Video & Transcript : 'delivery contractor' :

Page 16 of 439
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Committee on Climate Change and Global Warming May 27th, 2026

Senate Committee on Climate Change and Global Warming

Transcript Highlights:
  • And third... ...and more equitable delivery to all residents.
  • It works for contractors.
  • So there is a contractor on. Rick is on, and he's a contractor.
  • So we are the ones that are, we pay the contractors.
  • the contractors and train the contractors and work day-to-day with customers.
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

Interim Joint Committee on State Government. (6-23-26)

State Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> authority for capital project delivery authority for capital project delivery and<01:04:05.800><
  • </c> procurement and project delivery procurement and project delivery responsibilities. responsibilities
  • 08:56.839><c> the</c> Common challenges for contractors, the Common challenges for contractors, the challenges
  • available to contractors throughout the Commonwealth.
  • ><c> as</c><01:12:11.360><c> essential</c> We viewed our contractors as essential We viewed our contractors
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> necessary for delivery. necessary for delivery.
  • But for some of contractors bid on it.
  • </c><00:55:06.000><c> methods</c> we utilize alternative delivery methods we utilize alternative delivery
  • .<00:55:11.760><c> This</c><00:55:12.000><c> alternative</c><00:55:12.480><c> delivery</c> contractor
  • This alternative delivery contractor.
Summary: The Government Contracts Committee first approved the minutes from its July 8 meeting and then moved through a large agenda of contracts and deferred items. The committee deferred a Kentucky Education Television contract because the vendor was still not registered with the Secretary of State, and also deferred a University of Louisville contract to the September meeting at the university’s request. Both motions passed by roll call. The committee then took up a contract with the Department for Behavioral Health, Developmental and Intellectual Disabilities for Seven Counties Services. Committee members questioned why the state continues funding the provider despite its ongoing bankruptcy tied to unpaid retirement contributions, how the funding split is determined, whether the state had explored other providers or direct state delivery, and whether all services in the contract are truly required by statute. Agency officials said Seven Counties is the statutorily designated community mental health center for the region, serves about 24,500 people, and provides core safety-net services that would be difficult to replace; they also said the bankruptcy dispute is still ongoing and the contested amount is about $20 million. The committee ultimately deferred the contract to the next meeting and requested additional information on the scope of services and potential offsets or recovery of unfunded liabilities. The final deferred item was a Department for Community Based Services contract with Youth Villages for the Intercept program. DCBS explained that the program is used because it is an approved evidence-based service under the Family First Prevention Services Act, that Youth Villages has Kentucky staff and offices even though it is headquartered in Tennessee, and that the contract is intended to support intensive in-home services, foster care stabilization, and family reunification. Members asked why the services could not be provided in-house, whether Medicaid should cover more of the cost, and whether the state requires the provider to bill Medicaid as a payer of last resort. DCBS said it would verify billing and funding details and provide them back to the committee. The committee then voted to defer the contract to the next meeting.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Transportation Jan 14th, 2026 at 04:00 pm

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • During the summer, our contractors worked on more than 100 major construction projects.
  • So it depends on the actual timeline and delivery and funding we’ve got.
  • So it depends on the actual timeline and delivery and funding we’ve got.
  • I'm Jerry Vanderwood with Associated General Contractors.
  • I'm Jerry Vanderwood with Associated General Contractors.
Bills: HB2306
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Labor, Public Employment and Retirement Committee Apr 15th, 2026

Labor, Public Employment and Retirement

Transcript Highlights:
  • So electronic record-keeping, digital training attendance documentation, and updated training delivery
  • Permitting contractors to maintain compliant electronic records would also promote greater clarity and
  • There are plenty of employers and contractors who are paying workers their fair wages.
  • My name is Felipe Fuentes, and I'm here on behalf of the Associated General Contractors of California
  • Associated Builders and Contractors of California, also in opposition.
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

IC - Legislative Finance May 14th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • Well, that's where contractors make their real money is when you get into change orders, right?
  • to a 52 week delivery.
  • So we'll hire a team of contractors to help communities that already want to regionalize.
  • So we're going to pay for those contractors. We know we can keep the cost down.
  • They don't have to go through the oversight of a contractor.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Oregon-Washington Legislative Action Committee Sep 15th, 2025

Joint Oregon-Washington Legislative Action Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • If a movable span is selected, we are meeting with movable span designers and contractors who do big
  • We had an industry day event where we met with contractors and consultants who were interested in this
  • I am representing the Associated General Contractors organization.
  • We provided an update to our entire program's delivery schedule.
  • We have proposed delivery methods to go through on all of the projects.
Summary: The committee met jointly with the Washington-Oregon Legislative Action Committee for an update on the Interstate 5 Bridge Replacement (IBR) program. Members first adopted the proposed committee rules, then received program updates from staff on environmental review, permitting, design, tribal consultation, and public engagement. Staff said the project remains in the supplemental EIS process, with a final supplemental EIS and amended record of decision expected in early 2026, which would allow construction to begin. They also described ongoing work on Coast Guard navigation clearance, Section 106 historic-property coordination, and architectural guidelines for the bridge and five-mile corridor, emphasizing that the visualizations shown were conceptual and that public and partner feedback has already influenced design considerations such as accessibility and shared-use path connections. Members raised concerns about schedule delays, rising costs, and whether the project is being designed to be functional, safe, and economical. Staff acknowledged that the timeline has slipped from earlier expectations and said the delay reflects the complexity of the environmental and federal review process, as well as the need to avoid redoing steps. They said the updated cost estimate is being prepared now that design has advanced to roughly 30 percent, and that it will account for inflation, risk factors, and both fixed-span and movable-span options. Staff estimated a movable span would add more than $400 million and said the first construction work after environmental approval would likely be preliminary freeway and retaining-wall work in late 2026, followed by the bridge procurement. The committee also received funding and tolling updates. Staff reported that major federal grants have been executed, including Mega and Bridge Investment Grant agreements, and that state STIP amendments are advancing to allow access to federal funds. The tolling team described Level 3 traffic-and-revenue work, a bi-state tolling subcommittee process, and possible toll scenarios aimed at supporting either about $1.24 billion or $1.6 billion in toll revenue. Members questioned low-income toll relief timing, truck toll rates, and the effect of tolls on freight users. Staff said low-income discounts are being analyzed for both revenue and operational feasibility, that tribal exemptions and other policy exemptions are under review, and that the commissions expect to move into public outreach on toll rates and policies in 2026, with tolling on the existing bridges currently projected to begin in spring 2027.
OK
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Labor - 03/20/25

Labor

Transcript Highlights:
  • And that's contractors.
  • And that's contractors. In installation. And that's contractors.
  • </c> as we can tell is the largest contractor as we can tell is the largest contractor in<00:24:22.960
  • </c><00:26:19.840><c> all</c> problems with small contractors all problems with small contractors all
  • </c><00:26:27.679><c> to</c> impossible for other contractors to impossible for other contractors to
Committee: Senate Labor
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session Apr 7th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • 5196 by Capriglione relates to the telework of state employees and is referred to the Committee on Delivery
  • , refer to the Committee on Delivery of Government Efficiency.
  • Language regarding required security incident notifications is referred to the Committee on Delivery
  • for certain agencies, including public school contractors, in the access of the registry of a person
  • Enforcement of audit recommendations for the Committee on Delivery of Government Efficiency.
AR

Arkansas 2026 Regular Session

ALC-REVIEW Mar 17th, 2026

ALC-REVIEW

Transcript Highlights:
  • General Contractors Construction Projects, $5 million or more. Thank you, Mr. Chair.
  • Item C is your alternative delivery method construction project over $5 million.
  • This is the alternative delivery method project, Mr. Chair.
  • Any questions on this alternative delivery project? Seeing none, entertain motion. Motion. Second.
  • This is the alternative delivery method project, Mr. Chair.
Committee: All ALC-REVIEW
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection - 02/18/25

Commerce and Consumer Protection

Transcript Highlights:
  • It requires third-party delivery licensees, employees, or contractors to be 21 years old to verify the
  • 00:02:03.079><c> third-party</c><00:02:03.640><c> delivery</c> it requires third-party delivery it requires
  • c> contractors</c><00:02:06.119><c> to</c><00:02:06.240><c> be</c> licensees employees or contractors
  • I really am trying to understand your bill, and then the company that is the delivery is the delivery
  • </c> other types of other modes of delivery other types of other modes of delivery to<00:24:43.480><c
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • I encourage each of you and your staff to talk to a contractor in your state. or a trade association
  • And we have attracted new contractors to business. Philadelphia.
  • The other important part about flexibility of programs is actually in the delivery of projects.
  • because the contractors fear that they won't be paid.
  • So we're going to see how, if there is a true slowdown in delivery of that approval process.
Summary: The committee meeting focused on the Surface Transportation Reauthorization Act, discussing the ongoing implementation of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA). Chairman Capito highlighted the bipartisan nature of the legislation and the necessity of refining existing provisions to ensure effective delivery of transportation projects. Notable emphasis was placed on the need for flexibility in funding to address inflation impacts and delays caused by bureaucratic hurdles, especially relating to environmental reviews under NEPA. Witnesses from state transportation agencies provided valuable insights into real-world challenges faced in project execution, ultimately underscoring the importance of continuous federal support for infrastructure development. The discussion also touched on the broader implications of federal funding freezes by the previous administration, which have reportedly hindered several ongoing and planned projects. This issue raised significant concern among committee members, who urged the need for reliable funding and the removal of unnecessary bureaucratic obstacles that could cause delays in project implementation. The meeting concluded with a commitment from the members to work collaboratively to overcome these challenges and ensure a smooth path forward for critical infrastructure investments.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Utility relocations are now 93% complete, and 100% of the parcels have been delivered to our contractors
  • Project delivery and provide policymakers with clear, actionable options to navigate these realities
  • Complete the Merced to Bakersfield segment with an updated delivery target of 2032-33.
  • This plan identifies policy and implementation reforms necessary to streamline delivery and maintain
  • Our contractors, whoever we select, are actually required to bring those skill sets.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Utility relocations are now 93% complete, and 100% of the parcels have been delivered to our contractors
  • That is why we are maximizing available financial resources through a more dedicated approach to delivery
  • Project delivery and provide policymakers with clear, actionable options to navigate these realities
  • This plan identifies policy and implementation reforms necessary to streamline delivery and maintain
  • Our contractors, whoever we select, are actually required to bring those skill sets.
Summary: The Senate Budget Subcommittee No. 5 heard an update from the California High-Speed Rail Authority on its draft 2026 business plan and related budget proposals. The Authority reported continued Central Valley construction progress, including completion of 59 of 92 major structures, 80 of 119 miles of guideway under construction, 93% utility relocation completion, and plans to begin track laying and electrification soon. It said the revised goal remains completing the Merced-to-Bakersfield early operating segment by 2032-33, while also pursuing ancillary revenue opportunities, a private partner through a co-development procurement, and two budget change proposals to reappropriate $423 million for Link Union Station and $246 million in federal trust funds before they expire. The Legislative Analyst’s Office said it had no specific concerns with the budget change proposals but raised major concerns about the draft business plan and the project’s broader fiscal outlook. LAO said the plan appears incomplete in several respects, that funding is likely insufficient to complete the revised initial operating segment and would leave a larger gap for expansion beyond the Central Valley, and that borrowing costs, optimistic assumptions, and uncertainty around future greenhouse gas reduction fund revenues could worsen the outlook. LAO suggested the Legislature could wait for a finalized business plan and highlighted unresolved questions about the scope of the project, borrowing, public-private partnerships, and proposed statutory changes. Members focused on whether the project can be delivered on time and what financial obligations the state could face. Senators questioned the need for tax increment financing, value capture, and other legislative changes, with concerns about impacts on local governments and school districts. The Authority said utility relocation authority is its top legislative priority and that value capture is a longer-term tool that would not affect civil construction of Merced-to-Bakersfield, but could affect payback timing. It also said the state’s $1 billion annual cap-and-invest funding through 2045 is currently assumed to cover the Central Valley segment, while private partners could either finance against that state commitment or invest additional capital in other segments. Public testimony was mixed: building trades and labor groups supported the project and the Authority’s request, while local government and special district representatives opposed tax increment proposals and urged consent from affected agencies; environmental and rail advocates supported the project and urged action on utility relocation. No votes were taken, and the hearing adjourned after public comment.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Human Services May 6th, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • We used to think of community-based care as operating through our staff doing the direct delivery, and
  • In addition, we added three counties—Cook, Denton, and Wise County—to the existing contractor for the
  • We have some contractors on our board who are very adept in this area.
  • One Accord is not a single-source continuum contractor; we are not a child-placing agency.
  • This was partially because the model didn't account for the challenges of rural service delivery.
Bills: SB596 , SB961 , SB1398 , SB1183 , SB1952
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

House of Representatives Apr 23rd, 2026

Louisiana House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • by Speaker Mike Johnson, Broadband Cable Price Notice Act, provides for written notice, method of delivery
  • Speaker 1stam, Mike Johnson, Broadband Cable Price Notice Act, provide for written notice method of delivery
  • Landry said the entity has hundreds of millions of dollars in construction contracts and outside contractor
  • It's got accountability and outcomes, and it's flexible delivery.
  • Do you have the name of the IT contractor that we can use to make that happen? Google.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • A contractor that we would fund, or just connect them?
  • But we're going to pay for a contractor and staffer? Yes.
  • That flexibility is a lifeline for mixed-delivery systems.
  • The service delivery appears stable.
  • And working with a contractor to do a survey.
Summary: The committee heard an extensive Department of Social Services presentation on child care budget issues, including the Governor’s proposed 2026-27 budget, federal CCDF changes, Prop. 64 revenue adjustments, and a one-time $11.5 million disaster-related infrastructure grant for licensed child care facilities affected by 2025 declared disasters. DSS said federal formula updates and lower Prop. 64 revenues would reduce funding and could result in about 4,176 CCTR slots being reduced, but the department said it was working to avoid impacts to currently enrolled children. The LAO supported aligning general child care funding with lower revenues and asked for more detail on the disaster grant. Members pressed DSS and Finance on why reductions were not being backfilled and why so many awarded slots remain uncontracted or unused; DSS said delays are largely due to providers building new infrastructure, licensing, staffing, and enrollment challenges, and that some unspent funds revert to the General Fund. The committee also discussed whether some contract dollars should be shifted to vouchers and whether more flexibility should be allowed for infrastructure and expansion costs. A second panel focused on the state’s commitment to expand child care and on rate reform. DSS reported that nearly 125,000 new slots have been awarded since 2021-22, but speakers from Stanislaus County Office of Education, Parent Voices California, and the California Budget and Policy Center argued that unmet need remains large and that the system still leaves many families without access. Stanislaus County described a large local shortage of infant and toddler care and said reimbursement disparities between child care programs and state preschool create disincentives for providers. Parent Voices gave testimony about the burdens and instability families face when trying to access care, especially for survivors and low-income parents, and called for a universal, publicly funded system. The Budget Center said only about 16% of eligible children were enrolled in 2024, urged expansion across the mixed delivery system rather than concentrating investment in TK, and called for faster rate reform and new revenue. LAO estimated that bringing certain CCTR adjustment factors up to CSPP levels would cost $88 million to $131 million ongoing. Members and witnesses discussed the single rate structure, automation needs, and the need for deadlines and a ramp-up plan; DSS said the goal is to eliminate disparities, but that policy decisions are still needed before automation can proceed. The committee then reviewed several trailer bill proposals. DSS outlined a 2026-27 COLA proposal that would apply a 2.41% increase through cost-of-care-plus payments, though the department said it had inadvertently excluded CalWORKs Child Care and the Emergency Child Care Bridge Program and would revise the proposal; LAO recommended making the COLA methodology uniform across programs. DSS also proposed replacing the market rate survey with the federally approved alternative methodology on a triennial schedule, limiting temporary absences in family child care homes to 20% of monthly hours, defining excessive unexplained absences as more than 30 days in a year, and aligning family fee deductions with new federal requirements so providers receive the full voucher value. Members generally supported the temporary absence change and asked about implementation timing for the family fee deduction, with DSS saying it was in contact with Riverside County. The committee also heard a brief update on the Early Childhood Policy Council reappropriation, which would extend unused funds through June 30, 2028 because prior costs came in higher than expected.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Labor & Commerce Jan 19th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill is fundamentally about accelerated care delivery and accelerated return to work.
  • By October 1, 2026, an employer must provide current and former employees and independent contractors
  • From there, since they are contractors, they can only bargain certain limited things within the scope
  • There's also a requirement for confirmation of delivery or tracker receipt. We retain those.
  • So this section around that I just read from is around contractor registration.
Summary: The Senate Labor and Commerce Committee heard testimony on several bills. SB 6152 would add physical and occupational therapists as attending providers in workers’ compensation claims. Supporters said it would reduce delays, improve access to care, and speed return to work; opponents, including the Washington State Medical Association, retail and business groups, and L&I, raised concerns about diagnosis, scope of practice, network enrollment, implementation time, and the $1.9 million fiscal note from accident and medical aid accounts. The committee also heard SB 5437, which would prohibit non-compete agreements and clarify non-solicitation rules. The sponsor and labor and physician groups supported ending non-competes as anti-competitive and harmful to worker mobility, while business, banking, and clinic representatives argued non-competes protect investments, confidential information, and patient/customer relationships and asked for narrower changes. The committee then heard SB 6058, which would give L&I discretion over whether to investigate wage complaints and would toll civil statutes of limitation when a complaint is filed. The sponsor said it would better match agency resources, and testimony was entirely supportive. SB 5944 would require language access provider compensation bargaining to include missed or canceled appointments and make CBAs prevail over conflicting agency policies; the sponsor and union representatives said it would create consistency across agencies, with no opposition testimony. SB 6039 would modernize L&I communications by allowing electronic notices while preserving a non-electronic option; supporters called it a permissive modernization, while worker advocates warned email could be missed and could burden vulnerable workers, though L&I said the bill preserves choice and has no fiscal impact. Finally, the committee heard SB 6117, which would place workers and employers not covered by the NLRA under PERC jurisdiction if federal law no longer applies, with card-check and secret-ballot procedures and interest arbitration provisions. Supporters said it would create a state backstop if federal labor enforcement fails and protect workers’ organizing rights; opponents from agriculture, business, and small business groups warned it was too broad, could sweep in agriculture and small businesses, and could weaken secret-ballot protections and disrupt harvest operations. The sponsor closed by saying the bill is intended to create a clear framework where federal jurisdiction is absent. No votes or executive actions were taken in the hearing.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • A contractor that we would fund, or just connect them?
  • But we’re going to pay for a contractor and staffer? Yes.
  • But we're going to pay for a contractor and staffer? Yes.
  • The service delivery appears stable.
  • And working with a contractor to do a survey.
Summary: The committee heard a lengthy budget hearing focused on child care, child welfare, and immigration-related services, with most of the discussion centered on child care funding, slot utilization, and rate reform. Department of Social Services officials said the Governor’s budget would provide $6.8 billion for child care programs in 2026-27, including $11.5 million in Prop. 64 funds for mini-grants to licensed facilities affected by 2025 disasters. They also described federal CCDF and Prop. 64 revenue reductions that would reduce general child care funding by about 4,176 slots, while emphasizing that the cuts should not affect currently enrolled children. The LAO supported aligning spending with lower revenues and asked for more detail on the disaster grant program. Members questioned why so many awarded slots remain uncontracted or unfilled, and DSS said delays are largely due to providers building new infrastructure, licensing, staffing, and enrollment work. One senator criticized the repeated explanation, argued unspent funds revert to the General Fund instead of being redirected to child care, and urged shifting more funding from contract slots to vouchers and increasing flexibility for infrastructure and expansion costs. DSS said it is exploring more flexibility, better readiness screening, and quicker redistribution of relinquished slots. The committee also discussed the Emergency Child Care Bridge program, with DSS saying it can redistribute funds among counties to avoid disenrolling children. A second panel addressed the state’s broader commitment to expand child care and move toward a single rate structure. DSS reported that since 2021-22 nearly 125,000 new slots have been awarded across CCTR, CAPP, CMAP, and the Emergency Child Care Bridge program, bringing monthly service levels to more than 366,700 children. The department and CDE described progress on rate reform, including completion of the alternative methodology and joint recommendations from the labor-management committee on a single-rate framework. County and provider testimony emphasized persistent unmet need, especially for infant and toddler care, and argued that current reimbursement disparities between CDSS-funded programs and state preschool create inequities and discourage expansion. Stanislaus County Office of Education said rate differences can materially affect local program revenue and staffing, while Parent Voices California described the child care system as difficult to navigate and inequitable, especially for Black families and survivors of domestic violence. The California Budget and Policy Center argued that only a small share of eligible children are served, that Universal TK has concentrated investment in school-based settings, and that providers are still paid far below the cost of care. Members pressed the administration for deadlines on automation and implementation of the single-rate structure, and DSS said some work can proceed before collective bargaining concludes, though policy decisions are still needed. The committee also reviewed several trailer bill proposals. For the COLA, DSS proposed applying the 2026-27 increase through cost-of-care-plus payments, but acknowledged it had inadvertently excluded CalWORKs Child Care and the Emergency Child Care Bridge from the initial calculation; the LAO recommended making the COLA increase uniform across child care and state preschool programs. On the alternative methodology survey, DSS proposed replacing the market rate survey with the federally approved alternative methodology and aligning the timing with the federal CCDF state plan cycle. On licensed family child care homes, DSS proposed limiting temporary absences to 20% of monthly care hours and allowing more flexibility for medical appointments, jury duty, training, and union activities. On excessive unexplained absences, DSS proposed a statutory definition to align state policy with federal rules allowing disenrollment after 30 days of unexplained absences. The committee also discussed a proposal to require contractors to collect family fees directly so the full voucher value reaches providers, with DSS saying it is working with Riverside County on implementation and CDE asking that the same policy apply to state preschool. Finally, the committee reviewed an Early Childhood Policy Council reappropriation and reporting proposal, with DSS explaining that prior funds were underused because participation costs are hard to estimate and that additional staffing and contractor support would be needed for the expanded annual report requirements.