Transcript Highlights:

• Chairman, if in the interest of compromise we wanted to consider some kind of inflationary flexibility
• Adding to the testimony before, I think we do actually want flexibility here, both for communities and
• You know, even like data center operators, flexibility as it relates to water fees and infrastructure
• So I really think at the core here is that we want to keep this flexibility for our business community
• And so it's flexibility, and it's an opportunity to have your tax dollars go somewhere where you think

Bills: SB1142, SCR1028

Keywords: scholarships, tax credit, education funding, nonprofit organizations, Arizona Revised Statutes, constitutional amendment, state revenue, tax policy, legislative approval, two-thirds vote, 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• school districts with some flexibility. school districts with some flexibility.
• <00:13:44.480> And flexibility to the school district.
• And flexibility to the school district.
• um modest um expansion of flexibility um modest um expansion of flexibility for<00:48:53.359>
• <01:26:51.360> to us it will allow more flexibility to us it will allow more flexibility to

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It fixes the voucher program so there's greater flexibility to use both FFN care and traditional child
• It fixes the voucher program, so there's greater flexibility. FFN providers get the minimum wage.
• It fixes the voucher program, so there's greater flexibility to use both FFN care and traditional child
• Sometimes it's for folks who need either more care or just need greater flexibility in care.
• Sometimes it's for folks who need either more care or just need greater flexibility in care.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Joint Committee on Education held its sixth public hearing and took testimony on a large slate of bills, with the chair moving H. 542/S. 341 on family, friend, and neighbor (FFN) child care to the top of the agenda so young constituents would not have to wait. Witnesses from labor, community organizations, and FFN providers strongly supported the bill, saying FFN care fills critical gaps for families working nonstandard hours, especially in low-income, immigrant, and BIPOC communities. Testimony emphasized that FFN providers are currently underpaid, often receive only about $24 per child per day, and should be guaranteed at least the state minimum wage. Witnesses also backed changes to the voucher system to allow families to combine formal and FFN care more flexibly, and they supported creating an FFN advisory council. Committee members asked about the difference between FFN and center-based care, registration requirements, fingerprinting/background checks, EEC’s ongoing study group, and the fiscal impact; witnesses said the current annual cost is about $1.8 million and could rise to about $6 million if all current FFN providers were paid minimum wage, still under 1% of the EEC budget. The committee then closed testimony on that bill. The committee next heard testimony on several preschool and universal pre-K bills, including H. 707 on public preschool facilities, H. 687/S. 339 on universal pre-K and mixed delivery, and related bills such as H. 606, H. 523, H. 618, H. 522, H. 510, and H. 615, many of which were later closed without additional witnesses. A Lowell school official testified that space and facilities funding are major barriers to expanding preschool and that the city has hundreds of children on voucher waitlists. Other witnesses and organizations, including the Early Care and Education Consortium and AFT Massachusetts, supported mixed-delivery universal pre-K and warned that public-school expansion should not undermine community-based providers, whose preschool tuition helps subsidize infant and toddler care. Several witnesses also urged stronger standards for preschool teachers, better staffing ratios, and more integrated special education and support services. The committee accepted written testimony on some bills and closed testimony on the others when no one else came forward. A major portion of the hearing focused on H. 541/S. 373, which would ban school exclusion in pre-K through third grade. Advocates from Massachusetts Advocates for Children, Mass Appleseed, Citizens for Juvenile Justice, AFT Massachusetts, and the Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee argued that suspensions and expulsions at young ages harm learning, worsen inequities, and contribute to the school-to-prison pipeline. They cited data showing disproportionate impacts on Black and Latinx students, students with disabilities, and low-income children, and described personal stories of children whose behavior improved when schools kept them in class and addressed underlying needs. Committee members asked for updated data on the number of students and districts affected, and witnesses said they would provide more detailed written information. After testimony on this and a few other bills, including S. 372, S. 357, and H. 275/S. 133, the committee closed testimony and adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• It's very important to have that... ...uniformity and to give our employers the ability to set flexible
• We look at free market solutions that lower those costs. ...mainly giving employers the flexibility to
• , flexibility to provide any sort of competitive benefit.
• I think this will eliminate flexibility in our eyes.
• There is a reason that they've gone to ERISA, and that is the flexibility in plan design.

Bills: SB502, SB513, SB622, SB670, SB731, SB732, SB916, SB961, SB1122

Keywords: SB 502, Texas peace officers, Health and Human Services Commission, HHSC Office of Inspector General, OIG investigators, law enforcement classification, Schedule C, state employee benefits, injury benefits, peace officer status, commissioned officers, state auditor classification, Government Code, Code of Criminal Procedure, human services, health and human services, law enforcement compensation, public employee benefits, Texas state law enforcement, child welfare

Transcript Highlights:

• I do agree, probably some expectation with the flexibility, because some kids may not reconcile in three
• I just— I think that I appreciate the use of the word flexibility for the classroom. ...because the most
• He currently uses the DOI process to address certain areas such as flexibility with teacher certification
• It's very different, and so that flexibility helps us.
• It's going to drastically improve safety and security, but we need some flexibility.

Bills: SB27, SB226, SB326, SB570, SB605, SB870, SB991, SB1871, SB1872, SB1873, SB1874, SB1924, SB1925

Keywords: residency, public schools, child safety placement, enrollment, education code, antisemitism, student conduct, education, disciplinary actions, Texas Education Code, truancy, attendance policy, chronic absenteeism, school attendance, student absence notifications, parent notification, home visit, attendance officer, truancy court, school district

Transcript Highlights:

• We had the $10 million associated with equipment purchase to revitalize our equipment fleet, and we've
• already got stacks of purchase orders that are lined up ready to go to start spending down that balance
• I have a purchase order for $1.5 million to support Haw wall farm management organization.
• So that's why we've got a bill in that permits us the flexibility to have both exempt as well as civil
• Yes, so we believe that with this legislation it will give us the flexibility to retain the positions

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• THE BILL PRESERVES FLEXIBILITY FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND FDOT.
• WOULD THIS ALLOW ENGINEERING FLEXIBILITY?
• OR WILL THE CITY OR COUNTY ENGINEER BE ABLE TO USE FLEXIBILITY AND CREATIVITY? >> Rep.
• I'M CONCERNED ABOUT FLEXIBILITY AND I'M WORRIED ABOUT ENGINEERING FLEXIBILITY.
• I WILL TAKE WHAT YOU HEARD HERE TODAY AND START LOOKING AT HOW TO MAKE THIS MORE FLEXIBLE AND MAY BE

Transcript Highlights:

• And that would be a local decision if it’s flexible. They might be able to do that.
• But at the end of the day, certainly we’re supportive of flexible resources.
• And that would be a local decision if it's flexible. They might be able to do that.
• But at the end of the day, you know, certainly we're supportive of flexible resources.
• We appreciate the flexible dollars that were in the May Revise.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• AB 1673 gives my communities more resources, tools, and flexibility to be...
• AB 1673 gives my communities more resources, tools, and flexibility to manage these threats.
• A rigid cap removes the little flexibility that they do have to access these services in entirety.
• Behavioral treatment requires flexibility to meet the child where they're at.
• With the amendment, this bill gives courts the flexibility to consider the facts of each case, ensuring

Summary: The Assembly Appropriations Committee met on April 8, 2026, with a quorum established and 59 bills listed for consideration. The committee first approved two consent calendars: several bills were sent to the Assembly floor on a due-pass basis, and a smaller set was approved due-pass but not eligible for the floor consent calendar. The proposed suspense calendar was then deemed approved without individual debate on those measures. The committee heard several bills in regular order. AB 1977, sponsored by the Secretary of State, would clean up and clarify the Online Notarization Act to support implementation by 2030; it drew no opposition and was approved. AB 2011 would codify existing federal mental health parity standards into state law; supporters said it would preserve enforcement authority, while health plans opposed it as premature given federal uncertainty and possible premium impacts; the bill was placed on the B roll call. AB 1673 would give county fish and game commissions more flexibility to use certain revenues for wildlife conflict prevention, and it advanced on an A roll call. AB 2233 would allow unused authorized ABA therapy hours for children with autism to be made up within the authorization period; supporters emphasized access and continuity of care, while insurers warned of higher costs and reduced utilization safeguards; it advanced on an A roll call. AB 1660, as amended, would give courts more flexibility in cases involving financial institutions and public guardians/conservators, with supporters saying it could save counties time and money; it was approved due-pass as amended. During general public comment, speakers voiced support for AB 2081 and AB 1667, and opposition to AB 1777. After public comment and final vote recording for absent members, the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• This would give us the flexibility we need to support our schools. Thank you very much.
• And now, with those guardrails released, they can have complete flexibility depending on the situation
• Most troubling, so much of HB2's funding is earmarked, leaving districts with very little flexibility
• Really, what we need is the flexibility. money to provide pay raises to all of our staff.
• I just want to know where it doesn't work, where it does work, where you need flexibility and why.

Bills: HB2

Keywords: public education, teacher compensation, certification, funding, school finance, educator rights, education funding, charter schools, staff compensation, state aid, retention allotment, 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• 00:41:25.240> in<00:41:25.440> for brought the flexibility piece in for brought the flexibility
• Not "We need some flexibility with it."
• And flexibility within their districts.
• > $50 Increases flexible funding by $50 Increases flexible funding by $50 million<00:57:30.720
• flexibility to meet their local needs. flexibility to meet their local needs.

Bills: HF3493, HF4114

Keywords: safe schools, charter schools, nonpublic schools, Tribal education, funding increase, special education, funding, education finance, appropriations, budget, cross subsidy

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:13:42.480> to limit state tools and flexibilities to limit state tools and flexibilities
• So digging into the new flexibilities So digging into the new flexibilities and<00:14:25.519>
• <00:18:13.200> related additional state flexibilities related additional state flexibilities
• confusing in um state flexibilities confusing in um state flexibilities related<00:18:23.600>
• the impact on state flexibilities the impact on state flexibilities between<00:25:24.400> the

Keywords: 00:00:22 - Call to Order and Roll Call 00:03:00 – Approval of June 25, 2025 Minutes 00:03:22 - Update on Federal Changes to the Medicaid Program 01:03:44 - State Directed Payments, Provider Taxes, and the Rural Health Transformation Fund: How Medicaid Changes Could Impact Kentucky Hospitals 01:29:42 – Public Comments 01:45:25 – Announcements 01:46:19 - Adjournment, 958, all

Summary: The Medicaid Oversight and Advisory Board met on July 30, 2025, approved the June 25 minutes, and received a presentation from Katherine Castanza of the National Conference of State Legislatures on Medicaid provisions in H.R. 1. The presentation outlined more than 20 Medicaid-related provisions, emphasizing that the largest federal savings come from work/community engagement requirements, changes to provider taxes, limits on state-directed payments, more frequent eligibility redeterminations for expansion populations, and related eligibility/enrollment changes. She said the fiscal effects are backloaded, with most reductions occurring in the later years of the 10-year window, and noted potential significant impacts on hospital payments and state financing. She also described new funding opportunities, including a $50 billion rural health transformation fund and a new home and community-based services waiver with associated grants. A substantial portion of the discussion focused on Kentucky’s pending community engagement 1115 waiver and how it would interact with the new federal requirements. Board members asked whether the waiver had been approved, what the cabinet’s contingency plan would be if CMS does not approve it, and what the timeline is for compliance. Cabinet representatives said the waiver has not yet been approved by CMS, remains under public comment, and that the state will wait for CMS guidance before moving forward; if needed, the state would amend the waiver or submit a new one. They said the work requirement must be in place by January 1, 2027, with a possible extension to 2028. Castanza also explained that expansion adults with incomes between 100% and 138% of the federal poverty level would face new cost-sharing requirements beginning October 1, 2028, and that eligibility redeterminations would move from annual to every six months starting January 1, 2027. She then walked through provider tax changes, including a moratorium on new provider taxes beginning October 1, 2026, and a phased reduction in the hold-harmless threshold for existing taxes beginning January 1, 2028, with exemptions for nursing facilities and ICF/IID providers. Board members questioned the timing and likely impact on Kentucky, and Castanza responded that the effect would depend on each tax’s current rate and would phase in over time.

Transcript Highlights:

• on their way to implementing this flexibility.
• <00:37:57.520> because that new federal flexibility because that new federal flexibility because
• We appreciate the flexibility in this bill, and I thank you for your time this morning.
• We appreciate the flexibility in this bill, and I thank you for your time this morning.
• Yes, Senator Port, it's following the federal flexibilities that were put in by the rule.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So I don’t know, does the word flexibility help at all? Maybe we do need a whole new sentence.
• So I don’t know, does the word flexibility help at all? Maybe we do need a whole new sentence.
• Maybe the emphasis can be on flexibility regarding programs, the implementation of programs.
• Again, flexibility is the thing that’s going to help us reach out to other communities. Absolutely.
• It needs to be something that’s flexible to tailor to that individual for their recovery.

Summary: The committee met for its final session before submitting a report to the governor and legislature, with introductions from state officials, legislators, advocates, providers, and facilitators. Staff explained that the meeting would focus on finalizing the committee’s strategic priorities and recommendations for a five-year behavioral health plan centered on prevention, early intervention, and community-based services. Members reviewed the draft overarching priorities, including the need for a statewide behavioral health vision and an executive-level role to coordinate behavioral health across agencies, and discussed how those priorities should reflect people with lived experience, families, and community voice. A substantial portion of the meeting focused on the draft recommendations and how they should be organized and worded. Members raised concerns that the document was too aspirational and not specific enough, and several suggested moving more detailed actions under the broader priorities rather than leaving them in a separate section. There was also discussion about the use of the term “evidence-based,” with tribal representatives and others asking for language that also recognizes practice-based evidence, promising practices, cultural specificity, and flexibility in funding and implementation. Members also discussed clarifying “early intervention,” adding examples such as universal screening, outpatient access, primary care integration, and home visiting, and ensuring the plan reflects accountability and community feedback. Other edits included clarifying credentialing recommendations to distinguish between licensure and payer credentialing, adding mentorship as a workforce retention strategy, and broadening Medicaid-centric language to include carriers and insurers more generally. Staff noted the report would be revised and sent back out for review by May 22, with comments due by May 27, in order to meet the June 1 submission deadline. No public comment was offered, and the meeting ended with thanks to members and facilitators for their work.

Transcript Highlights:

• is down to 24%, and it is continuing to dwindle, and that's because universities are looking for flexibility
• is down to 24%, and it is continuing to dwindle, and that's because universities are looking for flexibility
• is down to 24%, and it is continuing to dwindle, and that's because universities are looking for flexibility
• is down to 24%, and it is continuing to dwindle, and that's because universities are looking for flexibility
• is down to 24%, and it is continuing to dwindle, and that's because universities are looking for flexibility

Bills: HB527, HB563, HB580, HB579, SB190, HB15, HB390, HB527, HB563, HB580, HB579, SB190, HB15, HB390

Keywords: liability, off-roading, parks, participant safety, risk management, SNAP, food assistance, public assistance, income standards, Department of Human Resources, eligibility, HB580, Alabama Healthy Schools Act, public schools, K-12, school nutrition, school meals, cafeteria, vending machines, fundraising sales

Transcript Highlights:

• And if there isn't flexibility in the programs that are funding the projects, you are potentially going
• And if there isn't flexibility in the programs that are funding the projects, you are potentially going
• And if there isn't flexibility in the programs that are funding the projects, you are potentially going
• And if there isn't flexibility in the programs that are funding the projects, you are potentially going
• If there isn't flexibility in the programs that are funding the projects, you are potentially going to

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The Committee on Housing heard and acted on three measures related to the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation (HHFDC) and affordable housing policy. First, it considered GM 681, the nomination of Garth Yamanaka to the HHFDC Board of Directors. Yamanaka testified that he supports using all available tools to increase housing production, including open space and park dedication where feasible, more revenue-neutral and workforce housing, and a broad mix of housing types. Senators questioned him on priorities such as perpetual affordability, state- and county-owned projects, and whether HHFDC should focus more on revenue-neutral housing; he generally supported greater flexibility and more options, while emphasizing the need to consider feasibility and local market needs. The committee recommended GM 681 for advise and consent and adopted that recommendation unanimously, with Senator Fevella excused. The committee then heard GM 764, the nomination of Susan Coons to the HHFDC Board. Coons said she supports prioritizing state and government lands for affordable housing but stressed that the government cannot solve the housing shortage alone and should continue to engage private and nonprofit partners. In response to questions, she said HHFDC should give greater priority to perpetual affordability and could potentially devote more resources to revenue-neutral, income-blind housing, but she cautioned against blanket policies and said decisions should be guided by data, community needs, and project readiness. She also supported the idea of a 100,000-unit housing plan and said HHFDC should focus on more specific policies and projects. The committee recommended GM 764 for advise and consent and adopted the recommendation. Finally, the committee considered HCR 83, which supports using the dwelling unit revolving fund for pre-development costs through interim loans for government affordable housing projects. HHFDC testified in support and explained that it already has authority to make pre-development loans, but the resolution would provide policy support and comfort to the board. Members asked about loan security and default; HHFDC said such loans would typically be secured by land collateral and that it would not expect to forgive the loans. The committee agreed to pass the resolution with amendments, including adding committee report language about default and collateral and noting HHFDC’s existing authority. In a joint portion with the Committee on Energy and Intergovernmental Affairs, the committees also took up HCR 98 HD1 and recommended it pass with amendments to clarify that the countywide housing pattern book applies only to the City and County of Honolulu and involves collaboration between Honolulu housing and planning agencies. All recommendations were adopted, and the hearing adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• Senators, this bill provides greater flexibility and cost savings by allowing more options for where
• The bill before you restores normal land use authority and flexibility of counties unaffected by the
• The key is flexibility. This bill doesn't provide the flexibility.
• As I mentioned, the key is flexibility: the right thing in the right place.
• As I mentioned, the key is flexibility.

Summary: The committee met with a quorum and considered a series of bills, many focused on local government authority, land use, housing, and public notice requirements. Several measures were reported favorably, including SB 984 on firefighter cancer benefits and prevention, SB 1612 requiring local governments to accept electronic payments, SB 936 on temporary door locking devices, SB 962 on affordable housing protections for farms, SB 218 on land use regulations in hurricane-affected counties, SB 1020 on regulation of chickee huts, and SB 1434 on infill redevelopment of environmentally challenged properties. SB 1180 on community development district recall elections was amended to narrow and clarify the recall process and to add provisions on synthetic turf and compact urban mixed-use districts before being reported favorably. SB 380 on legal notices was also amended and reported favorably despite significant opposition from the Florida Press Association, Common Cause, and others who argued it would further fragment public notice access; supporters said it would modernize publication options and save money. Testimony on the bills was mixed. Supporters of the housing and redevelopment measures argued they would increase attainable housing, streamline approvals, and make better use of underutilized or contaminated land, while local government groups and advocacy organizations warned about overdevelopment, reduced public input, infrastructure strain, and conflicts with comprehensive planning. On SB 1444, which combined preemptions related to religious gatherings, private clubs, and certain permitting requirements, supporters framed it as protecting religious freedom and limiting local micromanagement, while the League of Cities and the Florida Association of Counties opposed it as overly broad and unclear; the bill nevertheless passed favorably after debate. SB 218 was presented as restoring normal land-use authority in counties unaffected by hurricanes while preserving protections in damaged areas, and SB 984 was described as clarifying firefighter cancer benefits and health coverage rules; both passed without controversy. The committee also heard extensive testimony on SB 948, a strike-all on local government land development regulations and orders that would create a statewide framework for starter homes and lot-split rules within urban growth areas. Supporters said it would expand housing supply and reduce regulatory delays, while opponents said it would override local zoning, weaken infrastructure and environmental protections, and apply too broadly. The bill drew support from housing advocates and some local officials, but opposition from the Florida League of Cities, Florida Association of Counties, and others. The transcript ends with SB 948 still under consideration, with testimony continuing and no final vote shown in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• I do agree probably some expectation with the flexibility because some kids may not reconcile in three
• San Angelo ISD currently uses the DOI process to address certain areas such as flexibility with teacher
• San Angelo ISD currently uses the DOI process to address certain areas such as flexibility with teacher
• And so that flexibility helps us.
• It's really drastically improved safety. ...and security, but there's just some flexibility.

Bills: SB27, SB226, SB326, SB570, SB605, SB870, SB991, SB1871, SB1872, SB1873, SB1874, SB1924, SB1925

Keywords: residency, public schools, child safety placement, enrollment, education code, antisemitism, student conduct, education, disciplinary actions, Texas Education Code, truancy, attendance policy, chronic absenteeism, school attendance, student absence notifications, parent notification, home visit, attendance officer, truancy court, school district

Summary: The committee heard a series of school safety and discipline bills, beginning with SB 870, which would codify an attorney general opinion allowing local school boards to decide whether school marshals may openly carry, conceal carry, or store a firearm in a secure safe on campus. The bill was laid out with no public testimony and left pending. The chair then moved to a combined discussion of SB 1871, 1872, 1873, 1874, and 1924, all focused on school discipline, teacher authority, and student safety. Senators Perry and Creighton described the package as a response to rising classroom disruptions, assaults on teachers, and concerns that districts lack effective tools to maintain order. SB 1871 would expand teacher removal authority, require return-to-class plans before a student removed for certain conduct can return, make some serious offenses mandatory for placement in juvenile justice settings, and provide telehealth mental health services through a consortium. SB 1872 would require expulsion to a JJAEP for assaults on teachers or school volunteers and extend certain expulsion-eligible conduct to off-campus offenses. SB 1873 would restore the prior understanding that in-school suspension is not subject to a three-day limit. SB 1874 would grant teachers immunity from disciplinary action for reporting discipline violations or acting in compliance with Chapter 37. SB 1924 would restore authority for local police and school district police to issue Class C citations for school offenses and require criminal referrals for students posing an imminent threat or assaulting a teacher, with a substitute clarifying referral rules when a citation has already been issued. The committee adopted the substitutes for the bills and moved them forward. Invited witnesses from teacher and administrator groups largely supported the overall goal of stronger discipline and safer classrooms, while asking for refinements. The Texas Classroom Teachers Association testified that teachers need more autonomy to remove disruptive or violent students and that classroom removals should not mean removal from learning. Superintendents from San Angelo, Grandview, and Wiley ISDs supported the bills’ emphasis on safety, expanded ISS flexibility, mandatory placement for serious offenses, and telehealth mental health services, but asked for more local control, flexibility for Districts of Innovation, more than one campus behavior coordinator in large districts, clearer timelines for return-to-class plans, and more precise definitions for disruptive conduct. Several witnesses stressed that teacher retention and student learning are being harmed by current discipline problems, while some members raised concerns about vague standards and the risk of overuse or public humiliation through citations and removals.

Transcript Highlights:

• It enhances flexibility over district finances to allow districts to use the 1.5-mill discretionary capital
• It clarifies Title I spending flexibility and ensures charter schools access to available programs and
• Strengthening early learning governance. and mandates, I'm sorry, work programs mandated with more flexibility
• I'm really excited to see the provisions in this bill give more flexibility with the Title I dollars
• that are used in our most critical... ...flexibility with the Title I dollars that are used in our most

Summary: The Committee on Fiscal Policy heard and approved two bills. First, it took up CS for SB 290, an agriculture and consumer services bill, and adopted a strike-all amendment that covered a wide range of issues: density limits for certain small municipalities, a delay in biosolids rule changes from July 1, 2026 to July 1, 2028, higher insurance and penalty requirements for fumigation businesses, longer payment timeframes for contractors to pay subcontractors and suppliers, restrictions on county agritourism permitting ordinances, and renaming the Bonifay Forestry Station. Senators raised concerns about the contractor penalty increase, local government preemption, and the biosolids provisions. Audubon Florida testified in opposition to the state lands and biosolids sections, while several industry and agriculture groups waved in support. The committee then voted the bill favorably, with Senator Bracey Davis voting no. The committee next heard SB 320 on administrative efficiency in public schools. The bill would reduce district-level requirements in areas such as assessments, personnel, facilities, and budgeting; expand teacher apprenticeship and multi-year contracts; streamline salary supplements and testing calendars; give districts more flexibility with Title I and capital funds; update facility planning rules; and shift oversight of district-run VPK programs. Supporters from several school districts and education groups waved in favor. Senators generally supported the goal of reducing administrative burdens, though one question was raised about remedies if charter schools fail to respond directly to Department of Education inquiries. The sponsor said the bill is intended to create a more direct reporting path and reduce unnecessary layers of regulation. SB 320 was reported favorably, and the committee then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• The division is also requesting the continuation of the current 10% flexibility between PS and E&E and
• The 10% flexibility between PS and E&E and the 20% flexibility between the insurance dedicated and insurance
• This flexibility ensures that the division can immediately address any identified appropriation needs
• The division is also requesting the continuation of 10% flexibility in PS and E&E, not only in the GR
• The division is also requesting the continuation of a current 10% flexibility between PS and E&E.

Keywords: 959, house, all