HB2894, HB3418, HB3415, HB3413, HB3414, HB3416, HB3417, HB3419, HB3420, HB1739, HB1752, HB1979, HB2941, HB2992, HB3075, HB3086, HB3177, HB3269, HB3278, HB3279, HB3497, HB3644, HB4432, HB3720, HB3849, HB3882, HB3919, HB3941, HB4118, HB4141, HB4268, HB4342, HB4428, HB4429, HB4434

Keywords: HB2894, Oklahoma Rural Jobs Act, rural jobs, rural investment, tax credit, capital investment tax credit, state tax credits, economic development, rural fund, rural investor, qualified investment, eligible business, Department of Commerce, rural business, investment certification, tax liability, credit cap, workforce development, small business finance, rural development

Transcript Highlights:

• So you're recognized to explain Amendment bar code 4, 8, 6, 1, 7, 3. Thank you.
• All Amendment bar code 4, 0, 6, 4, 5, 5, >> Thank you, Chair, members.
• Bar Code 9, 6, 8, 6, 6, 7. You're recognized to explain the amendment.
• All Amendment bar code 4, 1, 5, 8, 1, 9, >> Thank you, chair.
• Amendment bar code 6, 6, 6, 2, 6, 7. Thank you, Sir. Mr.

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair: Representative, you're recognized to present your Amendment bar code 185837.
• And just to be clear, it's bar code 399125. Chair Robinson: Any questions on the amendment?
• Representative Abbott, you're recognized to explain that Amendment, bar code 453787.
• Clerk: Andrew Khalil, Florida Association of Code Enforcement waives in support.
• Sam Wagner, Florida League of Cities waives in support and Andrew Khalil, Florida Association of Code

Transcript Highlights:

• Texas Insurance Code Title 5, Chapter 542A, Section 542.003.
• But the code does not make it clear if the payment is accepted by the claimant after the pre-suit notice
• When reviewing Texas Insurance Code cases, if an insured hires an attorney, the attorney may handle the
• Does not include pharmacists or pharmacies under Texas Insurance Code 1458.
• The Texas Insurance Code provides coverage for telemedicine services.

Transcript Highlights:

• There's a lot of commodity codes.
• There's a process through administrative code. They request to use that contract.
• There's a process through administrative code.
• I've been in the procurement game for years and I hate commodity codes.
• There's over 8,000 commodity codes, and they're very tough to follow.

Summary: The subcommittee heard a panel on Florida’s IT procurement process from the Florida Digital Service, the Department of Management Services, and the Department of Financial Services. Witnesses walked through the procurement lifecycle, including planning, market research, solicitation, evaluation, award, implementation, and closeout, and emphasized the role of budget timing, contract managers, and subject matter experts. DMS described the state’s enterprise contracting system, noting more than 1,100 active vendor agreements, over 800 involving IT services, and the statutory requirement to request 25 quotes for certain IT purchases. DFS demonstrated the Florida Accountability Contract Tracking System (FACS), explaining how agencies upload contract and payment data and how the public can search contracts and related documents online. Members focused on accountability, transparency, and whether the state is getting the best products and vendors. Questions addressed how contracts are vetted, how technical evaluations are performed, how financial consequences are used for missed deliverables, how public records and confidential information are handled, and how the state screens vendors for foreign-concern or bad-actor issues. Witnesses said agencies rely on technical experts for evaluations, that contract terms should include measurable deliverables and meaningful financial consequences, and that agencies—not procurement staff—generally manage performance, though Florida Digital Service oversees large IT projects of $10 million or more. The committee then shifted to broader policy discussion, including Senate Bill 7026 and proposals to reorganize state IT governance. Several members argued for stronger centralization under a state CIO or similar enterprise authority, while others cautioned against abrupt restructuring and stressed the need for a transition plan. Members also raised concerns about workforce retention, consulting services, recurring project overruns, and the need for better planning and periodic monitoring. No votes were taken; the meeting ended with the chair thanking members and staff and adjourning the subcommittee.

Transcript Highlights:

• really understand that can do you know what they're talking it says there's a disability penalty and code
• Governed by Chapter 37 of the Education Code.
• And do private schools follow the Texas Education Code?
• The, so there are pieces of the Education Code. that apply to private schools.
• I can't remember if it's in the family code or the education code, but there are laws that apply to private

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• experience is is we establish a a code experience is is we establish a a code for<02:01:21.040><
• <02:01:57.360> Is they don't meet any of the codes. Is they don't meet any of the codes.
• Uh, it is getting somewhat creative in how you look at the code and what the intent of that code is.
• your codes and then we go through code your codes and then we go through code review<02:07:49.920
• it burns because you don't meet code it burns because you don't meet code anywhere<02:11:15.760>

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I don't know the code system very well.
• I don't know the code system very well.
• I don't know the code system very well.
• I don't know the code system very well.
• , Electric Code, Electric Code, this<01:22:06.240> bill<01:22:06.480> does<01:22:06.600

Bills: SF0095, SF0107, SF0112

Keywords: driver's license, motor vehicle services, third-party providers, Wyoming, regulatory compliance, motor vehicle, registration, license plate, electronic system, State Department of Transportation, county treasurers, vehicle fees, public records, license plates, replacement cycle, vehicle registration, motor vehicles, state fees, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And that code that describes the services has to be supported by a diagnosis code, an ICD-10 code that
• > this<00:58:36.000> person codes to determine, yes, this person codes to determine, yes
• .<00:59:14.720> And<00:59:15.040> that<00:59:15.359> code<00:59:16.160> code<
• And that code code uh that code.
• ,<00:59:22.240> an supported by uh a diagnosis code, an supported by uh a diagnosis code,

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• The Property Code Chapter 51 governs liens on real property and authorizes trustees and subtrustees to
• So HB 576 clarifies property, the Property Code chapter 51 by leveraging the definition of person from
• the Texas Code Construction Act.
• Texas Property Code chapter 51 relates to liens created against real property as enforcement of a deed
• OK, for one more time, let me repeat uh the the chair codes. Zigella. OK.

Bills: HB74, HB175

Keywords: environmental project, public money, political subdivision, greenhouse gas emissions, federal law compliance, renewable energy, water conservation, retroactive child support, child conception, paternity, family law, health care expenses