Video & Transcript Research : 'payment transparency'

Page 16 of 500
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 3/20/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • To receive those advanced payments, taxpayers will have to opt into advanced payments when they file
  • they're going to begin offering before they're going to begin offering Advanced<00:03:57.920> payments
  • of this Credit in 202 Advanced payments of this Credit in 202 and<00:04:00.079> calendar<00:04
  • <00:04:03.760> to um to receive those Advanced payments to um to receive those Advanced payments
  • when they file into advanced payments when they file their<00:04:07.319> return<00:04:07.519>
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee 3/10/25

Agriculture Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • uh bof Fields infrastructure payments uh bof Fields infrastructure which<00:15:23.000> we<00:
  • Clause C is for cost-share payments for the cost of organic certification.
  • Within this appropriation there are specific carve-outs for incentive payments.
  • Clause Q is for down payment assistance grants with the updated 2024 writer language.
  • Thank you as well for the increased funding for wolf and elk depredation payments.
Bills: HF1704
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Education Policy Committee 3/11/26

Education Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • article of the bill builds on the last several years of legislation to increase accountability and transparency
  • several years of legislation to increase accountability<01:17:01.600> and<01:17:01.840> transparency
  • <01:17:02.400> for<01:17:02.640> our accountability and transparency for our accountability
  • and transparency for our charter<01:17:03.199> schools.
Bills: HF3698, HF3067, HF3730
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/19/2026 - Senate Government

Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Arizona supports transparency and accountability with our tax dollars, including in education spending
  • We think SCR 1032 prioritizes teachers, increases transparency, and empowers voters to make that choice
Summary: The Senate Committee on Government considered only SCR 1032, along with a strike-everything amendment. The amendment would require school districts, subject to voter approval, to dedicate at least 60% of operational spending to teacher pay, with a phased-in increase starting in FY 2028 for districts below that threshold. It also would penalize noncompliant districts by requiring unexpended Classroom Site Fund monies to revert, making districts ineligible for those funds until back in compliance, and directing JLBC to exclude those districts from per-pupil calculations. The Superintendent of Public Instruction could grant limited waivers of the forfeiture provisions for up to one year, not more than two consecutive years for the same district. Supporters, including representatives of Heritage Action, the Goldwater Institute, and the Center for Arizona Policy, argued that Arizona has increased school funding substantially while teacher pay has remained flat in real terms, and said the measure would improve accountability and ensure more money reaches teachers rather than district administration. They cited Auditor General findings and prior voter-approved efforts such as the Classroom Site Fund and teacher pay initiatives as evidence that districts have not prioritized classroom spending as intended. A rural school coalition testified in opposition, saying the proposal would be difficult for small districts to meet because it could force cuts to other essential costs such as fuel, insurance, facilities, and other operating needs, and that the Auditor General’s classroom-spending categories may not accurately reflect actual teacher pay. One committee member also raised concerns that the measure could harm special education and other legally required student services. During discussion, the sponsor said charter schools were excluded because they are private businesses under the state’s framework, despite receiving public funds. The committee adopted the strike-everything amendment and then voted 4-3 to give SCR 1032, as amended, a do pass recommendation.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Rules Feb 9th, 2026 at 09:11 am

Senate Rules

Transcript Highlights:
  • And so, for transparency purposes, that is one of the other things that we're trying to clean up with
  • So, Madam Chair, Secretary, how do we bring transparency to this?
  • But we don't have clear roles and responsibilities and transparency into the Mansion Foundation's fund
  • So for us, it's a little bit of a problem because there's not transparency into the fund that uses the
  • So future decisions are grounded in facts, transparency, and accountability.
Bills: SB238, HJR1, SM21, SM22
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations - Education and Environment Division Apr 7th, 2025 at 02:30 pm

Appropriations - Education and Environment Division

Bills: SB2004, HB1600
Summary: The committee reconvened to continue work on water-related appropriations and related bills, with the chair emphasizing the need to move the water bill to conference committee soon because of differences with the House. Members reviewed project funding levels and carryover balances across several water projects, including NAWS, Southwest, Valley City, Cirrus River flood control, Hart River, Redder water supply, municipal and rural water, general water, and discretionary funding. The discussion focused on reduced revenue forecasts, the use of a $150 million line of credit as a working assumption, and concerns about large carryover amounts and piling up cash. No final changes were made to the water funding numbers, but the chair said the committee would revisit the bill after further cleanup of the draft language. The committee then took up House Bill 1600, which would create an immigration law clinic at the University of North Dakota law school. Members agreed the program should be treated as a one-time pilot rather than ongoing general fund spending, so they adopted an amendment changing the $400,000 appropriation to one-time funding from the strategic investment fund. The amended bill passed unanimously, and Senator Meyer was assigned to carry it. House Bill 1417, dealing with parole and probation-related policy, was also amended. The committee removed Section 8, which eliminated the bill’s appropriations language, based on testimony that the referenced funding was already included elsewhere in the budget. The amended bill then passed unanimously. The committee also discussed possible future amendments to water study language, including earlier reporting deadlines and a proposal to require larger new water project requests to go through the Water Topics Overview Committee before being introduced, but no final action was taken on those concepts. Several other bills, including the AI-related House Bill 1448 and law enforcement bonus bill 1193, were left for later consideration.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Because of our open nature, because of transparency, reciprocity, but we have an adversary particularly
  • Governing Boards by implementing this requirement Senate Bill 452 increases transparency and ensures
  • The bill also seeks to create more transparency surrounding faculty.
  • Senate Bill 37 will ensure this transparency and accountability. at all of our academic institutions
  • Some do, like A&M does, the transparency requirements and.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The committee's substitute aims to strengthen judicial accountability. transparency by one, expanding
  • I had a question about the judicial transparency information. Okay. And it starts on page 16.
  • Is the judicial transparency information section in Senate Bill 293 and the committee substitute?
  • We tried to streamline the process. this bill and make it more transparent.
  • And by which transparency could be revealed for everybody. No. So with that, thank you. house.
Bills: SB260, SB263, SB293, SJR18