Video & Transcript Research : 'subdivision'
Page 19 of 156
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- So, the definitions covered in subdivision six, I'm sorry, in Section 6, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, etc
- c> the<00:35:38.880>
the And then subdivision 2, the the And then subdivision 2, the the definitions - :36:00.080>
4, in Section 6, subdivision 1, 2, 3, 4, in Section 6, subdivision 1, 2, 3, 4, etc - >
penalties <00:37:11.760>for Subdivision 6 outlines the penalties for Subdivision 6 outlines - , under this subdivision, under this subdivision, but<00:37:34.280>
that <00:37:34.480>
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee 3/24/25
Agriculture Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- 11 uh Clause 7 expire .155 subdivision 11 uh Clause 7 expire as<00:52:09.359>
of <00:52:09.559 - He said the language in subdivision 7 seems duplicative.
- >
be language in subdivision 7 seems to be language in subdivision 7 seems to be dup<00:57:26.520 - But it's required right now under subdivision 6. Representative Hansen, thank you, Mr. Chair.
- If you go to statute 17.45, subdivision 2, we actually recognize deer farming in subdivision 5 and subdivision
Keywords:
HF1621, CelluComp, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, appropriation, grant, commercialization, fiber-based barrier packaging, packaging materials, PFAS, perfluoroalkyl substances, polyfluoroalkyl substances, plastic reduction, sustainable packaging, environmental health, materials innovation, bio-based packaging, food packaging, agriculture finance, one-time grant, state subsidy
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Human services policy bill gets committee OK, HF729 3/26/26
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:10:37.080>
4 subdivision 4 subdivision 4 to<00:10:38.680>limit <00:10:39.320>the - I'm here to speak on statute 245G.06, subdivision 4A, to make changes to the discharge summary.
- I'm here to speak on statute 245G.06, subdivision 4A, to make changes to the discharge summary.
- This proposal is simple: to change the timeline in statute 245G.06, subdivision 4A, from 5 days to 5
- 4A from 5 days to 5 business subdivision 4A from 5 days to 5 business days, days, days, so<00:15:43.880
Summary:
The committee took up House File 729, an omnibus policy bill, and walked through a series of amendments before moving the bill forward. Early amendments addressed adult maltreatment accountability, senior nutrition flexibility, MA provider enrollment and fraud prevention, Direct Care and Treatment data and staffing provisions, disability and aging policy changes, technical corrections from DHS, behavioral health language, and MDH policy updates. Most amendments were adopted without public opposition, and several members and testifiers described them as clarifications or technical fixes to existing policy.
Testimony focused on the practical effects of the bill’s provisions. Direct Care and Treatment representatives said the changes would help with data sharing, governance, staffing, patient care, and longer return stays for certain patients. Several witnesses from the substance use disorder and health care provider community supported changes to discharge summary deadlines and claims recoupment rules, arguing that business-day timelines and limits on late clawbacks would reduce administrative burden and financial uncertainty. A disability advocate also urged passage of the bill, saying services for people with disabilities were at risk if it did not advance.
After public testimony and member discussion, the committee adopted the DE2 amendment as amended and then approved the bill as amended. Chair Noor renewed the motion to re-refer House File 729 to the Committee on Ways and Means, and that motion passed.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Gov. Walz capital investment package 2/19/26
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- The process is open to state agencies and political subdivisions whose capital projects are generally
- MMB provides training and technical assistance to political subdivisions and state agencies to submit
- MMB provides training and technical assistance to political subdivisions and state agencies to submit
- The initial state agency and political subdivision requests were published by MMB in July of 2025.
- requests were published by subdivision requests were published by MMB<00:01:28.240>
in <00:01:
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- the eligibility of certain persons for relocation assistance within the state or the political subdivision
- HB 1998 by Spiller relating to the amount of an expenditure made by certain political subdivisions for
- HB 2207 by Bumgarner relating to the authority of political subdivision to propose a voter approval,
- HB 2302 by GERDIS relating to the definition of a rural political subdivision for the purposes of the
- HB 2384 by Guilin relating to county regulation of subdivision and approval of subdivision plans or Plas
WY
Wyoming 2026 Regular Session
Joint Agriculture, State and Public Lands & Water Resources Committee, June 11, 2026 - AM
Agriculture, State and Public Lands & Water Resources
Transcript Highlights:
- subdivisions subdivisions are<03:00:28.960>
typically <03:00:29.520>not <03:00:29.760>< - to make that part of the subdivision to make that part of the subdivision that<03:11:26.640>
- . subdivisions. subdivisions.
- were in a subdivision were in a subdivision and<03:36:00.000>
now <03:36:00.160>you <03:52:00.399>I subdivision like that. It's a mess. I subdivision like that.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety - Part 2 - 03/25/26
Judiciary and Public Safety
Transcript Highlights:
- On subdivision two, this nuisance.
- I actually really like the concept of subdivision two, but subdivision three, the local preemption, the
- concept of subdivision two, but subdivision<00:21:27.160>
three, <00:21:27.320>the <00: - 21:27.400>
local <00:21:27.680>preemption, subdivision three, the local preemption, subdivision - subdivision two since you brought it up. subdivision two since you brought it up.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Tax Expenditure Review Commission 6/17/26
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- To be continued in accordance with duties outlined in Minnesota Statute 3.8855, subdivision 5. is the
- duties outlined in Minnesota Statute duties outlined in Minnesota Statute 3.8855 3.8855 3.8855 subdivision
- <00:34:13.040>
5 subdivision 5 subdivision 5 parentheses<00:34:15.240>9. - subdivision 5 in parentheses 9. subdivision 5 in parentheses 9.
- But, um, Minnesota statute 3.8855, subdivision 4A, requires an initial review for each tax expenditure
Summary:
The Tax Expenditure Review Commission met on June 17, 2026, approved the January 20, 2026 minutes, and then adopted updated commission procedures. The procedural changes, presented by Legislative Budget Office Director Christian Larson, required a quorum of voting members to complete evaluations before a formal recommendation vote, and allowed members to bundle or unbundle tax expenditures for voting. The commission approved the revised procedures by roll call vote, with five ayes and four excused.
The commission then reviewed member evaluation summaries for tax expenditures presented in December 2025 and January 2026. It first considered the alcoholic beverage tax credits for small brewers and microdistilleries, and after discussion voted to recommend repeal of those two expenditures, while leaving the small winery credit for a later meeting because it lacked enough member responses under the new procedures. The vote on the repeal recommendation passed 4-1, with Commissioner Marquart voting no.
The commission next approved the lawful gambling bundle, which included bingo, raffle, and related exemptions. Larson reported that most members recommended continuation for each item, and the commission voted to recommend continuing all six lawful gambling expenditures. It then reviewed the residential utility services bundle—residential heating fuels, residential water services, and sewer services—where members generally favored continuation but several noted possible modifications or caps for higher-income users; the commission voted to recommend continuation of the bundle.
Finally, the commission reviewed the data center equipment sales tax exemption, which Larson said had an estimated annual revenue loss of $95 million and was intended to create jobs in construction and data center industries. Members raised questions about its effectiveness and whether the exemption should be modified or capped, but the commission ultimately voted to recommend continuation. The meeting concluded with these recommendations set to be included in the commission’s 2026 annual report.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Commerce and Consumer Affairs (05/27/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- It puts additional costs on our members and, ultimately, on political subdivisions.
- No, but but if political subdivisions.
- all political subdivisions, not just our<00:34:17.040>
members. - Um I subdivisions ac across the state.
- Again, we have 100 political subdivisions that we represent through our membership.
Summary:
The committee first took up SB 297 and a new amendment, 2462, which combined the original Senate bill with the Carson amendment and added a proposed alternative regulatory system, RSA 420R. The chair and members discussed that the amendment was intended to give the Senate what it had asked for while also creating a dual system for public entity risk pools. Members asked whether the new structure would affect ownership or governance of health trusts, and the chair explained that 420R would be a separate regulatory statute while existing 420J-style arrangements could remain in place. The committee also noted that a paragraph had been accidentally deleted from the amendment and that another amendment would be prepared to correct it, with the subcommittee recessed while that was done.
Public testimony focused on School Care, represented by Executive Director Lisa Ducette, who opposed the shift to Department of Insurance oversight under 420R. She argued that public entity risk pools are not insurance companies, that they are accountable to member entities and taxpayers, and that the proposed dual regulation would add unnecessary costs through examinations, higher reserves, and additional accounting requirements. She said the change could threaten tax-exempt status and create an uneven playing field, and she urged the committee to support SB 297 with the Carson amendment instead of moving to 420R. Committee members questioned whether the amendment would actually affect pools that stayed under the Secretary of State model, and one member cited support from the New Hampshire Municipal Association for the dual system.
The discussion then shifted to amendment 245 on ambulance reimbursement and contracting timelines. Members reviewed a provision giving insurers 45 days and ambulance providers 60 days in the contracting process, and one member suggested making both periods 60 days. The chair and others said the current language was intentional and part of a broader compromise aimed at ending balance billing and forcing insurers to establish reimbursement rates. Members noted that the measure was unusual and that its effects would be reviewed over the next two years, with one member saying the bill would likely be difficult to roll back later. No final vote was taken in the portion provided.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 3/18/26 - Evening Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Then on page three, there is a new subdivision four and subdivision five.
- Subdivision four has gift standards and policies.
- subdivision four and subdivision five. subdivision four and subdivision five.
- c> gift<00:02:26.880>
standards Subdivision four um has gift standards Subdivision four um - And then previous subdivision.
Summary:
The committee first took up HF 2526 and received a walkthrough of the DE1 amendment from nonpartisan staff. The amendment revised the bill’s gift and ethics provisions by defining local government and public safety officer, narrowing covered mental health or wellness services to those provided by a qualified mental health professional and tied to recovery from a traumatic event, excluding luxury services or events as determined by the Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board, and allowing local governments to adopt additional gift restrictions. It also added a bribery-related provision for gifts made with intent to influence a public safety officer. Members noted the language had been worked on by Representatives Duran, Vernig, and Freiberg, and the DE1 was adopted unanimously. HF 2526, as amended, then passed to the floor on a voice vote.
The committee then turned to HF 3722, which would remove deceased voters from the state voter registration system. The bill author argued that deceased voters should not remain on the rolls and that removing them would clean up the voter list. Secretary of State staff testified in opposition, saying deceased voters are already kept in a separate deceased status, not on active rolls, and that retaining the record helps flag suspicious activity and preserves voter history in case of administrative error. A second testifier described a real case in which a deceased voter’s retained record helped election officials identify and investigate a fraudulent ballot. After discussion, the committee tabled HF 3722.
Finally, the committee heard HF 3723, which would require additional verification for absentee ballot applications and permanent absentee voters. Supporters said the bill would help ensure ballots are not sent to people who have died or moved out of state. Secretary of State staff opposed the bill, saying most voters are already verified at registration, that the proposed checks would duplicate existing procedures, and that additional verification could create delays or false rejections. A testifier also objected to the bill’s effective date, saying it would take effect only days after absentee voting begins. The sponsor argued that voters remain on the permanent list indefinitely and that periodic verification is needed because people move or die; the committee did not reach a final vote in the portion provided.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- You were mentioning the political subdivisions, and I was wondering if hospitalization districts were
- Texans, all cities, all school districts, all counties, all the different political subdivisions that
- Together, these political subdivisions in our group represent 4.2 million Texans.
- The impact to cities and political subdivisions varies widely.
- The fiscal note we mentioned earlier was for all political subdivisions, not just the one... ...where
Bills:
HB511, HB972, HB 1035, HB2481, HB2723, HB2742, HB2894, HB2962, HB3077, HB3093, HB3307, HB3684, HJR67, HJR72
Keywords:
ad valorem taxation, caregiver exemption, Medicaid, long-term services, tax relief, assisted living, housing support, property tax exemption, caregiver support, residence homestead, tax exemption, unpaid caregiver, state tax code, property tax, caregiver, waiting list, intellectual disability, developmental disability, ad valorem tax, family support
OK
Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session
Local and County Government Feb 17th, 2026 at 02:00 pm
Local and County Government
Transcript Highlights:
- of matching requirements for federal funds shall be equally shared by the state and political subdivisions
- to continue the explanation of your Bill with title off Senate Bill 2019 creates the political subdivision
- liability insurance guarantee program and the political subdivision guarantee fund, and some of these
- what it's intended uses for these will be with your shared insurance groups in those political subdivisions
- But what we are trying to do is help the citizens in the subdivision, political subdivision, the school
Keywords:
emergency management, federal funding, disaster relief, cost sharing, public assistance, bail reform, public funds, nonprofit organizations, political subdivisions, injunctive relief, criminal procedure, surety bond, judicial discretion, uniform bond schedule, liability insurance, judgments, insurance fund, Oklahoma, county sheriff, commissary
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Debate to add SF3210 to the Calendar for the Day for Tue., May 12 5/11/26
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Uh, is that the process in relation to employment different than the process that's already in subdivision
- in subdivision 363 or section<00:03:20.360>
363A.08? - 6 refers only to uh 363.08 subdivision 6 refers only to the<00:10:05.440>
accommodation <00:10 - <00:10:15.400>
To <00:10:15.520>determine <00:10:16.000>the subdivision 6. - To determine the subdivision 6.
Summary:
The House debated Representative Hicks’ motion to place Senate File 3210 first on the calendar for the next day. Hicks said the bill, which concerns disability accommodations, had been on the general register since March 9 and had passed the Senate 46-18. Supporters argued it would strengthen the process for requesting accommodations and should be heard on the floor without further delay.
Representative Niska opposed the motion, arguing the bill was poorly drafted, had not received enough committee work, and could create ambiguity in the Minnesota Human Rights Act. He focused on the bill’s use of “may” in describing failure to engage in the accommodation process and questioned how the proposal would affect existing law in employment, housing, public accommodations, and education. Hicks responded that the bill addresses the process for reasonable accommodations, not the underlying accommodation standards, and said disability advocates and the Department of Human Rights supported the language.
Several members spoke in favor of calendaring the bill, emphasizing that it was bipartisan, had already moved through committee, and was important to people with disabilities. Some supporters described the accommodation process as difficult and said the bill would help ensure good-faith engagement between employers and individuals seeking accommodations. The exchange ended with the motion still under debate, with members indicating the bill would likely be taken up on the floor the following day.
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
Kentucky Housing Task Force 2025 (11-24-25)
Transcript Highlights:
- Uh, I saw in there that there was in some subdivisions, you know, that if, like, kinding subdivisions
- , you know, that that if subdivisions, you know, that that if like<00:03:07.440>
kinding <00:03 - :07.920>
subdivisions, <00:03:08.560>but <00:03:09.040>as <00:03:09.280>an - > like kinding subdivisions, but as an like kinding subdivisions, but as an appraiser,<00:03:10.720><
- and maybe the laws have a subdivision and maybe the laws have changed,<00:03:29.440>
but <00:03
Keywords:
Roll Call 00:00:08
Approval of minutes 00:00:08
Discussion of Final Report 00:00:58
Adjournment 00:23:57, 958, all
Summary:
The Housing Task Force met to approve its September and October minutes and then consider its final report, which was described as an overview of the second year of the task force’s work and included 14 recommendations for future legislative action. Members thanked the co-chairs and staff for compiling the report and noted that it had been posted publicly. Several members emphasized that housing problems affect both urban and rural areas across Kentucky and that the report should help guide next steps in the General Assembly.
Members offered a range of comments on the recommendations. One representative urged stronger language on the state’s role and cautioned against moratoriums on building-code reforms that could discourage sustainable practices or raise long-term utility costs, while also suggesting more down payment assistance. Others highlighted the need for local flexibility in housing policy, support for rehabilitation tax credits, and continued use or expansion of affordable housing credits and direct support for construction, infrastructure, revolving loan funds, and low-income housing tax credits. Another member suggested adding clearer “right to rebuild” language so homeowners could rebuild after a fire if the home meets current code.
The co-chairs summarized the task force’s main takeaways as two broad issues: regulatory delays and the need for more financial incentives. Members also discussed zoning, permitting delays, and the importance of moving permits more quickly so development can proceed without unnecessary holdups. After a motion and second, the committee approved the report as amended by the added “right to rebuild” language, and agreed to submit it to LRC, the Senate President, and the Speaker for approval before adjournment.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Capital Investment Committee considers HF2418 4/30/25
Transcript Highlights:
- programs in place for, uh, when, uh, bonding money is let to local jurisdictions and, uh, political subdivisions
- uh cities on bonding requests, require that they uh check a box that says whether the political subdivision
- It's just adding a piece to the list of things that are required for political subdivisions when they
- when they are political subdivisions when they are bringing<00:10:12.000>
forward <00:10:12.240 - So, 16A.86 is capital project grants to political subdivisions.
Summary:
The committee heard House File 2418 from Representative Tabke, a policy bill focused on requiring local governments seeking state bonding support to show whether they have a capital maintenance or preservation plan for the project. The bill was described as a continuation of work with Chair Lee and others to ensure that when the state invests in local capital projects, the local jurisdiction has a plan to maintain the asset over time rather than returning later for additional state funding. Representative Tabke emphasized that the proposal is not intended to block projects, but to provide information to the capital investment process and encourage responsible long-term planning.
Members asked several questions about how the requirement would work in practice, including whether a “no” answer on the maintenance-plan checkbox would disqualify projects, how the rule would apply to small communities, and whether major infrastructure such as wastewater or sewer projects would be exempt. Tabke clarified that the intent is informational and that projects without a maintenance plan should raise concerns, but that the proposal would not apply to major utility projects with separate funding mechanisms. He also explained that the earlier draft had been simplified after input from MMB, and that the adopted DE4 amendment adds the requirement through section 16A.86 for political subdivisions submitting bonding requests.
Chair Lee and other members supported the concept as a way to ensure state-funded assets are maintained locally and not repeatedly returned to the state for repairs decades later. One member requested clarifying language to make sure the bill does not apply to water treatment or sewer projects, and Tabke agreed that such language could be added. Tabke said the language had been developed with stakeholders including the League of Minnesota Cities, Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities, and small cities, and that they had agreed on the approach. The committee adopted the DE4 amendment and then laid House File 2418 over for possible future consideration.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:55:26.760>
purpose, subdivision one findings and purpose, subdivision one findings and - Um, subdivision six.
- Um<01:08:04.240>
subdivision <01:08:04.920>six. Um subdivision six. - Um subdivision six.
- direct him to uh 1.20 and subdivision 4. direct him to uh 1.20 and subdivision 4.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- Section one would amend Minnesota Statute 289A.08, subdivision 7.
- <00:04:25.440>
Subdivision <00:04:26.400>7 <00:04:26.960>permits subdivision - Subdivision 7 permits subdivision 7.
- And so the bill in itself goes through on the subdivision.
- And in subdivision 2, we go through and list the projects.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety - 04/08/26
Judiciary and Public Safety
Transcript Highlights:
- Chair, we have sections 9, subdivision 2, section 10, 11, 12, subdivision 6, 13, 15, and subdivision
- section 16, subdivision 1.
- 15,<00:02:51.519>
and <00:02:51.840>subdivision subdivision 6, 13, 15, and subdivision - subdivision 6, 13, 15, and subdivision section<00:02:53.280>
16, <00:02:53.680>subdivision - subdivision 11. subdivision 11.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 2/18/26
Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- Again, chair, members, subdivision five allows the employer to use the benefits in the computation of
- Again, chair, members, subdivision five allows the employer to use the benefits in the computation of
- future unemployment strikes on page two, subdivision 5, strikes on page two, subdivision 5, which<00
- deleting that subdivision would be? deleting that subdivision would be? >> Certainly.
- :10:47.279>
five <00:10:47.760>allows >> chair, members, subdivision five allows
Bills:
HF3393
OK
Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session
House of Representatives Second Regular Session of the 60th Legislature Day 51 May 4th, 2026 at 01:30 pm
Oklahoma House Floor Meeting
Bills:
SB1543, HB1933, HJR1088, HJR1090, HJR1091, HJR1092, HJR1093, HJR1095, SB1859, HB2988, HB3016, SB237, SB2065, HB3418, HCR1027, SB1641, SB1589, SB44, SB563, SB1403, HB1979, HB3075, SB2045, SB1653, SB1655, SB2030, HB2951, SB2028, SB2071, SB206, SB1849, HB3755, SB1509, SB1314, SB1561, SB1217, SB1618, HJR1096, HJR1099, HJR1100
Keywords:
driving under the influence, felony offense, ignition interlock device, community service, criminal assessment, nitrous oxide, Maddix Bias Act, intoxication, underage sale, misdemeanor, drug paraphernalia, enforcement, education rules, administrative rules, joint resolution, Oklahoma State Department of Education, higher education, State Regents for Higher Education, Teachers' Retirement System, charter schools