Video & Transcript : 'Chapter 32' :

Page 18 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Ways & Means Mar 17th, 2025

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • As I mentioned, the array of incentive tools that we have, chapter.
  • Chapter 380 was a creation that was done in the early 90s.
  • There's been some question and confusion about Chapter 380 agreements. Mr.
  • Chapter 380 agreement about an out-of-state consultant.
  • We don't believe that that is in keeping with the spirit of Chapter 380.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 3/3/25

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • to</c><00:32:05.159><c> I'll</c><00:32:05.360><c> let</c><00:32:05.600><c> the</c><00:32:05.960><c>
  • Chief author<00:32:07.120><c> have</c><00:32:07.240><c> a</c><00:32:07.440><c> final</c><00:32:07.720
  • :32:10.039><c> thank</c><00:32:10.200><c> you</c><00:32:10.320><c> Mr</c><00:32:10.600><c> chair</c><
  • 00:32:10.840><c> I</c><00:32:10.960><c> kind</c><00:32:11.039><c> of</c><00:32:11.200><c> thought</c>
  • ><01:32:04.080><c> thing</c><01:32:04.719><c> I</c><01:32:04.880><c> I</c><01:32:04.920><c> would</c>
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 3/24/26

Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh, but today's amendment moved it to chapter 181, which is enforced by our Division of Labor Standards
  • Uh, but today's amendment moved it to chapter 181, which is enforced by our Division of Labor Standards
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Housing Finance and Policy Committee 3/10/26

Housing Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um just<00:32:01.760><c> want</c><00:32:01.919><c> to</c><00:32:02.080><c> make</c><00:32:02.240><c>
  • ><c> know</c><00:32:06.000><c> what</c><00:32:06.240><c> is</c><00:32:06.399><c> the</c><00:32:07.760
  • c> some</c><00:32:15.120><c> uh</c><00:32:15.440><c> you</c><00:32:15.600><c> know</c><00:32:15.760><
  • </c><00:32:22.000><c> I</c><00:32:22.159><c> I</c><00:32:22.480><c> think</c><00:32:22.559><c> there<
  • there needs to<00:32:23.120><c> be</c><00:32:23.279><c> specificity</c><00:32:24.159><c> to</c><00:32
Bills: HF3600, HF3809, HF3608
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

Interim Joint Committee on Natural Resources & Energy (7-2-26) - Reupload

Natural Resources & Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • &gt;&gt; Okay,<00:32:03.280><c> seeing</c><00:32:03.560><c> no</c><00:32:03.760><c> others,</c><00:32
  • ><c> approve</c><00:32:05.680><c> the</c><00:32:05.760><c> findings</c><00:32:06.280><c> of</c><00:32
  • </c><00:32:08.080><c> Do</c><00:32:08.120><c> you</c><00:32:08.200><c> have</c><00:32:08.280><c> a</c
  • All<00:32:10.840><c> those</c><00:32:11.000><c> in</c><00:32:11.080><c> favor</c><00:32:11.320><c> sign
  • I.<00:32:12.680><c> Opposed</c><00:32:13.080><c> likewise,</c><00:32:13.680><c> the</c><00:32:13.800>
Bills: SB8
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

House Standing Committee on Local Government. (1-28-26)

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • He urged me<00:32:29.600><c> to</c><00:32:29.760><c> share</c><00:32:30.000><c> his</c><00:32:30.240>
  • :32.399><c> over</c><00:32:32.799><c> 70</c><00:32:33.200><c> years,</c><00:32:33.760><c> community</
  • > uh</c><00:32:44.559><c> cav</c><00:32:45.120><c> cavities</c><00:32:46.000><c> for</c><00:32:46.320
  • We<00:32:49.279><c> cannot</c><00:32:49.600><c> afford</c><00:32:50.080><c> an</c><00:32:50.399><c> increase
  • ><c> This</c><00:32:55.120><c> will</c><00:32:55.279><c> impact</c><00:32:55.679><c> our</c><00:32:56.000
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh the office<00:32:40.480><c> basically</c><00:32:40.880><c> was</c><00:32:41.120><c> operating</c><
  • Excel, Excel, operating<00:32:44.480><c> off</c><00:32:44.880><c> just</c><00:32:45.279><c> you</c><
  • legacy</c><00:32:49.039><c> systems</c><00:32:50.480><c> and</c><00:32:50.880><c> as</c><00:32:51.679
  • and as a result of<00:32:52.399><c> that</c><00:32:52.799><c> we</c><00:32:53.120><c> were</c><00:32:
  • </c><00:32:56.640><c> um</c><00:32:56.799><c> asking</c><00:32:57.120><c> for</c><00:32:57.360><c> help
Summary: The Capital Planning Advisory Board opened its fourth meeting, confirmed a quorum, approved the prior meeting’s minutes by unanimous voice vote, and then heard information items and agency presentations. The main substantive presentation came from the Council on Postsecondary Education, which outlined its capital planning recommendations for the 2026–28 biennium. CPE staff described the role of Kentucky’s research and education network (Kron), including connectivity to cloud services, Internet2, identity services, and new local AI/inferencing capacity, and argued that the network is now essential to higher education, health care, and extension services. They said the network’s recent upgrades were driven by privacy, security, redundancy, and the need to support modern research and AI workloads at lower cost than commercial providers. CPE also presented its broader higher-education capital request: $700 million for asset preservation and $1.73 billion for new construction, for a total recommendation of about $2.4 billion. Staff said they do not plan to recommend IT projects or equipment in this cycle, despite reviewing 48 IT submissions totaling nearly $1.4 billion and equipment requests totaling $322.6 million. For asset preservation, they said the recommended allocation method would remain based on each institution’s share of Category 1 and 2 square footage, and they noted that the state’s prior facility assessment is now 12 years old, with deferred maintenance still estimated in the $7–9 billion range. For new construction, they said the requests are heavily focused on STEM and health-related facilities that are difficult to retrofit into older buildings. Board members asked about how asset-preservation amounts were determined, including why Northern Kentucky University’s request was much larger than its prior allocation. CPE staff responded that campus size, building age, and institutional prioritization affect the requests, and that schools are asked to submit more projects than are likely to be funded. The board then moved on to an Attorney General capital plan overview, where senior counsel Will Schroeder began describing the office’s technology needs and the office’s prior reliance on a 2020 appropriation to replace legacy systems and improve security.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Local Government (Part II) Mar 24th, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate Bill 32 represents the Senate's business tax relief proposal of this session.
  • I'm representing the Texas Retailers Association here in support of SB 32.
  • Is there anyone else wishing to testify for or against Senate Bill 32?
  • Senate Bill 32 will be left pending, subject to call of the Chair.
  • Senate Bill 32 will be left pending, subject to call of the Chair.
Summary: The Senate Local Government Committee heard several bills by Senator Bettencourt focused on property tax and local government accountability. SB 32 would provide about $700 million in business tax relief by raising the business personal property exemption from $2,500 to $25,000 and continuing a 20% franchise tax credit for inventory taxes paid. Witnesses from NFIB, the Texas Retailers Association, and Texas Realtors supported the bill, saying business personal property and inventory taxes are burdensome and especially hard on small businesses. After no opposition testimony, SB 32 was left pending. The committee also heard SB 1453, which would change how interest and sinking tax rates are calculated by using only the minimum debt service required under bond schedules, while still allowing a higher rate with a 60% governing body vote and a public explanation. A witness from the Texas Taxpayers and Research Association supported the bill as a way to keep debt rates from rising as property values increase and to preserve tax relief. The bill was left pending after testimony. SB 1883 would tighten rules on local impact fees by requiring 60 days of public availability for capital improvement plans and land use assumptions, raising the approval threshold for adopting impact fees from a simple majority to two-thirds, limiting how often fees can be increased, and expanding notice requirements. Builders and developers testified in support, arguing that impact fees are often poorly reviewed, lack accountability, and are passed on to homebuyers, worsening housing affordability. Committee members discussed adding audit provisions and questioned the lack of city testimony. The bill was left pending with subcommittee action. SB 1452 would require a voter election to decide whether a municipal management district continues to exist, with dissolution if voters reject it; supporters said it would add accountability, while others noted some districts provide essential services and infrastructure. The committee heard testimony from district representatives and builders, then left SB 1452 pending before recessing.