Video & Transcript Research : 'facility rules'

Page 204 of 500
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/18/2026 - House Transportation & Infrastructure

Transportation & Infrastructure

Transcript Highlights:
  • There's rules on the boot being removed and what the charges would be.
  • Ninety-five percent of the people, you know, don't break the rules.
  • There's also misdemeanor penalties for violations of these rules. Thank you.
  • There's also misdemeanor penalties for violations of these rules.
  • And then... ...enhancing courts, technologies, and facilities—that's $35.
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

IC - New Mexico Finance Authority Oversight Aug 11th, 2025

New Mexico Finance Authority Oversight Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • Because they are subject to very complicated federal tax rules.
  • The rules are designed to prevent abuse of the tax exemption called tax arbitrage.
  • So, there are rules applying to disclosure.
  • Those are the rules that we need to make some minor amendments to our PPRF rules, and you all are the
  • I have questions about the rules, and I'm just gonna go through them. Oh, we are?
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • This is the first time this court is going to rule on this.
  • I mean, I know the rule is not always is the numbers. Right. Me neither.
  • We've established school safety facility standards. We've established intruder detection audit.
  • But without fail, what the superintendents told me was we just want to know the rules.
  • And it has to go by rule, by the commissioner's rule, yes sir. Thank you.
Keywords: 1185, senate, all
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • They're looking to build facilities has.
  • The refundable fuel tax credit allows production facilities out of state.
  • tax credit allows production facilities tax credit allows production facilities out<00:44:52.800
  • So, we have rules in place that allow it.
  • I do want to clarify that house rules I do want to clarify that house rules ask<01:21:23.360>
Keywords: 910, house, all
Summary: The committee heard testimony on HB 1694, which would create a sustainable aviation fuel tax credit, and HB 1695, which would expand the state’s renewable fuels production tax credit. For HB 1694, supporters from the airlines, renewable fuels industry, business groups, and some environmental and youth representatives said sustainable aviation fuel is a practical near-term way to cut emissions in aviation, a hard-to-decarbonize sector, and argued the credit would send a market signal, support local production, and help meet state climate goals. Opponents, including Energy Justice Network and a taxpayer-focused testifier, argued the bill could subsidize expensive fuels that may not be truly clean, could duplicate benefits available under other tax provisions, and should not support transpacific aviation or technologies they said are unproven or harmful. The Department of Taxation stood on written testimony, and the chair later asked that all verbal testimony on remaining bills be limited to one minute because of time constraints. HB 1695 drew similar support and opposition, but focused more broadly on renewable fuels for transportation, trucking, shipping, and other sectors. Supporters, including the Hawaii State Energy Office, airlines, PAR Hawaii, the Hawaii Renewable Fuels Coalition, Pacific Biodiesel, and the RNG Coalition, said the bill would help scale local fuel production, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, support jobs and agriculture, and advance the state’s climate and energy goals. Several supporters emphasized that the credit would help build a local industry and that life-cycle accounting should be used to measure emissions benefits. Opponents repeated concerns that some biofuels and waste-based fuels may not be climate-beneficial, may rely on flawed modeling, and could create costly infrastructure that would need to be replaced later. No votes or final committee action were taken in the portion of the meeting provided.
WV
Transcript Highlights:
  • I would ask for a ruling from the Chair under Rule 43.
  • It's a ruling of the Chair that a member of a class greater than five would be required to vote.
  • authorities for the planning, acquisition, construction, improvement, maintenance, or operation of hangar facilities
  • $8,704,000 from the unappropriated surplus balance of general revenue to the Department of Health Facilities
  • Questions of Council. to the Department of Health facilities in the following manner. $1 million to a
Keywords: 994, senate, all
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Aug 11th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • We also have approximately 1,100 acres of regional detention facilities that the drainage district manages
  • The majority of our system is a linear conveyance system, but we do have detention facilities where we
  • So these facilities, once water gets moved, then by gravity, they'll empty themselves out.
  • The TWDB produced a document to do three things: to assess risk and rules; number two, to... ...estimate
  • The development of the state and regional flood planning rules involved, again, extensive rulemaking
Keywords: 997, house, all
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Appropriations Apr 21st, 2025 at 09:15 am

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • And so going on down to section two, one time we've got facility improvements.
  • county, city, or township that adopts an ordinance or policy exceeds the state statute, administrative rules
  • policies or interferes with, unreasonably restricts, or conflicts with an agriculture or energy facility
  • policies or interferes with, unreasonably restricts, or conflicts with an agriculture or energy facility
  • policies or interferes with, unreasonably restricts, or conflicts with an agriculture or energy facility
Keywords: 908, all
Summary: The committee met to consider Senate Bill 2012, the Department of Transportation budget, with Representative Brandenburg presenting a detailed House amendment package and Speaker Robin Weisz explaining the overall funding strategy. The discussion focused on restructuring transportation funding streams, including moving Prairie Dog money into a flexible transportation fund, adjusting gas tax distributions, increasing the legacy earnings transfer from 7% to 8%, and authorizing a $155 million bond for Highway 85. Members also discussed DOT operations, bridge funding, rest areas, electronic titling, and the use of funds for grants to counties, cities, and townships. A separate provision would let the DOT consider whether local ordinances or policies unreasonably restrict permitted agriculture or energy projects when scoring grant applications, which drew significant debate about local control and whether the language was punitive. Testimony from Brandenburg and Weisz emphasized that the plan was intended to provide more predictable funding, preserve the ability to match federal dollars, and direct money where needs are greatest through a grant process. Weisz said the package was designed to simplify multiple revenue buckets, ensure DOT can meet federal match requirements, and free up money for the general fund while still supporting transportation needs. Several members raised concerns about whether cities, counties, and townships would receive as much as under the prior Prairie Dog structure, whether the bridge allocation was correctly reflected in the bill, and whether the local-policy language would penalize subdivisions that oppose energy projects. Supporters argued the state needed to protect revenue tied to energy development and that local governments would still receive distributions plus additional grant opportunities. The committee adopted the House amendment to SB 2012 by a vote of 19-1-3, then rejected an amendment to remove the local-policy language on a 5-15-3 vote. The committee then passed SB 2012 as amended on a 20-0-3 vote, with Representative Brandenburg designated as the carrier. The chair announced that Senate Bill 2014 would not be taken up at that time and the committee recessed until called back.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Elect Committee Meeting - 2026-03-11

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • , immigration, use of county facilities, immigration, use of county facilities, and<01:04:38.000>
  • . facilities. facilities.
  • /c><01:24:45.679> we there's another federal facility we there's another federal facility we believe
  • <01:24:49.199> in and there are federal facilities in and there are federal facilities in
  • So to a federal facility in Texas also.
Bills: HF4077, HF3798, HF3886
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Capital Investment Committee 2/24/26

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • Oh, it's real. potato facility. [clears throat] The potato facility.
  • >> Mr.<00:08:44.240> rules. >> Mr. rules. >> Mr. rules.
  • facility in East Grand Forks, Minnesota. facility in East Grand Forks, Minnesota.
  • . facility. facility.
  • library facilities. library facilities.
Keywords: 1183, house
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Judiciary (04/16/2025)

Transcript Highlights:
  • still be subject to like laws and rules still be subject to like laws and rules um<00:21:26.240>
  • <01:37:49.520> the to run you know run its facilities the to run you know run its facilities
  • If we use the facilities situations.
  • c><02:32:18.640> our<02:32:18.800> gender facilities that align with our gender facilities
  • They already have no choice facilities.
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The House Judiciary Committee opened a hearing on Senate Bill 141, which would create a narrow exception to New Hampshire’s three-year deadline for motions for a new trial when a petitioner has newly discovered evidence, new forensic testing, or new scientific understanding. The prime sponsor’s representative and advocates from the Innocence Project and New England Innocence Project argued the bill is needed to help wrongfully convicted people access the courts, noting that exonerations often take many years and that outdated forensic science has contributed to wrongful convictions. The chair also said he had drafted a proposed amendment for committee review, but it had not yet been formally submitted. Witnesses supporting the bill emphasized that the measure would not guarantee relief, only allow a petition to be filed and reviewed under existing standards. They discussed examples such as arson science, explaining that some convictions were based on forensic methods later shown to be unreliable. Committee members asked about the scope of habeas corpus, whether the bill would create a new cause of action, and whether additional screening or pleading requirements should be added. The supporters said they would be open to requiring a petitioner to plead innocence, but opposed adding more burdensome preliminary procedures or counsel requirements at the filing stage. Thomas Farardi, from the Attorney General’s Office, testified in opposition or with caution, saying the bill was a “solution looking for a problem” because existing habeas corpus and coram nobis procedures already provide avenues for relief, and prosecutors can act when credible new evidence arises. He argued the current draft could invite additional litigation and create a new cause of action, and said he favored more screening before cases proceed. The discussion also touched on whether the statute applies in criminal cases, the current three-year limitation in RSA 526:4, and questions about posthumous petitions and petitions by deported individuals. No vote or executive action was taken during the hearing.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
  • RSA 292:8, I believe, and there are also rules that go with this, but I don't know the rule reference
  • with this but I don't know the rule with this but I don't know the rule reference<04:42:52.240><
  • district shall offer an unused facility district shall offer an unused facility to<05:17:56.840>
  • You know, selling a facility, there's no requirement for them to hold on to a facility for a period of
  • <05:33:49.760> there's<05:33:49.920> no selling a facility there's no selling a facility
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The committee first addressed House Bill 415, which would remove the requirement that schools provide menstrual products. Members supporting an ITL said the mandate was unfunded, had been in place since 2019, and was already working without complaints from districts. Other members opposed the bill, arguing menstrual products are essential and that the requirement helps students, especially those with fewer resources. The committee voted ITL on HB 415 by a roll call of 17 yeas, 0 nays. The committee then took up House Bill 388, concerning public reports on special education. Supporters of ITL said they agreed with the goal of transparency but were concerned about student privacy, especially in small districts, and thought the bill’s information requests went too far. They noted that related issues could potentially be addressed in another bill, HB 557. The committee voted ITL on HB 388, 17-0. House Bill 730, which would require schools and some colleges to provide information on adoption, was also moved ITL. The sponsor said adoption is personally important to him but that the bill was not the right vehicle and involved entities such as colleges and the Attorney General unnecessarily; he said related ideas might be folded into other bills later. The committee agreed and voted ITL, 17-0. The committee then discussed House Bill 671, a preschool/early literacy proposal involving a statewide nonprofit digital program, likely Waterford. Members raised questions about who would be covered, data privacy, prior use of federal ESSER funds, whether the program had measurable results, and whether the bill’s nonprofit requirement was too restrictive. Department of Education witness Melissa White said the state had spent $400,000 in FY22 and $600,000 in FY23 on a Waterford contract using ARP ESSER funds, but she did not have participant counts and said the department could not measure literacy gains for that population. She also said the bill’s funding level would likely require an RFP and that, if enacted as written, the program would probably still be Waterford-based. The discussion continued without a final vote in the portion provided.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Health Committee Meeting - 2025-04-07

Health Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Facilities available within a reasonable distance. 4.
  • This resulted in higher profits through Unnecessary facility fees but not improved outcomes.
  • A few different facilities or companies, it's quite simple that multiple LLCs are getting created.
  • For me, it was about the rules and regulations that were placed on me in our business.
  • We are delegated by the Minnesota Department of Health for beverage, pool, and lodging facilities.
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

House - Appropriations and Finance Jan 28th, 2025

House Appropriations & Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • They needed a place; they didn't have facilities to house dogs, so we're housing about 60 dogs.
  • On our facilities and out in our junior livestock pavilion.
  • I know there's a number of other facilities that are on the fairgrounds that are in need of much repair
  • I mean, we have made great inroads on those facilities, but they are in severe need of updating, and
  • Is there any planned facilities there? I'm sorry, let me take a step back.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Agriculture Committee Mar 26th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • And this was written into the rule, which prohibits us from making the increases.
  • On the adoption, 526 committee rules, Soria. Thank you. 526 committee rules, Soria. Aye.
  • Again, on the committee rules, Soria. Aye. Soria, aye. Alanis. Committee rules. Soria? Aye. Soria.
  • Yeah, with a vote of 5-0, the committee rules are adopted.
  • We'll go back to the adoption of the committee rules for absent members.
Summary: The Assembly Agriculture Committee met as a subcommittee at first because a quorum was not yet present, then adopted its committee rules for the 2025-2026 legislative session by a 5-0 vote. The committee heard a series of agriculture-related bills, with most measures receiving broad support and moving forward. AB 1142 by Assemblymember Hoover would raise the fee thresholds for small public horse events that are exempt from equine medication monitoring rules; supporters said the current limits are outdated and hurt small riding clubs, and the bill passed to Appropriations. AB 411 by Assemblymember Papin would allow ranchers to compost livestock carcasses on-farm; supporters cited cost, environmental, and predator-control benefits, while rendering industry representatives asked for amendments to protect existing services and limit the bill’s scope. The bill passed to Natural Resources. AB 482 by Assemblymember Solache would modernize the California Table Grape Commission law and raise assessment caps without increasing assessments themselves; it passed to Appropriations. AB 312 by Vice Chair Alanis would shorten the holding period for ag theft property from six months to three months; it also passed to Appropriations. The committee also heard AB 937 and AB 947 by Assemblymember Connolly. AB 937 would make technical changes to the Organic Transition Pilot Program to improve access to organic transition support, with testimony from a farmer who said the program helped him pursue organic certification; the bill passed to Appropriations. AB 947 would expand and refine technical assistance under the Healthy Soils/Climate Smart Agriculture programs, including training, grant writing, matching funds coordination, equipment sharing, and outcome monitoring; supporters said the changes would help small and organic producers access state climate programs, and it also passed to Appropriations. AB 1486, presented by the chair, would use Proposition 4 funding to start grants for public postsecondary agricultural research farms focused on climate resiliency; members praised the role of CSU and UC research farms, and the bill passed to Natural Resources as amended. The most extensive discussion centered on AB 928 by Assemblymember Rogers, the California Cockfighting Cruelty Act. Supporters argued the bill would help law enforcement target cockfighting and rooster trafficking, reduce avian disease risks, and protect public health and animal welfare; opponents, including poultry hobbyists, breeders, and 4-H-related participants, said it would overreach into lawful poultry keeping and harm heritage-breed and youth programs, urging instead that cockfighting penalties be increased to a felony. Committee members echoed concerns about unintended impacts on legitimate poultry owners and requested continued work on exemptions and language. The bill passed to Judiciary on a 5-2-1 vote, with one no vote and one abstention, and the chair noted that further committee review would continue as the bill advances.
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

November 19, 2025 - 01:30 PM

Transcript Highlights:
  • somebody has decided, that my son doesn't have the same rights as I do inside a Florida medical facility
  • Florida's Supreme Court struck down these same caps twice, ruling them unconstitutional and in violation
  • Reimposing them now would defy those rulings and, once again, close the courthouse doors to those very
  • And while some, I think even today, have argued that the ruling was justified only by a past liability
  • We've been under rule by one party since 1990, and we haven't done anything about rates.
Summary: The Judiciary Committee met to consider HB 6003, a bill to repeal Florida’s “free kill” law that limits certain survivors’ ability to recover non-economic damages in medical negligence wrongful death cases. The sponsor, Rep. Trabulsy, said the bill would restore access to the courts for a small class of families and noted the measure passed both chambers last year before being vetoed by the governor. She and supporters framed the bill as a fairness and constitutional issue, while opponents argued repeal would increase malpractice exposure, insurance costs, and pressure on physician access, especially in high-risk specialties and rural areas. Public testimony was sharply divided. Supporters included family members who described deaths they said were caused by medical negligence and who argued the current law denies accountability and equal treatment based on marital status or whether a decedent had minor children. Opponents included the Florida Hospital Association, Florida Medical Association, Florida Chamber, U.S. Chamber, Florida Insurance Council, and other health care and business groups, who warned that repeal could worsen already high malpractice premiums, contribute to physician shortages, and destabilize access to care. Several speakers on both sides discussed possible caps on non-economic damages as a compromise, though the bill itself was presented as a clean repealer with no amendments. During debate, several members spoke in support, emphasizing equal access to the courts and rejecting the idea that the law should treat some families differently from others. Opponents of the bill argued that the current system helps preserve market stability and that liability concerns, not the free kill law, are driving provider departures. After closing remarks from the sponsor, the committee voted 15 yeas and 1 nay to report HB 6003 favorably.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/02/2026 - Senate Floor Session

Arizona Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • SB 1371, Commerce Authority Qualified Facility Definition.
  • SB 1449, Asbestos Program Rules Fees. Finance and Appropriations; Transportation and Technology.
  • SB 1477, Assisted Living Facilities Referral Agents. SB 1478, Liquor Policies Procedures.
  • SB 1491, Air Quality Fee Rules Applicability. SB 1492, Cradome Products Packaging Advertising.
Keywords: 1182, all
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Yes, so we waited to get prepared a ruling that proposes a work plan for how the program will run.
  • Can you give us the basics of the ruling?
  • It is a clean energy program, but it would be for a state water facility.
  • versus the facilities that have had problems.
  • Difference between the new facilities versus the facilities that have had problems. Absolutely.
Summary: The hearing was an informational budget session on energy agency proposals, with no votes taken. Early discussion focused on Proposition 4 climate bond implementation, including funding for demand-side grid support, offshore wind development, and transmission financing. The Department of Finance said the budget includes allocations for demand-side grid support and offshore wind, but not yet for the $325 million transmission financing piece pending a required study. The Legislative Analyst’s Office urged the Legislature to consider whether to wait on offshore wind funding, whether to keep shifting funds into demand-side grid support, and how to direct future transmission financing. Members also raised concerns about local technical assistance for offshore wind, Salton Sea priorities, and the need for more information before final decisions. The California Energy Commission and CPUC then reviewed the broader energy package. The CEC highlighted the demand-side grid support program’s growth, distributed energy backup assets, long-duration storage, hydrogen grants, and the SIRP clean energy reliability program. CPUC testimony emphasized affordability, wildfire mitigation costs, rooftop solar cost shifts, and efforts to reduce rates while maintaining reliability and clean energy goals. Members questioned CPUC staffing, delays in proceedings, coordination with the CEC and CAISO, and the impact of rate increases on customers. The agencies also discussed the AB 3264 transmission financing study, with CPUC saying work on the study had already begun and was on track for the July 1 deadline. Several trailer bill and implementation items were also discussed. The committee reviewed a proposal to extend the Deaf and Disabled Telecommunications Program surcharge, with members split over whether it should be handled in budget trailer bill language or policy legislation; the administration said the surcharge supports a critical program serving about three-quarters of a million Californians. The committee also heard a CPUC data-sharing proposal to allow nondisclosure agreements for transmission and reliability data, which members generally supported as a technical fix. DWR explained a proposal to clarify language for the Electricity Supply Strategic Reliability Reserve so it can potentially sell three gas-fired units it owns, and the CEC presented a federal transmission grant proposal tied to grid-enhancing technologies and ratepayer cost recovery. Finally, the committee discussed California Lifeline and possible broadband pilot reforms in light of uncertainty around federal Universal Service Fund support, with CPUC saying it is exploring a statewide standalone broadband option for eligible customers.
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

FIN Info Briefing - Thu Jan 16, 2025 @ 9:00 AM HST

Hawaii House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • So in order to build facilities that they can afford, or not only to buy but, in some cases, rent, we
  • On the subsistence egg lots, you know, our rules allow up to, I believe, 3 acres.
  • <05:14:31.240> I the Hawaii Youth Correctional Facility I the Hawaii Youth Correctional Facility
  • How many people currently in the facilities there? How many students?
  • or rule changes.
Keywords: 910, house, all
VT

Vermont 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Assembly - VSC Trustees and Adjutant General - 2026-02-19 - 10:30AM

Vermont Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • This mandate is set forth in 2 V.S.A. 12 and in Joint Rule 10A.
  • Rule 10A.
  • No representative or rules apply.
  • This is the most important rule of all.
  • has served on the finance and facilities has served on the finance and facilities committee,<00:
Keywords: 927, senate, all
AL

Alabama 2026 Regular Session

Alabama House Ways and Means Education Committee Feb 11th, 2026

Ways and Means Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • The rules, and I don't want to speak for Mr.
  • PCEL, higher education, but the rules have already been promulgated.
  • The rules, and I don't want to speak for Mr.
  • The rules, and I don't want to there.
  • <00:06:19.520> already<00:06:19.759> been but the rules have already been but the rules