Transcript Highlights:

• Seeing no questions, are there any amendments? No amendments. Public testimony.
• on the amendment?
• The clarifying amendment. Seeing no questions, is there public testimony on the amendment?
• No testimony on the amendment. Chair Chaney: Debate members on the amendment?
• Chair: Questions on the amendment? Is there public testimony on the amendment?

Transcript Highlights:

• That is the amendment. Questions on the amendment? Debate on the amendment.
• Amendment.
• That's the amendment. Questions on the amendment? Are there amendments to the amendment?
• Other amendments? On the desk, Mr. Speaker. Read the first amendment. Other amendments?
• Speaker, that is the amendment. Questions on the amendment? Are there amendments to the amendment?

Summary: The House convened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, and a quorum present, then adopted the special order report and moved into a series of budget-related bills. The chamber first took up HB 5011/SB 2506 on environmental resource management and natural resources funding, where Democrats argued the bill would reduce recurring support for the Resilient Florida program, the Florida Wildlife Corridor, invasive species removal, and other conservation efforts. Supporters said the change would shift money from recurring to nonrecurring funding so the Legislature could reassess priorities each year and rely more on private-sector stewardship. After a strike-all amendment and conference posture change, SB 2506 passed 97-12. HB 5013, reducing state-funded property reinsurance reserves, passed 108-0, and HB 5501, redirecting documentary stamp tax distributions from housing and transportation trust funds into general revenue, passed 82-26 after extended debate over its impact on affordable housing and transportation funding. The House also passed HB 5015 on state group insurance, which requires DMS to develop a formulary management system and was described as producing significant savings; members raised concerns about prescription access and implementation, but the bill passed 109-0. HB 5201 on state financial accounting and HB 5203 on the Capitol Center both passed unanimously, as did HB 5009, which creates a Florida Accountability Office and reorganizes audit functions. The chamber then passed HB 7031, a major sales tax reduction bill lowering the state sales tax rate and several related rates; supporters framed it as permanent relief for all Floridians, while opponents said property tax relief would be more meaningful and that the sales tax cut would also benefit tourists and out-of-state visitors. HB 7031 passed 112-0. The House then began consideration of HB 501, the proposed fiscal year 2025-26 budget, totaling $112.9 billion and emphasizing reduced recurring spending and large reserves. Subcommittee chairs outlined their budget silos: K-12 education at $20.6 billion with teacher raises, school hardening, literacy, transportation stipends, and security funding for Jewish day schools; health care at $47 billion with full Medicaid and KidCare funding, opioid settlement spending, mental health beds, and senior services; transportation/economic development at $18.5 billion; agriculture and natural resources at $5.8 billion with reduced Everglades spending but continued water, resiliency, and land management funding; higher education at $8.7 billion; state administration at $2.9 billion; justice at $7.3 billion; and IT at $529 million for Florida PALM, FX, and other systems. Members then began questioning the K-12 budget, focusing on FEFP funding, proration, voucher growth, stabilization dollars, mental health and school safety funding, and whether districts would be held harmless under the proposed allocations.

Transcript Highlights:

• So, uh, would ask the committee to take that as a friendly amendment.
• <00:35:13.079> language the bill but it says amended language the bill but it says amended
• <00:35:15.400> from highlighted that's amended language from highlighted that's amended language
• You'll see there's an amendment that was provided to the committee.
• <00:51:49.960> that now addressed by the amendment that now addressed by the amendment that

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So, in Senate 2 of the House Amended version, you'll see there's an amendment in front of you, 2026-2021S
• Um, amendment. Let's say, which amendment is it?
• Um, amendment. Let's say, which HP 155? Um, amendment.
• Let's say, which amendment<00:11:06.720> is<00:11:06.880> it? amendment is it?
• take a chance on your amendment as well. take a chance on your amendment as well.

Keywords: 9:00am HB 155 9:30am HB 1102 10:30am HB 1109 11:00am HB 1356 11:30am HB 1469 1:00pm HB 1323 2:00pm HB 1376, 928, house, all

Summary: The meeting began with unanimous committee approval of amendment 2026-2021S to HB 2. Senator Lang explained the amendment corrected a drafting error so that $2.5 million in state funds, matched with federal money for a total of $5 million, could be spent during the biennium rather than lapse at the end of the fiscal year. The money is intended to stabilize Medicaid per diem rates for county nursing homes, and members agreed without objection to adopt the amendment and continue working from the bill as amended by the Senate. The committee then discussed HB 155 and a proposed amendment, 2026-201H, dealing with the business enterprise tax. The House side described the proposal as a compromise that would raise the filing threshold from $250,000 to $375,000 and create a trigger that would reduce the BET rate by 0.05% for each $100 million in combined business tax surplus, down to a floor of 0.25%. Senate members opposed lowering the rate at this time, arguing that tax relief should focus on the filing threshold, which they said would remove filing burdens for about 3,500 small businesses, and that rate cuts should be considered in a budget cycle rather than an off-year. Concerns were raised that one-time revenues, such as tax amnesty receipts or federal repatriation-related surpluses, could unintentionally trigger reductions. Representative Sweeney later offered a revised approach by moving the effective date of the trigger mechanism to January 1, 2028, and said he was also willing to carve out tax amnesty revenues or adjust the effective date to avoid using one-time funds. The Senate remained unwilling to agree to a rate reduction, though it expressed openness to raising the filing threshold further. The committee ultimately did not resolve the business tax issue and recessed to continue discussions at a later time. The final item discussed was HB 1102, concerning an increase in the research and development tax credit paired with changes to state park fees. House members supported the R&D credit increase but opposed tying it to higher park fees, citing concerns about tourism, especially at border parks, and noting that the Department of Natural and Cultural Resources had said it did not need the increase. Senate members defended the park fee changes as a fairness issue, arguing that New Hampshire residents should pay less than out-of-state visitors and that the department had not raised rates in many years. No vote was taken on this item during the discussion captured here.

Transcript Highlights:

• Because the bill was heard for the very first time after the amendment deadline, there was no ability
• with ACLU California Action and Opposition, happy to answer any technical questions about First Amendment
• partners and others had concerns with some of the details of that moving. guidance document into statutory
• In section three of the bill, the amendments, which are in 262.32, there is a reference to the complaint
• I don't know if it would be statutory for these positions to be created, but it would take that time

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Chairman, by... coming up with another committee substitute if we have time, or just doing a floor amendment
• Either way, with a floor amendment or with another committee sub at the committee's direction.
• Finally, we must close statutory conflicts and loopholes that allow abuse to hide in plain sight within
• Chair lays out SJR 59 by Senator Birdwell as pending business This bill proposes a constitutional amendment
• did intervene and criminal charges were brought, but it shows the necessity for for there to be a statutory

Bills: SB604, SB843, SB1636, SB2395, SB571, SB1224, SB1832, SB2392, SB747, SB2623, SB2624, SB2185

Keywords: bonds, education funding, Texas Permanent School Fund, financial transparency, speculative rating, school funding, deferred maintenance, tax revenue, education budget, school districts, education, finance, Texas Education Code, misconduct, child abuse, educators, investigation, criminal offense, education law, suspension

Transcript Highlights:

• And because of a Democratic amendment to this bill in the last Congress, this prohibition was expanded
• The Clerk: H.R. 1692, a bill to amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to enable secure and trustworthy
• The Clerk: H.R. 1374, a bill to amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002, to make improvements to the
• It removes the statutory requirements restricting participation in the program to areas designated by
• IT REMOVES THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS RESTRICTING PARTICIPATION IN THE PROGRAM AREAS BE DESIGNATED BY

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Monday, March 10, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We're going to do questions after that amendment abuser. 2 amendments take up Amendment bar code 2, 4
• Are there questions on the Amendment? Mark Anderson speaking for. >> Thank you for the amendment.
• The amendment say yea, all those opposed the amendment adopted next.
• The amendment is adopted back on the bill as amended. Are there questions on the bill as amended?
• Let's go back to the bill as amended. amendment is adopted. Let's go back to the bill as amended.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And so, certainly, you know, if there's an attempt to modify those, a constitutional amendment would
• And so, certainly, you know, if there's an attempt to modify those, a constitutional amendment would
• And so, certainly, you know, if there's an attempt to modify those, a constitutional amendment would
• <00:12:31.680> exemptions<00:12:32.680> most with the statutory exemptions most with
• the statutory exemptions most property<00:12:33.959> tax<00:12:34.279> exemptions<00:12

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, any proposed amendments? first. Um, any proposed amendments?
• amendment and yield to you. amendment and yield to you.
• -page amendments, third reading amendments.
• -page amendments, third reading amendments.
• -page amendments, third reading amendments.

Bills: HB0022, HB0052, HB0076

Keywords: municipal officers, recall election, petition requirements, local governance, voter participation, elections, hand counting, recounts, vote auditing, Wyoming legislature, electoral process, annexation, landowner rights, municipal law, city planning, property, local government, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Specifically, the board has not implemented the recommendation to comply with all statutory open meeting
• required... law specifically the board has not implemented the recommendation to comply with all statutory
• evidence prior to making a report, we concluded that the adopted policy did not fully address the statutory
• We followed all the statutory requirements carefully and transparently. We can...
• We followed all the statutory requirements carefully and transparently.

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• amendment amendment uh<00:07:28.639> they<00:07:29.039> they<00:07:30.400> uh<00
• Again, Fifth Amendment violation.
• Again, Fifth Amendment violation.
• Again, Fifth Amendment violation.
• >> on House Bill 2578 with amendments. >> on House Bill 2578 with amendments.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee heard opening remarks and ground rules from Chair David Tarnas, including a request for two-minute testimony limits, clear speaking, Zoom etiquette, and respectful conduct. The first measure taken up was HB 2062, relating to gun violence prevention, which would appropriate funds for enforcement of gun violence protective orders and for public awareness campaigns. Judiciary submitted written testimony recommending technical changes to clarify that it does not enforce laws and instead should be funded for personnel to process temporary restraining orders and gun violence protective orders; the Department of Law Enforcement supported the bill and said it is well positioned to conduct public education. Support also came from county and advocacy witnesses, including Moms Demand Action, Giffords Gun Owners for Safety, HGEA, and a retired police officer, while opposition testimony argued the measure raises due process and Fifth Amendment concerns and that education, not enforcement, should be the focus. The chair noted 37 testimonies in support, 103 in opposition, and three comments; no vote was taken in the portion provided. Testimony on HB 2062 emphasized both public safety and constitutional concerns. Supporters described the bill as a way to increase awareness of an existing legal tool, prevent suicides and shootings, and help law enforcement and the public understand gun violence protective orders. Opponents, including gun owners and firearms groups, argued that red flag laws can be abused, lack due process, and should not be expanded through state funding. A county neighborhood safety witness suggested an amendment to allow public, private, and nonprofit consultants to assist with training and implementation. Members asked a few questions, but the agencies with written testimony were not present, so the chair referred members to their submissions. The committee then moved to HB 2061, relating to firearms, which appropriates money for the state gun buyback program and requires at least two buyback events in each county. Written support was noted from the Department of Law Enforcement, Hawaii County Council, the County of Kauai Prosecuting Attorney, and the Hawaii State Association of Counties, with the latter emphasizing that buybacks are voluntary prevention tools that can reduce risk before crises escalate. Opposition came from the Mid-Pacific Pistol League, SDM Training Group/Bows and Bullets, and others; one witness argued buybacks are ineffective, costly, and can be vulnerable to misuse or black-market diversion, and suggested a year-round surrender option instead. The committee heard additional support from a retired police officer and from a gun violence survivor with Students Demand Action, but no final action or vote was taken in the excerpt provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Madam Chair, Representative, moving the Substitute Care Advisory Council would require a statutory change
• Care Advisory Council would require a statutory change because statute does place it currently within
• Amendment of Chair: Revenues exceeded expenditures by $371,000 in FY25.
• Now, there is statutory language that says the casino has to be operating near the racetrack, so there

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• present those recommendations to the Budget Committee, and then [Carl](member_10532) is exercising his statutory
• Amended by Supreme Court staff, and those are in our budgets.
• And Chair, Senator, those members, give you some context: This is a statutory construct in which the
• So that's that statutory process where an attorney can petition for a court order to require a member

Transcript Highlights:

• state, federal, and county, uh, collaborative back in 1914 with the Smith-Leaver Act, and we're a statutory
• Other research includes looking at soil amendments, looking at genetics, and looking at irrigation technologies
• Uh, Kelly, in order for us to make changes, it's not statutory.
• And I don't know if we need to do that in council as a whole to figure that out because the statutory

Transcript Highlights:

• The Senate amendments are chaptering amendments. I respectfully ask for your aye vote.
• Senate amendments are concurred in.
• Senate amendments are concurred in.
• 76. 27, 8.30, 839, 848, Senate Bill 63 with amendments, 767 with amendments, 404 with amendments, and
• Senate Bill 614 with amendments.

Summary: The Assembly convened after a quorum call, opened with prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, welcomed visiting students from De La Salle High School and a guest for Assembly Member Kalra, and then moved through a lengthy concurrence and third-reading agenda. Early actions included concurrence on ACR 21 honoring fallen Galt Police Officer Herminda Grewal, followed by a series of mostly noncontroversial bills on utilities, reclamation districts, housing, wildfire relief, mobile homes, environmental quality, health care coverage, and local government. Several measures were presented as technical, clarifying, or urgency bills, and many passed with unanimous or near-unanimous votes; notable items included AB 238 (wildfire mortgage forbearance), AB 571 (Southern California Veterans Cemetery permitting/CEQA exemption), AB 574 (health care coverage), AB 696 (lithium-ion battery safety advisory group), AB 1150 (airport car rental facility maintenance), AB 1154 (ADU parking standards), and SB 499 (impact fee deferrals for emergency-related parkland and utility infrastructure). SB 499 drew the most debate, with supporters emphasizing disaster resilience and dual-use parkland and an opponent arguing it would worsen housing-related fee burdens; it ultimately passed after a call was lifted. The chamber also adopted SJR 4 urging restoration of NIH funding, and passed SB 230 expanding workers’ compensation presumptions to additional firefighters, SB 92 tightening density bonus law to curb loopholes, SB 782 creating disaster relief financing districts, SB 40 capping insulin copays at $35 and limiting step therapy, SB 362 strengthening small-business financing disclosures, SB 513 requiring workers access to training records, SB 489 requiring public agencies involved in housing approvals to post requirements online, SB 31 promoting recycled water use, SB 551 introducing normalization and dynamic security concepts in corrections, SB 639 extending flood-protection deadlines for Sacramento/Yuba projects, SB 653 defining environmentally sensitive vegetation management, AB 652 on air pollution, and SB 221 updating stalking law to include threats to pets. Several bills received recorded opposition or split votes, including SB 551, SB 439, SB 782, and SB 499, but most measures passed comfortably. The Assembly also concurred in Senate amendments on AB 516 and AB 1523, and later lifted the call on SB 499 to complete passage. The session included an adjournment in memory of Rick Bryson of Long Beach, with Assembly Member Lowenthal highlighting Bryson’s athletic, business, and civic contributions. The day ended with reminders to secure floor managers for pending bills, a notice of the next day’s 10 a.m. floor session, and adjournment until Thursday, September 4th.

Transcript Highlights:

• Also, having, what we've noticed as we've gotten statutory authority for this council, more legislative
• And if not, we need to amend the piece of legislation that created this so that we get people who are
• I'm not saying they don't care, but if they're not going to have someone, we need to look at amending
• and I'm not saying they don't care, but if they're not going to have someone, we need to look at amending
• this so that we get people... ...but if they're not going to have someone, we need to look at amending

Summary: The Arkansas Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia Advisory Council met with legislative members and agency, advocacy, and provider representatives present. The council adopted its rules and procedures, approved the prior meeting minutes, and authorized the co-chairs to approve special expenses. Members then heard an extensive update on the state Alzheimer’s plan and current developments in diagnosis, treatment, research, caregiving, and workforce issues. David Cook of the Alzheimer’s Association described major changes since the first state plan, including the growth of blood-based biomarkers, broader access to amyloid PET scans, and the availability of disease-slowing treatments such as Leqembi and Kisunla. He emphasized that Arkansas still faces major barriers in rural areas, including limited provider awareness, insurance coverage concerns, shortages of specialists, and long wait times for memory care and infusion services. He also highlighted caregiver burden, the need for better education and care navigation, and new efforts such as a dementia resource center pilot with UAMS, respite grants, and workforce training. Members discussed the importance of public education on brain health, diet, exercise, and risk reduction, as well as the need to collaborate with chronic disease partners and improve outreach to primary care providers. The council approved four proposed focus areas for the next state plan: advancing risk reduction, brain health, early detection and diagnosis; strengthening family caregiver support; improving access to diagnostics and treatment; and supporting access and quality of care, including workforce training and crisis response. Members also discussed possible legislative or statutory changes to keep the council active and engaged, and they agreed to pursue a future meeting in August, tentatively August 12 in Hot Springs, with additional meetings under consideration for later in the month. The meeting adjourned after no further business.

Transcript Highlights:

• And the current statutory sunset date is that we do this by the end of December.
• So we did put in an amendment for that in the fair share budget.
• So the fair share amendment, for those of you that don't know, is the millionaires tax.
• So we did put in an amendment for that in the fair share budget.
• So the fair share amendment, for those you that don't know, is the millionaires tax.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The commission approved the minutes from its March 11 meeting after a motion by Jeannie Costa and a second by Senator Michael Brady, with members noting a few possible corrections to attendance and wording. The meeting then focused on updates about the commission’s timeline and funding. Staff reported that an amendment to extend the commission’s deadline from December 31, 2026 to December 31, 2027 was filed in the Fair Share budget but was not accepted, and members discussed pursuing the extension through other budget vehicles, including the regular budget, a supplemental budget, or other legislation. Commissioners also discussed the need to fill a vacancy left by Julius Brito and to potentially extend the deadline for appointing new commissioners. A substantial portion of the meeting was devoted to brainstorming the commission’s community engagement plan for the proposed Cape Verdean Culture Center. Members revisited a three-part approach involving site visits, traditional listening sessions, and outreach at existing Cape Verdean events, while also emphasizing historical accuracy, youth engagement, visibility, and regional collaboration. Commissioners suggested using surveys, canvassing, social media, a website, and other digital tools to reach people across the diaspora, including those unable to attend in person. Several members recommended specific locations and institutions for engagement, including New Bedford, Brockton, Boston, Cape Cod, and Rhode Island, with references to museums, historical societies, clubs, and cultural organizations already doing related work. Testimony and comments also addressed funding and organizational structure for the future center. Legislators described possible funding sources such as House and Senate earmarks, a bond bill, and a nonprofit structure that could later support fundraising and operations. Members discussed examples from other cultural institutions, including the Holocaust Museum, the African American History Museum, and the Haitian Toussaint Louverture Cultural Center, as models for governance and public support. The group also raised the possibility of future collaboration with the Cape Verdean government and institutions in Cabo Verde, though one member urged waiting until after upcoming elections there before making formal contacts. No additional votes were taken beyond approving the minutes and adjourning the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• THERE IS NO EFFECTIVE DETERRENT IN THE CURRENT STATUTORY FRAMEWORK TO STOP THE CRIMINALS FROM CONTINUING
• THE STATUTORY SCHEME ITSELF IS NOT STRINGENT ENOUGH TO REPEL THIS CRIME IN OUR COMMUNITIES.
• IT COULD BE A COMBINATION OF EITHER BUT THE LIABILITY THAT THE LANDLORD FACES UNDER THE EXISTING STATUTORY
• REALLY THE LACK OF ENFORCEMENT BECAUSE OF THE STATUTORY SCHEME LEADS TO AS MR.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I am accepting the committee's amendments.
• We appreciate the amendments that were in print, the latest amendments in print, and are committed to
• committee amendments.
• Your bill does enjoy a due pass as amended recommendation with the committee amendments, and I commend
• Opposed and less amended. Thank you. Good afternoon, Chair.

Summary: The Assembly Communications and Conveyance Committee met with several bills on the agenda, beginning with SB 739 (Arreguín) on the Clean Miles Standard and Incentive Program for transportation network companies. The author and supporters from Lyft, Uber, and TechNet said the bill would update EV miles traveled and greenhouse gas targets to reflect current market conditions, add flexibility for CARB and the CPUC, and protect drivers from losing platform access while also creating a path for future electrification. Opponents including the American Lung Association, Sierra Club California, and NRDC argued the bill would weaken a program meant to accelerate EV adoption and should retain stronger targets. Members discussed affordability, charging infrastructure, and the need to balance climate goals with feasibility. The committee approved SB 739 as amended and re-referred it to Appropriations, later recording a 9-0 vote when the roll was completed. The committee then heard SB 1190 (Grove), the “Safe Passage for Youth Act,” which would regulate private youth transport services used for out-of-state residential placements. The author and sponsor testimony described abusive practices such as nighttime pickups, blindfolds, restraints, and emotional trauma, and said the bill would require CPUC permitting, TrustLine background checks, training, parental consent, and bans on certain practices. Support came from youth and disability advocates, with no opposition testimony. The bill was moved on a due pass as amended recommendation and later passed 9-0. SB 1191 (Ochoa Bogh) would extend the sunset for California High Cost Fund A and B universal service programs that help provide affordable telephone service in rural and high-cost areas. Supporters from rural telecom companies and industry groups said the funds are essential for maintaining service, 911 access, and emergency communications in remote communities. There was no opposition, and the committee advanced the bill on a due pass recommendation; it later passed 9-0. The consent item, SB 985 (Strickland) on the 911 emergency system, was also approved. Finally, the committee heard SB 1246 (Cortese) on autonomous vehicles and emergency response. The author and supporters from SEIU California and the California Professional Firefighters said the bill would require AV companies to provide incident response, notify local jurisdictions during system failures, ensure U.S.-based remote drivers, and prevent public safety workers from having to manage AV breakdowns. Industry opponents argued the bill intrudes on federal vehicle standards, gives local governments enforcement authority they should not have, and could create overly broad notification and response requirements. Members raised questions about local control, response times, and whether the bill was premature given existing DMV regulations. Despite those concerns, the committee passed SB 1246 on a due pass as amended recommendation, later recording a 7-1 vote. The committee then recessed and returned to complete roll calls before adjourning.