Transcript Highlights:

• Next up, we've got the LESC-endorsed legislation proposals.
• Any opposition to this being an endorsed legislative... Any other discussion?
• Any opposition to this being an endorsed legislation from the committee? The opposition.
• Is there opposition to this being an endorsed legislation?
• Okay, so with a 4-2, it does go in as adopted legislation. Thank you.

Summary: The committee first heard a detailed staff presentation on the LESC FY27 public school support recommendation. Staff reviewed the budget structure and explained that, despite a downward revision in state revenue estimates, the recommendation still relied on recurring and non-recurring revenue to support educator compensation, insurance, transportation, literacy, math, special education, and other school programs. Major recurring items included a 3% compensation increase, funding for an 80-20 health insurance cost share, insurance premium growth, and transportation adequacy funding. Staff also flagged a possible supplemental need of up to $35 million for virtual education tied to rapid enrollment growth in Chama and Santa Rosa, and members raised concerns about the quality, accountability, and funding model for virtual programs. Members asked questions about transportation for rural districts, the Martinez-Yazzie lawsuit fees, the treatment of enrollment declines in the school funding formula, and whether the word “average” in salary language should remain in the budget. Staff explained that the SEG should remain whole, that the insurance and transportation recommendations applied to all public school employees but not contractors, and that the budget included multiple math-related investments spread across several lines rather than one single appropriation. There was also discussion of out-of-school learning grants, school meals, literacy center operations, special education training, and the Public Education Reform Fund, including the use of multi-year, evaluation-based appropriations for high-impact tutoring and community schools. After discussion, the committee adopted the LESC budget recommendation. The committee then moved to endorsed legislation proposals. It endorsed a bill allowing the secretary to suspend an individual school board member, with notice and appeal procedures clarified, and a bill creating an 80-20 health insurance cost-share requirement for public school employees, along with a study of the sustainability of public school insurance programs. It also endorsed a bill on attendance provisions for students with severe medical conditions, which would keep those students from being classified as excessively absent. Finally, the committee discussed a teacher residency bill that would raise stipend levels, allow residents to complete service anywhere in New Mexico, and remove the requirement that sponsoring schools must hire them, though the bill did not include an appropriation. Members also raised questions about bilingual, Hispanic, and Black education funding, cultural and linguistic supports in teacher preparation, and where various programs should be placed in the budget or PERF framework.

Transcript Highlights:

• My name is Aubrey Rodriguez, and I'm a legislative advocate with ACLU California Action.
• My name is Aubrey Rodriguez, and I'm a legislative advocate with ACLU California Action.
• You guys know this, you're legislators; no one bill will solve all of our problems.
• in Washington to place a moratorium on the enforcement of state-level AI legislation.
• My name is Aubrey Rodriguez, and I am a legislative advocate with ACLU California Action.

Summary: The committee heard several public safety bills, with testimony split between supporters who framed the measures as targeted fixes and opponents who warned about overcriminalization and unintended consequences. SB 701, by Senator Wahab, drew support from law enforcement and local government groups, who said state law lacks a tool to address the conduct at issue; the ACLU opposed it as duplicative of existing law, while public defenders said they may withdraw opposition after amendments. Because there was no quorum at that point, the bill was held open without a vote. SB 834, by Senator DeRazzo, was presented as a technical cleanup bill to improve California’s automatic record clearance system by preventing outdated “pending” charges from blocking relief, requiring local court records to match DOJ records, and creating a way for people to obtain proof of relief. It received broad support from criminal justice reform and defense organizations, with no opposition, and the chair indicated support, but no final action was taken during the hearing. SB 248, by Senator Rubio, would require DOJ to send new gun purchasers educational materials during the waiting period about safe storage, suicide prevention, domestic violence, and related resources; supporters called it common-sense education, while one opponent argued the information is already available. The committee voted the bill out on a due-pass motion to Appropriations, but it remained on call pending one additional vote. Senator Rubio’s SB 19, the Safe Schools and Places of Worship Act, would create a new offense for credible threats against schools or houses of worship even when no specific individual is named. Supporters, including law enforcement and Jewish community advocates, said current law leaves a loophole and that the bill would help prevent panic and resource-draining lockdowns; opponents from civil liberties and youth justice groups argued existing law already covers threats and that the bill would worsen the school-to-prison pipeline. After a motion and second, the committee voted due pass to Appropriations, with the measure also left on call. Later, SB 759 by Senator Archuleta, prompted by the killing of Whittier Officer Keith Boyer, would require a court hearing after a third supervision violation or new offense for people on post-release community supervision; supporters said it adds accountability, while opponents said it removes probation discretion and could increase jail and court burdens. The bill passed due pass to Appropriations and was reported as passing. The committee also heard SB 6 by Senator Ashby, which would schedule xylazine as a controlled substance while preserving veterinary use. Supporters, including veterinarians, law enforcement, and a parent who lost a son to a drug-related death, said the drug is increasingly present in fentanyl mixtures and needs to be controlled; opponents from drug policy and civil liberties groups argued scheduling would criminalize users, hinder research, and repeat failed drug-war policies. After extensive debate, the committee voted the bill out due pass to Appropriations, and it passed. Finally, SB 11, the AI Abuse Protection Act, was introduced to regulate AI-generated voice, image, and video replicas, with supporters emphasizing protection against deepfakes and nonconsensual images; the California Chamber of Commerce opposed unless amended, seeking narrower definitions and limits on consumer warnings. The hearing ended while SB 11 was still under discussion, with no final vote reflected in the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm AJ with the legislative budget board.
• Have you been personally contacted by legislators about these plants?
• By any legislators? You and I have discussed concrete batch plants.
• Your agency has received from legislation. Passed and answered.
• As it relates to legislators, you have no idea how many have contacted you.

Bills: SB1, SB 1

Keywords: appropriations, budget, state funding, education, healthcare, infrastructure, campground safety, youth camp regulations, flood safety, emergency evacuation, health and safety standards, 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Speaker, I move that the reading of the journal at length for the first legislative day be dispensed
• 09:44.600> the<00:09:44.720> same<00:09:45.040> to<00:09:45.120> be legislative
• day and finds the same to be legislative day and finds the same to be correct.<00:09:45.960> Signed
• <00:09:52.440> day<00:09:52.640> be length for the first legislative day be length
• for the first legislative day be dispensed<00:09:53.360> with.

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• > solutions, This legislation focuses on solutions, This legislation focuses on solutions, not
• c><00:21:01.919> to the remarks on the legislation and to the remarks on the legislation and to
• > diminish<00:23:41.520> the This legislation will not diminish the This legislation will
• colleagues to support this legislation colleagues to support this legislation and<00:24:31.760><
• <01:48:00.000> Without for legislative business. Without for legislative business.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Friday, January 9, 2026, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• worksheet data this legislation worksheet data this legislation jeopardizes<01:32:02.639> the
• . ...related to this legislation.
• <03:02:51.120> thanks<03:02:51.520> anyone legislation thanks anyone legislation thanks
• We’re an organization dedicated to advancing evidence-based legislation and opposing legislation that
• We’re an organization dedicated to advancing evidence-based legislation and opposing legislation that

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The House Committee on Health, Human Services and Elderly Affairs heard testimony on House Bill 606, as amended, a bill aimed at preventing physicians from denying medically necessary sterilizing or fertility-affecting treatment based on a patient’s age, number of children, marital status, or a doctor’s speculation about future reproductive intentions. Representative Ellen Reed, the sponsor, described the bill as a response to her own long experience with PCOS, heavy bleeding, and repeated refusals by doctors to perform a hysterectomy despite her clear wishes. She said the amendment narrows the bill to medically necessary care, adds definitions for “medical condition” and “appropriate reproductive care,” and removes earlier provisions about voluntary sterilization referrals. She also said the bill does not target religious objections, and that doctors could still refuse for medical, payment, or existing religious reasons not addressed by the bill. Committee members asked about religious freedom, informed consent versus waivers, and the scope of the new definitions. Reed responded that religion was not added to the list of prohibited reasons for denial, and that the amendment is intended to protect doctors when patients sign informed consent or waivers. She explained that “appropriate reproductive care” includes procedures such as hysterectomy, oophorectomy, orchiectomy, salpingectomy, and endometrial ablation, and that the bill now focuses on medically necessary treatment rather than elective sterilization. She said the change was intended to make the proposal narrower and more tailored after earlier concerns. Several witnesses supported the bill with personal accounts of being denied hysterectomies or other procedures despite serious symptoms. Representative Lauren Selig described a decade-long effort to obtain a hysterectomy after years of cycle problems and migraines, saying doctors dismissed her concerns and treated her symptoms as normal. Jade Flad also testified in support, saying she had long been told to simply endure her cycle problems and noted that her husband was offered a vasectomy without similar barriers. The sponsor said online support was strong and that there was little or no written opposition testimony. No vote or final committee action was taken during the portion of the hearing provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• And, as customary, legislators and other elected officials will be taken out of turn.
• Legislators and other elected officials will be taken out of turn. And here we are.
• The Mass Ready Act is an incredibly important impact of this legislation.
• It's a good opportunity for legislators to ask him questions.
• Friedman's association with this legislation.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The hearing focused on the Healey-Driscoll administration’s Mass Ready Act, a $3 billion environmental bond bill. Administration officials said the bill would fund climate resilience, clean water, land conservation, parks, PFAS remediation, food security infrastructure, and coastal and inland flood protection, while also streamlining permitting for housing, restoration, and other resilience projects. They emphasized that the bond authorizes spending but does not itself obligate it, and said the proposal includes deauthorizations as housekeeping. Committee members asked about the new Resilience Revolving Fund, flood and drought management, MVP funding, land acquisition, Chapter 61 right-of-first-refusal changes, salt marsh carbon sequestration, and how the bill would help smaller municipalities and offset expected federal funding losses. Officials said the revolving fund would be managed through EEA and the Clean Water Trust, with criteria aimed at directing aid to communities most in need, and noted that drought issues would continue to be handled through existing DEP and drought commission tools. Several committee members and witnesses discussed specific policy provisions, including flood disclosure requirements for homebuyers and renters, expanded authority for regional planning and small-town access to grants, and permitting reforms that would exempt or expedite certain environmental restoration and priority housing projects from more time-consuming review processes. Administration witnesses defended the reforms as a way to achieve the same environmental outcomes faster and with more certainty, while some advocates argued the bill should go further, especially on Chapter 91 and restoration permitting. The administration also described investments in DCR facilities, water and wastewater systems, open space, agricultural easements, and a new focus on blue carbon and salt marsh restoration. Public testimony largely supported the bill. Mass Audubon, the Trustees of Reservations, the Environmental League of Massachusetts, The Nature Conservancy, MAPC, the Massachusetts Municipal Association, municipal officials, and others praised the bill’s resilience, conservation, and water infrastructure investments. Some witnesses urged additional funding for land protection, coastal resilience, buyouts, and restoration, and several called for stronger or simpler permitting reforms. Municipal witnesses from Boston, Beckett, Beverly, Conway, and regional planning organizations stressed the need for flexible financing, especially for small and rural communities facing costly infrastructure and climate adaptation projects. No votes were taken during the portion of the hearing provided; the committee heard testimony and asked questions before moving on to additional panels.

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm open to ideas on how to improve the legislation.
• We do not need this type of legislation.
• We do not need this type of legislation.
• I get the rhetoric around this legislation.
• I get the rhetoric around this legislation.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We support the goal of this legislation.
• We support the goal of this legislation. We support the goal of this legislation.
• We<00:56:05.080> encourage<00:56:05.440> legislator<00:56:06.280> legislators<00
• :56:06.920> to We encourage legislator legislators to We encourage legislator legislators to strengthen
• > codified Legislation passed last year codified Legislation passed last year codified these<01

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• What happened after the legislation was passed in.
• What demographics does this legislation target?
• We believe this is the intent of this legislation.
• I'm the legislative officer.
• And so, part of the goal of the legislation...

Bills: HB21, HB211, HB223, HB323, HB524, HB530, HB636, HB762, HB21, HB211, HB223

Keywords: housing finance, multifamily residential, low income, tax exemption, audit requirements, affordable housing, local government, development bonds, housing assistance, financial assistance, low income housing, community support, affordability, veterans housing, community involvement, air conditioning, tenant support, healthcare, elderly, taxation

Transcript Highlights:

• be implemented but the 2023 legislation be implemented but the 2023 legislation where<00:10:12.640
• I’m also the legislative co-chair for Literacy Action Network. Good morning.
• I’m also the legislative co-chair for Literacy Action Network. Good morning.
• I'm also the legislative co-chair of Literacy Action Network.
• I'm also the legislative co-chair of Literacy Action Network.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• . legislation. legislation.
• So I just that isn't in legislation.
• When you legislation specific to PT.
• > area<04:35:33.279> for legislation is a prime area for legislation is a prime area for
• >> General PBM legislation. So some states >> General PBM legislation.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• of<00:05:49.840> a<00:05:50.080> grieving legislation on behalf of a grieving legislation
• This piece of legislation is clots.
• > the<00:10:10.000> Department legislative affairs for the Department legislative affairs
• Expanding access to legislation.
• careful legislative attention. careful legislative attention.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Stewart for carrying the legislation. Stewart for carrying the legislation.
• So, thank you. take some legislative action on it. So take some legislative action on it.
• <01:30:38.000> next quickly with new legislation next quickly with new legislation next session
• should be ready to put that legislators should be ready to put forward<01:32:46.320> legislation<
• for keeping us involved as legislators. for keeping us involved as legislators.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We evaluate legislative member requests. We evaluate legislative member requests.
• It's a as is any a lot of legislation that as is any a lot of legislation that as is any a lot of legislation
• Um I you know, so I of the legislation. Um I you know, so I of the legislation.
• So, man, legislation to be implemented. So, man, legislation to be implemented.
• passed the legislation passed the legislation the definition changed.

Bills: HB 29, HB 125, HB 145, HB 171, HB 255, HB 50, HB 796, HB 363, HB 116, HB 491, HB 589, HB 1495, HB 368, HB 1285, HB 1905, HB 1360, HB 2002, HB 917, HB 2723, HB 2067, HB 1238, HB 2337, HB 745, HB 1188, HB 1606, HB 2003, HB 2147, HB 2391, HB 2355, HB 2546, HB 2495, HB 2818, HB 2249, HB 1749, HB 3109, HB 3228, HB 3240, HB 1507, HB 658, HB 1748, HB 1851, HB 1922, HB 2001, HB 2798, HB 107, HCR 29, SB 5, SB 262, HB 11, HJR 72, HB 106, HB 18, HB 48, HB 27, HB 37, HB 1481, HB 581, HB 1696, HB 2216, HB 1035, HB 1633, HB 742, HB 754, HB 1689, HB 1690, HB 2669, HB 391, HB 517, HB 1024, HB 1607, HB 252, HB 1716, HB 1562, HB 4116, HB 1866, HB 1741, HB 2103, HB 2637, HB 2884, HB 503, HB 1089, HB 2986, HB 972, HB 502, HB 29, HB 125, HB 145, HB 171, HB 255, HB 50, HB 796, HB 363, HB 116, HB 491, HB 589, HB 1495, HB 368, HB 1285, HB 1905, HB 1360, HB 2002, HB 917, HB 2723, HB 2067, HB 1238, HB 2337, HB 745, HB 1188, HB 1606, HB 2003, HB 2147, HB 2391, HB 2355, HB 2546, HB 2495, HB 2818, HB 2249, HB 1749, HB 3109, HB 3228, HB 3240, HB 1507, HB 658, HB 1748, HB 1851, HB 1922, HB 2001, HB 2798, HB 107, HCR 29

Keywords: water audit, water loss, water loss mitigation plan, municipally owned utility, municipal utility, water conservation, Texas Water Development Board, TCEQ, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, water leakage, leak detection, billing data accuracy, utility validation, water audit validation, water scarcity, water management, infrastructure, public utility, conservation plan, administrative penalty

Transcript Highlights:

• In deference to our legislators, our colleagues, we may take them out of turn.
• We also have Alois Bridges, Siona Schernoff, my legislative director, Galen Schran. Thank you.
• This legislation promotes fairness and equal opportunity in education.
• This legislation promotes fairness and equal opportunity in education.
• Without legislation, districts largely don't care to challenge them.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Joint Committee on Education held a public hearing on a large slate of bills, with much of the testimony focused on school discipline and student equity. Bills discussed included measures to address inequities in suspension and expulsion, clarify school exclusion rules, reduce discipline for dress and grooming violations, and expand protections related to fair educational practices. Committee members repeatedly reminded witnesses of the two-minute limit and asked for written testimony to supplement oral remarks. A substantial portion of the hearing centered on the RAISE Act and related school discipline bills, including H. 730/S. 376 and H. 731/S. 380. Testifiers from advocacy groups, legal services, and the legislature argued that exclusionary discipline disproportionately affects Black and Latino students, students with disabilities, low-income students, and DCF-involved youth. They said current law is overly broad or unclear in areas such as “assault on educational staff,” indefinite suspensions tied to felony complaints, and definitions of weapons, leading to unnecessary removals from school. Supporters said the bills would add due process, clearer definitions, and better accountability, while one legislator testified in support of the discipline reforms and opposed several other bills on the agenda. The committee also heard testimony on H. 576/S. 368, which would prohibit suspensions and expulsions for dress and grooming violations and require clearer, non-discriminatory dress code policies. Witnesses cited research and personal stories about disproportionate enforcement against Black girls, girls of color, non-binary students, and students wearing religious attire, and said the bill would prevent physical contact used to enforce dress codes. Another major topic was H. 641/S. 349, which would add “special medical status” protections in education; supporters said it would prevent exclusion based on medical decisions or conditions, though members questioned how it would interact with existing disability law and vaccination-related school requirements. The committee also heard testimony on H. 625, which would extend the ban on corporal punishment from public to private schools, with witnesses citing research on harm and disproportionate impact. Additional testimony covered bills on accelerated learning and gifted education, with parents, educators, and advocates saying Massachusetts under-identifies advanced learners and lacks adequate acceleration pathways. A senator also testified for S. 406 on recovery high schools, saying the funding formula should be updated to better support students in recovery. No votes were taken during the hearing; the chair closed testimony on several bill groups and noted that written testimony would remain open for a week.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:21:29.440> the of a veteran homes that the legisl the of a veteran homes that the legisl
• ,<00:34:50.079> social uh lives through legislation, social uh lives through legislation,
• Those are the legislators that we are addressing<00:36:26.079> today.
• <00:38:22.880> So fail legislative session for the CTF.
• So fail legislative session for the CTF.

Bills: HF3540, HF3522, HF3544

Keywords: veterans rights, employment discrimination, human rights, Minnesota laws, protected classes, veterans, Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs, veterans affairs, Secret War in Laos, SGU veteran, Hmong veterans, Laotian veterans, honor guard, military funeral honors, state veterans cemetery, burial eligibility, veterans home, temporary closure, state active service, National Guard

Transcript Highlights:

• Gonzalez emphasizes the need for legislative support in addressing mental health. Thank you, Dr.
• Legislation to prohibit same-day voter registration in Texas, legislation authorizing contracts with
• Good legislation. Thank you. I move passage.
• Good legislation. Thank you. I move passage. Members, the question occurs on passage.
• Meyer moves to excuse those members on this legislative day who were excused on the previous legislative

Bills: HB17, HB16, SB 10, HB27, HB23, SB 15, SB 18, HB 17, HB 16, SB 10, HB 27, HB 23, SB 15, SB 18

Keywords: property tax, school funding, enrollment changes, inflation adjustment, tax rate notice, judicial administration, court reform, juvenile diversion, court security, mental health services, drug offenses, constitutional amendments, property tax exemption, ad valorem tax, Texas Tax Code, nonprofit corporation, charitable organization, educational nonprofit, scientific nonprofit, agriculture support

Transcript Highlights:

• I believe there is a 20% discount for legislators available on the website.
• The way that they approached this legislation was sort of a values argument.
• This is relatively new legislation.
• I think just having legislation that says...
• Now, we were able to pass this legislation to get some...

Transcript Highlights:

• No, if you want to legislate support, support's easy.
• I'm like, no, if you want to legislate support, support's easy.
• When it comes down to the challenges related to interventions, that needs to be in legislation.
• Nevada System of Higher Education, we stand in support of this legislation.
• You're seeking a legislative solution to what I see is mostly a policy problem.

Keywords: 909, all