Video & Transcript Research : 'statutory amendment'

Page 19 of 500
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Feb 20th, 2025

Alabama Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Committee amendment pending. Senator Roberts: Mr. President, I have the committee amendment.
  • Chairman, I'd like to offer an amendment. All right, Secretary, please receive the amendment.
  • The amendments are adopted.
  • All right, Secretary, receive the amendment. Hello, let me read this amendment.
  • Please read the amendment.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Appropriations Apr 27th, 2026

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Oh, let staff read an amendment. Members, this is Amendment 4455.
  • There was a constitutional amendment, this one, and there's a statutory companion.
  • Constitutional amendment, this one, and there's a statutory companion.
  • Oh, we do have an amendment. Oh, you have an amendment? There is an amendment, yes.
  • Amendment? Okay. Vice Chairman Zeringue offers up the amendment.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Mar 24th, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Oklahoma Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • The amendment has been adopted. Senate Bill 63 is before you as amended.
  • Will read amendment two. I move to amend Senate Bill 346 by restoring the title.
  • Will there be questions on the amendment? Will there be debate on the amendment?
  • Seeing no further questions on the amendment, will there be debate on the amendment?
  • I declare the amendment to have passed. Clerk, will read Amendment 2.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Mar 24th, 2026 at 09:30 am

Oklahoma Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • your amendment.
  • Will there be questions on the amendment? Will there be debate on the amendment?
  • Amendment: Seeing none, will there be debate on the amendment?
  • Will there be questions on the amendment? Questions on the amendment.
  • Seeing no questions on the amendment, will there be debate on the amendment?
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part I) Aug 22nd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Chair recognizes Senator Huffman for a motion to not concur on House amendments to Senate Bill 5.
  • At this time, I move that the Senate refuse to concur with the House amendments to Senate Bill 5 and
  • In CD9, after your amendment, it's barely over 50%. You know what drove that or how that happened?
  • They help draw amendments for parties.
  • Yes, I've had them draw amendments in the past and...
Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part II) Aug 22nd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • They have referred to the 14th Amendment. Can you explain how?
  • Just in saying that it did not violate the 14th Amendment.
  • Secretary, read the amendment. For amendment number one by Zaffirini. Senator Zaffirini recognized.
  • Wow, well, thank you for bringing the amendment forward.
  • We're on an amendment. Oh no, that's not really on.
Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part III) Aug 22nd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • congressional map was subject to numerous violations of Section Two of the Voting Rights Act and the 14th Amendment
  • the criticism of this map, no alternate or substitute maps have been offered by a Democrat. ...an amendment
  • Nor was there a single amendment offered.
Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • There is an amendment. Clerk, please read the amendment. Do the one gra that's the one that's Mr.
  • Amendment submitted by Representative Orthen. Are there any questions on the amendment?
  • Any further questions on the Amendment seeing none, we need to adopt the amendment without objection.
  • There is an amendment on the bill. Clerk, please read the amendment. Mr.
  • Seeing none, we will adopt the amendment without objection. The amendment is adopted.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Mar 17th, 2026 at 09:00 am

Oklahoma Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Clerk, will you read the amendment? Amendment one.
  • The amendment is adopted. Back on the bill is an amendment.
  • Senator Saieri, we have Amendment Number 2 and restore title amendment.
  • That concludes explanations of the amendment. Will be questions on the amendment?
  • The amendment is adopted. Back on the bill as amended.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/25/2026 - Senate Judiciary and Elections

Judiciary and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's a friendly amendment. Do we need to do a roll call vote? It's a friendly amendment.
  • The strike-everything amendment is adopted. Please move the bill as amended.
  • The strike-everything amendment is adopted. Please move the bill as amended.
  • The amendment is adopted. Move the bill as amended.
  • The ayes have it; the amendment is adopted. Please move the bill as amended.
Summary: The committee first heard HB 2825, which would replace criminal enforcement tools for nonpayment of fines, fees, restitution, and related obligations with a civil collection process. Supporters, including the sponsor, argued it would streamline restitution collection and reduce costly incarceration, while opponents from victims’ rights groups, judges, and prosecutors said it would weaken victims’ constitutional rights and remove effective enforcement leverage. The chair adopted an amendment requiring a summons and clarifying that victims’ constitutional remedies are preserved, and the committee passed the bill 5-2. The committee then considered HB 4070, which would bar corporations from incorporating if an officer, director, or trustee had been convicted of sex or human trafficking, and would extend civil liability to those who facilitate trafficking. Supporters framed it as a “corporate death penalty” aimed at preventing trafficking through corporate governance, while the ACLU warned the facilitation language was vague and could sweep too broadly. After adopting the chair’s amendment defining “facilitate,” the committee passed the bill 5-2. The committee also unanimously recommended confirmation of Neil McDowell to the Arizona Board of Executive Clemency after hearing his background in corrections and his plans to review cases thoroughly and efficiently. Next, HB 2720 was heard, which would raise penalties for paying or agreeing to pay for sexual conduct, add a $200 assessment for the anti-human trafficking fund, and allow certain sex-trafficking victims convicted of prostitution to seal vacated records. Supporters, including law enforcement, prosecutors, and survivor advocates, said it would deter demand and help victims; opponents argued it could still sweep in trafficking victims and lacked sufficient safeguards. The committee passed the bill 4-3. The committee also heard HB 2028, a strike-everything amendment allowing community restitution in lieu of a $20 assessment for indigent homeless defendants, and HB 2047, which would increase trespass penalties for remaining in or returning to property after an eviction writ; both were discussed but no final vote is reflected in the transcript excerpt. Additional bills were introduced and heard later in the meeting, including HB 2136, which would create new offenses for “civil terrorism” and “subversion” and increase penalties for certain highway obstruction; the ACLU opposed it as viewpoint discrimination. HB 2406 would make images and recordings of abused children and deceased minors confidential and restrict dissemination and monetization; the sponsor said it was intended to prevent re-victimization and misuse of public records, while defense-side speakers asked for clearer access for defense teams. HB 2415 would tighten regulation of kratom products and specifically target concentrated 7-OH products; testimony sharply split between supporters who described public-health risks and opponents who said prohibition would harm consumers who use it for pain or recovery. The transcript ends before any final action on those later bills is shown.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • other motions to amend or entertained. other motions to amend or entertained.
  • Seeing none, the recommendation is adopted. with amendments. with amendments.
  • amendments. Any reservations? amendments. Any reservations?
  • the statutory language was not getting amended.
  • So this statutory amendment required, you know, extensive sort of back and forth to figure out what the
Summary: The House Housing Committee heard testimony on a series of housing-related Senate bills. SB 2190 SD2 on inclusionary zoning drew support from HHFDC, Hawaii YIMBY, Grassroot Institute, Housing Hawaii’s Future, and Hako Seed Center, with opposition from OHA and Aloha Independent Living Hawaii. SB 2338 SD1, dealing with housing agency personnel authority, received comments from the Attorney General cautioning that the bill should be clarified to avoid conflicts with civil service and collective bargaining laws and recommending removal of a provision limiting employment contracts; HHFDC said its comments addressed those concerns and supported the measure. SB 2424 SD1, concerning HHFDC, received broad support from housing, business, and community groups, with one opposition. Testimony focused on changing the definition of “qualified resident” so people who already own an HHFDC-assisted unit could later purchase another if their housing needs change; HHFDC said the current rule forces people to sell before buying again and that the bill would help people move up the housing ladder and encourage more housing development. SB 2356 on parking also drew broad support from state agencies, housing advocates, business groups, and local officials, with Unite Here Local 5 in opposition. SB 2981 on land use had strong support from many organizations and 67 individuals, with Unite Here Local 5 opposing. SB 3028 SD2 on property conveyance generated the most detailed policy debate. Supporters, including Catholic Charities Hawaii, Hawaii Children’s Action Network, Indivisible Hawaii, and others, backed restructuring the conveyance tax into a marginal rate system and urged changes to revenue allocations, including dedicated funding for homeless services, DHHL, and the rental housing revolving fund. The Tax Foundation of Hawaii supported the marginal-rate concept but opposed dedicated special-fund allocations and criticized the bill’s blank sections. Committee members questioned the historical purpose of the conveyance tax, and the Tax Foundation explained it was originally a modest tax tied to property-value tracking when the state still ran the property tax system. The committee also heard SB 3187 SD2 on off-site construction, SB 2378 SD2 on housing permitting, and SB 2398 SD2 on residential housing utilities. OPSD supported SB 3187 but said it preferred the House version and wanted clarification that off-site certification should apply to factories in Hawaii, not out of state, to avoid outsourcing labor; it also suggested starting with a small scope. SB 2378 SD2 drew support from engineering, housing, and labor groups, with testimony that the House version included needed fixes to make the program insurable. On SB 2398 SD2, the Board of Water Supply opposed the bill, saying it could require disclosure of sensitive infrastructure information beyond ordinary water-availability assessments and raise critical-infrastructure and cybersecurity concerns; developers and housing groups supported the measure. No votes or final actions were taken in the portion of the hearing provided.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/28/2026 - House Judiciary

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • When I thank the chairman for amending this bill, I think it's a great amendment.
  • open to in the Cowell amendment.
  • When I thank the chairman for amending this bill, I think it's a great amendment.
  • open to in the Cowell Amendment.
  • Chairman, the amendment that was requested—thank you for the amendment.
Summary: The Judiciary Committee heard and advanced several bills. HB 2763 would require legislative approval before the Arizona Game and Fish Commission could close a state-run shooting range. Supporters, including the sponsor, a Prescott doctor, gun-rights advocates, and Game and Fish, argued that range closures can push shooting into unsafe desert areas and that the legislature should have a voice; the bill passed 8-1. HB 2417 would let courts, at a defendant’s request, use speed-inhibiting devices instead of license suspension for certain speeding and racing offenses. The sponsor and supporters said it would help people keep working and reduce recidivism, while an Arizona Trucking Association representative warned the bill was overbroad and conflicted with federal law; the committee adopted an amendment and passed the bill 7-2. HB 2345 created a felony for unlawfully present persons possessing falsified CDLs and imposed vehicle forfeiture and employer penalties; trucking industry testimony said it was preempted by federal law and unenforceable, but the sponsor said he would keep working on it, and the bill passed 5-3 with one present after amendment. The committee also considered HB 2666, which increases penalties for sexual extortion involving victims ages 15-17. The sponsor and supporters from the anti-trafficking community and county attorney’s office said the bill responds to a serious and growing online exploitation problem affecting teens. Defense and juvenile-justice concerns focused on whether the bill could sweep in minors, create mandatory consecutive sentences, and fail to account for age-related defenses; the sponsor and supporters said they were open to discussing amendments, but the bill passed 8-0 with one present. HB 2175 would add political expression and political affiliation to Arizona’s bias-crime sentencing enhancements and create new misdemeanor-level enhancements for certain bias-motivated offenses. The sponsor, ADL, and county attorney’s office said it fills gaps and targets conduct, not speech; the ACLU and defense testimony warned it could chill speech and give prosecutors too much discretion. The bill passed 6-2 after amendment. HB 2186 would allow a passenger in a traffic stop to satisfy identity requirements by verbally providing name and date of birth rather than producing physical ID. The sponsor said it was meant to fix an unconstitutional-vagueness problem and clarify the law after a prior court issue; there was little opposition, and it passed 7-0 with one present. The committee also began hearing HB 2364, which would add penalties for distributing or receiving abortion-inducing drugs by courier, delivery, or rail service; the sponsor said it would strengthen enforcement of existing Arizona restrictions, but the transcript cuts off before testimony, debate, or any vote on that bill.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs Apr 14th, 2025

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution.
  • Y'all do have the capability to amend this bill on the floor.
  • You have the ability to add that exclusion on the floor with an amendment.
  • and I would support that amendment.
  • So I would support an amendment if Representative Canales added one. Thank you.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs Apr 14th, 2025

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • I am not against the Second Amendment; ...amendment, but putting more guns, throwing more guns at this
  • It's legal to do; it's our Second Amendment right, as Representative Tepper said.
  • Of civil rights and the Second Amendment.
  • I support the Second Amendment. I come from a rural area.
  • She was also a statutory county judge and a state district judge as well.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session Apr 14th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • The following amendment the clerk will read the amendment. Amendment by Toth.
  • Toth to explain the amendment. Thank You Mr.
  • Speaker and members My amendment is acceptable to the author.
  • The amendment adds crucial data points for the information.
  • Toth sends up an amendment. The amendment is acceptable to the author.