Video & Transcript Research : 'border control'

Page 18 of 500
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Judiciary Feb 14th, 2026 at 09:36 am

House Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • And poison control included. There's much more to come.
  • So how many cannabis-related poison control situations have we had in New Mexico?
  • What poison control situations have we had in New Mexico?
  • That's just the ones that call poison control.
  • We are tightly controlled on what we can do.
Bills: HB294, SB40, SB43, SB35
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Criminal Justice Jan 20th, 2026

Criminal Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • It is a known tactic of coercive control.
  • Animal abuse is a course of control.
  • Recognize animal abuse as a course of control. Do not simply see me as a case number.
  • Coercive control and manipulation. Thank you. It's been almost seven minutes.
  • Adding coercive control.
Summary: The committee took up a series of criminal justice and public safety bills. SB 1084, which exempts certain identifying and location information for non-legal support staff in state attorneys’ offices from public records requests, was supported by prosecuting attorneys and reported favorably. SB 212, as amended, created new restrictions related to sexual offenders and predators, including a 200-foot restricted presence provision near certain locations and updated notification/supervision requirements; it drew strong opposition from researchers, advocates, and affected families who argued it lacked evidence and would increase homelessness, but it was reported favorably. SB 682, addressing domestic violence, coercive control, strangulation, animal abuse, injunctions, and related training and enforcement issues, received emotional survivor testimony and support from animal welfare and law enforcement groups and was reported favorably. SB 656, creating and renaming FDLE Internet Crimes Against Children funding and grant programs, was amended and reported favorably and unanimously. The committee also considered SB 810 on sealing criminal history records, which would expand eligibility for some non-conviction records and one low-level misdemeanor conviction after waiting periods and judicial review; supporters said Florida is unusually restrictive, while one senator raised concerns about the scope, and the bill was reported favorably. SB 890, creating a standalone battery by strangulation offense applicable outside domestic relationships, was reported favorably after the sponsor said it would close a gap in current law. SB 892, revising habitual offender and violent career criminal sentencing procedures and notice requirements, was reported favorably, with defense lawyers supporting the clearer pretrial notice. SB 928, “Missy’s Law,” requiring immediate remand to custody after conviction of certain dangerous crimes, was amended to include computer pornography/child exploitation offenses and reported favorably after a family member of the namesake victim testified in support. Later, SB 1284 modernized arrest and search warrant statutes, expanding judicial summons options for some misdemeanors and broadening warrant/arrest authority in certain DUI, injunction, domestic violence, and misdemeanor force cases; defense lawyers supported the judicial-discretion portions but raised concerns about DUI/BUI arrests, and the bill was reported favorably. Finally, SB 812, a technical companion to SB 810 updating public records treatment for sealed criminal history records, was amended to clarify prosecutorial access for later cases and reported favorably. Several bills were supported by law enforcement, prosecutors, and advocacy groups, while others drew opposition from civil liberties, treatment, homelessness, and criminal defense advocates. The meeting adjourned after members recorded additional votes on selected tabs.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Control the convention. It doesn't say that you can't.
  • Whose power and control exceed anything ever imagined by the framers of the Constitution.
  • Our out-of-control national government.
  • brought to heel, for the false dichotomy of either an out-of-control. ...control federal government,
  • We have no control over other states. That's where I was going with that. Thank you, Mr.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Both of these companies the two primary proxy advisory firms that control 95% of the market are foreign-controlled
  • From a competitive perspective, given they control approximately 97% of the advisory business, there
  • Both of these proxy advisors are foreign-controlled and claim that they are making recommendations to
  • They can control thousands or millions of shares in a company.
  • These firms that control millions of shares, bought with other people's money...
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 3/24/25

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • MDOT may update the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices to integrate these signs into
  • 07.120> traffic the Minnesota manual on uniform traffic the Minnesota manual on uniform traffic control
  • devices to integrate these signs control devices to integrate these signs into<00:04:11.280> official
  • <00:59:24.240> Uh<00:59:24.559> those<00:59:24.799> were control and uh funding
  • Uh those were control and uh funding.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Education Finance Committee 3/18/25

Education Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • :07:40.720> chair<00:07:40.880> and Moorhead is a rural district, and we sit on the border
  • 07:59.120> the is a rural district and we sit on the is a rural district and we sit on the border
  • Minnesota<00:08:00.400> and<00:08:00.560> North<00:08:00.720> Dakota border
  • of Minnesota and North Dakota border of Minnesota and North Dakota which<00:08:01.680> um<00:
  • It's just a districts for local control. It's just a perspective<01:18:44.800> thing.
Bills: HF630, HF1435, HF1607
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Ways & Means Mar 10th, 2025

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, uh, property owners along the Texas border face a unique predicament.
  • Border crime.
  • Any increase in value due to the, uh, installation of border security infrastructure.
  • It only applies to counties along the Texas-Mexico border.
  • Border security infrastructure and then somehow um. Reporting that as, as exempt from taxation.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WAL Public Hearing - Thu Mar 19, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST

Water & Land

Transcript Highlights:
  • without DOH involvement or or control. without DOH involvement or or control.
  • at Kalaupapa, that means the federal government would have control of one of Kalaupapa's most sacred
  • <01:32:03.720> at Park Service that has full control at Park Service that has full control
  • of one of government would have control of one of Kalaupapa's<01:32:07.760> most<01:32:08.000
  • It's mainly the people that control large land. That's why they're on here.
Summary: The Committee on Water and Land heard testimony on SB 5253 SD2 relating to conservation and SB 2401 relating to regional shoreline mitigation district, with the chair emphasizing short testimony limits and the need to finish before session. On SB 5253, DLNR said it stood on its written testimony and answered questions about the bill’s proposed nonprofit endangered species sanctuary. Members asked whether existing entities or agreements, such as land trusts, private landowners, and DLNR safe harbor agreements, could accomplish similar conservation goals without creating a new entity. DLNR said similar work already exists, but it was not aware of a comparable sanctuary model in the state. A member also questioned language suggesting for-profit businesses in the sanctuary, and DLNR said the intent appeared to be sales of outreach or similar materials, though it agreed that such activities could be handled by a nonprofit. The bulk of the hearing focused on SB 2401, which would create a regional shoreline adaptation/mitigation framework. The Department of the Attorney General said it had concerns about inconsistent use of the terms “mitigation” and “adaptation,” warning of possible title-subject issues. DLNR said it was neutral on the terminology and more concerned with the substance, and noted that the bill would not waive permits; any plan would still require environmental review and applicable state and county permits. DLNR also supported OHA’s recommendation to consider impacts on Native Hawaiian traditional and customary practices during regional planning, and said the bill’s language on temporary shoreline protection measures could help address the gap between emergency permits and longer-term planning while avoiding a hardening-only approach. The Office of Planning supported the regional planning concept but noted it is not a regulatory agency and would need to work with DLNR and the Land Board. OHA supported the bill’s planning-based approach but recommended amendments to require assessment of impacts on Native Hawaiian traditional and customary practices during plan development and to clarify that environmental review would still apply at the project level. Testifiers from the Ka‘anapali Steering Committee strongly supported the bill, saying it would provide a regional framework for ongoing erosion problems while preserving full regulatory authority and normal permitting, and they proposed amendments to standardize terminology, create a limited pathway for temporary shoreline protection, and address ownership and maintenance responsibilities. Members discussed the meaning of “mitigation” versus “adaptation,” the scope of shoreline hardening, and whether the bill would help the legislature take a broader, more holistic view of shoreline decisions. No votes or final actions were taken in the portion of the hearing provided.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Apr 15th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Districts, public improvement districts, freshwater supply districts, water control and improvement districts
  • Ensuring safety, cleanliness, operating on unused local property and lands to better control costs.
  • project runs into unexpected cost changes. are like material price increases, delays out of their control
  • It seeks to remove local control from all of our cities and municipalities that wish to exercise control
  • It does not remove local control regarding public safety, zoning, or animal welfare oversight.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Apr 15th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • There are many things that control a county's ability to raise funds.
  • ought to be a signal to the body that we need some dramatic action on the reform side to really get control
  • I think those two polls... ...give us a pretty good indication that taxes are absolutely out of control
  • We've got to buy the electrons to put through the wires; we don't have any control over the natural gas